In dual entangled CP (Charge
Parity) symmetric mirror universes all quanta have complementarity in the other
universe.
So even the left and right slit of the one photon double slit
experiment.
Clocks are running backwards over
there, my hart is located at the right side of my body.
Bohmian
Mechanics suggested already such a non local reality.
see: https://www.academia.edu/32266541/Bohmian_Double_Slit_Interpretation_by_Dual_Entangled_Universes_and_the_Benjamin_Libet_experiment
In addition to my extended Benjamin Libet CP symmetric multiverse experimental proposal, I found this New Scientist article about David Bohm, who suggested long ago comparable influences at a long distance.
Quote: " Bohm’s ideas involve non-local hidden reality, in which everything depends on everything. In his universe, something happening in a distant galaxy is influencing you right now and vice versa, however minor the effect."
See New scientist article: "Quantum weirdness may hide an orderly reality after all".
In the Charge Parity symmetric copy multiverse, I assume that the one photon double slit experiment also is based on non local hidden reality.
The idea is that the parity symmetry between material and anti material entangled copy universes is assumed to be the origin of two interfering photons at long distance.
The left slit in one universe should function as the right slit in the other universe.
In dual entangled CP (Charge Parity) symmetric mirror universes all quanta have complementarity in the other universe. So even the left and right slit of the one photon double slit experiment.
Clocks are running backwards over there, my hart is located at the right side of my body.
Bohmian Mechanics suggested already such a non local reality.
"
Sheldon Goldstein, an expert on the foundations of quantum mechanics at Rutgers University in New Jersey, points out that the experiment’s observation of particle trajectories predicted by Bohmian mechanics does not prove that Bohm’s theory on the nature of reality was correct. Such paths can also be explained using other theories, he says.
But Goldstein says there are changes afoot. “After decades and decades, people are taking Bohmian mechanics a little bit more seriously,” he says. “There was a time when you couldn’t even talk about it because it was heretical. It probably still is the kiss of death for a physics career to be actually working on Bohm, but maybe that’s changing.”