According
to Quantum Function Follows Form Theory, the big bang was the evaporation and
splitting of a former Big Crunch black hole nucleus of compressed Axion Higgs
particles into the
oscillating Axion /Higgs field vacuum lattice respectively chunky nuclei of
dark matter black holes.
At the same
time this explosion should remain symmetric by entanglement and not only
produce material universes but also anti material universe bubbles in the form
of a raspberry, the multiverse.
As a
consequence, of a cyclic multiverse we should be able to find signs of a
contracting process inside our own universe.
One of that
signs is the well known merging of galaxies into clusters and Galaxy cluster
merging into galaxy super clusters.
However it
is still not observed that the vacuum space between the galaxy super clusters
is also contracting.
The Hubble
redshift we observe, is the main objection for such a contracting vacuum system
which is adopted by the physics community as a sign for the expansion of the
universe.
The Hubble
redshift is not a definite signal for expansion if we adopt that the redshift
is also subjected to a process of vacuum absorption by proliferated chunks of “new
physics” electric dark matter black holes.
Recently I
found that the merging of galaxy clusters itself show dynamic observational signs
of a contraction of the vacuum inside the merging galaxy clusters by the anomalous central clustering of the
dark matter black hole content which seems to be stripped from the individual
galaxy clusters located at the borders of the new super cluster.
( see Abell
520 and bullet cluster: “no inertia effect of dark matter black holes”.)
If there is
vacuum absorption inside galaxy clusters, then we also may assume that the
universal vacuum between galaxy clusters should be also subjected to this
absorption process, as a sign for universal contraction leading to a big crunch
black hole.
see: https://www.academia.edu/29847236/Galaxy_Cluster_Merging_and_Vacuum_Absorption_by_black_holes_as_a_Support_for_a_Contracting_Universe
