Abstract.
According
to Quantum FFF Theory, Polarized Fermions (Nuclear Quarks) are supposed to be the
origin of non accelerated motion through the resistive oscillating vacuum (Axion)
Higgs field.
Recent observations in the LHC do support the idea of
Fermion polarization into a constant specific space based direction, which
could support the idea of a constant battle between a resistive vacuum and
polarized spinning propeller shaped Fermions pushed forward by the same vacuum
at the same time to compensate the resistance.
Even a so called Lorentz Fitzgerald contraction seem
to be the logic result, which was described by John Bell in his essay: “How to Teach Special Relativity”
Introduction.
Recently
B. Bucher et al. was able to find strong indications of polarized Fermions.
See: Direct Evidence of Octupole
Deformation in Neutron-Rich 144Ba
see also: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-36597142?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link
In
addition: Dr Scheck says: "We've found these nuclei literally point
towards a direction in spacetime".
"Further, the protons enrich in the bump of the pear and create a specific charge distribution in the nucleus."
"Further, the protons enrich in the bump of the pear and create a specific charge distribution in the nucleus."
My
suggestion is that the proton charge distribution should have such a shape that
the resulting form of the electron shell should be in equilibrium and as a
result the origin of the atomic Lorentz Fitzgerald contraction.
As an example, a disk shaped Proton charge distribution could be the origin of a disk shaped electron shell distribution as the origin of the Lorentz contraction effect .
As an example, a disk shaped Proton charge distribution could be the origin of a disk shaped electron shell distribution as the origin of the Lorentz contraction effect .
Dr. Scheck says that this uneven distribition of mass and charge causes Barium-144's nucleus to 'point' in a certain direction in spacetime,
and this bias could explain why time seems to only want to go from past to present, and not backwards, even if the laws of physics don't care which way it goes.
see: http://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-just-discovered-a-new-nucleus-shape-and-it-could-ruin-our-hopes-of-time-travel
Of course, there's no way of proving that without further evidence,
but the discovery is yet another indication that the Universe might not be as symmetrical as the Standard Model of Physics needs it to be,
and proving that could usher us into a whole new era of theoretical physics.
The study has been published in Phyiscal Review Letters, and can be accessed for free at arXiv.org.
The solution of Quantum FFF Theory:
We live inside one of the CP symmetrical copy bubbles (universes) of the raspberry shaped multiverse with instant entanglement between copy Fermions spinning inside an oscillating resistive but also fermion pushing Axion-Higgs spacetime lattice.
Uri Geller.
As a
consequence, I suggest that strange deformation of metal objects like spoons
done by Uri Geller could be supported by such a proton asymmetry effect.
If
Uri Geller is able to influence the nucleus by an unknown magnetic monopole radiation,
then even levitation seems to be possible.
(
ref,60) viXra:1603.0240
Reaction Less Space Propulsion by the Magnetic Monopole Quantum Field Creation
of an Anti Maxwellian Dropping Zone Around an Energized Electric Wire
This until
now unknown magnetic radiation could be based on the monopole interpretation of
the magnetic field explained in the Quantum FFF Theory.
As a consequence,, The Uri Geller deformation of metal objects could be related to a external magnetic deformation of the nucleons in the same way as the Lorentz contraction deformation of the electron shells seem to do as suggested before.
Even levitation can not be excluded if the pear shaping of Fermions could be external influenced in the same way.
As a consequence,, The Uri Geller deformation of metal objects could be related to a external magnetic deformation of the nucleons in the same way as the Lorentz contraction deformation of the electron shells seem to do as suggested before.
Even levitation can not be excluded if the pear shaping of Fermions could be external influenced in the same way.
See also:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/12/polarized-fermions-nuclear-quarks-as.html
The Quantum FFF Model differences:
What are
the main differences of Q-FFFTheory with the standard model?
2, An
electric dark matter black hole splitting Big Bang with a 12x distant symmetric
instant entangled raspberry multiverse result, each with copy Lyman Alpha
forests.
3, Fermions
are real propeller shaped rigid convertible strings with dual spin and also
instant multiverse entanglement ( Charge Parity symmetric) .
4, The
vacuum is a dense tetrahedral shaped lattice with dual oscillating massless
Higgs particles ( dark energy).
5, All
particles have consciousness by their instant entanglement relation between 12
copy universes, however, humans have about 500 m .sec retardation to veto
an act. ( Benjamin Libet)
It was Abdus Salam who proposed that quarks
and leptons should have a sub-quantum level structure, and that they are
compound hardrock particles with a specific non-zero sized form. Jean Paul Vigier postulated that quarks
and leptons are "pushed around" by an energetic sea of vacuum
particles.
David Bohm suggested in contrast with The "Copenhagen
John Bell argued that the motion of mass related to the
surrounding vacuum reference frame, should originate real
"Lorentz-transformations", and also real relativistic measurable
contraction.
Richard Feynman postulated the idea of an all pervading
energetic quantum vacuum. He rejected it, because it should originate
resistance for every mass in motion, relative to the reference frame of the
quantum vacuum. However, I postulate the strange and counter intuitive possibility,
that this resistance for mass in motion, can be compensated, if we combine the
ideas of Vigier, Bell, Bohm and Salam, and a new dual universal Bohmian
"pilot wave", which is interpreted as the EPR correlation (or Big
Bang entanglement) between individual elementary anti-mirror particles, living
in dual universes.
Conclusion,
There is reason to make some
corrections to Einstein’s models.
Even the lightspeed through the solar system
and abroad, seems to be gravity related.
See: Numbered listing of Vixra essays by Leo Vuyk.
http://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk (ref 37,44,51)