The Physical Topology Form Principle and Math behind String Theory is Unknown.

Professor Michio Kaku says in his book Hyperspace (page:329)
"The underlying physical principle behind string theory is unknown"
As an architect I found an interesting form solution: "transformable rigid single- or compounding rings" formed by 4x mutual hinged quarter rings, called strings. Only one particle for the multiverse.

see: https://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk
Now the new Mathematics behind this system including rotation hinges, should be discovered, which seems to be not easy according to professor G.'t Hooft.( Uni-Utrecht)

The system: 

Is Someone Making Artificial Earthquakes under La Palma? Or Broken new physis Comets.

Is Someone Making Artificial Earthquakes under La Palma?  Or it resembles a string of broken and crashed (new physics) comets locally repelling Fermions in the early earth? 
There seems a grid of earthquake locations, under the island of La Palma.
Quakes on La Palma apparently arranged on a grid - this is due to the rounding of latitude / 
longitude values.

However  it seems to be originated by a series of energy spots, like new physics comets broken into pieces like Jupiter. was observed on.

 (image: EMSC: https://www.volcanodiscovery.com/la-palma/news/145321/La-Palma-volcano-update-Quakes-at-La-Palma-are-NOT-artificial.html  )

 The Q-FFF Theory says each Comet has a Fermion repelling Sprite blackhole nuclei

NEW PHYSICS !!.

Broken Comet Nuclei impacted at Jupiter. 1994.combined with unbroken comets.

Google also: on the possible origin of so called Tikofi sand balls in the Tawakeb valley balls in the Libyan desert.

Below the new fysics principle of fermion repelling micro blackholes (comets, ball lightningetc.)

A TOE by Ancient experiments radarreflection of Venus and observations etc.

 Ancient experiments: 

See: https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/albums/72157720130861136

Mega Cryometeors found on Earth being the remnants of micro Comet Nuclei, created by Sprite based interference black hole ball lightnings  pushed by plasma tails and instant falling by ice. Formation. ( Q-FFF)

What are the missing keys for a Theory Of Everything?

What are the missing keys for a Theory Of Everything?

1: Topological Strings Transformable and compounded (also decay) by mutual collision, are the building Blocks of everything.

2: The oscillating vacuum in Tetrahedron Lattice Fluxtube Form, is the Dark Energy for the spin of all Fermions , and the guidance for all Photons

3: A new evaporating String Knot Big Bang Black Hole, into the vacuum Lattice and Primordial Black Hole chunks.

4  Equal sized (with <15% Ratio) Black Holes seem to be the origin of star formation in between.( Herbig Haro systems with Bow front Hotspots) 

4:  All Black Holes are eating the vacuum lattice while elongating the local Planck Length between fluxtube knots, However, repelling all Fermions

5: The Mirror Symmetric (12x) Raspberry shaped Multiverse is Entangled for each Quantum at long distances. (ER=EPR) the origin of uncertainty and ( Libet) VETO FREE WILL of species.

6:  A dual opposite Vacuum- Fermion collision (pushing from opposite sides) system seems responsible for all Forces even instant Gravity . (supposd by Tom van Flandern) 

7: There are Super Nova Black Holes by fermion implosion.

8: However Ball Lightnings and Sunspots or even Comets are micro Black HOles.

Two Selves of the mirror symmetric Higgs strings of Q-FFF Theory seem to be found already by Atlas

See also : One or Two Higgses?

THIS

https://www.science20.com/quantum_diaries_survivor/atlas_higgs_results_one_or_two_higgs-99078

 

 

The Two Selves takes the position that the self is not a "thing" (Stanley B. Klein)

THIS seems a supportfor the instant entangled raspberry mirror symmetri multiverse of Q-FFFTheory.

However Q-FFF says that even a thing has its mirror copy things instant entangled in the opposite mirror universes too.

see: Testing Proposals for Human Free Will in the Raspberry Multiverse, Local instant  Entanglement and M&M Lightspeed.

https://vixra.org/pdf/1811.0125v1.pdf

The Book .
The Two Selves takes the position that the self is not a "thing" easily reduced to an 

object of scientific analysis. 
Rather, the self consists in a multiplicity of aspects, some of which have a 

neuro-cognitive basis (and thus are amenable to scientific inquiry) while other 

aspects are best  construed as first-person subjectivity, lacking material instantiation. 
As a consequence of its potential immateriality, the subjective aspect of self cannot 

be taken as an object and therefore is not easily amenable to treatment by current 

scientific methods. 

Klein argues that to fully appreciate the self, its two aspects must be acknowledged, 

since it is only in virtue of their interaction that the self of everyday experience 

becomes a phenomenological reality. 
However, given their different metaphysical commitments (i.e., material and 

immaterial aspects of reality), a number of issues must be addressed. These include, 

but are not limited to, the possibility of interaction between metaphysically distinct 

aspects of reality, questions of causal closure under the physical, and the principle of 

energy conservation. 

After addressing these concerns, Klein presents evidence based on self-reports from 

case studies of individuals who suffer from a chronic or temporary loss of their sense 

of personal ownership of their mental states. Drawing on this evidence, he argues

 that personal ownership may be the factor that closes the metaphysical gap between 

the material and immaterial selves, linking these two disparate aspects of reality, 

thereby enabling us to experience a unified sense of self despite its underlying multiplicity.

( book stanley Klein.)

Below: the Q-FFF Interpretation based on mirror dual raspberry multiverses which want to count tharatios betweenRPI and RPII whih is not exactly clear but less than 20%.

(Below) The RPI ratio with RPII less than 20% keeps between 8 and 12 mirror universes possible.

Review

"This is a wholly original book that derives from the distinctive, creative and (in my view) downright brilliant insights of the author. The book powerfully points out that the epistemological self is, if anything, over-studied, while the ontological self (of experience) is sadly neglected
empirically and conceptually. The scholarship is impressively wide and deep, demonstrating a thorough and sophisticated knowledge of contemporary research on the self and social cognition as well as current philosophy of mind and of science-two knowledge stores that are rarely to be found within the
same brain, let alone the same book."
- David Funder, Professor of Psychology, University of California, Riverside

"Klein is a profound thinker and a well-known leading force in a multidisciplinary field that deals with the ever-mysterious and fascinating issues of the human mind. One of the most prominent of these is the concept of 'self.' Klein has been at the forefront of the field of study of 'self' from the
beginning. His new book takes a quantum leap forward in the field. The thesis of the book is that much of the extant uncertainty and confusion about 'self' could be cleared up by the postulation of two independent but closely interacting forms of self, which he calls epistemological and
ontological. This is a fascinating idea. It is easy to imagine that it will become the focus of a great deal of philosophical and cognitive-science work on 'self' in the future."
- Endel Tulving, University Professor Emeritus, University of Toronto

"My first impression when I started The Two Selves was that S.B. Klein had asked the right question. My conviction when I finished the book was that Klein had indeed come to grips with the central problem of the self. His work is a welcome effort to distinguish between the threads, with which is
woven the seamless tapestry we call self. Klein has shown, not for the first time, that he is at the centre of the meaningful and intriguing project of psychologists and philosophers working together to try and understand the self. Klein's book is an essential reading for any person interested in
the self and more generally, in the human mind."
- L. Manning. Professor at the University of Strasbourg

"Klein not only succeeds in producing a cogent argument for distinguishing between these two senses of "self," he produces a clear characterization of them. These successes alone would have made this book well worth reading, but Klein does more. He shows that one fruitful avenue for enhancing our
understanding of self is to attend to abnormalities of belonging, those instances wherein the relationship between self and its experiences is disrupted. I believe the search for a "mental glue" that binds the self to its experiences will help to focus, invigorate, and integrate research spanning
multiple fields, as well as lead to a comprehensive framework for understanding self, that elusive datum about which all else revolves." - Timothy Lane, Taipei Medical University

"The Two Selves is a fascinating volume, showing the struggles of a modern brain scientist trying to be true to the phenomena of self, while not losing sight of what we have learned from the many disciplines that have contributed to our understanding of self over the 125 years since James wrote his
book. What is likely to be of greater interest to the general reader are the empirical studies that ground Klein's distinction between the two selves, since they are quite illuminating for any general theory of self. It seems to me that the strength of Klein's work is in his detailed articulation of
this research." -John Barresi, Notre Dame Philosophy Reviews

"[T]he core of Klein's argument is convincing, and any disagreement with the details of his view should be dwarfed by admiration for the originality of his approach. While Klein's
home discipline is psychology, this is as much a book of philosophy as it is of psychology. Such truly interdisciplinary work is, unfortunately, extremely rare. It is to be hoped that more of us will follow his lead in the future." -Kourken Michaelian, Mind & Machine

"The core of Klein's argument is convincing, and any disagreement with the details of his view should be dwarfed by admiration for the originality of his approach. While Klein's home discipline is psychology, this is as much a book of philosophy as it is of psychology. Such truly interdisciplinary
work is, unfortunately, extremely rare. As Klein's book demonstrates by example, both disciplines are very much the poorer for it. It is hoped that more of us will follow his lead in the future." --K. Michaelian, Journal Minds and Machines

--This text refers to the hardcover edition.

About the Author

Stanley B. Klein, PhD, was born in New York City and grew up in Connecticut. A BA graduate of Stanford University with a doctorate from Harvard University, he has taught at University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana; Trinity University, San Antonio; and University of California Santa Barbara, where he
is currently in the Psychology Department. Klein has been a member of the APA, Psychonomic Society, and Society for Experimental Social Psychology, all while publishing on memory, the self, evolutionary psychology, social psychology, neuroscience, social neuroscience, mental time travel, and nature
of mind (from a philosophical perspective).
--This text refers to the hardcover edition.

BENJAMIN LIBET found Free Will unintentionally active in a 12 fold Copy Symmetric Multiverse (see: Q-FFF Theory)

see also: Free Will Readiness Potential Ratios, the Key for a Multiverse Number Calculation.

https://vixra.org/pdf/1803.0100v1.pdf

The logic of supersymmetric Multiverse based Veto Free Will (Libet 1984) is in my multiverse view that IF I VETO AND IDEA THE OTHER 11X LEOs also veto that idea, inside 1x mirror universes, the rapsberry multiverse.  So I suggest nearly sinstant wormhole connection between all quanta.

Below: The difference of Readiness Potentials (RPs) measured by Benjamin Libet, the key support 

for the mirror symmetric entangled  Multivers limited to 12 numbers, and his VETO Free Wll idea, 

According Q-FFF Theory.

In German text see the VETO moment at  about 100 Msec..:

Trevena an Miller found surprisingly, that up to 20 % of all cases of human timings of Conscious intention to act, should be accounted as reversed in sequence thus: TCA before Lateral RP. However, 

It was Stanley Klein, who described his reaction and the reaction of other professionals, that the 20% reversed timing cases, found by Trevena and Miller, should decrease, if more common measurement biases were accounted for. 

SEE ALSO the book" The Two Selves" by stanley Klein.

https://www.bol.com/nl/nl/p/the-two-selves/9200000033620961/

 The two selves is about the two different Readiness Potentials as we show in normal "Libet experiments" 550 msec (=<20%) and 200-250 msec before the moror reaction. TCA.

However the exact % difference is not well understood without my support for the 12 fold supersymmetric mirror multiverse

http://cornea.berkeley.edu/pubs/161.pdf ///  http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.494.717&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Quotation of page 274 of the article by Stanley Klein: "The new data of Trevena and Miller (2002) indicate that the average time of the LRP still precedes the TCA, but by much less than does the RP.   The "Stanley Klein decreasion" makes an 8 fold multiverse untenable and prefer a 12 fold entangled multiverse..

This is indicating that NOT 8, but 12 universal entangled decissionmakers are active to press the same but different buttons.

So simple it seems to be.

Dr. Robert W. Doty, professor of Neurobiology and Anatomy at the University of Rochester:[33]
Benjamin Libet's discoveries are of extraordinary interest. His is almost the only approach yet to yield any credible evidence of how conscious awareness is produced by the brain. Libet's work is unique, and speaks to questions about free will asked by all humankind, he speaks of Free Will to Veto, based on different Readiness Potential measurements. 

So according to Q-FFF interpretation: Due to the Readiness Potentials (RP)  ratios 12.5 % down to 8.3 % on average. ( RPI-RPII) which means,that we may choose between 8 or 12 universe. with respectivily 12.5%  reps. 8.3% RPI preplanning. 

If every entangleduniversal copy person has the same right to make a preplan to push a button in the same experiment, than we can measure the number of universes involved by instant entanglement, suggested to be in action inside the rasppberry muliverse.

The entangled multiverse solution of Q-FFF Theory: If we assume that we are living inside one of the 12 copy universes, which are each others observer by “mutual instant entanglement” to trigger randomly and alternating the collapse of the copy wavefunctions inside all universes, (thus also to trigger a volitional act, like Libet's subjects) in the other 11 universes. Then as a consequence, we may expect that only a small part of the students will report to have had the conscious intention to act earlier. 

Thus in the case of 12 entangled universes we may expect that on average 1/12 part or 8,3 % of all (human) timing of conscious intention to act, will show a reversed timing sequence between the so called Time of conscious awareness (TCA) which will come before the electric Readiness Potential (RP). 

Indications of those percentages, are already found by Judy Trevena and Jeff Miller (Otago university NZ). See: 3 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12191 935 &dopt=Abs

Indeed according to Q-FFF Theory we need reaction information of 11x Readiness Potentials (RP)  of 12x copy entangled persons in a supersymmetric multiverse to be able to become uncertain before we push or Veto an electric button as a test person.  That instant communication system ( entanglement) is the gist of free will and consciousness of humans and all other species.

see: The Conscious Readiness Potential Ratio Multiverse 

: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334481423_The_Conscious_Readiness_Potential_Ratio_Multiverse

And:  Bohmian Double Slit Interpretation by Dual Entangled Universes, and the Benjamin Libet Experiment.   : https://vixra.org/pdf/1704.0047v1.pdf

And: A Testable CP Symmetric Multiverse Model by Extended Experiments, Done by the Late Benjamin Libet in 1964.   https://vixra.org/pdf/1704.0003v1.pdf

If every universal entangled copy person has the same right to make a preplan to push a button in the same experiment, than we can measure the number of universes involved by instant entanglement, suggested to be in action inside the rasppberry muliverse.

A NEW dual monopole magnetic vector field: support for a transformable particle universe.

I found one experiment to be a support for the excistence of monopole magnetic photon vector field:
USED BY Pigeons like other birds, Butterflies and Turles. They seem to be able to navigate solely on the Earth magnetic field. According to Quantum FFF theory, magnetic fields are just like electric fields based on monopole photonic information vector fields.

There are photon vector fields for electric negative and positive charge and for magnetic North and South potential. ( See second image of vector fields around the earth)
The boundary telescope (depicted above) is able to determine a so called fingerprint in the form of the half circle boundary shape of the two magnetic vector fields (North and South) at each location on earth. (see below).

The specific curvature of the half circle shaped boundary line (B) is the fingerprint observed to be unique for each location on earth
https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2016/11/pigeon-orientation-by-magnetic-dual.html
https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/albums/72157633287892650

The new Cyclic Super Symmetric Oscillating Stringy Vacuum variable opposed to all merging Black Holes into a Big Crunch.

 The Cyclic Charge Symmetric Raspberry shaped multiverse containing 12 universes, starting and ending as a Dark Matter String Black Hole compressed  by the 12x oscillating string vacuums, both with variable strings and fluxtubes in chiral tetrahedron shape Q-FFF Theory. an "The cyclic undivided Raspberry multiverse".  https://vixra.org/pdf/1911.0346v1.pdf

 

The Universe is even Sympler than Michio Kaku Thinks, (max 12 universes for B.Libet's VETO consiousness)

Because its is a symmetrical cyclic raspberry multiverse instant entangled at each quantum by worm holes.
https://vixra.org/pdf/2101.0131v2.pdf

and Michio Kaku on youtube: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_jqMAC3pM8

and: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PMcRNRtuHs

Due to the chirality of the vacuum we live inside a material universe.

 The vacuum oscillating string dark energy compressed at the Penrose trapped space Black hole horizon creates pairs of fermions.  

By the chirality of the vacuum we live inside a material universe. Anti Matter universes seem to have the opposite chirality.