Non Inertial Gravitating Dark Matter Black Holes and dual pressure gravity

According to Quantum FFF Theory, Dark Matter is always in the form of complex Rigid string based Quantum knot Black Hole nuclei or Dark Matter Black Holes (DMBHs).
Microscopic DMBH nuclei evaporate into Axion-Higgs dark energy vacuum particles like ball lightning and small short living earth bound comets seem to do.
Stable DMBH nuclei are growing by "eating" the gravitating ( oscillating Casimir/Axion Higgs) pressure vacuum they don't show standard mass related (Baryonic) inertial effects.
So: DMBHs show emergent gravitating effects ( only Axion/Higgs field vacuum pressure) but reduced- or  even none inertial effects.
The result is that  

1: Small DMBHs seem to concentrate around the central giant Galaxy BH like Signus A..  
So it seems that there is a dynamic BH selection process in galaxies. How? besides the reduced inertia capacity of BHs we also need a propulsion system for BHs ( plasma tails)  for such a Hierarchy process. For plasma tailed BHs see below.

2: Galaxy cluster mergers like Abell 520 (three clusters) overshoot and leaving behind their own Dark Matter Black Hole content by the lack of inertial capacity of dark matter ( BHs).
3 Large DMBHs come in the form of primordial GABHs  (Galaxy Anchor BHs, out of the splitting Big Bang nucleus) or as central Galaxy BHs gobbling ( eating) much smaller BHs without any trace or  LIGO signal . 
Conclusion: LIGO sees binary Black Hole mergers with very ( ( 1.sec) short lighthouse effect and the merging of neutron stars with much longer (30 sec) oscillating gravity based lighthouse effects.
see also:  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324390308_Emergent_Pressure_Gravity_by_Dipole_Repeller_Rigid_String_Pressure_the_Origin_of_Non_Inertial_Black_Holes 

or http://vixra.org/pdf/1804.0138v1.pdf

LIGO binary Black hole 1 sec wave strain 

LIGO 30 sec. neutron star wave strain.

Plasma tailed BH propulsion for the realization of the BH hierarchy process inside galaxies. see also Spire nebula above and Ball Lightning and micro comet photos below.

Proposal for the origin of the BH hierarchy in galaxies.
Large or small DMBHs have the same non inertial potency (zero-Mass), however larger DMBHs are able to create a larger plasma tail for BH propulsion than smaller BHs.
The plasma tail in contrast with the BH has real Baryon mass, so it will be pointing and guided into the center point of the galaxy BH "attraction= singular sided vacuum repulsion" around the giant BH. 
As a result pushing BHs away from the galaxy center but with less result and power for small BHs than for larger ones.
Around the central giant galaxy BH ( Sagitarius.) however, the central point of galaxy mass has gone because only emergent Casimir/Axion/Higgs field pressure gravity remains. ( BHs do not emit gravitons). 
As a consequence, the pushing BH plasma tails become fluffy without the power to resist the attraction of the central giant BH.

Video of an unstable splitting earth bound micro comet BH.
assumed to be created by Sprite interference far away.   
Only the splitting baby comet (video below) is pushed against the high wind direction by a standard plasma tail, because it is supposed to be a "naked" BH without a massive nuclear ice shell.

Magnetic Sprite interference seems to be able to form Quantum Knots called Black Holes, based on the ability of magnetic rigid strings to form two kinds of interconnecting Higgs rings (below) .  

Leo Vuyk

5 minuten · 

Bent jet of Young stars as support for the new physics of inertia- and mass less Dark Matter Black Holes with a non baryonic nuleus. See for artist impression : http://aasnova.org/2018/04/04/clues-from-bent-jets/
The origin: Dual pressure gravity on baryons (graviton and Axion vacuum pressure) and single pressure gravity on black holes (Axion/Higgs vacuum pressure)

Self seeding Star creation between dual Herbig Haro Hotspots ( BHs)

Open star clusters are assumed to be created in between Herbig Haro hotspots.
Such hotspots which we observe now, in our neighborhood are second- or third generation new physics micro black holes, according to Quantum FFF Theory.
Nature seems to have a self seeding mechanism of dual Herbig Haro hotspot creation. 
Small black holes are created around massive stars by interference of magnetic storms, also  resulting in cometary nuclei.
Comet nuclei crashing into stars seem to create and populate "starspots"in dual- or triple hotspot order.

SEE:  The Self Organizing Universe in three different Nebula systems.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1304.0022v6.pdf 

Leo Vuyk

5 minuten · 

Bent jet of Young stars as support for the new physics of inertia- and mass less Dark Matter Black Holes with a non baryonic nucleus. See for artist impression : http://aasnova.org/2018/04/04/clues-from-bent-jets/
The origin: Dual pressure gravity on baryons (graviton and Axion vacuum pressure) and single pressure gravity on black holes (Axion/Higgs vacuum pressure)

Umbral knots as former Comet nuclei new physics black holes.

Umbral knots: Support for Sunspot/new black holes, as former crashed comet nuclei, according to Quantum FFF Theory, see: http://vixra.org/pdf/1803.0093v1.pdf

Lots of Triple and dual umbral knots inside sunspots  as support for Herbig Haro gas concentration effects in between dual micro BHs. found here: http://aasnova.org/2018/03/19/featured-image-bright-dots-in-a-sunspot/ 

The same process of grouping BHs is observed in the centers of dying red dead galaxies.
The result of so many small BHs in the center of large galaxies is origin of galaxy dying.
WHY? because no Herbig Haro dual triple hotspot systems are possible.
Attention: Larger BHs seem to be kicked out of the galaxy ( and even Galaxy clusters?: see Virgo and Perseus: below) to form Globular clusters .

See also; micro sunspot black hole hotspots inside nebula and their function as seeding space with new star forming regions. below:

Muon and Rare Kaon decay according to Quantum FFF Theory.

see also: 3-Dimensional String based alternative particle model.

http://vixra.org/pdf/1103.0002v4.pdf

Muon decay.
The Muon decaying compound “click-on” Particle (see Below ) coded: (ORO,LOL,LOL). Is able to decay into three single parts: ORO+LRL+LLL. (changing one LOL into a LRL Particle (one hinge rotation over 90 degrees: R>L) and one LOL into a LLL Particle (one hinge rotation over 90 degrees: O>L). These particles are called: the Electron(ORO), the anti-electro-neutrino (LRL) and the muonic neutrino (LLL).
Kaon decay.
For normal Kaon plus decay, the main decay routes according to the literature are: (A: mu+, muonic neutrino)or (B: pi+, pi0) The Kaon + Particle is coded: for the U-Quark:(OLO,ROR)and for the anti-S Quark: (OLO,OLO,ROR).
For the A route: it is proposed that the u-Quark (OLO,ROR)decays into (LLL,ROR) which Particle is supposed to disintegrate and produce the (LLL) muonic neutrino and one undetected Gluon (ROR) will disappear into the Gluonic “sea”. The anti-s-Quark (OLO,OLO,ROR)will change into a positive muon (OLO,ROR,ROR).
For the B route: it is proposed that the U-Quark (OLO,ROR) does not decay and that the anti-S Quark also decays into (OLO,ROR,ROR) which is in combination with the U-Quark a positive pion+ Particle.
The pion-0 Particle coded: U, anti-U Quark: (OLO,ROR), and (ORO,LOL) are mirror symmetric and able to emerge directly from the vacuum as so called pair production results.
Rare Kaon–Plus decay.
A rare Kaon plus Particle decay: K+ => pi+, nu, nubar , (pi + , neutrino anti-neutrino) is recently 12 discovered and now acknowledged by a Brookhaven AGS experiment 949:see: http://www.phy.bnl.gov/949/ Interestingly this rare Kaon decay can easily be derived from the “Higgs Torus Particle” system properties.
The most simple explanation by this Higgs Particle click-on system is to assume that the decay is the same as route B mentioned before and in addition that the Pion 0 Particle (OLO,ROR)+(ORO,LOL) decays into two neutrinos.(OLO)=>(RLR) and (ORO)=> (LRL).
The (ROR) and (LOL) Gluons are supposed to “disappear into the Gluonic “sea” as described above under route A. Kaon Long/ Short decay.
It is proposed that the Kaon and anti Kaon Particles (ds)are mixing with themselves and with the Eta (ss) Particle by the continuous changing of one Gluon into a Lepton to change the d Quark into an s Quark and backwards a Lepton into a Gluon from s into a Quark. (d<=> s) At the same time it is proposed that the backward changing d into s last longer due to the slight chirality of the vacuum .
The angle of attack of the Tandem oscillating Higgs Particles to the Quarks, must be slightly different.
This is reason to propose that it is the S, anti-S (Eta Particle) that is the reason for the strange Kaon decay time-differences Explanation: the Kaon 0 Particle coded as: d-Quark: (ORO,LOL,LOL) anti-s Quark: (OLO,OLO,ROR) will change into an Eta (s) Particle: s Quark: (ORO,ORO,LOL) anti-s Quark: (OLO, OLO, ROR) by the Direct Weak attack mechanism of the tandem vacuum Particles to change three hinges of one compound Particle at once (OLO <=> ROR, or ORO <=>LOL).
Then after a while, the intermediate (s anti-s) Eta Particle will be changed into the anti-Kano-0, coded: S: (ORO,ORO,LOL) anti-D: (OLO,ROR,ROR,)
Thus it is assumed that the origin of this strange Long and Short Kaon decay mechanism is to find in the difference in transition speed for the LOL Gluon into the ORO Electron (needed to change the d Quark into an s Quark) which is supposed to be faster due to the chirality of the vacuum than the transition speed to change the OLO Positron into the ROR Gluon (needed to change the anti-s Quark into an anti d Quark, to produce the anti Kaon-0 Particle).

see also:  Tomaso Dorigo,  http://www.science20.com/tommaso_dorigo/na62_places_bid_for_future_observation_of_superrare_kaon_decay-231426

CP (T) symmetric universes of Neil Turok.

CP T symmetric universes.

Neil Turok has a new proposal for The symmetric multiverse, with some relation to my  Quantum FFF Theory, ( with only CP symmetry without time reversal)

 For a summary here, and a  longer paper  here.

In my Quantum FFF Model however, the T = Time component is not symmetric because clock are running over there ( in the anti material copy universe) with a left handed rotation opposite to our clocks with right handed rotation.

So the opposite world is CP symmetric including clocks, but not time itself.

See:  A Testable CP Symmetric Multiverse Model by Extended Experiments, Done by the Late Benjamin Libet in 1984.

http://vixra.org/pdf/1704.0003v1.pdf 

Dark Matter black hole systems show less inertia in mergers

The Bullet cluster and Abell 520 Galaxy cluster collision, seem to be examples of the clumping of dark matter systems (=black hole networks of dual Galaxy Anchor black holes ; GABHs) during galaxy passage through the center of the collision.

Galaxies seem to leave behind their Galaxy Anchor Black Holes, ( GABHs),In line with my Quantum FFF model.

Quotation of Wikipedia on Abell 520: “The dark matter collected into a "dark core" containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies hung together.

Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision.

This result could present a challenge to basic theories of dark matter, which predict that galaxies should be anchored to the invisible substance, even during the shock of a collision “

see also: Bullet cluster with central DM core.

So I would postulate that dark matter is related to black holes and second: Dark matter BHs have less inertia effects than fermionic matter.

The Dark Matter absence Mystery of NGC 1052 DF2 solved by triangle grouping of BHs?

By the triangle grouping (instead of dual Herbig Haro grouping) of the Dark Matter Black Hole splinters after the Big Bang nucleus explosion, buried in the centers of the very large Globular clusters. According to Quantum FFF Theory. (I name this: Triple Galaxy Anchor Black Holes:  3xGABHs)
see also: https://www.sciencenews.org/article/dark-matter-mia-strange-galaxy
and: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.10237.pdf
and: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320036172_Splitting_Dark_Matter_Black_Hole_Big_Bang_as_the_Origin_of_Ultra-Energetic-Cosmic-Rays-From_Far-Away

Interesting question: is the largest triangle located in the middle of the two smaller ones?

for the globular clusters, see also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2y79N4W6In8 

Below: 3C75, an example of a 3 tailed radio galaxy as the possible rare example of triple BH pairing?.

Example in Quantum FFF Theory, how BHs can split and pair to form stars and galaxies.

The large masses of early black holes originated by an exploding Dark Matter based Black Hole Big Bang nucleus.

The large masses of early black holes are a Support for the Dark matter black hole spltiing big bang, model of Quantum FFF Theory. see: http://www.sdss.org/press-releases/how-massive/ 
and also: http://vixra.org/pdf/1709.0388v1.pdf
"Splitting Dark Matter Black Hole Big Bang as the Origin of
Ultra-Energetic-Cosmic-Rays-From Far-Away"

Testing the number of universes in Hawking's NEW multiverse.by RP ratios of Benjamin Libet's experiment..

OR: How many universes are hiding in the new Hawking Multiverse?

First see: A Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation? 

by S. W. Hawking and Thomas Hertog  See : https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.07702.pdf

My proposal is 8 or 12 (anti-copy) universes,  all entangled down to each individual ( anti-)copy quantum based on a CP symmetric Big Bang Black Hole explosion according to QuantumFFFTheory. see: http://vixra.org/pdf/1801.0040v2.pdf 

Abstract:

Benjamin Libet measured the so called electric Readiness Potential (RP) time to perform a volitional act, in the brains of his students and the time of conscious awareness (TCA) of that act, which appeared to come 500 m.sec behind the RP.

The “volitional act” was in principle based on the free choice to press an electric switch button.

The results of this experiment gives still an ongoing debate in the broad layers of the scientific community, because the results are still (also in recent experiments) in firm contrast with the expected idea of Free Will and causality.

However I would propose the absurd but constructive possibility that we are not alone for decision making in a multiverse as an individual person, if the Big Bang was a symmetric process !! 
. Even Max Tegmark suggested already about the multiverse: “Is there a copy of you reading this article?”

We could be instant entangled with at least one instant entangled anti-copy person living inside a Charge and Parity symmetric copy Universe.

In that case we could construct a causal explanation for Libet’s strange results.

New statistical differenctial research on RPI and RPII of extended Libet experiments described here should support these ideas as a base for the number of participants ( and even universes) involved.

Wikipedia says: “Democracy is a form of government in which all eligible citizens participate equally”.

Free will in a multiverse seems to be based on: all instant entangled ideas of copy persons living in all CP symmetric copy universes, have the same possibility to Veto an act and participate equally.  

If we are able to “Tap into” those instant entanglement connections” sent out by other people, then even telepathic effects (mind reading) could be explained.
see also:  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323612709_Free_Will_Readiness_Potential_Ratios_the_Key_for_a_Multiverse_Number_Calculation 

.or: http://vixra.org/pdf/1803.0100v1.pdf 
and: http://vixra.org/pdf/1612.0026v3.pdf  

Did Hawking realise that the universe is one part ( one berry) of a CP symmetric raspberry multiverse syructure?

See: A Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation? 

by S. W. Hawking1 and Thomas Hertog

See : https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.07702.pdf

and:

A Consciousness Theory of Everything based on Rigid Transformable Strings, Instantly Entangled Between 8 or 12 CP Symmetric Universal Bubbles.

http://vixra.org/pdf/1801.0040v2.pdf