Cygnus-A Black Hole Lensing with free energy Ionisation effects

Cygnus-A the perfect example of a cosmic electric generator.

Cygnus-A as giant electron accellerator: The radio lobes receive their energy from jets which originate in the nucleus and extend 0.2 Mpc. The radio radiation is produced by synchrotron emission of relativistic electrons. Radio galaxies are giant particle accelerators with Ee˜10^12 eV.

see; Munich Astrophysics Introductory Course Lecture ( fall 2007)http://www.mpe.mpg.de/~bender/imprs/imprs_chapter_12_2007_active_galaxies.pdf

Radio Bridge FRII in Cygnus A with hotspots (black holes) at the end.
The ionized plasma jets are mainly electron jets. positive ionized atoms stay back at the center of the galaxy. This can according to Quantum FFF Theory be explained, by the new Black Hole physics (paradigm) of Fermion repulsion at the BH horizon, and the double cone shaped polarization structure of the space between the separated black holes.
leading to what is called anomalous resistivity and ion-electron drag, leading to an enormous current and magnetic field!! The electric universe!!

The Hubble background of I Zwicky 18 contains several clear cut early galaxy dumbbell structures, with the same structure as Herbig Haro objects, just like Cygnus-A, see below.

In the forground we see: the small I Zwicky 18 Galaxy, with companion, which has also a clear dumbbell structure like Cygnus-A. Conclusion: this companion-Galaxy should be the intermediate Galaxy form between Cygnus-A and I Zwicky 18 itself.

Cloud formation around Cygnus-A with double electron jet structure and ionisation of interstellar matter.

I Zwicky ( leftside) and companion together.

The "mainstream interpretation" of CYGNUS A is that a giant black hole is located at the centre of this bipolar Galaxy, which emits bipolar synchrotron jets.
These jets are interfering with the interstellar medium creating "lobes"and they end in so called "hotspots".

However, according to Quantum FFF theory, the fact the Cygnus A is so extraordinary luminous has to be found in the observation that there are not two hotspots but four hotspots and probably because these NEW black hole hotspots have a considerable size.
Four hotspots in line with each other is a sign for a so called merger of two "early" spiral galaxies with aligned polar axes.

For merging Galaxies see:

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/04/mainstream-physics-is-not-able-to.html

My alternative interpretation of Cygnus A, is based on the simple rigid "4x elbow macaroni" particle model, able to change form and combine into compound quarks.
As a result Fermions are repelled from the horizon of these NEW massless black holes, which is the main reason to change black hole places for all cosmological systems equipped with a bipolar structure and thus for Cygnus A.

Synchrotron radiation and magnetic fields.

At the same time electrons are accellerated in the form of jets "pushing"the two black holes away from the centre, ( Fermion repelling horizon) and form ionized zones in combination with synchrotron radiation and large magnetic fields streching over the whole area.
Cygnus A:
At least 2 dual "new" black holes, located inside the hotspots at the end of the synchrotron emitting electron jets ( and not inside the centre) plus the large magnetic fields are the origin of gravitational-red shifted and electrified plasma and ionized gas.
Positive charged inside the centre and negative charged at the lobes it is THE example of a cosmic powerhouse and gas- and star forming region, which is nearer than we thought, because the redshift is supposed to be gravitational around a hotspot black hole!
Comparable dual black hole based systems with different sized Black Holes, are supposed to be the main origin of all complex cosmological systems from Herbig Haro systems up to Galaxy Clusters and the origin of Dark Matter.

Rigid Elementary Compound interlocking Click-On Particles, Propellers and monopole based Fields

This FUNCTION FOLLOWS FORM (FFF) theory is based on the assumption that the electron (and positron) has an internal (propeller) structure and two kinds of rotation at the same time originated by the collisions of the oscillating Higgs vacuum. The vacuum itself seems to have a continuous tetrahedron alike chiral lattice structure.
The two rotation axes of the electron are always oriented perpendicular to each other.
The ring shaped Higgs particle is CONVERTABLE into all other singular elementary particles such as Neutrinos, Gluons and Photon particles.
MUON, TAU and QUARKS are supposed to be compound or composite particles.

The propeller shape of Quarks and Leptons is THE origine of the repulsion of Fermions by a new spin flip process just outside the black hole event horizon.
(New Black Hole Paradigm)
 
Not compound particles are: the electron or positron, 6x Gluon/photons and all 6x neutrinos if we follow the FFF system hich we will call the QUATRON system.


The QUATRON particle.
All singular particles can be compared with,
Four elbow macaroni shaped Beads on a unbreakable string with 3x hinges between the four beads.
The three hinges can have four positions of rotation, 90 degree separated from each other. so these positions are coined: L,R,U and O.
( Left (L), Right (R), Up (U) and Circular(O).
The result: ONLY 7X PARTICLES ARE NEEDED TO MAKE A WORLD (and anti world)! Electron Positron and 5x different shaped monopole Photons/Gluons are needed to make all compound quarks.


The start of a new STANDARD MODEL of elementary particles.
The electron (ORO) can click-on with (LOL,LOU.UOU). The positron (OLO) can click-on with (ROR,ROU,UOU)
Your special attention is asked for the difference between the "Gluon Neutrino oscillations" and the "Weak interaction oscillations"
Quarks are supposed to be"compound particles as combinations of electrons (for negative charged quarks) or positrons (for positive charged quarks) with 5 different shaped gluon/ photons.
As a result, QUARKS have the same size as electrons or positrons, however they have more intense interaction with the Higgs vacuum, leading to different radiation patterns like more graviton production.
(see below)

The difference between an UP and DOWN electron

circling around the atom nucleus:

Particle wave duality, by the tetrahedral vacuum lattice of oscillating Higs particles or "Ether particles" (Descartes)

Alternative Feynman diagram or collison scheme for GRAVITY.

Alternative Feynman diagram or collsion scheme for ELECTRIC ATTRACTION.


Alternative Feynman diagram or collision scheme for ELECTRIC REPULSION.

A new way of looking at up- and down spin fermion propellers.

A new way of looking at magnetic fields.

A start to understand the Aharonov Bohm effect, because now we see how even outside the long solenoid there are parallel directed North and South monopole photons in action, causing the electron to polarize up or down.



General explanation of the rigid particle principle
based on
4 x90-degree "elbow macaroni" Beads on a string.
All 4 "elbows" are interconnected by 3 hinges,
in combination with one "splitting point".

A new way of looking at electric fields.

Alternative electric field interpretation.

A solution for the fundamental particle symmetries in physics.

Representation of the proposed Lepton family.

We see the mirror- anti particles also: positron, anti muon and anti Tau.

The Muon and Tau are also supposed to be propeller shaped and to be geometrical identical with (D-) and (C-) quarks. The decay histories of the Muon and Tau leptons point clearly into that direction. ( see the decay pages)

The orthopositronium puzzle.

The proposed positronia configuration, para- and orthopositronia.

THE ORTHOPOSITRONIUM PUZZLE.

According to this model, the positronium is not a so called "exotic atom" with the electrons and positrons swirling around each other, but looks more like a "special quark" or lepton( see above).

This special quark is assumed to be made only from electron and positron- propellers, so without the Gluon-Photon knotty compound combination and without a propeller form, with left or righthanded pitch( shown for quarks and leptons). As a consequence, the positronium has no electric or magnetic dipole!!

This configuration is also the solution for the so called "orthopositronium puzzle" to find an explanation for the fact that the orthopositronium is more stable than the para positronium...................

It is easy to see, that there is less ROOM inside the knot for the three particles then for two particles, so the mutual "pinch force" will be larger and also the decay stability as a concequence. The fact that this particle has no propeller shape like the Fermions, means that it is not able to rotate and not able to produce ( by Higgs collision transformations) other photons than gravitons!

New compound quarks.

(electrons and positrons are made silver, gluon-photons are in black).

Short description of rigid particle hinge principles.

Keywords: microstructure of elementary particles, quark microstructure.

3-D visualisation of naked elementary particles.










The author is an architect and amateur in the field of physics. I made my alternative particle model 14 years ago (see figure), as an architectonic exercise to study the possibilities for flexible architectonical spaces.
I found out that these spaces could combine and “click-on” with two or more units, to each other and create COMPOUND structures.
For click-on compound ability however, it is of interest that the diameter ratio between the diameter of the ring en the diameter of the tube should be around 7:1.
These structures had the same “click-on characteristics” but with different force to click-on or click out.
I also realized that the decay processes of elementary particles like quarks could perhaps be mimicked with this system and that the single particles could be found to be the SUB-QUANTUM base for all the known particles of the “standard model” in this "supersymmetric particle model"..
Quarks are supposed to be compound particles, but Electrons, Positrons, Photons, Gluons and Neutrinos are "single" particles, which are coded by the position ( LORU: Left, O: ring, Right, Up) of the three hinges ( see figure).

This raised the possibility to interpret electromagnetism as the quantum mechanical FORM collisionary interaction between monopole photons ( -,+, electric and even North- and South magnetic photon-particles) and Fermions.
So I practiced with lots of real compound models made out of standard rubber rings with a 4 cm. ( 1.5 inch) diameter and tried to get a reaction from professionals.
All well known decay processes of particles could be mimicked by this "click-on system" of transformable Higgs particles system.



This Webblog is one of the visual proofs that I did not stop my research, see a GENERAL TRANSFORMATION SYSTEM for all particles :
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2787/2214/1600/Page%201.2.jpg
AND MY GEOMETRICAL APPROACH PAGE:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/02/geometrical-approach.html
ALSO: and a new successful experiment to show the different North and South monopole radiation components of the earth magnetic field by a simple Mu-Metal ( permalloy) tube- compass combination.
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2787/2214/1600/Kopie%202%20van%20p%2019-20.jpg

see also the permalloy apparatus:
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2787/2214/1600/meter.0.jpg

and the results :
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2787/2214/1600/Mu-Metal%20Tube%20results%20weesp.jpg

Leo Vuyk.

For more particle information see :
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/02/geometrical-approach.html
see also:http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/
for more recent ideas and news, see also:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MultiUniversalEntanglement/files/

.

.

Rigid Electron and Positron particle PROPELLERS with dual rotation and video camera in vertical motion. The colliding oscillating Higgs particles and the resulting gluons-photons are not shown. The vertical axis is the axis of the magnetic field. The central axis of the 2x rotating cone represents the direction of the graviton radiation ( at the base side) and the electric radiation ( at the top side of the cone) . For electrons and negative quarks, this is electric negative monopole radiation. For the positron and positive quarks, this is electric positive monopole radiation.

Video of DOUBLE SPIN ROTATION OF THE ELECTRON and POSITRON.

Video author: Bob Turner ( UK)

The dual spin of all Fermion propellers

Galaxy Form and Formation by dual NEW PARADIGM primordial black holes (DARK MATTER)

Latest descovery of the influence of Galaxy Anchor Black Hole located on both sides of a Spiral Galaxy: dated 9-11-2010.
See also below: M82 Galaxy with huge gas clouds at both sides of the Galaxy.
NASA's Fermi Telescope Finds Giant Structure in Our Galaxy.

Galaxy Anchor Black Holes (GABHs) in action:

CONCLUSION:

Giant black holes speeding up Galaxy formation, seem to be located on both sides of Spiral Galaxies, not in the Galaxy center! Only small black holes are expected to be there.

TYPICAL EXAMPLE OF CHARGED PLASMA GAS AND DUST produced by both Fermion producing and repelling black holes, moving away from the black holes, driven by electric fields, to the Galaxy CYGNUS -A.
The two GABHs are clearly visble on both sides of the Galaxy as distinct globules.

EXAMPLE OF GALAXY ANCHOR BLACK HOLES:

DARK MATTER SPHEROID AROUND A GALAXY OR GALAXY CLUSTER DETERMINES THE SIZE OF THE OBJECT.

The shape of the spheroid seems to be a so called "prolate speroid".

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/07/030725081649.htm

First a small introduction on galaxy formation in the early universe A STRONG INDICATION THAT MASSIVE BLACK HOLES (DARK MATTER) ARE NOT LOCATED INSIDE THE CENTERS OF GALAXIES (2009):

Galaxy study hints at cracks in dark matter theories

19:10 30 September 2009 by Stuart Clark

For similar stories, visit the Cosmology Topic Guide

See NewScientist, : http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17892-galaxy-study-hints-at-cracks-in-dark-matter-theories.html

Dark matter is either weirder than we thought or does not exist at all, a new study suggests.

A galaxy is supposed to sit at the heart of a giant cloud of dark matter and interact with it through gravity alone. The dark matter originally provided enough attraction for the galaxy to form and now keeps it rotating. But observations are not bearing out this simple picture.

Since dark matter does not radiate light, astronomers infer its distribution by looking at how a galaxy's gas and stars are moving. Previous studies have suggested that dark matter must be uniformly distributed within a galaxy's central region – a confounding result since the dark matter's gravity should make it progressively denser towards a galaxy's centre.

Now, the tale has taken a deeper turn into the unknown, thanks to an analysis of the normal matter at the centres of 28 galaxies of all shapes and sizes. The study shows that there is always five times more dark matter than normal matter where the dark matter density has dropped to one-quarter of its central value.

Undiscovered force?

The finding goes against expectations because the ratio of dark to normal matter should depend on the galaxy's history – for example, whether it has merged with another galaxy or remained isolated during its entire existence. Mergers should skew the ratio of dark to normal matter on an individual basis.

"There is absolutely no rule in physics that explains these results," says study co-author Hong Sheng Zhao of the University of St Andrews in the UK.The authors suggest there may be an undiscovered force of nature working between the dark matter and the normal matter, since gravity alone cannot maintain this constant ratio

Radio image of Merger Galaxy NGC 5291, shows bipolar dark kold matter blobs (pink) as the obvious locations of Galaxy Anchor Black Holes (GABHs)

Evidence for the absence of Huge Black holes in the centre of galaxies, see the recent Hubble/Chandra surprize of NGC 4649:

http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2008/ngc4649/

It is said that only very few matter is found to be attrackted to the center of the Galaxy, WHY? the central Black hole seems to in a dormant state!!!

The pairing of primordial Galaxy Anchor Black holes hes a merger effect and seems to be the origin of Galaxy complexity.
BLACK HOLE PAIRS OR BETTER BINARY BLACK HOLES,  are the base for fast galaxy formation after the big bang.
Primordial black holes are supposed to be "left over" from the evaporation process of the bouncing Big Bang as giant black holes.

The next plate present three examples of early galaxies with two or even three "HOTSPOTS"

Acoording to FFF theory all these galaxies should present at least THREE hotspots, one large in the middle and two smaller ones which are aligned with the core of the galaxy. ( see the last image: SDSS: 1517-2145).  

However the angle of sight will be often reason to screen one of the smaller hotspots, as supposed to be the case in the first two images. (13-januari 2011)



The Sombrero Galaxy, an example of primordial Galaxy Anchor Black Hole merging complexity.
A simple Galaxy overview.
An unexpected NewScinetist support for dual Galaxy Anchor Black Holes ( GABHs), "Cosmic 'egg-beaters' may have left magnetic legacy":

http://space.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg19526215.300&feedId=online-news_rss20



Quate:"DID colossal spinning loops of energy whip up the magnetic fields that thread through galaxies and may even stretch across intergalactic space? That's the idea being put forward to explain the universe's mysterious magnetic fields.
"Wherever we look, we find a magnetic field," says Mark Wyman, a cosmologist at the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. "But nobody can explain where they came from."


Mainstream Physics is not able to explain the complexity of the Universe. It is a world of guessing about real Nature, like the origin of Galaxy form and formation or Dark matter rings around the Cl0024+17 Galaxy cluster.


As a consequence new experimental based tools ( see below, like magnetic monopole photons ( N+S), real (propeller) shaped Fermions), new ideas about the energetic oscillating (chiral) vacuum and NEW Black Holes are postulated.


As a result, “Galaxy Anchor Black Holes”, are supposed to be the seeds ( splinters) left over from a “new” Black Hole-splitting and evaporation Big Bang.
“Stellar and Galaxy Anchor Black Holes”: able to Migrate inside and outside Galaxies, able to find other migrating Black Holes and “merge” ( see: 3C75) creating "dual black holes" forming the opposite Lobes like the Cygnus- A Lobes with so called hotspots as the representation of the black holes .

GALAXY COMPLEXITY: is supposed to be possible from simple spiral Galaxies, equipped with only two "Galaxy Anchor Black holes" (GABHs) , up to Elliptical Galaxies with GABHs all around.
The Dark matter ring recently spotted in a Galaxy Cluster, has an obvious resemblance with a large scale Lenticular Galaxy form.
For ESA report see:
Hubble sees Dark matter ring in a galaxy cluster CL0024+17.
or extended: ZWCl0024+1652.
http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEM5SHV681F_index_0.html

According to the alternative Dual Black hole (Dark Matter) system described before, for Galaxy Form and formation, it is a small step to suggest that the recently spotted Dark matter ring CL0024+17 is originated by a comparable system as is suggested for Lenticular Galaxies. ( see above)
As a result, two HUGE Big Bang evaporation black holes located symmetrical on the symmetry axis of the (Lenticular) Dark matter ring, seem to be responsible for the ring shape and even for the central Bulge of dark matter. ( licht blue coloured)

Conclusion: All ring shaped structures in space at all scales, from Cygnus-A, Eta Carina up to CL0024+17, seem to be formed by dual black hole influences.

Cygnus A, four gas producing black holes in line,

with gas concentration in the middle.

M82 Galaxy with huge double gas clouds.Here we see the atoms ( all equipped with extra electrons) which are produced by the Galaxy Anchor Black Holes ( GABHs) travelling ( by a combined gravity and electric force) into the direction of the Galaxy. This system is also the origin of so called "Cosmic Rays" (see image)

Cygnus A , is supposed to be THE example of a perfect Cosmic electric generator in between two or even more dual black holes in the form of a dumbbell.

(positive charged in the centre and negative charged at the lobes also called "electified plasmas")

How can we be so sure that only electrons are accellerated inside boith of the Cygnus A jets? Because scientists did not found traces of protons. see page 158 of:

http://www.aspbooks.org/publications/300/151.pdf

A FERMION REPELLING HORIZON?

How is it possible that these NEW Paradigm black holes are repelling fermions? All NEW Paradigm Black holes are supposed to have a local Fermion repelling horizon. Bosons are absorbed, but Fermions are repelled!! due to the special propeller form of Fermion particles, and the local Higgs structure of the vacuum at the black hole horizon , see below under "Higgs repulsion zone".

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2787/2214/1600/p%209-10.4.jpg

See also:

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap060412.html

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap021005.html

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/calendar/ca0604.html

See also: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006_02_01_archive.html

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006_03_01_archive.html

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006_04_01_archive.html

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2007_01_01_archive.html

http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix40

http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/

Higgs-Graviton Quantum Gravity, Mass in motion and Fermion Consciousness

Dual Higgs-Graviton quantum gravity of this model can be described as a kind of dual "Macro Casimir effect" or Dual- or Double Le Sage gravity.
The total Higgs pressure from outside acting on a mass like the earth, is larger than the Higgs pressure coming from the inside of that mass, because inside the earth, many Higgs particles are assumed to change by collision with chiral Fermions into Gravitons.
Gravitons are supposed to have less pressure capacity than each Higgs particle.
Gravitons are supposed to be not able to change by collision into other particles.

Anti-symmetrical globular shaped HIGGS-GRAVITON impulse vector HEDGEHOG profiles, the origin of Quantum gravity.

If we imagine that the vacuum all around us is filled up with a Planck-scaled crystalline network of oscillating Higgs-particles, then the vacuum is MORE DENSE than a Neutron star's Fermion interior.

This is hardly to imagine, but a real possibility to explain all relativity effects .

If we also assume that Higgs particles have a special form which can change by collision into other forms, like electron- positron pairs or Gluons, Photons, and gravitons, then a sort of double LESAGE gravity is showing up. see for single LaSage gravity:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_(LeSage)

However the Quantum gravity which is the result of this interacting system of Higgs and Graviton particles with spinning Fermions, will show something extra a double LE SAGE gravity( see fig. A.)

Quantum Gravity at the surface of our Earth, will show an anti-symmetrical Globular Higgs pushing "impulse profile" ( like the Casimir force) in combination with a less strong one-sided Graviton impulse profile (9) pushing Fermions up instead of down!!

Click on the picture below for enlargement or download.

The impulse vector HEDGEHOG

for normal gravity on earth.

See also:
Quantum gravity as sum over spacetimes, by:
J. Ambjørn, J. Jurkiewicz and R. Loll, (University of Utrecht, NL)

The four-dimensional CDT model of quantum gravity is extremely simple.
It is the path integral over the class of causal geometries with a global time foliation.
In order to perform the summation explicitly, we introduce a grid of piecewise linear geometries, much in the same way as when defining the path integral in quantum mechanics. Next, we rotate each of these geometries to Euclidean signature and use as bare action the Einstein-Hilbert action8 in Regge form.
That is all.

One scenario, which has often been discussed as a possibility, but which is still missing an explicit implementation is the following:
when one approaches sub-Planckian scales the theory effectively becomes a topological quantum field theory where the metric plays no role. Also in our very explicit implementation of a quantum gravity model it is unclear how such a scenario would look.
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0906/0906.3947v2.pdf

MASS IN MOTION.

According to this new particle system, Mass in motion needs a particle MEMORY system to memorize "Lorentz polarization" or "Fermion Consciousness".

If we imagine that in such a dense vacuum lattice, mass has to be able to move and accelerate, then we need something very special to keep a tennis ball in motion after it is hit by your racket. We need to introduce a Higgs oscillating vacuum Lattice, which we could call "COMPLEXIFIED Lorentz space" able to push or pull spinning Fermion propellers and transform complete atoms to create "REAL Lorentz dilation in time" but NO "Lorentz CONTRACTION".

Why? Because if we assume that gravity is dragging the lightspeed with the Earth, then all the Michelson-Morley apparatusses should have shown a diurnal effect!! originated solely by the contraction of the apparatus itself!!

Thus ONLY "Lorentz TIME DELATION is real" and the logical result of a quantum mechanical Higgs-Fermion collison process.
In other words, I would call these particles: "Lorentz polarized" Fermion propeller particles with a double spin state, able to absorb more "Casimir" vacuum energy from behind than from the front side.
( see Figure B) below.
HOWEVER in that case, every Fermion should have some sort of a Memory :
I suggest the symmetrical Big Bang ENTANGLEMENT MEMORY is still acting between two or more IDENTICAL but CPT ( Charge Parity and Time) symmetric Universes to solve the so called "Schroedingers CAT problem" and also the "Lorentz polarization" memory !!

Seconly, we should consider, that massive objects like the Earth will drag their own peculiar reference frame with them. This is called "LASOF""Local anti-symmetrical Oscillating Vacuum Frame", the origin of small Radar reflection anomalies of Venus and Mercury.( described later in this book). see:

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/02/gravity-dependent-lightspeed.html

Socrates unmoved mover.

It was Socrates ( 479-399 BC.), who supposed that all objects in motion should have a so called unmoving mover, as the origin of the motion.
This model predict an oscillating (unmoving) mover.


The gravitational consequences of the oscillating vacuum for a NEW BLACK HOLE is: that only pure Higgs ( Casimir) Gravity can exist. The reason is, that no Gravitons can leave a black hole.

The motion consequences of the oscillating vacuum for a NEW BLACK HOLE is, that Black holes are STUCK unless an outside influence like a "gas tail" is able to influence the globular symmetry of the black hole horizon.

Fermion repulsive NEW black holes
This New Black hole gravity in combination with propeller shaped Fermions creates a second consequence: the existence of a FERMION REPULSIVE HORIZON around the NEW BLACK HOLE , which is visible as polarized negative charged gas clouds around so called "Lobes" of lots of Quasars, HH- objects, AGNs etc. like Cygnus A.

This repulsive Black Hole horizon is expected to be responsible for the complexity of the Universe due to the ( so called warp driven) MIGRATION OF BLACK HOLES

( see Rosette's HH1 object below)

into Binary systems, forming the base for Quasars, HH objects, Spiral and Lenticular Galaxies and all charged particle Jet formations.

SEE ALSO:

http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/

In his book "the Character of Physical Law" (p.37-39), RichardFeynman wrote:
"Suppose that in the world everywhere there are a lot of (space filling vacuum-) particles, flying through us at very high speed. They come equally from all directions, -just shooting by- and they also partly hit us in a bombardment.
We and the sun, are practically transparent for them. Practically, but not completely,and some of them hit. Look at what would happen; If the earth is moving it is running into the particles coming towards it and away from the ones that are chasing it from behind.
So more particleswill hit from the front than from the back, and there will be a(vacuum) force opposing any motion. This force would slow the Earth up in its orbit" (which is proved to be not the case); so that is the end of that theory......!
.......Well you say, it was a good one, and I got rid of the mathematics for a while, maybe I could invent a better one".

That is the gist of this weblog.
In "Crazy" but SERIOUS contrast with Richard Feynman's story, this new model assumes that Nature may compensate such an opposing vacuum resistance by a NEW vacuum MECHANISM..
1: if the Feynman vacuum particles are supposed to be energetic oscillating vacuum particles coined "Higgs-Virgin Particles"oscillating in a chiral 3D vacuum lattice and
2: if the mass carrying particles (of the Earth) have the ability, by real Lorentz transformations, to absorb just enough energy of this oscillating Higgs-vacuum frame in the right direction to compensate for the opposing vacuum resistance and to keep this Lorentz polarization in its memory as a guiding mechanism.
This polarizing guiding mechanism is coined a "Big Bang Entanglement" memory, active from the beginning of the universes between TWO OR MORE CPT ( Charge Parity and Time) symmetric ( anti-) COPY UNIVERSES!! and also acting as an instantaneous medium to keep the object- subject "eigenstate" of each particle harmonized..
As a result. this weblog describes my personal alternative reductionist’s view on some aspects of mainstream physics and astronomy.In general this alternative contribution is the product of intuitive and logic thinking about a three dimensional image of reality down to the Planckian scale of the cosmos.I choose a so called "Lattice model" base for the vacuum in contrast with the so called “continuum of space and spacetime models”. Both ideas about the structure of space are well known in mainstream physics.This Lattice model concentrates on the way SPACE is fully filled-up with a topological 3-D lattice which represents the oscillation trajectories of Higgs particles.These Higgs particles are assumed to have a rigid RING-form and able to transform the ring by collision into real rigid Fermions or Bosons.It is assumed that at each lattice there are two Higgs particles active in a continuous oscillation process able to transfer bosonic information from the source of the boson down to the measurement location in some unresolved digital (or trigital tetrahedron) way.Secondly it is assumed that Higgs particles transform their shape into bosons, (photons, gravitons, gluons) by collision processes with real spinning Fermions.As a result, the energy (radiation) and the Spin of the electron is produced only by mechanical Collisions. Thus it is assumed that the form of Chiral Fermions should have a “propeller form “ with left- or right handed PITCH to realize a left- or right handed Spin.HIGGS-GRAVITON QUANTUM GRAVITY.The Fermions of the Earth are assumed to produce gluons, photons and gravitons by the Higgs collision process..As a result, there are more Higgs particles with a Higgs identity going into the Earth than there are Higgs particles with a Higgs identity coming out.If we also assume that the average Higgs collision impact on Fermions is larger than a graviton impact on Fermions, then a new kind of Quantum Gravity is presented: the “Higgs-Graviton Quantum Gravity".

It is postulated that the length of these lattices are in general (in normal vacuum, far away from Black holes) the same in length, they are gathering together at connection points.The structure of the lattice is of a tetrahedron kind of shape, which is equipped with a so called “chiral rotation” (left or right handed) all through the vacuum inside one and the same universe.
ir. Leo Vuyk ( architect/engineer)

Small Gravity and GR anomalies and Test Proposals

GR ( general relativity) anomalies

A remarkable Paper on relativity in 2009 by Reginald Cahill. (Flinders univ. au.) also suggesting that the Ether should have dynamical qualities ( dubbed: dynamical 3-SPACE) which can explain the small anomalies of relativity rules. This paper seems to be just IN LINE with the LASOF (Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame) described on these pages.

It is called: Combining NASA/JPL One-Way Optical-Fiber Light-Speed
Data with Spacecraft Earth-Flyby Doppler-Shift Data to
Characterise 3-Space Flow
Reginald T. Cahill
http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.5404


In recent years it has become clear, from numerous experiments and observations, that a dynamical 3-space exists [1, 2]. This dynamical system gives a deeper explanation for various observed effects that, until now, have been successfully described, but not explained, by the Special Relativity (SR) and General Relativity (GR) formalisms. However it also offers an explanation for other observed effects not described by SR or GR, such as observed light speed anisotropy, bore hole gravity anomalies, black hole mass spectrum and spiral galaxy rotation curves and an expanding universe without dark matter or dark energy

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0906/0906.5404v2.pdf

NOW I PRESENT HERE MY OWN APPROACH.

Gravity related light speed= mass related lightspeed.

It is well known that the sun has its own lightspeed related reference frame. All space probes have clocks which are calibrated for the probe speed relative to the solar reference frame and not related to the Earth's reference frame!!

Conclusion we have to measure at what distance from the earth the lightspeed changes its reference frame to that of the reference frame of the sun.
So we have to know what the minor and major axis of the ellipsoidal reference frame (called LASOF) around the earth is.
Below we estimate this minor axis to be 5450 km above the earth's surface, only for directions with small angles to the earth's surface.

How to teach SR by J.Bell.

How, to teach special relativity.

This is a clear example of how mainstream physics differ from logic relativity thinking.
According to mainstream physics the thin thread between the rockets will not break because the thread with the two rockets will not change length measured by their own rulers!!
Quotation of John S. Bell; See; J.S.Bell’s book "Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics."( paperback page 67, how to teach special relativity)

"I have for long thought that if I had the opportunity to teach thissubject, I would emphasize the continuity with earlier ideas. Usually it is the discontinuity which is stressed, the radical breakwith more primitive notions of space and time. Often the result is to destroy completely the confidence of the student in perfectly sound and useful concepts already acquired'.If you doubt this, then you might try the experiment of confronting your students with the following situation. Three small spaceships,A, B, and C, drift freely in a region of space remote from other matter, without rotation and without relative motion, with B and C equidistant from A.

On reception of a signal from A the motors of B and C are ignited and they accelerate gently'. Let ships B and C be identical, and have identical acceleration programmes.

Then (as reckoned by an observer in A) they will have at every moment the same velocity, and so remain displaced one from theother by a fixed distance. Suppose that a .fragile thread is tied initially between projections from B and C. If it is just long enough to span the required distance initially, then as the rockets speed up, it will become too short, because of its need to Fitzgerald contract, and must finally break, It must break when, at a sufficiently high velocity, the artificial prevention of the natural contraction imposes intolerable stress."

I think Bell is right in his logic, also and in addition because the rockets itselfwill contract in length, which makes the mutual distance for the thread longer to span.

Examples of gravity lensing sunspots

There is something Knotty in the Helix nebula.

KNOTTY dark matter sources of the Helix nebula represent the former “sunspots” of the former star, they seem to be less able to get in motion by the explosion of the star than normal atomic material. This is in line with the new black hole model. It is even suggested that these knotty micro black hole “sunspots” have a gas producing feature.

Changing sunspot distribution is assumed to be the origin of different forms of Solar gravitational lensing, found in different experiments.

Solar-Moon eclipse anomaly solution, based on Solar dark HIGGS energy lensing.

Gravity seems to be the result of the absorption of vacuum Higgs oscillations (dubbed dark energy) by Fermions, in line with the Casimir force. Consequently gravity seems to be a large scale Casimir force, giving fermions even their so called "eigen energy".




Solar-Moon eclipse anomaly solution, based on Solar dark energy lensing.

Proposal for a Solar gravity (dark energy) lensing effect, as the origin of the Solar eclipse anomaly found by Wang and Yang et all. 9 March 1997 (at Moho, China). The experiment showed a clear gravity decrease (a double dip) before and after the total eclipse (see location A). The mass of the Moon is supposed to "SCREEN" only the Solar lensing effect. As a consequence, Higgs impulse energy (dark energy) can only transform by mass into Graviton impulse energy and not backwards.

As a second consequence, it is assumed that the Sun Spots should be adopted as microlensing micro-black holes, as proposed earlier by the author. These micro black holes are thought to be visible as small dots in the Helix Planetary Nebula interior (see Hubble gallery).
Sun spots are supposed to be the remnants of former Comets.
At the same time, this quantum gravity solution is a support for other well known “tilt”and “pendula” eclipse effects.

See ABOVE.

This solution proposal is also based on the existence of a variable so called pushing gravity impulse vector HEDGEHOG field ( short IVH or impulse gravity hedgehog) active as an vacuum source of “eigen-energy” active around each Fermion and responsible for all motion and spin. See also :
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/

The eclipse experiment description mentioned above are available in two magazines see below:
X.-S. Yang and Q.S. Wang, Gravity anomaly during the Mohe total solar eclipse and
new constraint on gravitational shielding parameter, Astrophys. Space Sci. 282
(2002) 245.
Q.-S. Wang, X.-S.Yang, C.-Z. Wu, H.-G. Guo, H.-C. Liu and C.-C. Hua, Precise
measurement of gravity variations during a total solar eclipse, Phys. Rev. D 62
(2000) 041101.


Existence of gravity lensing elements (micro-black holes) inside the Sun, Moon and the Earth.
My former explanation for the "double gravity dip" before and after solar eclipse measured by Wang and Yang in 1997
see: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/03/how-small-anomalies-could-influence.html
is reason to explore the eclipse results made by others in the past. As a result I conclude that not only the sun harbours gravity lensing objects inside, but also the moon and perhaps even the earth.

My "double gravity dip" explanation was based on the assumption that Sunspots are gravity lensing micro black holes.
If we assume that the vacuum generates a (oscillating Higgs) pressure gravity from outside the earth and the earth is able to decrease this energy by changing Higgs particles into ( less energetic) gravitons then, then we have a global idea about the principle of quantum gravity based on boson scattering with fermions.
As a result I proposed that sunspots are micro black holes which are able to concentrate the Higgs vacuum gravity energy in the shape of dual bundles. The passage of the moon as a screening object of these dual pushing gravity bundles gave a direct logic explanation.

However it is strange that I could find only one experiment with a similar dual gravity decrease effect. It was only T. Kuusela who found a comparable result with two gravity peaks before and after the full eclipse of 1991 in Mexico.
However, these dual gravity decreasing peaks had a different character than the peaks measured by Wang and Yang in 1997.
Of interest is here the difference of 6 years, which is about the difference between Maximum and Minimum Sunspot activity!! The year 1991 is close to a maximum and 1997 is close to a minimum of sunspot activity.
My hypothesis is, that at sunspot minimum, the sunspots are located close to each other in the form of a disc inside the sun and at sunspot maximum they are more spread out sometimes hitting the surface of the sun.
As a logical result, the gravity lensing effect will have different shaped bundle profiles.
In the minimum sunspot activity period ( 1997 Wang and Yang) there are supposed to be two large bundles as described in my article http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/03/how-small-anomalies-could-influence.html
In the maximum sunspot activity period, these bundles are supposed to be spread out with incidental pencil like lensing effects due to the cooperation of two incidental aligning sunspots.
This should be the explanation for the two pencil like "double gravity dip" effects measured by T. Kuusela in 1991.
However, the short time these effects happened does indicate that ALSO THE MOON SHOULD HARBOUR ONE OR MORE gravity lensing elements like SUNSPOTS!!
As is stated before, my assumption is that sunspots are the former nuclei Comets once smashed into the sun.
As a consequence, we may assume that also the moon and the earth harbour sunspot alike ( Fermion friendly) micro black holes.
A second support for this hypothesis of interacting micro black holes, is based on the measurements of Tom Kuusela done in march 29 2006.
In this report we find the evidence for an east west variation of the tilt meter, which is only measured inside the centre of the moon sun eclipse line.
One tilt meter placed 60 km outside this propagation line did not react at all.
A third support is that 20 -24 hour before the eclipse T. Kuusela measured similar deviations ("we observed similar type of changes in one of the measurement locations also 20–24 hours before and after the eclipse") . http://users.utu.fi/kuusela/gravity/Report.pdf
I interprete this effect as a support for my proposal that two sunspots if they are in line, are able to give an effect, which does introduce the possibility of pencil alike lensing effects, if two solar sunspots and one lensing black hole of the moon are in line. See:

The hypothesis of Fermion friendly (Fermion repelling) black holes is one of the key elements of my new physics theory, see: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/

This NEW black hole model is even the base for my explanation of the so called pioneer anomaly. See:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ArDoWzECXSo/Reb9IJHVbCI/AAAAAAAAAEc/PuvylOrUcyE/s1600-h/SOLAR+SABHs+1.jpg
As a consequence there seem to be not only stellar anchor black holes but even Galaxy anchor black holes, the base for galaxy form and ( quick) formation.

A possible indication for the influence of SOLAR anchor black holes, could be found in the next article about the evidence that the gravitational constant varies
with orientation.

Experimental evidence that the gravitational constant varies
with orientation.
by Mikhail L. Gershteyn∗†, Lev I. Gershteyn†, Arkady Gershteyn†, Oleg V. Karagioz‡
http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0202/0202058.pdf

some extra details of the former Lightspeed anomalies.

GPS signal outliers measured in 2003 ( see below) are the origin to calculate the minor LASOF axis on 11821 km.

Massive outliers of 180 meters are measured in 2003.(below)

Measured by

Bae, Tae-Suk, Near Real-Time Precise Orbit Determination of Low Earth Orbit Satellites Using an Optimal GPS Triple-Differencing Technique, viii+121 pp., November 2006
http://www.geology.osu.edu/~jekeli.1/OSUReports/reports/report_481.pdf
see also:
http://geodeticscience.osu.edu/OSUReports.htm

A clear example of GPS signal failures for the CHAMP Low Earth Orbiters at 430 km altitude, is one of the reasons that so called Kinematic Precise Orbit Determination (POD) by GPS readings is very complicated. Several other ground based systems and complex computer programs are needed to compensate these errors.
However, if the LASOF idea about gravity (or Mass) related lightspeed is incorporated in the GPS readings, then these errors are supposed to vanish for a great deal.

"Short Period Quasi-Regular Oscillations" of Venus and Mercury of about 30 days, are described by I.I Shapiro in Radar Astronomy 1968, page 170-172. see at the and of this file.

This Binary Star system (see below) seems to be -just like Mercury and Venus- "ahead" before conjunction and "further away" after.
Examples of QPOs (Quasi Periodic Oscillations) or Orbital Periodicities of Binaries are supposed to be examples of gravity influenced LASOF lightspeed anomalies just like Venus and Mercury. see below: ( H.Lehmann, Binary RZ-cas. and P.G.Ostrov, Binary HV 2543).

Globular and Cigar shaped LASOFs.
There seems to be two different shaped LASOF ( local anti-symmetrical oscillating vacuum frame) lightspeed extinction envelopes, for A: Earth bound light sources and for B: Satellite- or space based light sources.
Based on Radar reflection data of Venus and Mercury done by I.I Shapiro, I concluded, that for Earth bound light sources, the LASOF extinction envelope around the Earth, seem to be globular with a diameter of 70 million km. see: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/02/gravity-dependent-lightspeed.html

Based on sparse Formosat- Champ- Topex satellite data in combination with the small anomalies measured by G.Miller and Y.Galaev, I suggest, that for space based light sources, the LASOF envelope seems to be ellipsoidal (or cigar shaped), with the major axis coinciding to the Earth-Satellite axis of the same length and an unknown minor axis.
Future satellite-GPS distance reading variations should give information about the minor axis of the cigar shaped LASOF envelope. (see before and below).




my proposal for the Planetary (Earth) gravitational drag of the Lightspeed has a realistic base, as mentioned below, then all GPS signal readings taken by other satellites should account for such an effect.

Improvement of onboard GPS readings for precise orbit determination (POD) of Low Earth Orbiting (LEO) Satellites, like Formoasat-3, Camp, or Jason-1-/Topex-Poseidon satellites and ISS, are suggested to be possible, if these readings are taken into directions without any Earth-Solar orbital lightspeed influence.
A: for signals not directed into the Earth surface: Above 21 degrees above the horizontal-Earth line for Formosat-3 and Champ (both at about the same height) and Above 34 degrees for Jason-Topex satellites (cruising at higher levels) see figure B3.
OR;
B: if the orbital speed has no influence; GPS-readings taken perpendicular to the axis of orbital motion of the Earth round the Sun.
Outside these areas, the “Earth gravitational drag effect” should be incorporated into the GPS-reading calculations. This should be the case e.g. for so called LEO “GPS-occultations” skimming the Earth atmosphere. se also fig 5.3.

Leo Vuyk.