Merging Galaxy Cluster distribution mystery explained by Quantum FFF Theory.

The well known bullet cluster and Abell 520, are known by its  mysterious distribution of hot xray gas lagging behind the merging galaxy clusters.
According to Quantum FFF Theory,
1: black holes have lost all inertia related to the former imploded matter of the original star into a compact stringy nucleus, without spinning propeller shaped fermions and without Lorentz polarized atoms...
However, small black holes ( non primordial BHs) do produce hot plasma at their horizon, which seems to be able to stay away from the black hole by what I call Fermion repulsion of the propeller shaped stringy atomic matter (see image) based on Lorentz polarized Fermions.
2: Neutron stars have lost some of their inertia by the absence of a polarizable atomic polar rotational Quark system.
However Quark based Neutrons are supposed to have reduced Lorentz polarizable abilities, which is the reason that inertia of Quarks is assumed to be reduced.

As a consequence, we may assume that old primordial dark matter Black Holes also called Galaxy- Anchor Black Holes ( GABHs inside Globular clusters) do not produce plasma or hot gas, which is able to keep the internal Dark Matter Black Hole inside the globular cluster most of the inertia of the Atomic based star system.

In merging galaxies and galaxy clusters this phenomenon is assumed to be the origin of the peculiar shifting of  hot gas and the dark matter  light bending by lensing of the background observed in  merging galaxy clusters.

(The former explanation is in contrast with the next suggestions made by Ethan Siegel)

Ethan Siegel in Forbes report:
"When your cluster is undisturbed, the gravitational effects are located where the matter is distributed. It's only after a collision or interaction has taken place that we see what appears to be a non-local effect. This indicates that something happens during the collision process to separate normal matter from where we see the gravitational effects. Adding dark matter makes this work, but non-local gravity would make differing before-and-after predictions that can't both match up, simultaneously, with what we observe."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2017/11/09/the-bullet-cluster-proves-dark-matter-exists-but-not-for-the-reason-most-physicists-think/#d536bc41738c

Not MOND theory but Dark Matter Black Holes the origin of the acceleration effects

Not MOND theory but Dark Matter Black Holes could be the origin of the acceleration effects of galaxy rotation and even the Hubble redshift acceleration effects through the universe.
see: Dipole Repeller Gravity Effects at Different Universal Scales as the Origin of Large Scale and Local Quantum Gravity and Hubble Redshift.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1708.0083v1.pdf

How Variable Massive Star Formation is Originated?

How Variable Massive Star Formation is Originated?
Or How different massive Stars and Galaxies are born?
According to Quantum FFF Theory, there is a direct relation between the virtual mass of both Black Hole Based Herbig Haro "Bowshocks" (Stellar Anchor Black Holes; (SABHs) and the maximum capacity to form stable stars in between the bowshocks.
If the star has reached its maximum mass, it is assumed to become unstable and will produce one or  two smaller stars, which is the start of an open star cluster. (see image)
For galaxy forming, those massive stars has to go through a process of supernova black hole production and black hole pairing into NEW smaller Herbig Haro systems to for secondary stellar Anchor Black Holes ( SABHs)
Even our sun has two SABHs.( see image ) 
See: Astronomers View Cosmic Light Show of Star Formation.
Quote: "But, unlike stars like our ( small) Sun, astronomers know much less about how these enormous stars form".
https://scitechdaily.com/astronomers-view-cosmic-light-show-of-star-formation/

Even the sun is growing by contraction of gas clouds and spitting out so called "failed stars" see below.

ONE MICROLENSING IN ONLY 7 HRS? MEANS that the Hubble constant is extra crushed to pieces

Stephen Hawkings suggestion that Dark Matter could be the same as tiny black holes lurking far out from galaxies is tested by Subary/HSC bobservation of stellar microlensing..
see:  Microlensing constraints on primordial black holes with the Subaru/HSC Andromeda observation  https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.02151

However, They found ONE MICROLENSING IN ONLY 7 HRS?
Which is suggested to negate the Hawking idea of tiny BHs .
However, in Quantum FFF Theory, it could mean that the Hubble constant is extra crushed to pieces
by the existence of larger than tiny dark matter black holes with influence on the redshift of light passing by.

According to Quantum FFF Theory, Black Holes are indeed the same as Dark Matter as Hawking suggested, but at all BH scales.
Black holes can have different sizes from the Higgs 125 GeV up to the central Milky Way BH and more central BHs even able to merge into a Big Crunch BH, as the base for a cyclic raspberry shaped Multiverse.
If  the Big Crunch black hole stringy nucleus is supposed to become in equilibrium with the outside vacuum pressure, the nucleus will explode into chunks of different sizes and partly evaporate into the oscillating vacuum lattice with a tetrahedral shape ( in pyrochlore form)
Equal sized chuncks will form huge Herbig Haro bowshocks with star and galaxy creation in between..

Other examples of Dark Matter Black Holes even around and between clusters are assumed to be the origin of extra redshift and as the origin of the mysterious rotation curves galaxies.

4x things we could learn the next 10th of April's Horizon Telescope images.?

See:  https://www.sciencenews.org/article/event-horizon-telescope-first-image-black-hole-questions

4x things we could learn?
Questions:
1,What does a black hole really look like?
2,Does general relativity hold up close to a black hole?
3,How do some black holes make jets?
4,Do stellar corpses called pulsars surround the Milky Way’s black hole?
Answers suggested by Quantum-FFF Theory:
1, mostly with a fermion disc
2, Yes.
3, By the Planck length polarization due to additional adjacent black holes. e.g. two Herbig Haro Black holes, as the dual jet connection.
4, Yes, but only around the largest BHs such as central galaxy BHs. ( small BHs ( the pulsars) are eaten by larger BHs)  BHs with the same mass will form Herbig Haro systems with star formation in the middle.
see also:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267759588_The_Proper_Motion_of_the_Galactic_Center_Pulsar_Relative_to_Sagittarius_A 

In an interview with Newsweek following the 2017 observation period, Vincent Fish, a research scientist at MIT Haystack, said they hope to see the flow of material in and out of the black hole. “What we expect to see is an asymmetric image where you have a circular dark region. That’s the black hole shadow,” he said. “And there might be a bright ring at the edge of that—which is the photon ring [a spherical region of space where gravity is so strong photons are forced to travel in orbits]. Then around it you will see one side is bright and the other side is faint, so kind of like a crescent.”

Propeller Fermion String Theory, the base for a new Multiverse.

see also: https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2019/03/fermion-propeller-string-theory-as.html

and:  https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2019/04/support-for-new-black-hole-paradigm.html

and: http://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk

Support for New Black Hole Paradigm: They create and sweep away Fermions ( they don't eat Fermions)

Herschel observations are a strong support for the New Black Hole paradigm of Quantum FFF theory:

Black Holes create and sweep away all Fermions, but absorb smaller black holes and the oscillating vacuum lattice and radiation.

How are propeller shaped Fermions swept away? 

see: https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2019/03/fermion-propeller-string-theory-as.html

see also: : http://sci.esa.int/herschel/55643-black-hole-winds-sweep-away-the-gas-in-galaxies-artists-impression/ 

see also: The Electric Universe by Electric Dark Matter Big Bang Black Holes of Quantum FFF Theory.

http://vixra.org/pdf/1902.0349v1.pdf and http://vixra.org/pdf/1301.0050v4.pdf

see also: 

4x things we could learn the next 10th of April's Horizon Telescope images.?

See:  https://www.sciencenews.org/article/event-horizon-telescope-first-image-black-hole-questions

4x things we could learn?
Questions:
1,What does a black hole really look like?
2,Does general relativity hold up close to a black hole?
3,How do some black holes make jets?
4,Do stellar corpses called pulsars surround the Milky Way’s black hole?
Answers suggested by Quantum-FFF Theory:
1, mostly with a fermion disc
2, Yes.
3, By the Planck length polarization due to additional adjacent black holes. e.g. two Herbig Haro Black holes, as the dual jet connection.
4, Yes, but only around central galaxy BHs.

The first direct evidence supporting this feedback scenario was made possible by combining far-infrared observations from ESA's Herschel space observatory, which detected large-scale outflows of molecular gas in the galaxy IRAS F11119+3257, with X-ray data from the Japanese/US Suzaku X-ray observatory, which could sense the winds close to the black hole. The multi-wavelength aspect of this study was crucial to linking what happens in the vicinity of the black hole and its global effect on the galaxy as a whole.

The galaxy observed in this study is an Ultra-Luminous InfraRed Galaxy (ULIRG) at redshift 0.189, whose light has taken some two billion years to reach us. Astronomers consider these 'local' ULIRGs to be systems that are undergoing massive galactic mergers; in turn, the merger spurs intense bursts of star formation.

The Creation and Repulsion of propeller shaped Fermions by new paradigm Electric Dark Matter black Holes.   see also: http://vixra.org/pdf/1902.0349v1.pdf