SILICON BASED BALL LIGHTNING IN THE LAB, an alternative micro black hole interpretation

EXAMPLES OF SPLITTING SILICON BASED BALL LIGHTNING ( micro black holes created ) IN THE LAB. ( molecular black hole)

Experiment with Nico Vuyk, sept 2012.

Simple methode for Nano Black Hole production, splitting and evaporation in- and outside a silicon globule.
Experiment copied from Ronald Dekker's methode by Leo Vuyk with simple commercial electric welding equippement using carbon electrode on mono crystaline silicium wafer, ( july 2012)

The micro (nano) black hole tunneling exit funnels are clearly visible at all globules.

These globules have no signs of multiple exit funnels (by an internal nano black hole splitting process) as is seen at some of the R.Dekker globules.
(see below)

Below: Trimmed video of Antonio Pavão and Gerson Paiva Brazil.
For general information about the Zero Point Energy Black Hole Paradigm, or ZPE Black Hole Paradigm see:
Examples of NEW PARADIGM Splitting and Pairing Accelerated MASSLESS (Micro) Black Holes.

(From Wikipedia)

Silicon experiments

Experiments in 2007 involved shocking silicon wafers with electricity, which vaporizes the silicon and induces oxidation in the vapors. The visual effect can be described as small glowing, sparkling orbs that roll around a surface. Two Brazilian scientists, Antonio Pavão and Gerson Paiva of the Federal University of Pernambuco^[48] have reportedly consistently made small long-lasting balls using this method.^[49][50] These experiments stemmed from the theory that ball lightning is actually oxidized silicon vapors (see vaporized silicon hypothesis, ).

Second example of Silicon based Ball lightning:
by Ronald Dekker, Martijn Goossens and Pascal de Graaf. TuDelft (University of Delft, the Netherlands)

Electron microscope images of the Silicon based BL nuclei, with permission of the author: Ronald Dekker at al.
Image of some silicon nuclei, all with globular shape and equipped with one large and several smaller appendices and diameters between 0.4 and 0.8 mm

A remarkable globular nucleus: equipped with several small globules- and only ONE larger appendix (TRUNK) without the oxidation skin observed at the Silicon globule. 

Future research should focus on these differences!
My Quantum FFF theory proposal, based on the new black hole paradigm: (see: http://vixra.org/pdf/1103.0011v1.pdf  and http://vixra.org/pdf/1108.0036v3.pdf )      
This silicon globule represents the splitting of the original central NEW micro black hole (Quantum Knot or NANO Black Hole) located inside the Silicon globule, into one larger and multiple smaller BH nuclei, tunneling through the silicon to the surface of the globule and leaving there "naked" Silicon globules (small) and one larger trunk behind..

Below: Examples of possible micro black hole tunneling locations in sectional view.

A: is a large central hole presenting an irregular shape with "arms" suggesting the beginning of the splitting process?
B and C: sectional view of different micro black hole tunneling results?

Examples of large appendices or tunneling trunks or funnels assumed to be originated by the micro black hole while leaving the globule. Curved trunks are an indication for extra spin of the silicon globule at the end of the journey. (see also the "roundabouts" observed at the black scorch trace image below)

Examples of small "naked" globules supposed to represent the tunneling exit of the smallest micro black holes.

How could we relate these images to Quantum FFF theory based effects?
By assuming that splitting NEW paradigm micro black holes are the shaping origine of these silicon based nuclei. for new paradigm black holes see the older blog article (17-05-2012).

If we look at SECTIONAL VIEWS of these nuclei: we find some extra support for this hypothesis.
However, new experiments under nitrogen conditions combined with other variabilities are needed to get more foundation for this hypothesis.

Sectional views. 

A; Future metallurgical research should define which molecules are gathered here.

B; Future research should produce clues why the Oxidation skin is monolitic and has a very thin boundary layer (D)

C: This double hole could be representing the curved exit tunnel of the main micro black hole as the origine of the nearby located trunk shaped appendix.(A)

Macro Casimir compactification process on Silicon particles is an example of decreasing entropy around black holes. see: http://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk and http://vixra.org/abs/1103.0097 

For more info, see;

The new black hole at larger scale:

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2012/05/500-light-years-wide-cygnus-x-area.html

this is an example for the proposal that NEW paradigm black holes are active at all universal scales from ball lightning Comets Sunspots Herbig Haro objects Galaxy forming Galaxy Anchor Black Holes (GABHs) Dark matter, and the Big Crunch/ Big Bang. (Pulsating Universe hypothesis)

Artificial Ball Lightning production and exploitation device for

Zero Point Electric Energy usage.

http://vixra.org/pdf/1108.0036v3.pdf

Quantum FFF theory is based on my early research on the architecture of elementary particles related to ball lightning with micro black holes. See report on 4e ICBL in 1995, reporting:
"Elementary particle architecture links ball lightning with microscopic black holes
(L. Vuyk). "  8 august 1995, by Geert C Dijkhuis: http://home.wxs.nl/~icblsec/1995.html

Image below: Silicon BLs leaving black scorch traces on (horizontal) paper, some with regular white bounching contact points (ABCD).
Two traces are equippe with strange roundabouts (due to local silicon nucleus rotation?) at the end of the bouncing traces (A, C and D).
Future experiments should focus on these roundabouts, because it is assumed that here we will find silicon nuclei equipped with "Curved Trunks" as the tunneling ejecting result of the large micro black hole.
Two aberrant rectangular scorches are observed at (E,F) assumed to be the scorching result of hot silicon particles without internal micro black holes.

Why Silicon?

How a future Silicon based Ball Lightning experiment could look like.

Other explanations for spinning and self propulsion of silicon based ball lightning is given by:
Gerson S. Paiva and Carlton A. Taft
Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas, 22290-180, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
called
SELF-PROPULSION OF LEIDENFROST SILICON BALL LIGHTNING
http://sbpmat.org.br/9encontro/especific_files/papers/B532.pdf

The pair suggested that when lightning strikes a surface, like the Earth's silica-rich soil, a vapor is formed. This silicon vapor may condense into particles that combine with oxygen in the air to slowly burn with the chemical energy of oxidation.

National geographic quote:
Pavão and Paiva have spent two years testing the theory with a simple experiment.
They used electrodes to shock silicon wafers with enough electricity to create a silicon vapor.
Most of the artificial orbs lasted two to five seconds, but at least one has survived as long as eight seconds—approximating natural ball lightning and far exceeding previous efforts to create the phenomenon in the lab.

Some examples of pairing and splitting Black Holes at astronomical scales; Comet Hartley 2, Cygnus A and the Eagle nebula as an indication that black holes are active at all scales in the universe, from microscopic up to the Big Bang!.

Comet Hartley2, with a comparable identity with the silicon nuclei described before, however at a larger scale..

Cygnus X and Carina areas, a showcase for Quantum FFF theory and the new black hole paradigm.

see also:

http://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk

Herschel does reveal the region's complex filaments of cool gas and dust that lead to dense locations where new massive stars are forming. Cygnus X lies some 4500 light-years away toward the heart of the northern constellation of the Swan. At that distance this picture would be almost 500 light-years wide.
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap120517.html

A recent Carina Photo:

How equally sized Black holes can come across shortly and split into

Herbig Haro dumbbells with star forming in between.

How different sized black holes are able to downscale each other.

The smaller black hole will always split the larger one. 

The Eagle example of splitting and pairing black holes to become starforming Herbig Haro dumbbell systems.

Accelerated star formation in between black holes by vacuum deformation of dark Casimir energy.

The Higgs vacuum in between black holes has a-symmetric oscillation qualities

Anti-symmetric vacuum oscillations around a single black hole.

The new physics of the black hole

SPLITTING ELECTRONS?

Observations of a 'single' electron apparently splitting into two independent entities -- so-called quasi-particles -- are reported in this week’s Nature.

See: http://phys.org/news/2012-04-electrons.html
Electrons doing the splits
April 18, 2012

However,
According to Quantum FFF theory, each elementary particle has 4x hinge connected parts.
So the electron should even be able to split into 4 parts, if not only ONE- but all 4x hinges of the Higgs particle are able to transform into splitting points.

LHC antimatter anomaly hints at new physics and Quantum FFF theory

According to Quantum FFF theory, the vacuum has chiral abilties by massless Higgs particles oscillating along a tatrahedron shaped vacuum lattice equipped with a slight chiral structure.
see:
Construction principle of  "chiral atoms of spacetime geometry"


LHC antimatter anomaly hints at new physics ":
"The Large Hadron Collider has turned up differences in how particles of matter and antimatter decay that the reigning standard model of physics may not be able to explain

WE ARE here thanks to a curious imbalance in the universe. "

Supercomputer probes famous but messy particle split :
New Scientist says:
"It is one the biggest mysteries in physics - where did all the antimatter go? Now a team of physicists claims to have found the first ever hint of an answer in experimental data."
"According to our current picture, the big bang produced both particles and antiparticles in equal amounts, most of which mutually annihilated to release energy. At some point, some unknown factor must have led there to be slightly more particles than antiparticles"

 see also:

Black hole horizon curvature dependent balance between plasma creation

and e-e+ annihilation in Quantum FFF Theory

http://vixra.org/pdf/1111.0061v1.pdf

The MAJORANA particle's form according to Quantum FFF theory

news:

Theoretical Physicists Probe the Majorana Mystery 08-02-2012.

“When matter and antimatter collide, they typically disappear in a burst of energy -- not so with the Majoranas, thought to be stable and robust.”
“Majorana could collectively form as "quasiparticles," built out of ordinary electrons in matter, under appropriate physical conditions.”

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/08/120801113540.htm

The Majorana particle's form according to Quantum FFF theory.

(FFF= Function Follows Form)

Can we be sure that the Majorana is a Fermion?

According to Quantum FFF theory the Majorana is not a Fermion!! because it has a different middle hinge in the (U) position and not in the (L) or (R) position which is needed for the characteristic double spin of Fermions.

 The Majorana shape is supposed to be the result of a transformed or converted Fermion, especially a converted electron or positron!

The shape shifting is simply the rotation of the middle hinge of both particles by 90 degrees!.

So the transformations  are:  ORO into OUO and OLO into OUO. 

This rotation is supposed to be done by the intervention of TWO opposite oscillating Higgs particle rings forming a kind of lasso, each around one of the eletron-/positron arms.

As a result, the Majoran has an (S) shape has NO pitch or Chirality, but it can have spin, which is supposed to be very chaotic, but in harmony with the second (or more) entangled Majorana particles.

6x Leptons: Electron Positron, Muon (-and +) and Tauon (-and+)