Quantum FFF Rigid String Theory ( FFF= Function Follws string Form)

QUANTUM FFF topological STRING THEORY and the Fermion Propeller.
http://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk
https://www.flickr.com/photos_user.gne?
path=&nsid=93308747%40N05&page=&details=1

If the big bang was the splitting of a huge Axion/ Higgs particle Dark Matter Black Hole (ELISIUM DM- BH) nucleus into smaller DM-BH nuclei, then no standard Fermion/ Baryon inflation has happened only the DM-BH based Lyman alpha forest equipped with local Herbig Haro star/galaxy creating systems.

All black holes of all sizes (down to ball lightning) seem to be equipped with a Fermion repelling- and plasma producing horizon, which has also a charge splitting effect into a negative (outside) and positive ( inside) zone ( see oriental basin of the moon) .Conclusion, all Bhs are: "Negative Charged Electric Dark Matter Black Holes" with a rigid open string sector with intrinsic 3x hinging curvature.

Tuesday, August 09, 2016

Strange star KIC8462852 with sphere of Sunspot BHs resembles the vast sphere of BHs in Milky Way

According to Quantum FFF Model, sunspots are micro black holes, ( BHs killing stars) which could even resemble the "vast sphere of observed black holes in center of the Milky way, ( and other galaxies) which seem to kill star production.
see:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/07/nasa-our-milky-way-galaxy-is-embedded.html
and:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/08/strange-star-kic8462852-under-extra.html
and:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/albums/72157645714672412
As a consequence I suggest, that only Herbig Haro (based on dual BH) systems are able to repell Fermions and more complex BH systems are not able to form HH systems with star production and even able to eat Fermions, due to the complexity of the Higgs field between the two BHs.
Butterfly curves depicted in ( 2D) cross section of the (3D) oscillating dark energy push Higgs vacuum lattice. 






Monday, August 08, 2016

Strange star KIC8462852 under extra large sunspot black hole destruction?

According to Quantum FFF Model sunspots are the same as new physics " electric dark matter black holes"
see: http://vixra.org/pdf/1402.0044v4.pdf 
The Impossible Electric Dark Matter Black Hole as the Origin of New Physics even for Comets like 67P,C-G.

Below: Photometry of KIC8462852 as measured by Kepler data. The analysis reveals a slow but steady decrease in the star’s luminosity for about 1000 days, followed by a period of more rapid decline. Image: Montet & Simon 2016.
http://gizmodo.com/the-so-called-alien-megastructure-just-got-even-more-my-1784883811?utm_medium=sharefromsite&utm_source=Gizmodo_facebook 
also: https://www.academia.edu/25189003/Electric_Dark_Matter_Black_Holes_Outside_and_Inside_Galaxies_are_respectively_responsible_for_the_creation_and_contraction_of_a_Cyclic_Universe
see also:
How to kill a galaxy.
"Red Geysers " --Previously Unknown Phenomenon Discovered Killing Off Galaxies of the Universe
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/07/a-new-black-hole-paradigm-supported-by.html
How we could interpret such a process of star destruction by over sized sunspots?
According to Quantum FFF model, new paradigm black holes repel Fermions if there are no other black hole nearby.
In case of galaxy centers and older stars crowded with sunspot BHs , those BHs could probably change into Fermion eating black holes by the complex polarization of the Higgs vacuum lattice.
Fermion repelling BHs are supposed to repel Fermions by their polarization potential of propeller shaped Fermions.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1502.0086v3.pdf 

Tuesday, August 02, 2016

How to teach special relativity ( John Bell seems right) with aether related Lorentz contraction and propeller fermions!!


Lorentz contraction effect of each electron shell around a pear shaped nucleus. 
Propeller shaped Fermions are responsible for the act of contraction by plowing into the tetrahedron oscillating Higgs field!
For the origin of pear shaped nuclei (ellipsoid) according to Quantum FFF Theory, see:'
"Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, chapter 9:
"How to teach special relativity" (p. 67-80)
http://ebooks.cambridge.org/chapter.jsf?bid=CBO9780511815676&cid=CBO9780511815676A018
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/07/pear-shaped-atom-nuclei-sem-to-point.html
and:
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-36597142?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link
Dr Scheck says: "We've found these nuclei literally point towards a ( fixed) direction in space. This relates to a direction in time, proving there's a well-defined direction in time and we will always travel from past to present."
He says: "Further, the protons enrich in the bump of the pear and create a specific charge distribution in the nucleus.
Conclusion, according to Quantum FFF Model:  the electron shell around the nucleus will contract along the central axis of the pear shaped nucleus.
The result ;  contraction of the atom sphere and thus contraction into the absolute direction of flight against the energetic oscillating vacuum lattice.


Now we should imagine what happens at the electron shell.
The opposite effect must be working to form an spheroid shaped electron shell.
 Spheroid =Ellipsoid of revolution, see image.


Pear shaped atomic nuclei is reason to assume John Bell was right!
With Lorentz contraction in special relativity.
The atom nucleus is an ellipsoid with elongated central axis.
The electron shell is a spheroid with shortened central axis, according to the Quantum FFF Model.

Propeller shaped Fermions, polarized into the direction of absolute motion through the vacuum reference frame, are pushed from behind as compensation for their resistance!
How does the Fermion know its polarization to keep? by instant entanglement with their copy Fermions of 11 other universes!
Even Bohm and Vigier was in the right direction!
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/01/salam-vigier-bell-bohm-and-feynman-form.html 






Sunday, July 31, 2016

A double Stern Gerlach experiment and Bertlemann's socks and more

To solve the Q.M. problem described by J.S.Bell about the standard Stern Gerlach experiment.
Experiment proposal to support the existence of a new kind of Entanglement, which should show up inside a double Stern Gerlach experiment with two S-G magnets with different orientation.
The proposal for this experiment, is based on the hypothesis that all heated and vaporized silver atoms inside the silver oven are entangled as a whole and that magnetic measurement of one atom travelling outside the oven influences the magnetic polarity of all the other atoms in the oven.
If the oven sends the silver atoms (by shutters) alternately to the two magnets, then the resulting impact pattern on both screens will show an additional BAR in the middle of the original impact pattern.
This could be the explanation for the fact that only up and down orientated atoms should enter into the S-G magnet to explain the “non smearing” effect on the screen.
John S. Bell described his doubts about the Stern Gerlach experiment interpretation in his book: “Speakable and unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics on chapter 16 ( Bertlemann's socks) page 140-141.
 John Bell argued that there is no logic to be found behind the fact, that there is a so called “absence of smearing” of the particle impact pattern on the screen.




Alternative double Stern Gerlach experiment to measure possible entanglement polarization effects between vaporized silver atoms outside respectivily inside the silver oven.
The result could give answeres about locality and Bell’s surprize that there was no smearing of impacts on the screen observed between between the upper and lower bar.

If the oven sends the silver atoms in small groups in alternation to opposite magnets, then the resulting impact pattern on the screen will show an additional bar in the middle.
This will support the idea that each measurement of an atom will change the polarisation of all the silver atoms at rest in the oven into 50/50 percent groups with aligned up or down polarisation. According to Quantum FFF Model.

Other experiments.


next : axion inflation and Big Bang black hole splitting.