Wednesday, July 31, 2019

Magical Comet mergers.and micro black holes,

Magical merging of two multi-micro black hole based comets into a dumbbell shaped object with gassing funnels.
Comparison between Comet 67P-CG. and the larger Ultima Thule with comparable crater structures.
Evidence for Dark Matter Black Hole based plasma, dust and ice production inside Comets like 67P,C-G. and the growing Earth.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1410.0039v7.pdf


see also: empty spaces in 67P CG Comet.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1010800827618004992



Comet 67P-CG. with micro black hole structure.
Magical merging of two multi-micro black hole based comets into a dumbbell shaped object with gassing funnels


Tuesday, July 30, 2019

Our complex way to make a golf swing, by readiness potentials RP I and RP II.

RP 1 seems super deterministic (not Free) by the MWI pinball Machine effect on quantum jumps..
RP II Is clearly needed as the real FREE Veto for all our decisions.
Suggestion:
The quantum world is fully deterministic based on quantum Jumps:  God plays dice indeed with the universe !
However living creatures are able to influence initiatives ( RP I) by Veto actions ( RP II) at all levels of consciousness.
see also Backreaction: http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-forgotten-solution-superdeterminism.html
Golf Training by Multiverse Readiness Potential Interference for Approve or Veto a Golf swing.
Free Will by several interfering Free Veto levels before (Golfing) Action.
Readiness Potential RP I, initiative in one Universe has to be INSTANTLY vetoed or approved by its anti copy Golfer persons living far away inside the entangled copy universes: .7x OR 11x?  see:
https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-golf-training-by-multiverse.html



Golf Training by Multiverse Readiness Potential Interference for Approve or Veto a Golf swing.

Free Will by several Free Veto levels before (Golfing) Action.
Readiness Potential RP I, initiative in one Universe has to be INSTANTLY vetoed or approved by its anti copy Golfer persons living far away inside the entangled copy universes: .7x OR 11x?

Golfing has in contrast with Tennis or other fast sports a longer time for the transactional period.
In tennis sports the quality shot seems to be more based on muscle memory.



see: Democratic Free Will and Telepathy in the Instant Entangled Multiverse.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1612.0026v3.pdf
and: Free Will Readiness Potential Ratios, the Key for a Multiverse Number Calculation.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1803.0100v1.pdf
and:  Testing Proposals for Human Free Will in the Raspberry Multiverse, Local Entanglement and M&M Lightspeed.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1811.0125v1.pdf
and: The Conscious Undivided Multiverse,
http://vixra.org/pdf/1905.0123v2.pdf


Monday, July 29, 2019

John C. Cramer’s TI and the Super Symmetric Deterministic Raspberry MWI with Free Veto.-Free will.

John C. Cramer’s TI and the Super Symmetric Deterministic Raspberry MWI with Free Veto.-Free will of Benjamin Libet.
TI or Transactional Interpretation is found to be fully in line with our daily reality of Free Will or better Free Veto, in a super deterministic clockwork World, as Benjamin Libet proposed and tested in 1984. 
Both Based on the Handshake idea of superluminal entanglement signals between copy universes according to Quantum FFF Theory.



see: Democratic Free Will and Telepathy in the Instant Entangled Multiverse.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1612.0026v3.pdf
and: Free Will Readiness Potential Ratios, the Key for a Multiverse Number Calculation.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1803.0100v1.pdf
and:  Testing Proposals for Human Free Will in the Raspberry Multiverse, Local Entanglement and M&M Lightspeed.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1811.0125v1.pdf
and: The Conscious Undivided Multiverse,
http://vixra.org/pdf/1905.0123v2.pdf





Open letter to John G. Cramer , (4-augustus 2019)

Dear professor Cramer,

I found your interesting paper on TI called:
The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Nonlocality (2015)
At the conclusion you write:
"Is free will possible in such a system? It is our view that it is. Freedom of choice
does not include the freedom to choose to violate physical laws. The transactional
handshakes between present and future are acting to enforce physical laws, and they
restrict the choices between future possibilities only to that extent."

Dear professor, do you still stand for this conclusion?
Or could it be that Benjamin Libets measurements about the Readiness Potential of subjects could lead to a different kind of handshake between Supersymmetric ( CPT) subjects living far away from each other inside the raspberry multiverse.
see my paper: "The Conscious Readiness Potential Ratio Multiverse."
http://vixra.org/pdf/1907.0250v2.pdf
See perhaps also::
"John Cramer’s TI and the Super Symmetric Deterministic Raspberry MWI with Free Veto.-Free will."
https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2019/07/john-cramers-ti-and-super-symmetric.html


Sincerely yours,

Leo Vuyk.



Thursday, July 25, 2019

Stop Global warming by geostationary Origami screens.


Stop Global Warming and climat change by local Solar screening of  large Geosynchronous Origami panels each stretched by 6 satellites in star formation, at 35000 km above earth, to form low pressure areas and clouds at sea.
 including semi controlled weather patterns.
According to Quantum FFF Theory.




Former attaempts to deploi sail to use the sun energy. ( mylar sail for space propulsion )










Wednesday, July 17, 2019

The Copenhagen interpretation reinvented with support of Benjamin Libet.

NEUROSCIENCE beats QUANTUM MECHANICS.

QUANTUM MECHANICS explained by NEUROSCIENCE !!

The Observer- Subject/ object relation of the Copenhagen interpretation reinvented, without half dead/living  Cats and leading to an Entangled Raspberry shaped Multiverse with 8 or 12 entangled CP symmetric universal bubbles (or berries)
see: "The Conscious Readiness Potential Ratio Multiverse"
http://vixra.org/pdf/1907.0250v2.pdf
and : The Conscious Undivided Multiverse.
http://vixra.org/abs/1905.0123

Conclusion:  there are always more observers (80%) RPII, to follow -by entanglement at universal distances- the initiative of RPI = observed (<20%).

Benjamin Libet found indications for the entangled 8 or12 fold Entangled Raspberry Multiverse already in 1983, by his RPI-RPII splitting measurements combined with a 20-80% splitting found later by Trevena and Miller .see: Free Will Readiness Potential Ratios, the Key for a Multiverse Number Calculation.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1803.0100v1.pdf
see also: 
The 11 fold connections in our brain:



The Benjamin Libet discovered two different Readiness Potentials (RPI and RPII: INTERPRETED by me, AS THE  OBJECT AND SUBJECT separated FAR AWAY from each other, but entangled from the start of the big bang inside different  CP symmetric COPY UNIVERSES) .
Libet did not Notice the ratio constancy, other did notice them later. with an average  20-80% result for RPI respectively. RPII see Trevena and Miller ( <20%) : http://vixra.org/pdf/1803.0100v1.pdf



Former essays about Consciousness in the  Multiverse
Free Will Readiness Potential Ratios, the Key for a Multiverse Number Calculation.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1803.0100v1.pdf
Democratic Free Will and Telepathy in the Instant Entangled Multiverse.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1612.0026v3.pdf

Wikipedia about MWI and Copenhagen interpretation:
 Some versions of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics proposed a process of "collapse" in which an indeterminate quantum system would probabilistically collapse down onto, or select, just one determinate outcome to "explain" this phenomenon of observation. Wavefunction collapse was widely regarded as artificial and ad hoc[citation needed], so an alternative interpretation in which the behavior of measurement could be understood from more fundamental physical principles was considered desirable.
Everett's Ph.D. work provided such an alternative interpretation. Everett stated that for a composite system – for example a subject (the "observer" or measuring apparatus) observing an object (the "observed" system, such as a particle) – the statement that either the observer or the observed has a well-defined state is meaningless; in modern parlance, the observer and the observed have become entangled
(which i.m.o. was the key invention of Everett)
we can only specify the state of one relative to the other, i.e., the state of the observer and the observed are correlated after the observation is made. This led Everett to derive from the unitary, deterministic dynamics alone (i.e., without assuming wavefunction collapse) the notion of a relativity of states.

However, i.m.o. the Key question should be: Are we human observers entangled with that Cat in the  box during opening of the box experiment?
OR: do we live inside a fixed number of entangled SuSy parallel ( anti matter) universes, with large distant entangled susy copy cat in boxes, with 50% chance for entangled atomic decay.?
However we have to accept a superluminal entanglement connection between the susy copy experimental systems (at universal distances) around the box.
And that is the problem.  Einstein did not accept superluminal signalling! or spooky action at a distance.







Tuesday, July 16, 2019

The Conscious Readiness Potential Ratio Multiverse

The Benjamin Libet discovery of two different Readiness Potentials (RPI and RPII) and the potential to VETO an act,  is reason to suggest the presence of a SuSy multiverse with entanglement down to each quantum.

However, Libet did not Notice, because he (or his successors) did not measure the ratio between RPI and RPII , as a base for the total number of SuSy Universes.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334481423_The_Conscious_Readiness_Potential_Ratio_Multiverse


Some interesting indications for democratic free will: Trevena and Miller and Benjamin Libet’s Readiness Potential. Benjamin Libet measured the so called electric Readiness Potential (RP) time to perform a volitional act , in the brains of his students and the time of conscious awareness (TCA) of that act, which appeared to come 500 m.sec behind the RP.
However, if we assume that the postulated 12 copy universes are each others observer to trigger randomly and alternating the collapse of the copy wavefunctions, (to trigger a volitional act, like Libet's subjects) in the other 11 universes.
Then as a consequence, we may expect that only 1/12 part or 8,3 % of all (human) timing of conscious intention to act, will show a reversed timing sequence between the so called Time of conscious awareness (TCA) came before the Readiness Potential (RP). indications in that directions, are already found by Judy Trevena and Jeff Miller (Otago university NZ).
See: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1219 1935&dopt=Abs tract
Trevena an Miller found surprisingly, that up to 20 % of all cases of human timings of Conscious intention to act, should be accounted as reversed in sequence thus: TCA before Lateral RP.
However, It was Stanley Klein, who described his reaction and the reaction of other professionals, that the 20% reversed timing cases, found by Trevena and Miller, should decrease, if more common measurement biases were accounted for.
See: page 274: http://cornea.berkeley.edu/pubs/161.pdf
Quotation of page 274 of the article by Stanley Klein: "The new data of Trevena and Miller (2002) indicate that the average time of the LRP still precedes the TCA, but by much less than does the RP.

However, Trevena and Miller argue that the averaging process can distort the story and that one needs to look at the percentage of times that the timing is reversed (TCA coming before the LRP).
They find that 20% of the time the TCA occurs before the LRP.
Based on that finding it is likely (they say) that the conscious decision to act comes before the LRP. A bias of 100 msec in the TCA could upset Trevena and Miller’s argument since the 20% with TCA before LRP would decrease substantially.
When the average TCA is shifted from 2200 ms to 2100 ms it is unlikely that there will be many occasions in which the LRP comes after the conscious decision to move.
I will go through the topic of bias carefully with special attention to the flash-lag effect (Nijhawan, 1994).
 I argue that the forward referral of the flash-lag effect, not a backward referral that had been suggested for this purpose, can compensate for the perceptual delay latency."
As a consequence,
If future experiments could be made more focused on this issue, then perhaps we could find more support for the hypothesis of such 12 fold trigger mechanisms to collapse every time a set of 11 fold copy wave-functions inside the other 11 fold entangled copyuniverses.




Friday, July 12, 2019

3x Massless Axion-Higgs Torus shaped vacuum particles able to transform into 125 ,126 and more GeV stringknots to form ( micro) black holes

The Higgs boson was discovered in 2012 by the ATLAS and CMS Experiments at CERN, but its coupling to other particles remains a puzzle.

However, if the 125-126 Higgs is made by three transformed stringy Massless Axion Higgses, then we may assume the answer on how the coupling to other particles arises is restricted to Black Hole nuclei compressed by the massless oscillating vacuum Higgssen.



The Higgs boson was discovered in 2012 by the ATLAS and CMS Experiments at CERN, but its coupling to other particles remains a puzzle.
https://phys.org/news/2019-05-atlas-pieces-higgs-boson-puzzle.html




Wednesday, July 10, 2019

Splitting Ball Lightning stuck in the top of an electric mast. FUTURE ENERGY SOURCE ?

Ball lightning stuck in the top of electric mast, splitting and partly falling down.
Example of new physics electric dark matter black holes, also called ball lightning or micro comet according to Quantum FFF Theory, 
http://vixra.org/pdf/1803.0093v1.pdf
also: Future Free Energy of New Physics Ball Lightning Black Holes, the origin of a Super Social Society or the Opposite?
http://vixra.org/pdf/1404.0151v1.pdf
and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6oCTWDeL8c



Monday, July 01, 2019

Curved Light Path and Redshift Origin around Dark Matter Black Holes.


According to Quantum FFF Theory, the vacuum is based on oscillating Axion-Higgs particle jumping every Planck time from one node to the neighbor next node.
Around black holes the node distances are elongated by the BH vacuum absorption.

Conclusion: the exponential Hubble-LemaƮtre redshift from starlight travelling long distances must be influenced by by the elongated node distances, present on the road to our telescopes.
Proposed experiment:  Two different light trajectories from one galaxy passing at opposite sides of a dark matter sources  should give different redshifts.  As a strong support for the  anti Hubble redshift idea.
see  also: http://vixra.org/pdf/1702.0040v3.pdf
The Alternative Origin of Hubble Redshift : Vacuum Absorption by black holes as a Support for Quantum Dipole Repeller Gravity and a Contracting Universe.