Golf Training by Multiverse Readiness Potential Interference for Approve or Veto a Golf swing.

Free Will by several Free Veto levels before (Golfing) Action.
Readiness Potential RP I, initiative in one Universe has to be INSTANTLY vetoed or approved by its anti copy Golfer persons living far away inside the entangled copy universes: .7x OR 11x?

Golfing has in contrast with Tennis or other fast sports a longer time for the transactional period.
In tennis sports the quality shot seems to be more based on muscle memory.

see: Democratic Free Will and Telepathy in the Instant Entangled Multiverse.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1612.0026v3.pdf
and: Free Will Readiness Potential Ratios, the Key for a Multiverse Number Calculation.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1803.0100v1.pdf
and:  Testing Proposals for Human Free Will in the Raspberry Multiverse, Local Entanglement and M&M Lightspeed.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1811.0125v1.pdf
and: The Conscious Undivided Multiverse,
http://vixra.org/pdf/1905.0123v2.pdf

John C. Cramer’s TI and the Super Symmetric Deterministic Raspberry MWI with Free Veto.-Free will.

John C. Cramer’s TI and the Super Symmetric Deterministic Raspberry MWI with Free Veto.-Free will of Benjamin Libet.
TI or Transactional Interpretation is found to be fully in line with our daily reality of Free Will or better Free Veto, in a super deterministic clockwork World, as Benjamin Libet proposed and tested in 1984. 
Both Based on the Handshake idea of superluminal entanglement signals between copy universes according to Quantum FFF Theory.

see: Democratic Free Will and Telepathy in the Instant Entangled Multiverse.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1612.0026v3.pdf
and: Free Will Readiness Potential Ratios, the Key for a Multiverse Number Calculation.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1803.0100v1.pdf
and:  Testing Proposals for Human Free Will in the Raspberry Multiverse, Local Entanglement and M&M Lightspeed.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1811.0125v1.pdf
and: The Conscious Undivided Multiverse,
http://vixra.org/pdf/1905.0123v2.pdf

Open letter to John G. Cramer , (4-augustus 2019)

Dear professor Cramer,

I found your interesting paper on TI called:
The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Nonlocality (2015)
At the conclusion you write:
"Is free will possible in such a system? It is our view that it is. Freedom of choice
does not include the freedom to choose to violate physical laws. The transactional
handshakes between present and future are acting to enforce physical laws, and they
restrict the choices between future possibilities only to that extent."

Dear professor, do you still stand for this conclusion?
Or could it be that Benjamin Libets measurements about the Readiness Potential of subjects could lead to a different kind of handshake between Supersymmetric ( CPT) subjects living far away from each other inside the raspberry multiverse.
see my paper: "The Conscious Readiness Potential Ratio Multiverse."
http://vixra.org/pdf/1907.0250v2.pdf
See perhaps also::
"John Cramer’s TI and the Super Symmetric Deterministic Raspberry MWI with Free Veto.-Free will."
https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2019/07/john-cramers-ti-and-super-symmetric.html


Sincerely yours,

Leo Vuyk.

Stop Global warming by geostationary Origami screens.

Stop Global Warming and climat change by local Solar screening of  large Geosynchronous Origami panels each stretched by 6 satellites in star formation, at 35000 km above earth, to form low pressure areas and clouds at sea.
 including semi controlled weather patterns.

According to Quantum FFF Theory.

Former attaempts to deploi sail to use the sun energy. ( mylar sail for space propulsion )

MWI: and the 11 fold connections (dimensions) in our brain for a 12 fold entangled multiverse?

See THIS article

and: https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-copenhagen-interpretation.html

.

The Copenhagen interpretation reinvented with support of Benjamin Libet.

NEUROSCIENCE beats QUANTUM MECHANICS.

QUANTUM MECHANICS explained by NEUROSCIENCE !!

The Observer- Subject/ object relation of the Copenhagen interpretation reinvented, without half dead/living  Cats and leading to an Entangled Raspberry shaped Multiverse with 8 or 12 entangled CP symmetric universal bubbles (or berries)
see: "The Conscious Readiness Potential Ratio Multiverse"
http://vixra.org/pdf/1907.0250v2.pdf
and : The Conscious Undivided Multiverse.
http://vixra.org/abs/1905.0123

Conclusion:  there are always more observers (80%) RPII, to follow -by entanglement at universal distances- the initiative of RPI = observed (<20%).

Benjamin Libet found indications for the entangled 8 or12 fold Entangled Raspberry Multiverse already in 1983, by his RPI-RPII splitting measurements combined with a 20-80% splitting found later by Trevena and Miller .see: Free Will Readiness Potential Ratios, the Key for a Multiverse Number Calculation.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1803.0100v1.pdf
see also: 
The 11 fold connections in our brain:

The Benjamin Libet discovered two different Readiness Potentials (RPI and RPII: INTERPRETED by me, AS THE  OBJECT AND SUBJECT separated FAR AWAY from each other, but entangled from the start of the big bang inside different  CP symmetric COPY UNIVERSES) .
Libet did not Notice the ratio constancy, other did notice them later. with an average  20-80% result for RPI respectively. RPII see Trevena and Miller ( <20%) : http://vixra.org/pdf/1803.0100v1.pdf

Former essays about Consciousness in the  Multiverse
Free Will Readiness Potential Ratios, the Key for a Multiverse Number Calculation.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1803.0100v1.pdf
Democratic Free Will and Telepathy in the Instant Entangled Multiverse.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1612.0026v3.pdf

Wikipedia about MWI and Copenhagen interpretation:
 Some versions of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics proposed a process of "collapse" in which an indeterminate quantum system would probabilistically collapse down onto, or select, just one determinate outcome to "explain" this phenomenon of observation. Wavefunction collapse was widely regarded as artificial and ad hoc^{[citation needed]}, so an alternative interpretation in which the behavior of measurement could be understood from more fundamental physical principles was considered desirable.

Everett's Ph.D. work provided such an alternative interpretation. Everett stated that for a composite system – for example a subject (the "observer" or measuring apparatus) observing an object (the "observed" system, such as a particle) – the statement that either the observer or the observed has a well-defined state is meaningless; in modern parlance, the observer and the observed have become entangled; 
(which i.m.o. was the key invention of Everett)
we can only specify the state of one relative to the other, i.e., the state of the observer and the observed are correlated after the observation is made. This led Everett to derive from the unitary, deterministic dynamics alone (i.e., without assuming wavefunction collapse) the notion of a relativity of states.

However, i.m.o. the Key question should be: Are we human observers entangled with that Cat in the  box during opening of the box experiment?
OR: do we live inside a fixed number of entangled SuSy parallel ( anti matter) universes, with large distant entangled susy copy cat in boxes, with 50% chance for entangled atomic decay.?
However we have to accept a superluminal entanglement connection between the susy copy experimental systems (at universal distances) around the box.
And that is the problem.  Einstein did not accept superluminal signalling! or spooky action at a distance.