Smooth Big Bang or Black Hole Splitting?

A non smooth big bang  should  be a symmetric string based black hole nucleus explosion, into ever more exponentially smaller BHs and a tetrahedron based vacuum with variable Planck length edges.
 see: https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/34445454512/in/album-72157639797727585/

https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/albums/72157639797727585

see also: http://motls.blogspot.nl/2017/06/turoks-bogus-criticism-of-hartle.html

The recent 2017 Black hole merger (LIGO GW 170104) seems to Fill the gap.

Could LIGO project also be the start to explain Gamma Ray Bursts of small black holes?
The recent 2017 Black hole merger (GW 170104) seems to Fill the gap between the two former merger black holes, which  raise the question what BH mass upper- and lower boundaries and BH  ratios we could expect?

See: http://motls.blogspot.nl/2017/06/ligo-announces-new-gravitational-wave.html

 Could it even explain the Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) conundrum about the narrow energy focusing of the explosion energy by assuming that we have to do with a splitting BH in two equal halves by a much smaller one crashing into it?

Several nebula ( like the Eagle -Spire) seem to show such splitting processes.

Consequently, it would be interesting to investigate the directional focusing  of Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) could be originated  by the merging and even splitting of smaller lower bound BHs as suggested to take place in nebula like the Eagle (Spire) nebula.

 I would propose that there could be three different merger and splitting systems of BHs depending on the size and ratios of both BHs.

1: Normal merger BHs as found by LIGO. Which seem so have rations between: 1/1.24 and 1/1.9 with masses of the participating BHs and resulting BHs between: 6 and 60 solar masses.

2: BH splitting into two equal halves, observed in the Eagle ( spire) nebula with unknown ratios

3: Central Galaxy BHs gobbling up  much smaller BHs and growing in size with small steps.

Microscopic molecular black holes

For my old experiments on microscopic molecular black holes, see:

https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2012/08/more-ball-lightning-research-can-lead.html
and:
http://vixra.org/pdf/1407.0001v2.pdf
and:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/05/170531133323.htm

Not all Black Hole Mergers Join into one Bigger BH

 Not all black hole mergers merge into one bigger BH, as Quantum FFF theory predicted. see: 
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/chandra/images/astronomers-pursue-renegade-supermassive-black-hole.html and: 
http://www.space.com/36932-renegade-speeding-supermassive-black-hole-spotted.html?utm_source=sdc-newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20170522-sdc#undefined.gbpl 
If they have about equal mass then they tend to split again and accelerate away from each other to form a Herbig Haro system with two hotspots ( bowshocks) , often also a bar in between as the remnant of the repelling plasma/gas concentration, and two jets in between . see also: http://vixra.org/pdf/1611.0226v7.pdf

the differences between Small and Larger ( older) micro Comet nuclei

This video shows us that there seems to be differences between large (older)  and small micro Comet nuclei after splitting one small nucleus, 
The smaller nucleus takes a different direction probably due to the assumption that is did not have already a massive shell of ice around the nucleus and as a result it point its plasma tail away from the local wind direction pushing the nucleus against the wind!
Also seems clear that the small nucleus produces no visible gas/ plasma tail already .