The Cold Dark Matter Black Hole Big Bang Heated by Herbig Haro Systems of Star Formation.

How Herbig Haro systems created the universe, by two equal sized black holes, creating plasma, swept together in the pressure cooker center for a monster star.

The Cosmic Microwave Power spectrum is a support for the  COLD “Dark Matter Black Hole  Big Bang” and the first monster Dual Black Hole based Herbig Haro systems with Monster Star forming processes in the middle (Q-FFF Theory) the origin of the first universal heating.

see: The Electric Universe by Electric Dark Matter Big Bang Black Holes of Quantum FFF Theory. https://vixra.org/pdf/1902.0349v1.pdf

EM Drive, for faster space flight, based on Anti Maxwell magnetic monopole reduction on Lorentz reaction force..

Below example of a anti Maxwell space propulsion experiment.

see also: Different Levitation Systems Observed in Big Basin UFOs, EMEC and Anti Maxwell Effect and Free Energy.

https://vixra.org/pdf/2006.0130v2.pdf

The latest developments on Alcuberrie space drive

 

see: https://thedebrief.org/mysterious-new-warp-drive-patent-surfaces-online/

and also: https://backreaction.blogspot.com/2020/11/warp-drive-news-seriously.html?fbclid=IwAR0nDN0G_ct2F82ELbsx7SX1YBlGJP7XOxVQt8PRCH9yFKpilwxBpOOi4Sw

New Dimension Particles are Needed for the Q-FFF String Theory model and the cyclic multiverse..

 Invention of  new particles (Duda-Vuyk) needed to construct and transform a primordial Axion string and the origin of a cyclic universe by a new Penrose trapped space horizon.
https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2021/03/new-micro-particles-duda-vuyk-needed-to.html
How strings are able to merge at close distance.

String macaroni structure with three hinges of 90 degree rotation restriction. See: Lepton/ quarks based on dual compounding forms ( Q-FFF Theory) . A,  1/7 diameter ratio is needed for merging.

Invention of the Penrose TRAPPED SPACE HORIZON creating and repelling pairs of fermions ( plasma) as the base for new star formination in between two equal sized Herbig Haro Black Holes..

How fermions e-e- are able to merge at close distance. could be the same as the dual sub string particles able to make transformer strings. (Q-FFF Theory).

New micro particles (Duda-Vuyk) needed to build and transform a primordial Axion string and the origin of a cyclic (multi) universe

 Invention of  new particles (Duda-Vuyk) needed to build and transform a primordial Axion string and the origin of a cyclic universe.
How strings are able to merge at close distance.
The vacuum pressure ( Casimir) seems even the origin of black hole nucleus forming compacted by the vacuum pressure which is decreasing by vacuum dilution (eating)  by merging black holes nuclei!!
In Q-FFF Theory the reducing vacuum pressure on the growing Big Crunch Black Hole, is reason to propose a cyclic universe, 

see: https://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk 

As the diluted vacuum pressure is in equilibrium with the internal pressure of the Big Crunch Black Hole nucleus it will explode into series of  smaller black hole chunks, evaporating a new oscillating vacuum lattice and forming dual Herbig Haro systems to form stars in between. .

THE ELECTRON SCALE IS: 10^-33 CM, however the electron string can rotate intern by hinges into other particles.

Invention of  new particles (Duda-Vuyk) needed to build and transform a primordial Axion string.

The electron string (-Axion) rotate intern by restricted hinges over 90 degrees, into all other singular particles

Q-FFF Theory: see: 3-Dimensional Rigid Transformer Strings with Composite Topological Strings

https://vixra.org/pdf/2002.0074v1.pdf

and: https://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk

Below: How strings are able to merge at close distance.

The vacuum pressure ( Casimir) seems even the origin of black hole nucleus forming compacted by the vacuum pressure !! 

In Q-FFF Theory the reducing vacuum pressure on the Big Crunch Black Hole, is reason to propose a cyclic universe.

 

Nuclear Energy Plants not needed if Ball Lightning Plants take over.

Hawking predicted already micro black holes, but not compared with ball lightning or Higgs boson knots, like Q-FFF Theory does.

see:  The alternative for Nuclear Energy Plants.
see also :  The biggest blunders of Astrophysics: 

https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2021/12/biggest-blunders-of-astrophysic.html

Hawking described how mini black holes—the signature of which he predicted in the early 1970s—might yet be seen in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN in Geneva. “So I might get a Nobel Prize after all,” he added, to more laughter.
 see: https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/stephen-hawking-celebrity-physicist-flaws?fbclid=IwAR2P01X6_fHgAZYltxwPA78sw8K-tosbe7RQyO8VSvBeLGqs4rbZ4Q_pDmM

history 1995: ISBL, "Canterbury Elementary particle architecture links ball lightning with microscopic black holes" (L. Vuyk) see: http://home.wxs.nl/~icblsec/1995.html

long living but decaying Ball Lightning in street pool, has a compound nucleus of string stuff, breaking in pieces to the ground..

Ball Lightning: The future of Free Energy out of the vacuum.

Photos and videos of interfering- and des-integrating ball lightnings.
BL, is assumed to have  a nucleus of magnetic compound photon string knot with a 3 or 4 photon knot as abase. (image below)

Ball Lightning:= DARK MATTER COMPOUND MICRO PHOTON INTERFERENCE BLACK HOLES , The future of Free Energy out of the vacuum.

Photos and videos of interfering- and des integrating ball lightnings.

BL, has a nucleus of ONE magnetic photon string knot with a 3 or 4 compound string particles as a base. ( see below)

Hypothesis:

Below: Intermitting trails of short living stringy knots made by three or four interfering electro-magnetic particle waves.

The future of our energy production out of the vacuum.

An other possible BL interference device principle.

Youtube Video ( India?) At second 34, a fierce soil cloud emerges from the pole base. ( Heated by el. charge?) At sec. 53, the ball lightning falls in pieces via the local tree to the ground 

The end: min: 1.45 the grounded BL pieces are died out.

Long living Ball Lightning nucleus splitted after fallen from the street pole

The Penrose Trapped space horizon surface acting as a vacuum particle collider creating and repelling new pairs of fermions. 

Leo Vuyk Articles for review:

https://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk

Fulgurite is found: 18 foot long, 18 inch wide with 3 inch canal.

FULGURITE IS FOUND OF 18 FOOT LONG AND pipes of 18 INCH WIDE INCLUDING THE HOLLOW CANAL OF 3 INCH.

Also Fulgurite in the USA.
https://youtu.be/2_rWMWisl_U see 2.50 minutes.

It seems evidence for different decay times of ball lightning or better different STRINGY diameters knots. just as is observed in India street pole Ball Lightning.

below.

see: https://youtu.be/Y6oCTWDeL8c

Other example of a splitting micro comet/ ball lightning

https://youtu.be/puFBnUsqVIg

Dark Matter BALL LIGHTNING seems CREATED BY INTERFERENCE OF 3 or 4 STRING WAVES.

Fulgurite created by Lightning bullet also known as ball lightning, according to Quantum FFF theory.
see: https://vixra.org/pdf/1805.0307v1.pdf

also Fulgurite in the USA.

https://youtu.be/2_rWMWisl_U

see video: of falling splitting and decaying BL string nucleus out of a street pole. https://youtu.be/Y6oCTWDeL8c

Splitted Ball Lightning nucleus fallen on the ground firing out by decaying. The cables from the pole are broken ( left) probably by overheating by extra current.

The smoke coming from the ground is also evidence for electric currents to the ground.

From Wikipedia Leo Vuyk.

Leo Vuyk

In this edit a newly-created IP account added text giving Leo Vuyk credit for originating the hypothesis that ball lightning could be caused by miniature black holes. The ref given was "(in 1992, see patent Espacenet; reactor vessel for the purpose of maintaining, enlarging and making commercial use of a small black hole (or ball lightning))", which leads to to an abstract here. Beyond the parenthetical mention, there is no discussion in the abstract of ball lightning. (The full text is in Danish ( no: DUTCH)- not one of my languages.) The patent application, which lapsed on 1994/10/03, states "it is possible to generate a mechanical perpetuum mobile". It sounds to me like Vuyk did not actually go so far as to suggest black holes as a possible explanation for the natural phenomenon (or not) of ball lightning. If his advocate would like to replace such a statement in the article, I would like to first see the passage of the patent were this claim is made. Art Carlson (talk) 14:59, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Sorry for my late reaction to Art Carlson's quest for more clarity on my claims,

The translation of the Dutch abstract goes like this:

Title of the invention:

The invention relates to a reactor vessel for the purpose of maintaining, enlarging and making commercial use of a small black hole (or ball lightning). An important phenomenon associated with so-called miniature black holes is Hawking radiation. This radiation consists, internally, of an outwardly directed flux of electrons and an inwardly directed flux of antiparticles, the positrons.

The purpose of the reactor vessel is to exploit the electrical power produced outside the observation horizon of the black hole by conducting the electron flux on the one hand and the positron flux on the other hand in such a way that an inexhaustible D.C. energy can be obtained and utilized. ~~Leo Vuyk~~ Leo Vuyk — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.211.109.180 (talk) 08:58, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

My comment was based on the English abstract to which I already gave a link. Your comment does not address the problem. Art Carlson (talk) 09:34, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

YOU WROTE: It sounds to me like Vuyk did not actually go so far as to suggest black holes as a possible explanation for the natural phenomenon (or not) of ball lightning. If his advocate would like to replace such a statement in the article, I would like to first see the passage of the patent were this claim is made. I MADE THE CLAIM BY THE TITLE; "The invention relates to a reactor vessel for the purpose of maintaining, enlarging and making commercial use of a small black hole (or ball lightning). " AND OF COURSE FURTHER IN THE DUTCH TEXT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leo Vuyk (talk • contribs) 17:13, 30 May 2013 (UTC) SEE AT PAGE 6 AND 7 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leo Vuyk (talk • contribs) 17:23, 30 May 2013 (UTC) The words Ball Lightning are in Dutch: "BOL BLIKSEM" ~~LEO VUYK~~

Leo - your perpetual motion engine is based on the idea of a Kugelblitz, which is not the same phenomenon as is being discussed on this page -- but translates to the same word in English. As a perpetual motion engine, it is also an impossible idea, but you might attempt to suggest it on the ball lightning (astrophysics) page.77.101.47.254 (talk) 15:49, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Toroids etc.

Removed duplicate section and tried to create cites. Kortoso (talk) 23:36, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

A plausible explanation is completely ignored, why?

Er, there's a lot of high-powered physics speculation here, but isn't it entirely possible that "ball lightning" is not a distinct phenomenon at all? So far as I can tell, the evidence consists of a grab-bag of anecdotal reports. It's quite plausible that these are just an assortment of garbled descriptions, misinterpretations, fantasies, hoaxes, and so forth. This article more or less presumes that there is a physical phenomenon called ball lightning and then attempts to speculatively explain it. Isn't that premature? 99.249.153.25 (talk) 02:13, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

I might add that the very large number of reports of ball lightning is, paradoxically, evidence against the idea that it is a distinct phenomenon. Video recorders of all kinds are now ubiquitous. If it were that the vast majority of ball lightning reports were not false, we would have a recording of the phenomenon by now. But if we know that the vast majority of the reports are false, then it becomes more plausible that all are false. Although I guess the above wouldn't apply to claims that it is a distinct neurological phenomenon (although I regard those as fairly speculative on their own terms.) 99.249.153.25 (talk) 02:19, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

"Plausible" does not constitute proof one way or the other. It would seem (at least to me) that the article needs to treat the subject as neutrally as possible; whatever the various accounts and so forth mean or do not mean, they do exist, and the article should mention them (and any other theories on the subject) while emphasizing that no scientifically-verifiable evidence or proof of this phenonemon has been forthcoming up to the present time. That is just my opinion. - Ecjmartin (talk) 02:22, 12 August 2011 (UTC)