Quantum FFF Rigid String Theory ( FFF= Function Follws string Form)

QUANTUM FFF STRING THEORY and the Propeller Fermion Propeller.

If the big bang was the splitting of a huge Axion/ Higgs particle Dark Matter Black Hole (DM- BH) nucleus into smaller DM-BH nuclei, then no standard Fermion/ Baryon inflation has happened only the DM-BH based Lyman alpha forest equipped with local Herbig Haro star/galaxy creating systems.

All black holes of all sizes (down to ball lightning) seem to be equipped with a Fermion repelling- and plasma producing horizon, which has also a charge splitting effect into a negative (outside) and positive ( inside) zone ( see oriental basin of the moon) .Conclusion, all Bhs are: "Negative Charged Electric Dark Matter Black Holes" with a rigid open string sector with intrinsic 3x hinging curvature.

Thursday, February 02, 2006

Planetary Lightspeed Frame Dragging by LASOF ( Local A-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)

Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?
As is stated before, the ellipsoidal shaped LASOF (local A-symmetrical oscillating vacuum frame) frame seems to influence the lightspeed around the earth in a complex way.
However, there is also reason to assume that the same LASOF is equipped with extra gravity drag, which could be the origin of the so called Fly By “Slingshot” anomaly.
The FlyBy “slingshot” anomaly is the UNEXPECTED EXTRA push which is given to spacecrafts passing the Earth.
n the next article is made clear, that the gravitational asymmetry is oriented in the
direction of the Earth’s motion within an assumed unique reference frame (just like the LASOF ellipsoid?)
H. J. Busack
17. November 2007

Part of the abstract:
All anomalous velocity increases until now observed during the Earth flybys of the spacecrafts Galileo, NEAR, Rosetta, Cassini and Messenger have been correctly calculated by computer simulation using an asymmetric potential term in addition to the Newtonian potential.
The specific characteristic of this term is the lack of coupling to the rotation of the Earth or to the direction of other gravitational sources such as the Sun or Moon. Instead, the asymmetry is oriented in the direction of the Earth’s motion within an assumed unique reference frame.

Radar refelection anomalies for Venus and Mercury.
If a radar signal leaves the Earth with a speed C-v, in the Solar reference frame (v=21.5 km/s. interpolated earth orbit speed into the direction of Venus) and after a 70 million km travel the speed of the radar pulse has become C (v=extinct).
THEN--after bouncing back on the approaching Venus--- the radar signal leaves Venus with the speed of C+v, (v=35 km/s. Venus orbit speed) and after 54 million km this speed has become also C.
As a consequence: FIGURE 3-4 ( see below) OF THE SHAPIRO RADAR REFLECTION ANOMALY CAN BE EXPLAINED, by the mutual overlap of Venus and later Earth of te "extinction distances". ( see also fig C. and C2 for Venus and fig.D. for Mercury below)
ATTENTION, for the time being, this has nothing to do with the well known "Shapiro delay" for signals passing massive objects like the Sun.
Below figure C2, represents the moment of 10 april 1964. Attention: only the radar signal that is leaving a planet is influeneced by the LASOF C+v or C- v!!
The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
In 1964 it was I.I.Shapiro who made precise radar reflection measurements on Venus and Mercury. He found a peculiar reflection anomaly for both planets around the moment of conjunction. He didn't have a clear explanation for this anomaly ( see the text on top of page 170)
Around the 10-15th of may and 20-27 july 1964, we can see a clear change in the radar reflection of Venus, which in my perspective can only have one origin: the influence of the overlapping Earth related globular extinction LASOF (local anti-symmetrical oscillating vacuum frame) with Venus. This was reason to accept that the radius of the LASOF globule should be about 70 million km. As a logic result, the Venus related LASOF should have a radius of 54 million km. For Mercury the LASOF radius should be 21 million km. ( see below)

My altenative(LASOF) interpretation of the anomaly

The I.I.Shapiro Radar reflection data is showing us that:
The Planetary reference frame for the Lightspeed seems to be dragged by Planets in a special way.

ONLY the EM signal which is LEAVING a MASSIVE object like Earth, Mercury or Venus, seems to be influenced over a certain distance of extinction, by the speed of the Planets.
The incoming signal is not influenced at all!!!
I will call the origin of this strange phenomenon: LASOF ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)

For the basic small anomalies see also:
GPS low elevation Test possibilities
Extra Orbital lightspeed extinction distances of Planets are: 70 million km for the Earth and 54 million km for Venus and 21 million km for Mercury ( see below).

Attention: for clarity, the Earth-Solar axis, is depicted in these sketches as fixed, ( not in motion) while the other planets are in ( extra) motion through the different days.

Earth and Venus LASOF diameter calculation. Below figure C, represents more than one moment in 1964. For clarity, Planet Earth is imaged as standing still and Venus is approaching Earth with 35 km/sec.. Attention: only the radar signal that is leaving a planet is influeneced by the LASOF C+v or C- v!!

Mercury LASOF diameter calculation.

My suggestion to search for minimal effects on Earth.


  1. Hi Leo,

    You mentioned under your webpage link the Quantized Redshift effect. I looked into this issue just recently in connection with my own theory for the Hubble Redshift of Galaxies. I had some vague idea how to explain this with my theory, but after reading now some more recent publications, I am not quite sure anymore how real this effect actually is. For instance, Burbidge and Napier (2000)( http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0008026 ) claim that the effect is only observed for quasars (and only a particular type of quasars at that) but not for normal galaxies (see the third paragraph in the introduction of the paper). This would obviously contradict Tifft's earlier observation, so I am not quite sure at the moment what to make out of this. If only quasars are affected, then I would have to think about other explanations. For the time being, I have put this issue on hold as I can not exclude that the quasar data are probably also not real.
    So I wonder whether you have any more information on this.



  2. Hello Thomas,

    About the Hubble redshift I wrote before:

    In the world of astronomy, nobody seems to have attention for the structural but small anti-Relativity Lightspeed relation, which is found in Binary stars. However the recent discovery of the variation of the electromagnetic coupling constant (or fine-structure constant) alpha, seem to introduce a new perspective in the physical community. (John K. Webb. /P. Davies: "the speed of light has changed" http://www.pr.mq.edu.au/events/index.asp?ItemID=607 ) It is assumed that the oscillating quantum vacuum (OQV) 3D-lattice, measured from the center to the rim of our universe, becomes more and more "structural anti-symmetric", due to the absorption of the vacuum by Dark Matter, located mainly around Galaxies in the form of "Galaxy Anchor Black Holes" (GABH’s). (see: semi cold dual Fractal Big Bang.) . This anti-symmetry can be compared with the LASOF areas (Local A-Symmetrical Oscillating Vacuum Frame) connected to massive objects. As a consequence it is assumed that the "Hubble redshift" is originated not by the expansion of the universes, but by this GABH absorption effect. As a result, the universal change in the Lightspeed (or alpha change) suggested by P.Davies should be not continuous. This discontinuity is supposed to be originated by the increased vacuum absorption rate of GABH’s located in the center of the universe, which must be more evolved than the GABH’s at the universal rim, if we include the effect of the so called "look back time". It is assumed that somewhere in between this distance, the lightspeed ( or alpha) change is decreased. This effect can be seen at: "Michael Murphy’s Research" page. At http://bat.phys.unsw.edu.au/%7Emim/res.html figure: 2, between 0,65 and 0,85 "Fractional look-back time" we can see a structural decrease of the alpha change, which is supposed to be the result of the former described effect. It is proposed that even the recent discovery of the "acceleration of the universal expansion" measured by comparing so called Type 1a Supernova data should be also originated by the same increased vacuum absorption rate of GABH’s all over the universe.

    Leo Vuyk.

  3. Hi Thomas,

    Perhaps also interesting is the so called "fingers of God" found in several Galaxy clusters .see for the VIRGO CLUSTER:

    If you look at the two red colored strings of redshifted Galaxies in the diagram, then it is clear that the most distant Galaxy will be the most redshifted Galaxy.
    The interGalactic space inside the VIRGO CLUSTER is according to my model filled with "NEW Galaxy Anchor-Black Holes" eating the vacuum and at the same time the origin of redshift differences in Virgo.

    Leo Vuyk

  4. Hi Leo,

    I had a look at Michael Murphy’s Research" page (which is now under http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~mim/res.html by the way). First of all, I don't think the data are really signficant considering their error bars. They appear to lie somewhat below zero but not very clearly. If the error bars were half as wide, then it would be clear, but not as it is. And the data don't seem to indicate a linear increase of the discrepancy with distance at all (what they should do).

    Even if the effect is real, it could probably be explained by a different redshift for the individual lines. This would be in principle a possible consequence of my Plasma Theory for the Hubble Redshift of Galaxies if the coherence of the light changes with wavelength. So it must not necessarily have something to do with a variable speed of light.


  5. Thank you Thomas for that information,
    However for clarity, this subject concerns the Hubble redshift and NOT my variable lightspeed calculations ( extinction distances) of Figure C and D of Venus and Mercury.