Vedic Physics compared to the Quantum FFF Model Raspberry Multiverse.

see also: https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2019/07/john-cramers-ti-and-super-symmetric.html

Varita Perusha represents the cyclic multiverse with  8-12? Charge Parity symmetric copy  universes.

Subtitle:
Splitting and Pairing black holes, colliding and merging particles of  Quantum FFF Theory, compared to the Hindu Vedic Rgveda (or Rigveda, between1500-800 BC)

It is well known that the Rgveda  could be correlated to the origin of the universe in hymns which contain hidden meanings. 
Dr. Raja Ram Mohan Roy, PhD, did research on this subject, which is published in his book: "Vedic Physics" 1999, "scientific origin of Hinduism". Published by Golden Egg Publishing. USA.. Foreword by Prof.Subhash Kak, author of "The Astronomical Code of the Rgveda".
The hidden meaning seems to be most significant in the way that the Rgveda speaks a lot of the sacrifice of different named Gods to become an other (multiple) God. 
The God Perusa could be interpreted as the origin and the end of everything in the universe and this god does its work by eating the universe (big Crunch) and also the sacrifice of itself into different pieces and different forms. ( Big Bang,; vacuum- small primordial splinter black holes- and real pair production)
It is an interesting effort to compare the indications of Rgveda hymns with the Fractal based Big Bang model of Quantum FFF Theory ( FFF= Function Follows Form ).
Rgveda 10.90.2: ( I use the translation into english by dr. Raja Ram Mohan Roy, in his book: "Vedic Physics" 1999. I do not use most of R.R.M.Roy's particle ideas. ) says: 
All there is Perusa whatever what happened and whatever will happen. He is the Lord of immortality, who increases by food. 
If we interpret Perusa with the Big Crunch Black Hole (BCBH) which is increasing in this model, by the absorption of all the universal matter and vacuum particles, then we see a clear parallel.
Rgveda 10.90.3: Such a glory, there is an even greater Perusa. All that is born, is one fourth, his three fourth is immortal in heaven. 
Which could be interpreted as the evaporation division of Higgs-Virgin Nuclear Particles (HVNP's) into ¼ of matter and vacuum particles and ¾ of not evaporating Black Hole nuclear particles inside  the Galaxy- and Stellar Anchor Black Holes (GABH's and SABH's) which is the same as Dark matter..
Rgveda 10.90.4: ¾ of Perusa is above, his ¼ is born again and again. Then he covered them all, those who eat, ( dark matter black holes) and those who don't. ( Fermions and vacuum particles) Which could according to this model be interpreted as: ¾ is above all interaction, "locked up" in the nuclei of GABH's and SABH's, and ¼ is always interacting with each other (vacuum particles and real Quarks or Leptons and Bosons) . 
These particles are born and dying again and again, like all matter in the universe does in Supernovas, and all bosons in wave/particles duality processes. This is also in agreement with the so called "1 cm postulate" of this model ( Q-FFF) : that each photon, gluon or neutrino only travels maximal 1 cm as a real shaped particle, before it is changing shape into an Oscillating Axion Higgs-Virgin Vacuum (OHVV) particle. 
Then he covered them all, those who eat, (all stable black holes) and those who don't. (all other particles including vacuum particles) is interpreted as: At the end The Big Crunch Black Hole (BCBH) covered all elements ( the Axion-Higgs vacuum particles and all black holes)  in its nucleus.
Rgveda: 10.90.5: Then Virata(Viraj) was born. Virata is greater Perusa. Virata can be compared with the even number of unstable evaporating 2e stage Big Bang Black Holes (BBBH's) bigger in volume than the original BCBH. He began dividing after being born. Interpreted as the division of the Big Crunch Black Hole (BCBH) into 2e stage Big Bang Black Holes (BBBH's), Then Bhumi and Pura (Parandara or Indra) became. These Gods can be translated as different universes created from the BBBH's. 
Rgveda: 10.90.15: Seven were its enclosures (Paridhi): This could mean: 7 different shaped elementary particles are used to make matter as combinations of compound quarks and compound leptons (electron and positron, and 5 different formed photon/gluon particles), three times seven were made firelogs (Samidha): This could mean: 3 different forms (colors in QCD of the standard model) of compound quarks are used to make 36 different quarks. 
In the Yajna: In the nothingness outside the expanding vacuum which Gods were expanding, they sacrificed the Perusa animal (the unstable black hole nucleus): to form a network oscillating vacuum around stable splinter black holes. ( Q-FFF Model) They sacrificed the BCBH.

Other Gods of the Rgveda and the correlation with phenomena of my Q-FFF model: 

Agni: the Axion-Higgs-Virgin vacuum Particle. 
Aditi: the 2e stage Big Bang. Indra: the Universe. 
Soma: a general expression for all the different particles including Axion Higgs-Virgin particles. 
Varuna: Oscillating Axion Higgs-Virgin Vacuum (OHVV). 
Yami and Yama: the electron and positron. 
The Ashvins (twins): Proton and Neutron. 
Manu: quark. Mitra: Big Bang Entanglement, or EPR correlation between ant-copy particles located in separated dual universes. 
Vayu: Higgs-Virgin vacuum polarization (e.g. around Stellar Anchor Black Holes) 
Usha: Galaxy- or Stellar (binary) Anchor Black Holes system (GABH/SABH). . 
Ratri (sister of Usha): single migrating Black Hole.
Asura: White Hole lying in between the dual GABH or SABH. Rudra: general expression for a Black Hole. 
Marut: atom. Vitra or Savitr (the Serpent): The Fractals in the Big Bang or Fractal Creating Pairing Black Hole (FCPBH). 
Tvastar: Fractal Creating Black Hole Splinter (FCBHS). 
Pusan (the eye of Vitra): (FCPBH). Surya: Higgs-Virgin vacuum polarization. 
Aryaman: Big Bang Entanglement (EPR correlation) between anti-copy oscillating vacuum particles located in separated dual universes. 

For Quantum FFF Theory see:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/
http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/
http://vixra.org/author/Leo_Vuyk

QUANTUM FFF theory, new paradigm Black Holes and the Cyclic Universe.
The Quantum FFF Theory is based on new paradigm splitting and pairing black
holes, which come in different sizes and stages of the cyclic universe.
From the Big Bang Black Hole down to Ball lightning black hole, see below.
This is the base for most complex mass distribution structures in the multiverse.

CLASSIFICATION OF NEW BLACK HOLES.


Ultra large Black holes (BHs) are supposed to be active in the BH splitting Big Bang process, as the origin of the well known acceleration of the gas concentration in Galaxy forming.
Observations of the Early universe are reason to assume that at least TWO pairing BHs are responsible for such an acceleration process in the middle of both BHs.
Such a symmetric double BH configuration is even observed in much smaller objects like star forming Nebula and in the Hartley 2 Comet!
As a consequence I suppose that ALL Black Holes are able to pair and split, not only in the Big Bang or star forming Nebula, but at all other scales down to ball lightning.

Overview of Black Holes in Nature with decreasing order of sizes. 
Big Crunch Black Hole. (BCBH)
Big Bang Black Hole (BBBH)
Lyman Alpha Fractal creating black Hole Splinters (FCBHSs)
Fractal Creating Pairing Black Holes (FCPBHs)
Galaxy Anchor Black Holes (GABHs)
Stellar Anchor Black Holes (SABHs) 
Sunspot Black Holes (SUBHs)
Cometary Black Holes (COBHs) also supposed to be active inside "Sungrazers".
Ball Lightning Black Holes (BLBHs)
Fire Ball Black Holes (FIBHs) 
Observed at 70-90km Mesosphere. See Langmuir video.

The special features of Cometary Black Holes. (COBHs)
COBHs even come in pairs, see Hartley 2. 2010 (by Cassini spacecraft). 
If COBHs hit the sun they are supposed to become Sunspot BHs. (SUBHs).
If COBHs hit planets or even moons they are supposed to be the origin of Red Spots (Jupiter) or a heating effect, like Saturn's moon Enceladus (cracks and jets also observed by Cassini spacecraft 2010).
Even Volcanic activities and the internal heat source of the Earth could be originatd by this process.

Four kinds of NEW black hole creation.

1: I propose Electro magnetic (x-ray) interference to be the origin of the group of small sized black holes. (SUBH-COBH-FIBH-BLBH). This process is observable in the Langmuir video: fireball production inside Sprites by electric discharge activity.
Sunspot black holes are supposed to be the remnants of Comets and so called Sun grazers originated by Solar Electro magnetic discharges.
2: Stellar Anchor Black Holes (SABHs) are supposed to be formed in supernova explosions.
3: Galaxy Anchor Black Holes (GABHs) are supposed to be formed in the initial splitting process of the Big bang black hole (BBBH). 
4: the Big Crunch Black Hole is supposed to be the result of the contraction of the universe, due to the elimination of the Dark Energy (Higgs) content of the Universes by Higgs consumption by the increasing number of black holes (Dark matter).

Fireballs produced by Sprites or by Electro Magnetic Solar activity are good candidates for the Fireball mysteries on Earth, like the Tunguska mystery in Siberia in 1908. 
So called Small Comets seem to have no relation with Fireball events.
Two Fireball examples on Earth, supporting my new black hole hypothesis.
All black holes of different sizes, 
produce a Quark- Gluon- Electron- Positron- Plasma 
at their Fermion repelling globular horizon

Leo Vuyk.

Scientific glossary made by R.R.M.Roy in his book:Vedic physics, 

In contrast with Description above of Q-FFF Theory.

New Physics Magnetic Monopole (MM) Thruster Space propulsion.

Magnetic monopole models according to Quantum FFF Theory. see North and south monopole photonic curved jets coming out of the polarized up/down electron,  around a current in a wire, which lead to Anti-Maxwell dip zone around a wire.
The Anti Maxwell Dip zone can be used as reactionless EM Drive Thruster and space propulsion.
EM Drive Thruster by Anti Maxwell Monopole Tubular Field Reduction Around a Conductor.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1905.0244v2.pdf
se also "Anti Gravity Propulsion"

see also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88dMqfxZf_c

An alternative could still be.

Magical Comet mergers.and micro black holes,

Magical merging of two multi-micro black hole based comets into a dumbbell shaped object with gassing funnels.
Comparison between Comet 67P-CG. and the larger Ultima Thule with comparable crater structures.
Evidence for Dark Matter Black Hole based plasma, dust and ice production inside Comets like 67P,C-G. and the growing Earth.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1410.0039v7.pdf

see also: empty spaces in 67P CG Comet.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1010800827618004992

Comet 67P-CG. with micro black hole structure.
Magical merging of two multi-micro black hole based comets into a dumbbell shaped object with gassing funnels

Our complex way to make a golf swing, by readiness potentials RP I and RP II.

RP 1 seems super deterministic (not Free) by the MWI pinball Machine effect on quantum jumps..
RP II Is clearly needed as the real FREE Veto for all our decisions.
Suggestion:
The quantum world is fully deterministic based on quantum Jumps:  God plays dice indeed with the universe !
However living creatures are able to influence initiatives ( RP I) by Veto actions ( RP II) at all levels of consciousness.
see also Backreaction: http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-forgotten-solution-superdeterminism.html
Golf Training by Multiverse Readiness Potential Interference for Approve or Veto a Golf swing.
Free Will by several interfering Free Veto levels before (Golfing) Action.
Readiness Potential RP I, initiative in one Universe has to be INSTANTLY vetoed or approved by its anti copy Golfer persons living far away inside the entangled copy universes: .7x OR 11x?  see:
https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-golf-training-by-multiverse.html

Golf Training by Multiverse Readiness Potential Interference for Approve or Veto a Golf swing.

Free Will by several Free Veto levels before (Golfing) Action.
Readiness Potential RP I, initiative in one Universe has to be INSTANTLY vetoed or approved by its anti copy Golfer persons living far away inside the entangled copy universes: .7x OR 11x?

Golfing has in contrast with Tennis or other fast sports a longer time for the transactional period.
In tennis sports the quality shot seems to be more based on muscle memory.

see: Democratic Free Will and Telepathy in the Instant Entangled Multiverse.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1612.0026v3.pdf
and: Free Will Readiness Potential Ratios, the Key for a Multiverse Number Calculation.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1803.0100v1.pdf
and:  Testing Proposals for Human Free Will in the Raspberry Multiverse, Local Entanglement and M&M Lightspeed.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1811.0125v1.pdf
and: The Conscious Undivided Multiverse,
http://vixra.org/pdf/1905.0123v2.pdf

John C. Cramer’s TI and the Super Symmetric Deterministic Raspberry MWI with Free Veto.-Free will.

John C. Cramer’s TI and the Super Symmetric Deterministic Raspberry MWI with Free Veto.-Free will of Benjamin Libet.
TI or Transactional Interpretation is found to be fully in line with our daily reality of Free Will or better Free Veto, in a super deterministic clockwork World, as Benjamin Libet proposed and tested in 1984. 
Both Based on the Handshake idea of superluminal entanglement signals between copy universes according to Quantum FFF Theory.

see: Democratic Free Will and Telepathy in the Instant Entangled Multiverse.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1612.0026v3.pdf
and: Free Will Readiness Potential Ratios, the Key for a Multiverse Number Calculation.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1803.0100v1.pdf
and:  Testing Proposals for Human Free Will in the Raspberry Multiverse, Local Entanglement and M&M Lightspeed.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1811.0125v1.pdf
and: The Conscious Undivided Multiverse,
http://vixra.org/pdf/1905.0123v2.pdf

Open letter to John G. Cramer , (4-augustus 2019)

Dear professor Cramer,

I found your interesting paper on TI called:
The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Nonlocality (2015)
At the conclusion you write:
"Is free will possible in such a system? It is our view that it is. Freedom of choice
does not include the freedom to choose to violate physical laws. The transactional
handshakes between present and future are acting to enforce physical laws, and they
restrict the choices between future possibilities only to that extent."

Dear professor, do you still stand for this conclusion?
Or could it be that Benjamin Libets measurements about the Readiness Potential of subjects could lead to a different kind of handshake between Supersymmetric ( CPT) subjects living far away from each other inside the raspberry multiverse.
see my paper: "The Conscious Readiness Potential Ratio Multiverse."
http://vixra.org/pdf/1907.0250v2.pdf
See perhaps also::
"John Cramer’s TI and the Super Symmetric Deterministic Raspberry MWI with Free Veto.-Free will."
https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2019/07/john-cramers-ti-and-super-symmetric.html


Sincerely yours,

Leo Vuyk.

Stop Global warming by geostationary Origami screens.

Stop Global Warming and climat change by local Solar screening of  large Geosynchronous Origami panels each stretched by 6 satellites in star formation, at 35000 km above earth, to form low pressure areas and clouds at sea.
 including semi controlled weather patterns.

According to Quantum FFF Theory.

Former attaempts to deploi sail to use the sun energy. ( mylar sail for space propulsion )

MWI: and the 11 fold connections (dimensions) in our brain for a 12 fold entangled multiverse?

See THIS article

and: https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-copenhagen-interpretation.html

.

The Copenhagen interpretation reinvented with support of Benjamin Libet.

NEUROSCIENCE beats QUANTUM MECHANICS.

QUANTUM MECHANICS explained by NEUROSCIENCE !!

The Observer- Subject/ object relation of the Copenhagen interpretation reinvented, without half dead/living  Cats and leading to an Entangled Raspberry shaped Multiverse with 8 or 12 entangled CP symmetric universal bubbles (or berries)
see: "The Conscious Readiness Potential Ratio Multiverse"
http://vixra.org/pdf/1907.0250v2.pdf
and : The Conscious Undivided Multiverse.
http://vixra.org/abs/1905.0123

Conclusion:  there are always more observers (80%) RPII, to follow -by entanglement at universal distances- the initiative of RPI = observed (<20%).

Benjamin Libet found indications for the entangled 8 or12 fold Entangled Raspberry Multiverse already in 1983, by his RPI-RPII splitting measurements combined with a 20-80% splitting found later by Trevena and Miller .see: Free Will Readiness Potential Ratios, the Key for a Multiverse Number Calculation.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1803.0100v1.pdf
see also: 
The 11 fold connections in our brain:

The Benjamin Libet discovered two different Readiness Potentials (RPI and RPII: INTERPRETED by me, AS THE  OBJECT AND SUBJECT separated FAR AWAY from each other, but entangled from the start of the big bang inside different  CP symmetric COPY UNIVERSES) .
Libet did not Notice the ratio constancy, other did notice them later. with an average  20-80% result for RPI respectively. RPII see Trevena and Miller ( <20%) : http://vixra.org/pdf/1803.0100v1.pdf

Former essays about Consciousness in the  Multiverse
Free Will Readiness Potential Ratios, the Key for a Multiverse Number Calculation.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1803.0100v1.pdf
Democratic Free Will and Telepathy in the Instant Entangled Multiverse.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1612.0026v3.pdf

Wikipedia about MWI and Copenhagen interpretation:
 Some versions of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics proposed a process of "collapse" in which an indeterminate quantum system would probabilistically collapse down onto, or select, just one determinate outcome to "explain" this phenomenon of observation. Wavefunction collapse was widely regarded as artificial and ad hoc^{[citation needed]}, so an alternative interpretation in which the behavior of measurement could be understood from more fundamental physical principles was considered desirable.

Everett's Ph.D. work provided such an alternative interpretation. Everett stated that for a composite system – for example a subject (the "observer" or measuring apparatus) observing an object (the "observed" system, such as a particle) – the statement that either the observer or the observed has a well-defined state is meaningless; in modern parlance, the observer and the observed have become entangled; 
(which i.m.o. was the key invention of Everett)
we can only specify the state of one relative to the other, i.e., the state of the observer and the observed are correlated after the observation is made. This led Everett to derive from the unitary, deterministic dynamics alone (i.e., without assuming wavefunction collapse) the notion of a relativity of states.

However, i.m.o. the Key question should be: Are we human observers entangled with that Cat in the  box during opening of the box experiment?
OR: do we live inside a fixed number of entangled SuSy parallel ( anti matter) universes, with large distant entangled susy copy cat in boxes, with 50% chance for entangled atomic decay.?
However we have to accept a superluminal entanglement connection between the susy copy experimental systems (at universal distances) around the box.
And that is the problem.  Einstein did not accept superluminal signalling! or spooky action at a distance.

The Conscious Readiness Potential Ratio Multiverse

The Benjamin Libet discovery of two different Readiness Potentials (RPI and RPII) and the potential to VETO an act,  is reason to suggest the presence of a SuSy multiverse with entanglement down to each quantum.

However, Libet did not Notice, because he (or his successors) did not measure the ratio between RPI and RPII , as a base for the total number of SuSy Universes.

 see: http://vixra.org/pdf/1907.0250v1.pdf
or:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334481423_The_Conscious_Readiness_Potential_Ratio_Multiverse

Some interesting indications for democratic free will: Trevena and Miller and Benjamin Libet’s Readiness Potential. Benjamin Libet measured the so called electric Readiness Potential (RP) time to perform a volitional act , in the brains of his students and the time of conscious awareness (TCA) of that act, which appeared to come 500 m.sec behind the RP.
However, if we assume that the postulated 12 copy universes are each others observer to trigger randomly and alternating the collapse of the copy wavefunctions, (to trigger a volitional act, like Libet's subjects) in the other 11 universes.
Then as a consequence, we may expect that only 1/12 part or 8,3 % of all (human) timing of conscious intention to act, will show a reversed timing sequence between the so called Time of conscious awareness (TCA) came before the Readiness Potential (RP). indications in that directions, are already found by Judy Trevena and Jeff Miller (Otago university NZ).
See: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1219 1935&dopt=Abs tract
Trevena an Miller found surprisingly, that up to 20 % of all cases of human timings of Conscious intention to act, should be accounted as reversed in sequence thus: TCA before Lateral RP.
However, It was Stanley Klein, who described his reaction and the reaction of other professionals, that the 20% reversed timing cases, found by Trevena and Miller, should decrease, if more common measurement biases were accounted for.
See: page 274: http://cornea.berkeley.edu/pubs/161.pdf
Quotation of page 274 of the article by Stanley Klein: "The new data of Trevena and Miller (2002) indicate that the average time of the LRP still precedes the TCA, but by much less than does the RP.

However, Trevena and Miller argue that the averaging process can distort the story and that one needs to look at the percentage of times that the timing is reversed (TCA coming before the LRP).
They find that 20% of the time the TCA occurs before the LRP.
Based on that finding it is likely (they say) that the conscious decision to act comes before the LRP. A bias of 100 msec in the TCA could upset Trevena and Miller’s argument since the 20% with TCA before LRP would decrease substantially.
When the average TCA is shifted from 2200 ms to 2100 ms it is unlikely that there will be many occasions in which the LRP comes after the conscious decision to move.
I will go through the topic of bias carefully with special attention to the flash-lag effect (Nijhawan, 1994).
 I argue that the forward referral of the flash-lag effect, not a backward referral that had been suggested for this purpose, can compensate for the perceptual delay latency."
As a consequence,
If future experiments could be made more focused on this issue, then perhaps we could find more support for the hypothesis of such 12 fold trigger mechanisms to collapse every time a set of 11 fold copy wave-functions inside the other 11 fold entangled copyuniverses.

3x Massless Axion-Higgs Torus shaped vacuum particles able to transform into 125 ,126 and more GeV stringknots to form ( micro) black holes

The Higgs boson was discovered in 2012 by the ATLAS and CMS Experiments at CERN, but its coupling to other particles remains a puzzle.

https://phys.org/news/2019-05-atlas-pieces-higgs-boson-puzzle.html

However, if the 125-126 Higgs is made by three transformed stringy Massless Axion Higgses, then we may assume the answer on how the coupling to other particles arises is restricted to Black Hole nuclei compressed by the massless oscillating vacuum Higgssen.

The Higgs boson was discovered in 2012 by the ATLAS and CMS Experiments at CERN, but its coupling to other particles remains a puzzle.
https://phys.org/news/2019-05-atlas-pieces-higgs-boson-puzzle.html

Splitting Ball Lightning stuck in the top of an electric mast. FUTURE ENERGY SOURCE ?

Ball lightning stuck in the top of electric mast, splitting and partly falling down.
Example of new physics electric dark matter black holes, also called ball lightning or micro comet according to Quantum FFF Theory, 
http://vixra.org/pdf/1803.0093v1.pdf
also: Future Free Energy of New Physics Ball Lightning Black Holes, the origin of a Super Social Society or the Opposite?
http://vixra.org/pdf/1404.0151v1.pdf
and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6oCTWDeL8c

Curved Light Path and Redshift Origin around Dark Matter Black Holes.

According to Quantum FFF Theory, the vacuum is based on oscillating Axion-Higgs particle jumping every Planck time from one node to the neighbor next node.
Around black holes the node distances are elongated by the BH vacuum absorption.

Conclusion: the exponential Hubble-Lemaître redshift from starlight travelling long distances must be influenced by by the elongated node distances, present on the road to our telescopes.
Proposed experiment:  Two different light trajectories from one galaxy passing at opposite sides of a dark matter sources  should give different redshifts.  As a strong support for the  anti Hubble redshift idea.
see  also: http://vixra.org/pdf/1702.0040v3.pdf
The Alternative Origin of Hubble Redshift : Vacuum Absorption by black holes as a Support for Quantum Dipole Repeller Gravity and a Contracting Universe.