the differences between Small and Larger ( older) micro Comet nuclei

This video shows us that there seems to be differences between large (older)  and small micro Comet nuclei after splitting one small nucleus, 
The smaller nucleus takes a different direction probably due to the assumption that is did not have already a massive shell of ice around the nucleus and as a result it point its plasma tail away from the local wind direction pushing the nucleus against the wind!
Also seems clear that the small nucleus produces no visible gas/ plasma tail already .

How to Make Stable Ball Lightning or Sprite Quantum Knots for ZPE energy and Hydrogen harvest?

My proposal: 3 and 4x interconnected rigid  string knots (massive Higgs) as start for stable ball lightning?

Several ball lightning photos seem to indicate that EM interference from three directions is able to create unstable but light generating  string knots as suggested by the next image.

However according to the Q- FFF Model even quantum knots with  4x EM strings are able to form quantum knot models with a stiff bonding. ( see first image)

Based on my former posters with negative charged black holes (outside) and positive charge at the globular inside: for zpe energy creation.

This video shows us that there seems to be differences between large and small micro Comet nuclei after splitting one small nucleus, 
The smaller nucleus takes a different direction probably due to the assumption that is did not have already a massive shell of ice around the nucleus and as a result it point its plasma tail away from the local wind direction pushing the nucleus against the wind!
Also seems clear that the small nucleus produces no visible gas/ plasma tail already .

see:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puFBnUsqVIg

4x Black Hole Horizon positions A,B,C and D

A= Fermion polarization or Repel/Attraction shift boundary. B= Hydrogen Plasma and Proton Construction site for D and U quarks. C= Fermion DE-Polarisation  or Repel/ Attraction shift boundary. D= Photon and vacuum COLLIDER concentration  zone for pair production.

ll black hole nuclei are assumed to be negative charged from the outside and positive charged from the inside. At location B protons and electrons should merge to form real hydrogen plasma, expelled as observed at dual Cygnus A  hotspots and even interference B.Hole based Ball Lightning.                    According to Quantum Function Follows Form Theory.

Super-Nova Nebula related to dual or quadruple primordial external Black Hole structure.

Different Super Nova shapes are created around two star types: A:  Stars with distant “dual or quadruple Stellar Anchor Black Holes” assumed to be located in the center of a former open star cluster.   ( SN1987, NGC2440, Crab Nebula) 

B: stars without an external SABH system. (SN1572)     Our sun is equipped with two sunspot rings assumed to be of type A, with two external SABHs, (see below),  according to Quantum Function Follows Form Theory.

see also:  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316968220_A_different_Black_Hole_Horizon_Interpretation_leading_to_Entropy_Reduction_and_Violation_of_the_Second_Law

see also: gas planet expelled by the sun as remnant of the mother star of an open star cluster. https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2015/10/new-giant-gas-planet-expelled-by-sun.html 

A different Black Hole Horizon Interpretation leading to Entropy Reduction and Violation of the Second Law.

Abstract,

According to Function Follows Form Theory,

Hawking mathematics of a black hole horizon should be interpreted differently.

Too weird to be true?

My conclusion is that 

Stephen Hawking is still too anxious to admit that the splitting of positive mass ( going out) and negative mass (going in) at the black hole horizon should lead to violation of the second law of thermodynamics , by entropy decrease!!

 So, the Hawking mathematics of a black hole horizon should be interpreted differently.

All Fermions (with positive mass) should be repelled at one of the fermion repelling horizons with positive or negative charge!

As a result, each black hole is assumed to have a globular shell of positron and proton based plasma at the inside and a negative electron based plasma shell outside this positive shell.

The ingoing negative mass (suggested by Hawking) could be interpreted as the anti material entangled copy symmetric shadow partners popping up into  distant entangled anti material copy universes and the origin of the interference effect in a one photon double split experiment as suggested by David Bohm..

If we include existence of small interference black holes (or Quantum Knots) then Ball lightning and micro comets ( including Comets and sunspots) are to be explained as micro black holes violating the second law of thermodynamics.  

The FORM and MICROSTRUCTURE of elementary particles, is supposed to be the origin of FUNCTIONAL differences between Higgs- Graviton- Photon- and Fermion particles. As a consequence, a NEW splitting, accelerating and pairing MASSLESS BLACK HOLE, able to convert vacuum energy (ZPE) into real energy by entropy decrease, seems to be able to explain quick Galaxy- and Star formation, down to Sunspots, (Micro) Comets, Lightning bolts, Sprites and Elves, Sprite Fireballs and Ball Lightning. Recently the NASA-SOHO satellite photos showed clear evidence of multiple hotspots created at the solar surface by interference .  I assume that the majority of the hotspots can be compared with Micro Comet- or fireball phenomena related to Sprites

Should we take Inflation after a Big Bang idea serious?

IMHO, if we take the CMB energy over-densities serious,  we could postulate, that the big bang was the symmetric  splitting and evaporation of huge string based nucleus into smaller splinter black holes.

However it seems to be also a logic assumption that it was the result of a big crunch, so the result of a bouncing multiverse.

As a consequence however the Hubble redshift should have an alternative origin. See:

The Alternative Origin of Hubble Redshift : Vacuum Absorption by black holes as a Support for Quantum Dipole Repeller Gravity and a Contracting Universe.  
See: 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316877659_A_different_Black_Hole_Horizon_Interpretation_leading_to_Entropy_Reduction_and_Violation_of_the_Second_Law

The Beginning and End of Time.
Multiverse cycle time versus quantities of mass carrying particles, Dark Matter Black Hole particles and Dark Energy Oscillating Vacuum Lattice (Axion Higgs field) particles. All particles and fields are assumed to be based on rigid string paticles. Negative and Positive charged Fermions should have propeller shapes with opposite pitch.
A: The end of matter based time. (Big Crunch) All rigid string matter is through merger Super Nova black holes concentrated into one BH nucleus, which is compressed by the remaining-but absorbing- deluting-dark energy vacuum. If the deluted vacuum pressure comes into equilibrium with the total internal string tension of the nucleus, the Big Bang BH splits symmetrical into 8 or 12 entangled BH nuclei.
B:The beginning of matter based time and the splitting of the Big Bang Black Hole string nucleus into series of minor secondary primordial BHs, building the fractal shaped Lyman Alpha Forest and the start of dual pairing BHs into primordial Herbig Haro systems with vast galaxy formation in  between. 
All New physics BHs (even micro interference BHs) are postulated to create not only pair production at the horizon, but even entire protons. (plasma)
C: The end of primary Big Bang black hole splitting and the end of vacuum expansion (vacuum inflation)
D: The Total number of particles during the cycle process is constant. 

According to the Quantum Function Follows Form model.