Readiness Potential I and II is not the same as Thinking, Fast and Slow. (by B.Libet respectively D. Kahneman) in Quantum Function Follow Form Theory.
Both are pointing into the direction of:
Accepting yourself as a stranger! (D.Kahneman)
Why? IMHO, because we are living inside a 8 or 12 fold symmetrical (anti) copy multiverse with 8 or 12 Leo Vuyk's in competition with each other for vetoing and creating ideas.
Benjamin Libet measured the so called electric Readiness Potential (RP) time to perform a volitional act, in the brains of his students and the time of conscious awareness (TCA) of that act, which appeared to come 500 m.sec behind the RP.
The “volitional act” was in principle based on the free choice to press an electric bell button.
The results of this experiment gives still an ongoing debate in the broad layers of the scientific community, because the results are still (also in recent experiments) in firm contrast with the expected idea of Free Will and causality.
However in an instant entangled copy multiverse (according to my Quantum FFF Theory) propose the seemingly absurd but constructive possibility that we are not alone for decision making in a multiverse as an individual person, but we seem to be entangled resulting in the possibility to initiate but also Veto an act which is even a base for Considering, Revolve, Meditate, or Ponder.
Even Max Tegmark suggested already about the multiverse: “Is there a copy of you reading this article?” We could be instant entangled with at least one instant entangled anti-copy person living inside a Charge and Parity symmetric copy Universe.
In that case we could construct a causal explanation for Libet’s strange results.
New statistical difference research on RPI and RPII of repeated Libet experiments described here could support these ideas. Wikipedia says: “Democracy is a form of government in which all eligible citizens participate equally”. Free will in a multiverse seems to be based on:
all entangled copy persons living in all CP symmetric copy universes, have the same possibility to Veto an act and participate equally.
RPI and RPII however should not be mixed up with "Thinking, Fast and Slow" which is a best-selling 2011 book by Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics winner Daniel Kahneman.
Daniel Kahneman describes a dichotomy between two modes of thought: "System 1" is fast, instinctive and emotional; "System 2" is slower, more deliberative, and more logical.
The book delineates cognitive biases associated with each type of thinking, starting with Kahneman's own research on loss aversion.
What is my new vision on reality:
That the human action of vetoing ideas (proposed by Benjamin Libet) is more involved in "slow" thinking and hardly active in "fast"thinking.
However Type RPI with ealier onset is still needed (inside one of the universes) for fast decission making like sport activity but without a (0-400 m.sec) veto reaction from all copy sport-participants.
see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking,_Fast_and_Slow
and: https://www.academia.edu/5928548/Democratic_Free_Will_in_the_instant_Entangled_Multiverse
and: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/08/inside-supersymmetric-multiversal.html
NEW EXPERIMENT proposal:
I proposed earlier in my free will paper that the frontal cortex is the brain area which is involved by vetoing processes such as our responsibility check to do- or veto activities.
For "fast thinking:" I assume now that this frontal cortex does play a less important role, or even no measurable role at all.
So if we repeat the Libet's experiment pushing the electric bell button in a different faster way, than we could measure the relation between fast thinking and slow thinking by the absence of frontal cortex influence for fast pushing a bell button.
To check however the number of participating RPs ( universes) by counting the statistical ratios between RPI and RPII over a series of tests seems to me still very valid.
