The origin of “dead” galaxies:

The origin of “dead” galaxies according to Quantum FFF Theory, is assumed to be based on very stable external dark matter black hole configuration with a growing internal central dark matter black hole, growing by smaller black hole mergers (not by Fermion merger mass) and absence of neighboring galaxy merger potential.                 

According to Quantum FFF Theory, early Galaxies have growing potential by the number and size of external primordial dark matter black holes initially formed as big bang splinters able to pair into Herbig Haro star-galaxy systems, which can merge with others. 

If no galaxy merger candidates are available in the neighborhood, the galaxy will soon reach a maximum size and die.  Some Elliptic galaxies die also by reaching maximum merger potential. see also: 
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317936473_The_Origin_of_Dead_Galaxies 

 

See: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/06/170621145150.htm
"By combining the power of a 'natural lens' in space with the capability of NASA's Hubble Space Telescope, astronomers made a surprising discovery -- the first example of a compact yet massive, fast-spinning, disk-shaped galaxy that stopped making stars only a few billion years after the big bang"

Below: Poster with configuration examples of paired dark matter black holes.

Mass in Motion According to Quantum FFF Theory.

According to Quantum FFF Theory, stable Polarized propeller shaped Fermions (Nuclear Quarks) are supposed to be the origin of stable non accelerated motion through the resistive oscillating vacuum (Axion) Higgs field.

Recent observations in the LHC do support the idea of  Fermion polarization into a constant specific space based direction, which could support the idea of a constant battle between a resistive vacuum and polarized spinning propeller shaped Fermions pushed forward by the same vacuum at the same time to compensate the resistance.

Even a so called Lorentz Fitzgerald contraction seem to be the logic result, which was described by John Bell in his essay: “How to Teach Special Relativity”

The recently observed Axial symmetric pear shaped atom Barium nuclei ( LHC) are an extra support for the atomic interaction with a new massless oscillating Axion-Higgs vacuum reference frame postulated by Quantum FFF Theory.

John S. Bell was Right: “How to Teach Special Relativity” and atomic pear shaped contraction.

see also:

https://www.academia.edu/33602082/Mass_in_Motion_according_to_Quantum_FFF_Theory

Magnetic Monopole Test to Demonstrate the Existence of a Anti Maxwell Dead Zone around a current in a wire..

Abstract.

According to Quantum FFF Theory (Function Follows Form at the quantum level) the

magnetic quantum field has always TWO different shaped monopole vector components: a

North- and a South vector field component.

This is comparable with the electric Quantum field, equipped with Plus and Minus vector components but it is in contrast with all other quantum fields like the neutrino- gravity-or x-gamma ray field.

See: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317719169_Magnetic_Monopole_Test_to_Demonstrate_the_Existence_of_a_Anti_Maxwell_Dead_Zone_around_a_current_in_a_wire

After interference of the magnetic wave with a real spinning propeller shaped Fermion

particle, TWO real monopole magnetic photon particle based waves from opposite direction

will collapse and come to life as two real rigid shaped photons, as the result of two individual

mutated oscillating Higgs field particles from the vacuum.

These photons should do the magnetic job by interlocking temporarily with the Fermion, and give the Fermion a push to the left respectively a push to the right fully in line and according to the Lorentz force law.

However, based on observation of iron filing-powder patterns close to direct currents in a

wire, it is assumed that these monopole ( N+S) particle/ wave dualities travel only locally

parallel to each other without a magnetic field effect inside the Higgs field.

This in contrast with the natural opposing curvature of the so called B field. .As a result, the

magnetic field strength- created by the wire itself-locally drops down to zero, with a up to

zero reduced Lorentz force on the iron filing atoms.

As a consequence, this is in contradiction with Maxwell’s magnetic field law around an

electric direct current wire and I call it the “tubular local magnetic dropping zone” ( dead

zone) around the electric wire, which can be used for reaction less drive propulsion and

Levitation in combination with different forms of strong tubular or spiral magnets.

Magnet optimization is suggested to form spiral configurations of high performance magnet

plating with spiraling electric coils in between.

The Lorentz force created on the wire by the static magnetic field of the tubular or spiral

magnet (s) is supposed to be the only force in the system, by the absence of a reaction force

on the magnet due to the local magnetic dropping zone.

Three circular anti-Maxwell propulsion systems in triangle configuration, should be enough

to create stable piloting and flight Experiments with coiled magnetized iron tubes has

already shown this new physics reaction less propulsion effect.

Dual waltzing dwarfs or paring micro black holes?

Dual Waltzing dwarfs seem to be  pairing micro black holes to form a Herbig haro system with ( failed) star ( or brown dwarf) formation in between. 
According to Quantum FFF Theory, only (micro) black holes produce plasma which form elongated tails pushing the BHs away from local massive objects. 
However in contrast BHs seem to be also attracted to each other like these two and tend to form Herbig Haro systems with star formation or dwarf formation in between.

see also: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/06/170609193102.htm 

Pairing micro Black Holes according to the Quantum FFF Model. below: 

Plasma tails propelling former starspots ( globules) in the Helix nebula.

Even proplyds seem to have comparable pushing tails.

Proplyds are not young planets, but young black holes accelerated by plasma tails.

According to Quantum FFF Theory,
Proplyds should be young molecular ( ejected star spot) black holes accelerated by plasma tails.
Proto planetary discs, show mostly a tail and seem to be in motion in opposite direction of that tail.

Why because most proplyds show strong resemblance with some Helix "proplyds". and we know that the Helix nebula is the result of a star explosion  see image:

For comparison, see the Orion proplyds below:

.In addition, The Spire / Eagle nebula is a good example of splitting and merging young starspot black holes merging into small ( micro) Herbig Haro systems producing often red dwarfs or even failed stars.
as the next Bok globule image shows.

black hole acceleration by plasma tails combined with the pairing and Herbig haro splitting process below:

The origin of micro molecular black holes as exploded ( ejected) star spot black holes.
Star spots however are assumed to be the result of crashed Comets in the former star.

Clockwork Composite Higgs Models

Clockwork Composite Higgs Models based on internal 3x rotation of the Higgs torus as rigid strings.
Topological proposal for most particles.
see also: 
https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Composite_Higgs_models 

Unstable dark matter particles made up by deformed massless Axion/ Higgs vacuum strings (coded OOO) assumed to be the origin of dark energy and emerging gravity. According to Quantum FFF theory.
So: The LHC ( 125 GeV) Higgs is an unstable dark matter black hole particle.

The Axion/Higgs field vacuum particle ( the virgin mother torus) however is supposed to be massless.

Smooth Big Bang or Black Hole Splitting?

A non smooth big bang  should  be a symmetric string based black hole nucleus explosion, into ever more exponentially smaller BHs and a tetrahedron based vacuum with variable Planck length edges.
 see: https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/34445454512/in/album-72157639797727585/

https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/albums/72157639797727585

see also: http://motls.blogspot.nl/2017/06/turoks-bogus-criticism-of-hartle.html

The recent 2017 Black hole merger (LIGO GW 170104) seems to Fill the gap.

Could LIGO project also be the start to explain Gamma Ray Bursts of small black holes?
The recent 2017 Black hole merger (GW 170104) seems to Fill the gap between the two former merger black holes, which  raise the question what BH mass upper- and lower boundaries and BH  ratios we could expect?

See: http://motls.blogspot.nl/2017/06/ligo-announces-new-gravitational-wave.html

 Could it even explain the Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) conundrum about the narrow energy focusing of the explosion energy by assuming that we have to do with a splitting BH in two equal halves by a much smaller one crashing into it?

Several nebula ( like the Eagle -Spire) seem to show such splitting processes.

Consequently, it would be interesting to investigate the directional focusing  of Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) could be originated  by the merging and even splitting of smaller lower bound BHs as suggested to take place in nebula like the Eagle (Spire) nebula.

 I would propose that there could be three different merger and splitting systems of BHs depending on the size and ratios of both BHs.

1: Normal merger BHs as found by LIGO. Which seem so have rations between: 1/1.24 and 1/1.9 with masses of the participating BHs and resulting BHs between: 6 and 60 solar masses.

2: BH splitting into two equal halves, observed in the Eagle ( spire) nebula with unknown ratios

3: Central Galaxy BHs gobbling up  much smaller BHs and growing in size with small steps.

Microscopic molecular black holes

For my old experiments on microscopic molecular black holes, see:

https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2012/08/more-ball-lightning-research-can-lead.html
and:
http://vixra.org/pdf/1407.0001v2.pdf
and:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/05/170531133323.htm

Not all Black Hole Mergers Join into one Bigger BH

 Not all black hole mergers merge into one bigger BH, as Quantum FFF theory predicted. see: 
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/chandra/images/astronomers-pursue-renegade-supermassive-black-hole.html and: 
http://www.space.com/36932-renegade-speeding-supermassive-black-hole-spotted.html?utm_source=sdc-newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20170522-sdc#undefined.gbpl 
If they have about equal mass then they tend to split again and accelerate away from each other to form a Herbig Haro system with two hotspots ( bowshocks) , often also a bar in between as the remnant of the repelling plasma/gas concentration, and two jets in between . see also: http://vixra.org/pdf/1611.0226v7.pdf

the differences between Small and Larger ( older) micro Comet nuclei

This video shows us that there seems to be differences between large (older)  and small micro Comet nuclei after splitting one small nucleus, 
The smaller nucleus takes a different direction probably due to the assumption that is did not have already a massive shell of ice around the nucleus and as a result it point its plasma tail away from the local wind direction pushing the nucleus against the wind!
Also seems clear that the small nucleus produces no visible gas/ plasma tail already .

How to Make Stable Ball Lightning or Sprite Quantum Knots for ZPE energy and Hydrogen harvest?

My proposal: 3 and 4x interconnected rigid  string knots (massive Higgs) as start for stable ball lightning?

Several ball lightning photos seem to indicate that EM interference from three directions is able to create unstable but light generating  string knots as suggested by the next image.

However according to the Q- FFF Model even quantum knots with  4x EM strings are able to form quantum knot models with a stiff bonding. ( see first image)

Based on my former posters with negative charged black holes (outside) and positive charge at the globular inside: for zpe energy creation.

This video shows us that there seems to be differences between large and small micro Comet nuclei after splitting one small nucleus, 
The smaller nucleus takes a different direction probably due to the assumption that is did not have already a massive shell of ice around the nucleus and as a result it point its plasma tail away from the local wind direction pushing the nucleus against the wind!
Also seems clear that the small nucleus produces no visible gas/ plasma tail already .

see:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puFBnUsqVIg

4x Black Hole Horizon positions A,B,C and D

A= Fermion polarization or Repel/Attraction shift boundary. B= Hydrogen Plasma and Proton Construction site for D and U quarks. C= Fermion DE-Polarisation  or Repel/ Attraction shift boundary. D= Photon and vacuum COLLIDER concentration  zone for pair production.

ll black hole nuclei are assumed to be negative charged from the outside and positive charged from the inside. At location B protons and electrons should merge to form real hydrogen plasma, expelled as observed at dual Cygnus A  hotspots and even interference B.Hole based Ball Lightning.                    According to Quantum Function Follows Form Theory.

Super-Nova Nebula related to dual or quadruple primordial external Black Hole structure.

Different Super Nova shapes are created around two star types: A:  Stars with distant “dual or quadruple Stellar Anchor Black Holes” assumed to be located in the center of a former open star cluster.   ( SN1987, NGC2440, Crab Nebula) 

B: stars without an external SABH system. (SN1572)     Our sun is equipped with two sunspot rings assumed to be of type A, with two external SABHs, (see below),  according to Quantum Function Follows Form Theory.

see also:  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316968220_A_different_Black_Hole_Horizon_Interpretation_leading_to_Entropy_Reduction_and_Violation_of_the_Second_Law

see also: gas planet expelled by the sun as remnant of the mother star of an open star cluster. https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2015/10/new-giant-gas-planet-expelled-by-sun.html 

A different Black Hole Horizon Interpretation leading to Entropy Reduction and Violation of the Second Law.

Abstract,

According to Function Follows Form Theory,

Hawking mathematics of a black hole horizon should be interpreted differently.

Too weird to be true?

My conclusion is that 

Stephen Hawking is still too anxious to admit that the splitting of positive mass ( going out) and negative mass (going in) at the black hole horizon should lead to violation of the second law of thermodynamics , by entropy decrease!!

 So, the Hawking mathematics of a black hole horizon should be interpreted differently.

All Fermions (with positive mass) should be repelled at one of the fermion repelling horizons with positive or negative charge!

As a result, each black hole is assumed to have a globular shell of positron and proton based plasma at the inside and a negative electron based plasma shell outside this positive shell.

The ingoing negative mass (suggested by Hawking) could be interpreted as the anti material entangled copy symmetric shadow partners popping up into  distant entangled anti material copy universes and the origin of the interference effect in a one photon double split experiment as suggested by David Bohm..

If we include existence of small interference black holes (or Quantum Knots) then Ball lightning and micro comets ( including Comets and sunspots) are to be explained as micro black holes violating the second law of thermodynamics.  

The FORM and MICROSTRUCTURE of elementary particles, is supposed to be the origin of FUNCTIONAL differences between Higgs- Graviton- Photon- and Fermion particles. As a consequence, a NEW splitting, accelerating and pairing MASSLESS BLACK HOLE, able to convert vacuum energy (ZPE) into real energy by entropy decrease, seems to be able to explain quick Galaxy- and Star formation, down to Sunspots, (Micro) Comets, Lightning bolts, Sprites and Elves, Sprite Fireballs and Ball Lightning. Recently the NASA-SOHO satellite photos showed clear evidence of multiple hotspots created at the solar surface by interference .  I assume that the majority of the hotspots can be compared with Micro Comet- or fireball phenomena related to Sprites