Ball Lightning after a Lightning stroke hit the streetpole, hopping to inside a house over an electric wire into the Fusebox coming out, damaging houshold, a telephone connected through a cable at 3 meters distance and fade away through the ground. Still, a blackened plastic Tupperware cap remained as evidence of the incident 50 years ago..
The Q-FFF Rigid String Theory says: (1) There is only one CONSTRUCTIVE Topological and Resilient TRANSFORMING STRING (Axion/vacuum Dark Energy building block ), forming direct after the Black Hole Splitting Big Bang. so called Travelling TADPOLE Black Hole based Filaments, expanding the Cosmic Lyman Alpha Structure. (2) A Raspberry Entangled 12x Mirror Copy Multiverse is Postulated as base for uncertainty (ER=EPR) and Libet's FREE VETO WILL . SO We live inside an exploded BH
Quantum FFF Rigid String Theory ( FFF= Function Follws string Form)
QUANTUM FFF topological STRING THEORY and the Fermion Propeller.http://vixra.org/author/leo_vuykhttps://www.flickr.com/photos_user.gne?path=&nsid=93308747%40N05&page=&details=1If the big bang was the splitting of a huge Axion/ Higgs particle Dark Matter Black Hole (ELISIUM DM- BH) nucleus into smaller DM-BH nuclei, then no standard Fermion/ Baryon inflation has happened only the DM-BH based Lyman alpha forest equipped with local Herbig Haro star/galaxy creating systems.
All black holes of all sizes (down to ball lightning) seem to be equipped with a Fermion repelling- and plasma producing horizon, which has also a charge splitting effect into a negative (outside) and positive ( inside) zone ( see oriental basin of the moon) .Conclusion, all Bhs are: "Negative Charged Electric Dark Matter Black Holes" with a rigid open string sector with intrinsic 3x hinging curvature.
Sunday, January 02, 2022
Report of an ancient (1970) Ball Lightning in the Netherlands.
NIELS BOHR DOODLE GOOGLE of atomic understanding
:Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true.
Great quotes from a man at the nucleus of atomic understanding.
(Washington Post By Michael Cavna 0ctober 2012 )
NIELS BOHR was deeply intuitive, a pioneering physicist who moved insightfully
from the theoretical to the real of atomic structures.
borrowed from the Quantum Theory as established by Planck, ...
[Bohr] succeeded in working out and presenting a picture of atomic structure that,
with later improvements (mainly as a result of Heisenberg’s ideas in 1925), still fitly
serves as an elucidation of the physical and chemical properties of the elements.”
A scientist as thoughtful as Bohr is perhaps best remembered in his own words —
as well as the words of key colleagues. So here, to help celebrate the occasion,
are our 12 favorite quotes by and about Niels Henrik David Bohr (*according to
numerous sources, with the wording sometimes varying slightly by source):
1. “Prediction is very difficult, especially if it’s about the future.”
— Niels Bohr
2. “Never express yourself more clearly than you are able to think.”
3. “No, no, you’re not thinking — you’re just being logical.”
4. “One of the favorite maxims of my father was the distinction between the two sorts
of truths — profound truths recognized by the fact that the opposite is also a
profound truth, in contrast to trivialities where opposites are obviously absurd.”
— Son Hans Henrik Bohr, from “My father” in “Niels Bohr: His Life and Work
As Seen By His Friends and Colleagues (1967)
(Another son, theoretical physicist Aage Bohr, shared in the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1975.)
5. “How wonderful that we have met with a paradox. Now we have some hope of making progress.”
— Bohr
6. “The first thing Bohr said to me was that it would only then be profitable to work with him if I understood that he was a dilettante. ... Evidently Bohr was serious. He explained how he had to approach every new question from a starting point of total ignorance. It is perhaps better to say that Bohr’s strength lay in his formidable intuition and insight rather than erudition.”
— Abraham Pais
7. “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct. My own feeling is that it is not crazy enough.”
— Bohr
8. “An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes, which can be made, in a very narrow field.”
— Bohr
9. “Every great and deep difficulty bears in itself its own solution. It forces us to change our thinking in order to find it.”
— Bohr
10. “Not often in life has a human being caused me such joy by his mere presence as you did.”
— Albert Einstein, in a letter to Bohr
11. “Einstein, stop telling God what to do.”
— Bohr “in response to [Einstein’s] famous quote attacking quantum physics, wherein he said that ‘God does not play dice with the universe,’ ” according to About.com
12. “Every sentence I utter must be understood not as an affirmation, but as a question.”x
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Saturday, December 25, 2021
Early Q-FFF Theory review by A Brandon. ( uni of Amsterdam)
http://www.wehope.com/Pages/a006.html (7 of 10)3/7/2005 12:44:37 PM
www.wehope.com/a006.html
Leo Vuyk, (an architect/ building engineer) started this model in1980,
only the help of a simple compass and a mu-metal jar (page: 18-19
and app.p.5)
What he discovered was a clear measurable distinction between
North-and South magnetic radiation and at the same time a new
particle-wave interpretation of the (Earth) magnetic field.
He boldly concluded that there was reason to "construct" an
adapted "standard model" of elementary particles. Two Vacuum
(Higgs-virgin) particles could change by mutual collision into an
electron and a positron. One vacuum particle could change by
collision with leptons or quarks into a variety of 6 different photons:
magnetic photons (North or South), electric photons (plus or minus),
a "general" photon or a graviton. With an exception for the graviton
these photons can merge (or click) together with an electron or
positron to form quarks and at the same time they represent the 8
+1 gluon functions (4x2 + 1). As a result, the so called "preons"
invented by Salam 26 years ago, as the sub-particle components of
quarks, come in this case in 7 varieties (2+4+1).
Photons pop into existence after collision of Higgs-virgin particles
with leptons and quarks and after travelling a distance with the
"source referred speed of light" (roughly spoken) 3 cm they pop
back into a Higgs-virgin particle and become a wave, which has the
light speed of the "local vacuum reference frame".(app.p.28) This
transition after 3 cm, which we will call: the "photon transition" is the
explanation for wave-particle duality and a part of the explanation
for the fact that no variations of the speed of light are showing up in
the measurements.
The photon information is conserved through a wavefunction,
expanding with a "Local Higgs virgin vacuum" referred speed of light
which must be interpreted as an additional oscillation, added to the
local fabric of oscillating Higgs-virgin particles. This means, that the
"real" velocity of Higss-virgin particles on the "Planck scale" has to
be varying by these oscillations , so does the velocity of light
("tunneling" effects). On average however on the scale of our
measurements, the velocity of light is constant. The wave function
collapses again by changing a local Higgs-virgin particle into the
original "hard rock" photon. This "photon transition" system give us
the ILLUSION of photons and Higgs virgin particles which are
"CRUISING" AS PARTICLES through space. In the next paper the
term CRUISING is frequently used.
The local oscillating "Higgs-virgin vacuum" around the Sun
originates a local vacuum frame, which is centered around the Sun
and is anchored by at least two "anchor Black Holes" in "dumbbell
form": each located at one side of the planetary plane. This gave the
explanation for "non-Newtonian gravity" measured by " the Pioneer
and Ulysses (app.p. 34) ). It could be possible to locate these
"anchor Black Holes" by telescope from the Earth. The relative
circular change of the Black Hole position, should incidentally
originate a "microlensing effect" on the the background stars.
This photon transition system should be the explanation of wave ad
http://www.wehope.com/Pages/a006.html (8 of 10)3/7/2005 12:44:37 PM
www.wehope.com/a006.html
particle duality and the "null result" of experiments, like the well
known stellar aberration experiment with the water filled telescope
of sir G.Airy in 1871: In water, the photon is not able to "transform"
into the wavefunction due to the molecule density of the water.
Consequently the water has its own reference frame, which is
originating the "Fresnel drag", for water proved through experiment
by H.L.Fizeau in 1851.
At the same time this photon transition system was Leo’s clue to
explain relativity in an ontological way, and at the same time, in
agreement with the "Bell interpretation" of relativity. To speak with
John Bell’s words: "As with relativity before Einstein, there is then a
preferred frame in the formulation of the theory… but it seems
experimentally indistinguishable. It seems an eccentric way to make
a world" (J.S. Bell: "Speakable and unspeakable in QM", p.180).
Fortunately Leo suggested two tests: using a part of the 24 hours
variation of cycle-synchrotron radiation (2:test: page .12) and an
alternative for "John Bell’s spaceship experiment" to prove the "real
contraction of rods" (see app.p 34).
Together with the particle model in hand, he couldn't withstand the
temptation to go further and he found answers and parallel ideas in
some already existing mostly "dissident" theories in physics and
astronomy.
As there are: John Bell (CERN Geneva, app.p.10 and 34): Dissident
interpretation of Special Relativity ("contraction of rods") David
Bohm: (app.p.1-2 and 11) sub-quantum level structure of particles
and pilot wave theory. Halton Arp: (p.16 , app.p.18) migrating
quasars out of Galaxies. Rupert Sheldrake: pigeon homing skills
and pet behavior: (app.p. 26-32). Abdus Salam: sub-quantum level
structure of elementary particles, known as "preons". H.B.G.
Casimir and H.E. Puthoff: Zero Point Energy, Alan Guth: Inflation.
Together with his particle model, this turned the Universe on its
head and gave to his surprise interesting answers to unresolved
questions like: Wave or particle: Wave AND 3-Dimensional
particle!!! Particles are "guided" by Big Bang-entanglement, "pushed
around" by the energetic Higgs-virgin vacuum particles, which
originate: "matter waves". This is supplemented with "Big Bangentangled" pop-up photons triggered by the collapse of the
"wavefunction" (This had an interesting resemblance with the theory
of David Bohm, see Basil Hiley: app.p.11).
These answers originated Leo's suggestions for the "Graviton-Higgs
combined pressure gravity" (page 6-10). Alternative Feynman
diagrams ( app. p. 13). The "Mass-less-repulsive Black Hole"(p.9
and 21). The "Higgs-virgin" particle behavior. The "Zero Point
Energy" ZPE- propulsion of the mass-less Black Hole (quasars and
ball-lightning, p.21-25). The Galaxy-type relation with "anchor Black
Hole" configurations (p.26). Restoration of Universal symmetry by
introducing an extra synchronized anti-mirror Universe, with the
need for an instantaneous "Big Bang entanglement" relation on all
scales between these dual Universes. This formed a base to explain
interference, inertia and other phenomena (app.p 29). Free will
should be connected to my personal anti-mirror (dual) individual
give the explanation for the way matter and anti-matter became
separated in two Big Bang entangled Universes and for the so
called "sheet /finger like" concentration/distribution of matter in the
Universe: the "Lyman Alpha Forest"(app.p.40-41)
Leo started after his discovery, with a lot of intuition and a subjective
believe in a hypothesis: "The sub-quantum level 3-dimensional
structure of particles" and by accumulation of facts (Physical by his
measurements and Astronomical by clear alternative
interpretations) he was able to emerge more objectivity in his
hypothesis.
Consciousness, Chance and Free Will to run this world, seems
dubious, but is causal and at least challenging (app. p. 33).
Challenging because the two main Quantum Mechanical Paradoxes
can be explained and put to the test. The "double slit experiment" by
the "consciousness complexity grade" of the "macroscopic" detector
(app.p. 31-32). The up- or down state "knowledge in advance" in the
"Stern-Gerlach" experiment, by the Big Bang entanglement acting
between Universes ( app.p.42).
Most physicists believe that there is no reason why consciousness
should play a role in physics.
Here the causal answer is presented, that consciousness should
play a KEY role in physics. The quantum vacuum is "pushing" the
electron around, but the Big Bang-entanglement (Big Bangconsciousness) is "guiding" and correlating the electron to its "dual
anti-mirror counterpart" in the opposite synchronized "anti-mirror
Universe". That also humans, birds, flowers and rocks, should be
Big Bang-entangled in this way, sounds weird but is the inevitable
awful conclusion of this model! The singular private SELF (R.
Descartes) is an illusion and has to be replaced by the multiple Big
Bang entangled SELF! (app.p.33)
Is this model pointing into the direction of a "Theory of everything"? I
think it is a good start!
So, I would wish that also the leading professionals would find new
creative horizons in this model.
ATTENTION: The following description of the model, is presented in
the time-sequential uncorrected form, which means that early ideas
of particle-wave duality and "cruising" (instead of "oscillating") Higgs
particles which were described in the beginning (1996-1999) are
printed in the uncorrected form.
Arnold Brandon, Amsterdam: 2-29-2000.
Visit the Author's Website
home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/
BALL LIGHTNING.
Friday, December 24, 2021
The Biggest blunders of astrophysics according to Q-FFF Theory.
Blunders of astrophysics according to Q-FFF Theory.
