How you become a real radical rebel questioning relativity.

IMHO you are a real radical rebel if you go back to the start of relativity and dig deeper than Einstein did.
Then you have to question the constancy of the lightspeed and even the Fitzgerald contraction descibed by John Bell in "How to teach special relativity"
It was Abdus Salam who proposed that quarks and leptons should have a sub-quantum level structure, and that they are compound hardrock particles with a specific non-zero sized form.
Jean Paul Vigier postulated that quarks and leptons are "pushed around" by an energetic sea of vacuum particles.
David Bohm suggested in contrast with The "Copenhagen interpretation", that reality is not created by the eye of the human observer, and second: elementary particles should be "guided
by a pilot wave".
John Bell argued that the motion of mass related to the surrounding vacuum reference frame, should originate real
"Lorentz-transformations", and also real relativistic measurable contraction.
Richard Feynman postulated the idea of an all pervading energetic quantum vacuum.
He rejected it, because it should originate resistance for every mass in motion, relative to the reference frame of the quantum vacuum.
However, I postulate the strange and counter intuitive possibility, that this resistance for mass in motion, can be compensated, if we combine the ideas of Vigier, Bell, Bohm and Salam, and
a new dual universal Bohmian "pilot wave", which is interpreted as the EPR correlation (or Big Bang entanglement) between individual elementary anti-mirror particles, living in dual
universes. see:
The O‘Connell Effect in Eclipsing Binaries Explained by Mass Related Light Speed Extinction Distances (Lasof) of Stars and Even Planets.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1409.0164v2.pdf

If the orbits of close binary stars are circular, and the light speed is NOT influenced by the speed of the stars, we have to expect that the light curves are symmetrical between moments
of eclipse or even conjunction.
However, This is mostly not the case and still an ongoing debate in astronomy and called the “O ‘Connell effect”.
According to Quantum FFF Theory, however I assume that the local light speed around the  stars is gravity related for a mass related distance from the source (star) called LASOF
ellipsoid, (Local Asymmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
As a result the so called O ‘Connell effect can easily be explained as a logic result of  additional redshift or blueshift by the local lightspeed variation.
At the same time also planets should show such lightspeed extinction effects, which is already measured but not understood by I.I.Shapiro (see “radar astronomy” edition by Evans and
Hagfors, 1964).
see Also: Experiments to determine the mass related Lightspeed extinction volume around the Earth and around spinning objects in the Lab.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1102.0056v2.pdf

Different headed Egyptian anthropomorphic figures, and the Anthropic principle.

Different headed Egyptian anthropomorphic figures, as indication that the Anthropic principle is probably not Universal, as support for an Encephalic or cerebral principle.

see also: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/08/the-antropic-principle-should-change.html

The ANTHROPIC principle should change into ENCEPHALIC principle.

The ANTHROPIC principle should be changed into what I would call ENCEPHALIC (brain) principle.
So, not humans but complexity of brains (the frontal cortex) seem to be cruxial for the survival of species.
According to My Quantum FFF model ( Function Follows Form) the Frontal Cortex of all animals, is supposed to be responsible for the length of the VETO time period (Human=400 msec.Benjamin .Libet) related to each initiative to come to a decision/action inside the idential anti-copy (instant entangled mirror symmetrical) multiverse raspberry bubbles.
Secondly: The fundamental laws of physics take the particular form we observe because all particles and forces are dependent on different sub quantum particle shapes.

IMHO, it could be postulated that the Einstein Rosen (ER) “bridging wormholes” between entangled particles are the guiding channels .for Einstein Podolski and Rosen (EPR) non local entanglement even at universal distances.
So; ER=EPR in the Multiverse and in the lab
My Supersymmetric Multiverse interpretation of quantum mechanics is based on the idea that
NOT ALL POSSIBLE ALTERNATE HISTORIES of OUR UNIVERSE need to exist if there is instant mirror symmetrical wavefunction collapse in at least two distant (Charge and Parity) mirror symmetric universes.
So I postulate that ALL POSSIBLE ALTERNATE HISTORIES of OUR MULTIVERSE
exist because there is instant mirror symmetrical wavefunction collapse in at least two distant (Charge and Parity) mirror symmetric universes.
Then all alternate histories exist but have the same anti-copy mirror result (inside different
charged anti-copy universes).
Dual entangled Cats and anti-Cats in both universes, die or live instantly (superpositioned) without looking at them: they (the nuclear decay trigger) look to each other by long distant instant! Quantum entanglement.
see: 
ER=EPR in the Supersymmetric Cyclic Multiverse and in the lab without strange Cats.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1604.0229v1.pdf 
and: 
Democratic Free Will in the Instant Entangled Multiverse.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1401.0071v2.pdf 
and:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/08/inside-supersymmetric-multiversal.html 
and: 
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/08/no-lhc-particle-susy-means-multiverse.html 

Conclusion: Humans could not be the only intelligent species in the multiverse..

No New Physics by the LHC but by DIGGING UP OLD IDEAS..

The LHC new physics failure could be reason to go back to the beginning, some thoughts
It was Abdus Salam who proposed that quarks and leptons should have a sub-quantum level structure, and that they are compound hardrock particles with a specific non-zero sized form.
Jean Paul Vigier postulated that quarks and leptons are "pushed around" by an energetic sea of vacuum particles.
David Bohm suggested in contrast with The "Copenhagen interpretation", that reality is not created by the eye of the human observer, and second: elementary particles should be "guided by a pilot wave".
John Bell argued that the motion of mass related to the surrounding vacuum reference frame, should originate real
"Lorentz-transformations", and also real relativistic measurable contraction.
Richard Feynman postulated the idea of an all pervading energetic quantum vacuum. He rejected it, because it should originate resistance for every mass in motion, relative to the reference frame of the quantum vacuum.
However, I postulate the strange and counter intuitive possibility, that this resistance for mass in motion, can be compensated, if we combine the ideas of Vigier, Bell, Bohm and Salam, and a new dual universal Bohmian "pilot wave", which is interpreted as the EPR correlation (or Big Bang entanglement) between individual elementary anti-mirror particles, living in dual universes.
See my poster collection for the Quantum FFF Model ( Function Follows Form at the Planck scale)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/albums/72157652141594655
and http://vixra.org/pdf/1604.0229v1.pdf

Strange star KIC8462852 with sphere of Sunspot BHs resembles the vast sphere of BHs in Milky Way

According to Quantum FFF Model, sunspots are micro black holes, ( BHs killing stars) which could even resemble the "vast sphere of observed black holes in center of the Milky way, ( and other galaxies) which seem to kill star production.
see:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/07/nasa-our-milky-way-galaxy-is-embedded.html
and:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/08/strange-star-kic8462852-under-extra.html
and:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/albums/72157645714672412
As a consequence I suggest, that only Herbig Haro (based on dual BH) systems are able to repell Fermions and more complex BH systems are not able to form HH systems with star production and even able to eat Fermions, due to the complexity of the Higgs field between the two BHs.

Butterfly curves depicted in ( 2D) cross section of the (3D) oscillating dark energy push Higgs vacuum lattice. 

Strange star KIC8462852 under extra large sunspot black hole destruction?

According to Quantum FFF Model sunspots are the same as new physics " electric dark matter black holes"
see: http://vixra.org/pdf/1402.0044v4.pdf 
The Impossible Electric Dark Matter Black Hole as the Origin of New Physics even for Comets like 67P,C-G.

Below: Photometry of KIC8462852 as measured by Kepler data. The analysis reveals a slow but steady decrease in the star’s luminosity for about 1000 days, followed by a period of more rapid decline. Image: Montet & Simon 2016.
http://gizmodo.com/the-so-called-alien-megastructure-just-got-even-more-my-1784883811?utm_medium=sharefromsite&utm_source=Gizmodo_facebook 
also: https://www.academia.edu/25189003/Electric_Dark_Matter_Black_Holes_Outside_and_Inside_Galaxies_are_respectively_responsible_for_the_creation_and_contraction_of_a_Cyclic_Universe
see also:
How to kill a galaxy.
"Red Geysers " --Previously Unknown Phenomenon Discovered Killing Off Galaxies of the Universe
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/07/a-new-black-hole-paradigm-supported-by.html

How we could interpret such a process of star destruction by over sized sunspots?
According to Quantum FFF model, new paradigm black holes repel Fermions if there are no other black hole nearby.
In case of galaxy centers and older stars crowded with sunspot BHs , those BHs could probably change into Fermion eating black holes by the complex polarization of the Higgs vacuum lattice.
Fermion repelling BHs are supposed to repel Fermions by their polarization potential of propeller shaped Fermions.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1502.0086v3.pdf 

My Vixra paper summary plus Flickr poster series.

See:
http://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk
Posters:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/
and Facebook info:
https://www.facebook.com/leo.vuyk

see also:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/01/salam-vigier-bell-bohm-and-feynman-form.html

How to teach special relativity ( John Bell seems right) with aether related Lorentz contraction and propeller fermions!!

Lorentz contraction effect of each electron shell around a pear shaped nucleus. 
Propeller shaped Fermions are responsible for the act of contraction by plowing into the tetrahedron oscillating Higgs field!
For the origin of pear shaped nuclei (ellipsoid) according to Quantum FFF Theory, see:'
"Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, chapter 9:
"How to teach special relativity" (p. 67-80)
http://ebooks.cambridge.org/chapter.jsf?bid=CBO9780511815676&cid=CBO9780511815676A018
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/07/pear-shaped-atom-nuclei-sem-to-point.html
and:
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-36597142?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link
Dr Scheck says: "We've found these nuclei literally point towards a ( fixed) direction in space. This relates to a direction in time, proving there's a well-defined direction in time and we will always travel from past to present."
He says: "Further, the protons enrich in the bump of the pear and create a specific charge distribution in the nucleus.
Conclusion, according to Quantum FFF Model:  the electron shell around the nucleus will contract along the central axis of the pear shaped nucleus.
The result ;  contraction of the atom sphere and thus contraction into the absolute direction of flight against the energetic oscillating vacuum lattice.


Now we should imagine what happens at the electron shell.
The opposite effect must be working to form an spheroid shaped electron shell.
 Spheroid =Ellipsoid of revolution, see image.

Pear shaped atomic nuclei is reason to assume John Bell was right!
With Lorentz contraction in special relativity.
The atom nucleus is an ellipsoid with elongated central axis.

The electron shell is a spheroid with shortened central axis, according to the Quantum FFF Model.

Propeller shaped Fermions, polarized into the direction of absolute motion through the vacuum reference frame, are pushed from behind as compensation for their resistance!

How does the Fermion know its polarization to keep? by instant entanglement with their copy Fermions of 11 other universes!
Even Bohm and Vigier was in the right direction!
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/01/salam-vigier-bell-bohm-and-feynman-form.html 

A double Stern Gerlach experiment and Bertlemann's socks and more

To solve the Q.M. problem described by J.S.Bell about the standard Stern Gerlach experiment.
Experiment proposal to support the existence of a new kind of Entanglement, which should show up inside a double Stern Gerlach experiment with two S-G magnets with different orientation.
The proposal for this experiment, is based on the hypothesis that all heated and vaporized silver atoms inside the silver oven are entangled as a whole and that magnetic measurement of one atom travelling outside the oven influences the magnetic polarity of all the other atoms in the oven.
If the oven sends the silver atoms (by shutters) alternately to the two magnets, then the resulting impact pattern on both screens will show an additional BAR in the middle of the original impact pattern.
This could be the explanation for the fact that only up and down orientated atoms should enter into the S-G magnet to explain the “non smearing” effect on the screen.
John S. Bell described his doubts about the Stern Gerlach experiment interpretation in his book: “Speakable and unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics on chapter 16 ( Bertlemann's socks) page 140-141.
 John Bell argued that there is no logic to be found behind the fact, that there is a so called “absence of smearing” of the particle impact pattern on the screen.

Alternative double Stern Gerlach experiment to measure possible entanglement polarization effects between vaporized silver atoms outside respectivily inside the silver oven.
The result could give answeres about locality and Bell’s surprize that there was no smearing of impacts on the screen observed between between the upper and lower bar.

If the oven sends the silver atoms in small groups in alternation to opposite magnets, then the resulting impact pattern on the screen will show an additional bar in the middle.
This will support the idea that each measurement of an atom will change the polarisation of all the silver atoms at rest in the oven into 50/50 percent groups with aligned up or down polarisation. According to Quantum FFF Model.

Other experiments.

next : axion inflation and Big Bang black hole splitting. 

Magical Saturn temporary spokes explained by dual micro Black Hole lighthouse effect.

NASA: There is no commonly accepted theory for the creation of spokes. Some ideas suggest that spokes result from meteoroid impacts onto the rings; others suggest that they are created by instability in Saturn's magnetic field, which surrounds the planet, near the rings. Whatever the cause, imaging team members will study the new spoke images and maintain their vigil for additional spoke sightings.
http://www.universetoday.com/401/saturns-ring-spokes-are-back/  Temporary spokes at the rings of Saturn are a mystery for NASA. (see text) Quantum FFF Theory offers a suggestion: Lighthouse pencil gravity effect by dual alignment of internal Cometary black holes inside Saturn.
Such pencil gravity effects are also supposed to be active around the sun ( by dual aligned sunspots) and all other planets (Earth) and moons (Enceladus) vulnerable for crashing comets. ( See flyby anomaly )https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/15553800153 

The Great Red Spot of Jupiter is a persistent anticyclonic storm, ploughing against the storm direction. Indicating that these cometary black holes (new paradigm!) are deeper located. For Saturn this is also an indication how the lighthouse pencil shaped gravity based on dual aligned black holes could work out.see:  see: 
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a3/790106-0203_Voyager_58M_to_31M_reduced.gif 
see also:
http://vixra.org/pdf/1603.0240v1.pdf 

Perhaps also involved : The missing ceres crater problem:

see: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/07/160726122956.htm 

see for gravity lensing also; https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/albums/72157658993403568 

Supernova velocity differences by pencil / lighthouse gravity effects of starspot alignment.

Earth Weather Jet Stream influenced (Rossby) by Solar Lighthouse Pencil gravity waves with gravitating Sunspot alignment origin.

See also vertical spokes on earth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPi5JlS_XFk