we need no real free will for the creation of spontaneous- ideas or initiatives but we need VETO influence on our ideas and actions to become responsible for our actions and therefore wee could use universal symmetry.
Sabine Hossenfelder wrote:
Sabine Hossenfelder wrote:
“There is no free will in such a fundamental law because there is no “will” – there is just some randomness sprinkled over the determinism. In neither case do you have free will in any meaningful way.”
For the creation of ideas and initiatives, this should be correct, however it could be influenced by a VETO action.
And:
And:
“This randomness cannot be influenced by anything, and in particular it cannot be influenced by you, whatever you think “you” are.”
Seems also correct but she forget the veto possibility.
Seems also correct but she forget the veto possibility.
Benjamin Libet measured the so called electric Readiness Potential (RP) time to perform a volitional act, in the brains of his students and the time of conscious awareness (TCA) of that act, which appeared to come 500 m.sec behind the RP.
The “volitional act” was in principle based on the free choice to press an electric bell button.
The results of this experiment gives still an ongoing debate in the broad layers of the scientific community, because the results are still (also in recent experiments) in firm contrast with the expected idea of Free Will and causality.
However I would propose the absurd but constructive possibility that we are not alone for decision making in a multiverse as an individual person.
Even Max Tegmark suggested already about the multiverse: “Is there a copy of you reading this article?”
We could be instant entangled with at least one instant entangled anti-copy person living inside a Charge and Parity symmetric copy Universe.
In that case we could construct a causal explanation for Libet’s strange results.
New statistical difference research on RPI and RPII of repeated Libet experiments described here could support these ideas.
See: Democratic Free Will in the instant Entangled Multiverse.
https://www.academia.edu/20185302/Democratic_Free_Will_in_the_instant_Entangled_Multiverse
https://www.academia.edu/20185302/Democratic_Free_Will_in_the_instant_Entangled_Multiverse
and: FREE WILL to VETO, and the Wavefunction Collapse between universes.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/albums/72157651824791041
and:
Thus: Descarte's: "I think therefore I am" should change into: "I am
a QM system, which is always non-local instantaneous correlated and in competition by VETOING the ideas of my opposite anti-I, living in a dual anti-mirror universe, therefore we are!
We are dual co-authors of our common life".
The
Raspberry shaped Super Symmetric Multiverse without a CAT paradox.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1308.0083v3.pdf
Thus: Descarte's: "I think therefore I am" should change into: "I am
a QM system, which is always non-local instantaneous correlated and in competition by VETOING the ideas of my opposite anti-I, living in a dual anti-mirror universe, therefore we are!
We are dual co-authors of our common life".
