Experiment with Nico Vuyk, sept 2012.
Simple methode for Nano Black Hole production, splitting and evaporation in- and outside a silicon globule.
Experiment copied from Ronald Dekker's methode by Leo Vuyk with simple commercial electric welding equippement using carbon electrode on mono crystaline silicium wafer, ( july 2012)
The micro (nano) black hole tunneling exit funnels are clearly visible at all globules.
These globules have no signs of multiple exit funnels (by an internal nano black hole splitting process) as is seen at some of the R.Dekker globules.
(see below)
(see below)
Below: Trimmed video of Antonio Pavão and Gerson Paiva Brazil.
For general information about the Zero Point Energy Black Hole Paradigm, or ZPE Black Hole Paradigm see:
Examples of NEW PARADIGM Splitting and Pairing Accelerated MASSLESS (Micro) Black Holes.
(From Wikipedia)
Silicon experiments
Experiments in 2007 involved shocking silicon wafers with electricity, which vaporizes the silicon and induces oxidation in the vapors. The visual effect can be described as small glowing, sparkling orbs that roll around a surface. Two Brazilian scientists, Antonio Pavão and Gerson Paiva of the Federal University of Pernambuco[48] have reportedly consistently made small long-lasting balls using this method.[49][50] These experiments stemmed from the theory that ball lightning is actually oxidized silicon vapors (see vaporized silicon hypothesis, ).Second example of Silicon based Ball lightning:
by Ronald Dekker, Martijn Goossens and Pascal de Graaf. TuDelft (University of Delft, the Netherlands)
Electron microscope images of the Silicon based BL nuclei, with permission of the author: Ronald Dekker at al.
Image of some silicon nuclei, all with globular shape and equipped with one large and several smaller appendices and diameters between 0.4 and 0.8 mm
A remarkable globular nucleus: equipped with several small globules- and only ONE larger appendix (TRUNK) without the oxidation skin observed at the Silicon globule.
Future research should focus on these differences!
My Quantum FFF theory proposal, based on the new black hole paradigm: (see: http://vixra.org/pdf/1103.0011v1.pdf and http://vixra.org/pdf/1108.0036v3.pdf )
This silicon globule represents the splitting of the original central NEW micro black hole (Quantum Knot or NANO Black Hole) located inside the Silicon globule, into one larger and multiple smaller BH nuclei, tunneling through the silicon to the surface of the globule and leaving there "naked" Silicon globules (small) and one larger trunk behind..
.jpg)
My Quantum FFF theory proposal, based on the new black hole paradigm: (see: http://vixra.org/pdf/1103.0011v1.pdf and http://vixra.org/pdf/1108.0036v3.pdf )
This silicon globule represents the splitting of the original central NEW micro black hole (Quantum Knot or NANO Black Hole) located inside the Silicon globule, into one larger and multiple smaller BH nuclei, tunneling through the silicon to the surface of the globule and leaving there "naked" Silicon globules (small) and one larger trunk behind..
.jpg)
B and C: sectional view of different micro black hole tunneling results?
Examples of large appendices or tunneling trunks or funnels assumed to be originated by the micro black hole while leaving the globule. Curved trunks are an indication for extra spin of the silicon globule at the end of the journey. (see also the "roundabouts" observed at the black scorch trace image below)
Examples of small "naked" globules supposed to represent the tunneling exit of the smallest micro black holes.
How could we relate these images to Quantum FFF theory based effects?
By assuming that splitting NEW paradigm micro black holes are the shaping origine of these silicon based nuclei. for new paradigm black holes see the older blog article (17-05-2012).
If we look at SECTIONAL VIEWS of these nuclei: we find some extra support for this hypothesis.
However, new experiments under nitrogen conditions combined with other variabilities are needed to get more foundation for this hypothesis.
Sectional views.
A; Future metallurgical research should define which molecules are gathered here.
B; Future research should produce clues why the Oxidation skin is monolitic and has a very thin boundary layer (D)
C: This double hole could be representing the curved exit tunnel of the main micro black hole as the origine of the nearby located trunk shaped appendix.(A)
Macro Casimir compactification process on Silicon particles is an example of decreasing entropy around black holes. see: http://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk and http://vixra.org/abs/1103.0097
For more info, see;
The new black hole at larger scale:
this is an example for the proposal that NEW paradigm black holes are active at all universal scales from ball lightning Comets Sunspots Herbig Haro objects Galaxy forming Galaxy Anchor Black Holes (GABHs) Dark matter, and the Big Crunch/ Big Bang. (Pulsating Universe hypothesis)
Artificial Ball Lightning production and exploitation device for
Zero Point Electric Energy usage.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1108.0036v3.pdfQuantum FFF theory is based on my early research on the architecture of elementary particles related to ball lightning with micro black holes. See report on 4e ICBL in 1995, reporting:
"Elementary particle architecture links ball lightning with microscopic black holes
(L. Vuyk). " 8 august 1995, by Geert C Dijkhuis: http://home.wxs.nl/~icblsec/1995.html
Image below: Silicon BLs leaving black scorch traces on (horizontal) paper, some with regular white bounching contact points (ABCD).
Two traces are equippe with strange roundabouts (due to local silicon nucleus rotation?) at the end of the bouncing traces (A, C and D).
Future experiments should focus on these roundabouts, because it is assumed that here we will find silicon nuclei equipped with "Curved Trunks" as the tunneling ejecting result of the large micro black hole.
Two aberrant rectangular scorches are observed at (E,F) assumed to be the scorching result of hot silicon particles without internal micro black holes.
Why Silicon?
How a future Silicon based Ball Lightning experiment could look like.
Gerson S. Paiva and Carlton A. Taft
Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas, 22290-180, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
called
SELF-PROPULSION OF LEIDENFROST SILICON BALL LIGHTNING
http://sbpmat.org.br/9encontro/especific_files/papers/B532.pdf
The pair suggested that when lightning strikes a surface, like the Earth's silica-rich soil, a vapor is formed. This silicon vapor may condense into particles that combine with oxygen in the air to slowly burn with the chemical energy of oxidation.
National geographic quote:
Pavão and Paiva have spent two years testing the theory with a simple experiment.
They used electrodes to shock silicon wafers with enough electricity to create a silicon vapor.
Most of the artificial orbs lasted two to five seconds, but at least one has survived as long as eight seconds—approximating natural ball lightning and far exceeding previous efforts to create the phenomenon in the lab.
Some examples of pairing and splitting Black Holes at astronomical scales; Comet Hartley 2, Cygnus A and the Eagle nebula as an indication that black holes are active at all scales in the universe, from microscopic up to the Big Bang!.
Comet Hartley2, with a comparable identity with the silicon nuclei described before, however at a larger scale..
