Quantum FFF String Theory ( FFF= Function Follws string Form)


If the big bang was the splitting of a huge Axion/ Higgs particle Dark Matter Black Hole (DM- BH) nucleus into smaller DM-BH nuclei, then no standard Fermion/ Baryon inflation has happened only the DM-BH based Lyman alpha forest equipped with local Herbig Haro star/galaxy creating systems.

All black holes of all sizes (down to ball lightning) seem to be equipped with a Fermion repelling- and plasma producing horizon, which has also a charge splitting effect into a negative (outside) and positive ( inside) zone ( see oriental basin of the moon) .Conclusion, all Bhs are: "Negative Charged Electric Dark Matter Black Holes"

Thursday, May 04, 2017

TEST Our Multiverse consciousness of entangled mirror symmetric ME.

 I think, therefore I am not the only one who think the same.

Consciousness seems to be multi-universal and even fundamental for each elementary particle.
According to Quantum Function Follows Form theory, the big bang was the symmetric entangled splitting of a huge compressed nucleus of dark matter vacuum particles able to split into 8 or 12 symmetric mirror universes ( the raspberry shaped bubble multiverse) which are still entangled -at huge distances- down to each quantum.
We may call this entanglement effect holographic or even a simulation.
So even humans have each others mirror copys walking around over there on a mirror ( anti-mterial) earth 
IMHO, Future Libet statistical experiments should solve the conscious -QM problem.
HOW could we test such a rigorous idea?
IMHO by a simple brain reaction test to push a button, done already by professor Benjamin Libet in the USA in 1964.
The famous B. Libet brain reaction scan experiment, suggests that in only a few percentage of the brain measurements, test persons seem to pre-plan a simple action as the pressing of a button.
In most measurements he found no pre-planning at all, so are we robots?
 see also:
Much of Libet’s position (about brain activity of test persons pressing a button) hinges on the distinction between Type I and Type II Readiness Potentials (RP).
While the distinction between the two types in his data is very clear, it is less clear what critical difference in mental activity leads to these different classes of brain activity.”

We would expect that based on causality the Time of Conscious Awareness (TCA) always comes before the electric RP, which is found to be present in our brain because this would be the proof that we humans are equipped with the free will to press on the button at the moment WE want to do that!!!.
However, Libet (and later all other researchers) measured the opposite for most of the students, but not for all!
My suggestion is to measure how much in average percentages.
Only a few Libet students reported to have “pre- planned their action” ( RPI) which is in my multiverse based consciousness perspective a key issue to focus on.
The statistical knowledge of how few students are pre-planning their action should indicate how many instant entangled Copy universes we have to deal with in a democratic sense.
See: Democratic Free Will in the Instant Entangled Multiverse

Future Libet statistical experiments should solve the conscious—Quantum Mechanical relation  question.
The famous B. Libet brain scan experiment of 1964, suggests that in only a few percentage of the brain measurements, test persons seem to pre-plan a simple action as the pressing of a button.  Reason to do the experiment again focused on a fixed universal RPI/RPII ratio, like the golden mean.
SEE image:
copies of Libets 1964 Test results on Electric Readiness Potential (RP) listed for 4x test persons. RPI shows without preplanning. RPII shows with preplanning. If there are 12x or 8x cooperating multiversal entanglement origins then the statistical ratios should show resp. 91.7 or 87,5 RPII and 8,3 or 12,5 RPI according to Quantum FFF theory.