We are 12 individual entangled Anti Copy Persons living inside 12 anti-copy (EPR) instant entangled universes with only one Central Big Bang.
Conclusion: The Big Bang is the center of the 12 fold Raspberry shaped cyclic Multiverse already from the start of the exploding BB nucleus creating entangled dark matter black holes forming each copy universe by dual electric BH Herbig Haro systems. ( Charge Parity mirror Symmetric)
.jpg)
Modern Science is built on a set of unquestionable certainties, or is it?
.jpg)
The Benjamin Libet discovery of two different Readiness Potentials (RPI and RPII) and the potential to VETO an act, is reason to suggest the presence of a SuSy multiverse with entanglement down to each quantum.
However, Libet did not Notice, because he (or his successors) did not measure the ratio between RPI and RPII , as a base for the total number of SuSy Universes.
see: http://vixra.org/pdf/1907.0250v1.pdf or:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334481423_The_Conscious_Readiness_Potential_Ratio_Multiverse bs/161.pdf
Quotation of page 274 of the article by Stanley Klein: "The new data of Trevena and Miller (2002) indicate that the average time of the LRP still precedes the TCA, but by much less than does the RP.
However, Trevena and Miller argue that the averaging process can distort the story and that one needs to look at the percentage of times that the timing is reversed (TCA coming before the LRP).
They find that 20% of the time the TCA occurs before the LRP.
Based on that finding it is likely (they say) that the conscious decision to act comes before the LRP. A bias of 100 msec in the TCA could upset Trevena and Miller’s argument since the 20% with TCA before LRP would decrease substantially.
When the average TCA is shifted from 2200 ms to 2100 ms it is unlikely that there will be many occasions in which the LRP comes after the conscious decision to move.
I will go through the topic of bias carefully with special attention to the flash-lag effect (Nijhawan, 1994).
I argue that the forward referral of the flash-lag effect, not a backward referral that had been suggested for this purpose, can compensate for the perceptual delay latency."
As a consequence,
If future experiments could be made more focused on this issue, then perhaps we could find more support for the hypothesis of such 12 fold trigger mechanisms to collapse every time a set of 11 fold copy wave-functions inside the other 11 fold instant entangled copy universes.
However, Libet did not Notice, because he (or his successors) did not measure the ratio between RPI and RPII , as a base for the total number of SuSy Universes.
see: http://vixra.org/pdf/1907.0250v1.pdf or:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334481423_The_Conscious_Readiness_Potential_Ratio_Multiverse bs/161.pdf
Quotation of page 274 of the article by Stanley Klein: "The new data of Trevena and Miller (2002) indicate that the average time of the LRP still precedes the TCA, but by much less than does the RP.
However, Trevena and Miller argue that the averaging process can distort the story and that one needs to look at the percentage of times that the timing is reversed (TCA coming before the LRP).
They find that 20% of the time the TCA occurs before the LRP.
Based on that finding it is likely (they say) that the conscious decision to act comes before the LRP. A bias of 100 msec in the TCA could upset Trevena and Miller’s argument since the 20% with TCA before LRP would decrease substantially.
When the average TCA is shifted from 2200 ms to 2100 ms it is unlikely that there will be many occasions in which the LRP comes after the conscious decision to move.
I will go through the topic of bias carefully with special attention to the flash-lag effect (Nijhawan, 1994).
I argue that the forward referral of the flash-lag effect, not a backward referral that had been suggested for this purpose, can compensate for the perceptual delay latency."
As a consequence,
If future experiments could be made more focused on this issue, then perhaps we could find more support for the hypothesis of such 12 fold trigger mechanisms to collapse every time a set of 11 fold copy wave-functions inside the other 11 fold instant entangled copy universes.
.jpg)
see also:
The collapse of the wavefunction of consciousness, comes from outside according to Roger Penrose, it is not computation.
What kind of new outside it would be?
see his youtube : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXgqik6HXc0
My suggestion: you need the CPT symmetric Multiverse.
It seems Instant ENTANGLEMENT ! WITH ONE- OR MORE COPY BRAINS outside our own universe.
This seems only possible with copy symmetric multiverses like Q-FFF Theory suggests.
see; A Consciousness Theory of Everything based on Rigid Transformable Strings, Instantly Entangled Between 8 or 12 CP Symmetric Universal Bubbles.
https://vixra.org/pdf/1801.0040v2.pdf
What kind of new outside it would be?
see his youtube : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXgqik6HXc0
My suggestion: you need the CPT symmetric Multiverse.
It seems Instant ENTANGLEMENT ! WITH ONE- OR MORE COPY BRAINS outside our own universe.
This seems only possible with copy symmetric multiverses like Q-FFF Theory suggests.
see; A Consciousness Theory of Everything based on Rigid Transformable Strings, Instantly Entangled Between 8 or 12 CP Symmetric Universal Bubbles.
https://vixra.org/pdf/1801.0040v2.pdf
Notonly consciousness but also the double slit experiment shows support !!
see: : Bohmian Double Slit Interpretation by Dual Entangled Universes, and the Benjamin Libet experiment.
and: The Conscious Undivided Multiverse,
and: The Conscious Readiness Potential Ratio Multiverse with Transactional Interpretation of J. Cramer. see: https://vixra.org/pdf/1907.0250v3.pdf