New Nuclear Polar-Ring Structure

A Mathematical challenge to translate a new geometrical ( Polar Ring) system for magic numbered nuclei, into one formula.
The Large Hadron Collider at Geneva, is perhaps able to find traces of the AXIAL POLAR RING SYMMETRY of ion nuclei in their heavy ion program by the CMS (Muon) detector.
The results could even give new information on the nuclear geometry described below.
latest news: 8 november 2010:
The CMS experiment at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider (LHC) has recorded its first lead-lead collisions at an energy of 2.76 TeV per nucleon pair, marking the start of its heavy ion research program and the search for "axial symmetry of nuclei".

New NUCLEAR POLAR RING geometry of atoms, based on MAGIC NUMBER logic.
Proposal for a new 3-Dimensional nucleon system for atomic nuclei, based on magic numbers.
As is well known, Magic numbers are assumed to be in action for the atomic nuclear system of protons as well as neutrons. See:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/03/new-math-needed-for-new-nuclear.html

Each nucleus has only one polar central axis with an even number of nucleons on it in combination with one or two equatorial symmetric coaxial ring systems.
There are TWO ring systems possible in a symmetric co-axial combination located around the central axis: coined an INNER and an OUTER RING system.

Only the two highest numbered magic numbers: T=82 and T=126 seem to be equipped with this inner ring system.


The rough rules are:
For magic numbered nuclei:
The existence of a linear shaped axis of an even numbered string of nucleons.

The axis symmetrical oriented even numbered strings of nucleons in ring shape, perpendicular oriented to the central nucleon axis.
The whole nuclear geometry, all together in more or less globular shape and as such with axis- and equatorial symmetry.
If the nucleon number of 82 is reached, an additional equatorial "inner" ring of 6 nucleons is present.
For 126 nucleons this number is raised to 20 nucleons devided into three rings with 6,8,and 6 nucleons.

For non magic numbered nuclei:
The existence of a linear shaped axis of an even/or ODD numbered string of nucleons.
The axis symmetrical oriented even/or ODD numbered strings of nucleons in ring shape, perpendicular oriented to the central nucleon axis.
The whole nuclear geometry, all together in more or less globular shape and as such with axis- and equatorial symmetry.
If the nucleon number of 82 is reached, an additional equatorial "inner" ring of 6 nucleons is present.
For 126 nucleons this number is raised to 20 nucleons devided into three rings with 6,8,and 6 nucleons.

Overview of the system:
For T=8 we count the nucleons (dots) from top to bottom:
On the axis = 2 nucleons
On the single ring: 6 nucleons

For T=20, we count dots from top to bottom:
On the axis =4 nucleons
On the three (3) rings: 4,8,4 = 16 nucleons
(4+16=20)

ALTERNATIVE:

For T=20, we could even count from top to bottom:
On the axis =6 nucleons
On the three (3) rings: 4,6,4 = 14 nucleons
(6+14=20)

According to my two kinds of nuclear structure of the T=20 nucleus, I would expect that there are two kinds of Calcium (z=20) atoms. I am not a nuclear specialist, so I am not able to point into examples for calcium.
The only hint I would give is that inside double magic Calcium (20protons+28 neutrons)
I would expect that the proton structure should have an axial amount of 6 protons, combined with three rings of 4,6,4 nucleons.

Why?  because the T=28 neutron nucleus has an axis of 8 neutrons and three rings of 6,8,6 neutrons, which gives maximum space for the proton nucleus


For T=28, we count dots from top to bottom:
On the axis =8 nucleons
On the three (3) rings: 6,8,6 = 20 nucleons
(8+20=28)

For T=50, we count dots from top to bottom:
On the axis =12 nucleons
On the five rings: 6,8,10,8,6,= 38 nucleons
(12+38=50)

For T=82, we count dots from top to bottom:
On the axis =16 nucleons
On the seven (7) OUTER rings: 6,8,10,12,10,8,6,= 60 nucleons
On the single (1) INNER ring: =6 nucleons
(16+60+6=82)

For T=126, we count dots from top to bottom:
On the axis = 20 nucleons
On the nine (9) OUTER rings: 6,8,10,12,14,12,10,8,6,= 86 nucleons
On the three (3) INNER ring: =6,8,6=20 nucleons.
(20+86+20=126).

THE NEXT STEP:
For T=184, we count dots from top to bottom:
On the axis = 24 nucleons
On the nine (11) OUTER rings: 6,8,10,12,14,16,14,12,10,8,6,= 116 nucleons
On the three (5) INNER ring: =6,8,10,8,6=38 nucleons.
On the ONE extra INNERring: =6
(24+116+38+6=184).

According to the foregoing systematic approach, THE NEXT STEP as new ISLAND OF STABILITY should HAVE 254 NUCLEON!!! See below::
For T=254, we count dots from top to bottom:
On the axis = 28 nucleons
On the nine (11) OUTER rings: 6,8,10,12,14,16,18,16,14,12,10,8,6,= 146 nucleons.
On the three (5) INNER ring: =6,8,10,12,10,8,6=60 nucleons.
On the ONE extra INNERring: =6,8,6=20 nucleons.
(28+146+60+20=254).


Conclusion : between 126-184 and 254, we do not expect to have REAL islands of stability.


Newscientist; 2011 preview: No 'magic' element just yet.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20827923.500-2011-preview-no-magic-element-just-yet.html

Elements occupying the far depths of the periodic table are so exotic and ephemeral it seems as if they are only barely there. In early 2010, when physicists announced the creation of the superheavy element ununseptium, even the handful of atoms that were made decayed into smaller ones in a fraction of a second.

Theory predicts, however, that superheavy isotopes with lifetimes of minutes can be made. These might have novel properties. What's more, they would confirm the existence of the fabled "island of stability",


See also my book: The New GOD Particle and Free Will is now available also as e-book by LuLu.com under:

http://www.lulu.com/content/2552961

Triple Stellar aligned Objects: two black holes with a young star in the middle

My book: The New GOD Particle and Free Will is now available also as e-book by LuLu.com under:
http://www.lulu.com/content/2552961

Peculiar examples of triple star formations in LMC and SMC.

Recently I found out that two special zones on both sides of themain body of the SMC ( Small Maggelanic Cloud) contained special formed stellar distributions.see below. I found typical distributions:

A: three stars in line with equal pacing ( equidistance) in betweenthese three stars, and

B: Elliptical string formations of four or more stars ( probablycircular strings, seen from aside)The linear ( triple) star formations are fully in line with my newBlack Hole paradigm, where every solar system should be based ontwo "Stellar Black holes"( SABHs) with "SUN" and a planetary systemin between. ( this should also be the case for our own Solar system)

see also: http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/

Attention: only some of the peculiar stellar string examples are indicated by rectangles and ellipses.

The linear ordered stellar objects indicated by a rectangle, are a combination of THREE stellar object in a straight line order, with an equal distance between these three objects.

Elliptical shaped strings ( supposed to be in fact real circular strings) of stellar objects are indicated by an ellipse.

New: 2016:

High Speed Black Holes.

My book: The New GOD Particle and Free Will is now available also as e-book by LuLu.com under:
http://www.lulu.com/content/2552961

The so called HH1 jet inside the eye of the Rosette Nebula, is according to this model, probably not a fast moving peculiar small "bullet" Star, but a Black Hole.

See below: THE NEED FOR A NEW BLACK HOLE.

So if my proposal is correct and this Rosette HH1 “bullet star” is a black hole, migrating with a speed of 2500 km/sec, out of the Rosette centre, then it is the half of a newly to form Herbig-Haro system somewhere in the Rosette system, to create new stars in between and become later a temporary equidistant triple stellar object, as we observe, as long as local gas will be in contact with the gas repelling horizon of both NEW Paradigm black holes.

ROSETTE NEBULA

Planetary Lightspeed Frame Dragging by LASOF ( Local A-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)

Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?
As is stated before, the ellipsoidal shaped LASOF (local A-symmetrical oscillating vacuum frame) frame seems to influence the lightspeed around the earth in a complex way.
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/03/how-small-anomalies-could-influence.html
However, there is also reason to assume that the same LASOF is equipped with extra gravity drag, which could be the origin of the so called Fly By “Slingshot” anomaly.
The FlyBy “slingshot” anomaly is the UNEXPECTED EXTRA push which is given to spacecrafts passing the Earth.
n the next article is made clear, that the gravitational asymmetry is oriented in the
direction of the Earth’s motion within an assumed unique reference frame (just like the LASOF ellipsoid?)
see:
H. J. Busack
17. November 2007
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0711/0711.2781.pdf

Part of the abstract:
All anomalous velocity increases until now observed during the Earth flybys of the spacecrafts Galileo, NEAR, Rosetta, Cassini and Messenger have been correctly calculated by computer simulation using an asymmetric potential term in addition to the Newtonian potential.

The specific characteristic of this term is the lack of coupling to the rotation of the Earth or to the direction of other gravitational sources such as the Sun or Moon. Instead, the asymmetry is oriented in the direction of the Earth’s motion within an assumed unique reference frame.

Radar refelection anomalies for Venus and Mercury.

If a radar signal leaves the Earth with a speed C-v, in the Solar reference frame (v=21.5 km/s. interpolated earth orbit speed into the direction of Venus) and after a 70 million km travel the speed of the radar pulse has become C (v=extinct).

THEN--after bouncing back on the approaching Venus--- the radar signal leaves Venus with the speed of C+v, (v=35 km/s. Venus orbit speed) and after 54 million km this speed has become also C.

As a consequence: FIGURE 3-4 ( see below) OF THE SHAPIRO RADAR REFLECTION ANOMALY CAN BE EXPLAINED, by the mutual overlap of Venus and later Earth of te "extinction distances". ( see also fig C. and C2 for Venus and fig.D. for Mercury below)

ATTENTION, for the time being, this has nothing to do with the well known "Shapiro delay" for signals passing massive objects like the Sun.

Below figure C2, represents the moment of 10 april 1964. Attention: only the radar signal that is leaving a planet is influeneced by the LASOF C+v or C- v!!
The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
In 1964 it was I.I.Shapiro who made precise radar reflection measurements on Venus and Mercury. He found a peculiar reflection anomaly for both planets around the moment of conjunction. He didn't have a clear explanation for this anomaly ( see the text on top of page 170)
Around the 10-15th of may and 20-27 july 1964, we can see a clear change in the radar reflection of Venus, which in my perspective can only have one origin: the influence of the overlapping Earth related globular extinction LASOF (local anti-symmetrical oscillating vacuum frame) with Venus. This was reason to accept that the radius of the LASOF globule should be about 70 million km. As a logic result, the Venus related LASOF should have a radius of 54 million km. For Mercury the LASOF radius should be 21 million km. ( see below)

My altenative(LASOF) interpretation of the anomaly

The I.I.Shapiro Radar reflection data is showing us that:

The Planetary reference frame for the Lightspeed seems to be dragged by Planets in a special way.

ONLY the EM signal which is LEAVING a MASSIVE object like Earth, Mercury or Venus, seems to be influenced over a certain distance of extinction, by the speed of the Planets.

The incoming signal is not influenced at all!!!

I will call the origin of this strange phenomenon: LASOF ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)

For the basic small anomalies see also:

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/03/how-small-anomalies-could-influence.html

GPS low elevation Test possibilities
Extra Orbital lightspeed extinction distances of Planets are: 70 million km for the Earth and 54 million km for Venus and 21 million km for Mercury ( see below).

Attention: for clarity, the Earth-Solar axis, is depicted in these sketches as fixed, ( not in motion) while the other planets are in ( extra) motion through the different days.

Earth and Venus LASOF diameter calculation. Below figure C, represents more than one moment in 1964. For clarity, Planet Earth is imaged as standing still and Venus is approaching Earth with 35 km/sec.. Attention: only the radar signal that is leaving a planet is influeneced by the LASOF C+v or C- v!!

Mercury LASOF diameter calculation.

My suggestion to search for minimal effects on Earth.

The Evaporating Big Bang and other Black Holes

The splitting and evaporation of the original Big CRUNCH Black hole, as an example of the start of a 8-or 12-fold set of Entangled CPT ( Charge Parity and Time) symmetric COPY Universes.

Distortion of Galaxies evidence for Dual sets of Galaxy Anchor Black Holes ( GABHs) with a Dark matter Function.

Non Symmetrical Higgs-Vacuum pressure vectors around a black hole and the propeller shape of fermions should be the origin of the local Fermion repulsion horizon of each Black hole.

The rough differences between the Old and New Black Hole, and the possibility to explain "gas-tail propelled" migrating Black Holes.

The DOUBLE Black Hole -Vacuum propelled gas-dynamics and ELECTRON JETS of Cygnus-A an obvious example of a cosmic vacuum energy converter into ELECTRIC POWER .

Rigid Gluonium Knots and Ball lightning

Ball lightning/ small Comet/ Fireball, photo by Werner Burger in Montafon mountains Austria.Werner reported that there was some dripping rain and far rumbling thunder.What we are able to observe on this photo, is that this fireball has a TAIL which seem to be produce a trail of (water) vapour.At the same time it looks as if some raindrops are accelerated with a "curve" into the direction of the falling fireball, which could be a sign of mass Dynamic attraction by the fireball.Some other "raindrops" seem to be linear accelerated more or less in line and keep up with the fireballs tail.These features seem to me a clear example of the violation of the second law of thermodynamics and a great support of my model for a NEW black hole theory.http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2007/02/higgs-vacuum-energy-lensing-effect-and.html

For x-ray production related to discharges, see also:

Multiple X-ray bursts from long discharges in air, C.V. Nguyen, A.P.J. van Deursen, U. Ebert, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41, 234012 (2008) [7 pages, 7 figures], paper

4-PARTICLE GLUON-PHOTON GLUEBALL.

2-PARTICLE GLUON-PHOTON GLUEBALLS

MICRO-BLACK HOLE- BALL LIGHTNING NUCLEUS.

QUARK COMBINATIONS OF

FERMION-GLUON-PHOTON CLICK-ON KNOTS.

The Black Hole relation with Comets

My book: The New GOD Particle and Free Will is now available also as e-book by LuLu.com under:
http://www.lulu.com/content/2552961

Werner Muller.

The well known St. Gallenkirch Ball Lightning photo made by Werner Burger, is supposed to be a so called "Small Comet" and seems to be originated by magnetic and x-ray interference. (Solar , Sprite or Elve)

see:http://www.naturschau.at/wissen/gem_9548.shtm

The Mouse.

The so called "Mouse", a peculiar fast moving Pulsar? or a migrating Black hole? Speed, 1,3 million miles per hour, lenght 55 lightyears. ( Chandra 2004)

Is Saturns Moon Telesto, with a smooth icy surface, the former Shell of an evaporated Micro Blak Hole Comet nucleus? (Cassini satellite)

Is Saturns moon Hyperion a former Comet without a micro black hole nucleus?

Or is Saturns moon Hyperion THE example of an abandoned Icy Shell of an Evaporated micro black hole Comet nucleus? (Cassini satellite).

The Peculiar radial structure and the Globular shape in the middle of the Moon could be the tell tales of a Nuclear micro black hole evaporation.

Vacuum Lattice models and Diffraction

Professor Rernate Loll ( University of Utrecht) wrote on Cosmic matrix models:

Armed with last century's insights into the nature of both quantum theory and general relativity, physicists believe that probing the structure of space and time at distances far below those currently accessible by our most powerful accelerators would reveal a rich geometric fabric, where spacetime itself never stands still but instead quantum-fluctuates wildly. One of the biggest challenges of theoretical physics today is to identify the fundamental "atoms of spacetime geometry" and understand how their interactions give rise to the macroscopic spacetime we see around us and which serves as a backdrop for all known physical phenomena."

Leo Vuyk wrote:

The fourth dimension seems to be the oscillation speed (potential time base) of the Higgs doublets along the Cosmic lattice edges of the vacuum spin field.

Higgs particle doublets are supposed to oscillate in "tandem" or doublets (like a boxer piston engine) along each vacuum lattice edge, to be able to transfer photonic information properly.

This system need to have Higgs particle doublets because otherwise it would be impossible to have a decent information transition system at the vortices.

In this system is one lattice edge equal to one Planck length.

Around black holes, the Higgs lattice system will be absorbed by the black hole and the Planck length will increase!!!

. One Higgs doublet oscillation along the lattice is the base for TIME.

TIME is running forward because the universe is like a huge pinball machine. Spinning Fermions (the pinball) are driven by the oscillating Higgs field (the electric springs) which is supposed to be the origin of the general increase of entropy base of the second law of thermodynamics.
However dark matter in the form of black holes will eat the dark energy of the Higgs field and decrease entropy again, reason to postulate a pulsating and cyclic universe.
Universal Symmetry is not broken if we accept that each material universe is entangled at a long distance with an anti-material copy universe, equipped with opposite chirality inside the oscillating Higgs lattice field.

Model with "curved Lattices" of infinite length of so called "Fiber space".

Models with "Linear lattices" and information transfer points or knots, are supposed to be able to do the Quantum Mechanical job better than fiber based spaces (see figure above). The lattice density of space should become infinite, to do the photon transportation job from every point in space into my telescope.

the .

SIDEREAL DIFFRACTION VARIATION,

HOW THE VACUUM IS ABLE TO MIMIC: C= CONSTANT

"Wrapping Fluxes around the compact geometries" "there are a lot of ways" to wrap!! "for every mode of vibration of the field" there is a vacuum energy!!

( according to Lee Smolin in "the Trouble with Physics" p.152-155.)

Alternative 3D "Star of David" Space Filler without "Connection Tetrahedrons".

The Geometry of Decay Processes in Detail

2-D overview of Quark generations with decay directions and Muon- Tau .

The QUATRON particle, Three hinges and Four elbow macaroni shapes.

There are 5 different shaped monopole photons possible, which have the ability to "click-on with electrons or positrons to form quarks.

Three types of photons (LOL,LOU,UOU) are able to click-on with electrons (ORO)and three types (ROR,ROU,UOU) are clicking with the positron (OLO).

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2007/01/introduction.html

Weak- Electromagnetic- and Strong interactions.

Decay basics.

Particle geometry and massless Higgs-vacuum model.

Higgs Fermion interaction types and products.

14 ELEMENTARY SINGULAR BUILDING BLOCKS, AS BASE FOR EVERYTHING, PLUS THE VACUUM ENERGY PRODUCING OSCILLATING HIGGS PARTICLE.

XXX

OLO-ORO=ELECTRON-POSITRON

LOL-LOU-ROR-ROU-UOU=GLUON-PHOTON MONOPOLES.

LOR (OR ROL)= GRAVITON.

LLL-RRR-LRL-RLR-ULU-URU= NEUTRINOS

XXX

OOO= massless HIGGS PARTICLE

New Feynmann diagrams as a logical result.

Examples of well known particle decay processes translated for
The Higgs “Quatron Torus Particle" system.

Suggestion for the W+ and Z particles.
The W particles could harbour one or two extra valence Electrons or Positrons to explain the recent so called Tevatron Bump showing more massive W particles.
( april-6-2011)

The Quatron Torus particle is designed as a real 3D
Shape-changeable Particle, to model and mimic the
sub-quantum structure of all known Particles described
by the “standard model” and beyond the standard model,
(monopoles, Gluons) to be able to explain even the most
complex and weird particle decay processes like the Kaon decay.
(See below and the Attached pages 1-6)

Only spinning particles gain mass by the production of gravitons

out of the collision process with massless Higgs particles


Decay examples:

Muon decay.The Muon decaying compound “click-on” Particle (see
Below ) coded: (ORO,LOL,LOL). Is able to decay into
three single parts: ORO+LRL+LLL. (changing one LOL
into a LRL Particle (one hinge rotation over 90 degrees: R>L)
and one LOL into a LLL Particle (one hinge rotation over 90 degrees: O>L).

These particles are called: the Electron(ORO), the
anti-electro-neutrino (LRL) and the muonic neutrino
(LLL).

Kaon decay.For normal Kaon plus decay, the main decay routes
according to the literature are: (A: mu+, muonic
neutrino)or (B: pi+, pi0)
The Kaon + Particle is coded: for the
U-Quark:(OLO,ROR)and for the anti-S Quark:
(OLO,OLO,ROR).
For the A route: it is proposed that the u-Quark
(OLO,ROR)decays into (LLL,ROR) which Particle is
supposed to disintegrate and produce the (LLL) muonic
neutrino and one undetected Gluon (ROR) will disappear
into the Gluonic “sea”.
The anti-s-Quark (OLO,OLO,ROR)will change into a
positive muon (OLO,ROR,ROR).

For the B route: it is proposed that the U-Quark
(OLO,ROR) does not decay and that the anti-S Quark
also decays into (OLO,ROR,ROR) which is in combination
with the U-Quark a positive pion+ Particle.
The pion-0 Particle coded: U, anti-U Quark: (OLO,ROR),
and (ORO,LOL) are mirror symmetric and able to emerge
directly from the vacuum as so called pair production
results.

Rare Kaon–Plus decay.
A rare Kaon plus Particle decay: K+ => pi+, nu, nubar
, (pi + , neutrino anti-neutrino) is recently
discovered and now acknowledged by a Brookhaven AGS
experiment 949:see: http://www.phy.bnl.gov/949/

Interestingly this rare Kaon decay can easily be
derived from the “Quatron Torus Particle” system
properties.
The most simple explanation by this Quatron Particle
click-on system is to assume that the decay is the
same as route B mentioned before and in addition that
the Pion 0 Particle (OLO,ROR)+(ORO,LOL) decays into
two neutrinos.(OLO)=>(RLR) and (ORO)=> (LRL). The
(ROR) and (LOL) Gluons are supposed to “disappear into
the Gluonic “sea” as described above under route A.


Kaon Long/ Short decay.
It is proposed that the Kaon and anti Kaon Particles
(ds)are mixing with themselves and with the Eta (ss)
Particle by the continuous changing of one Gluon into
a Lepton to change the d Quark into an s Quark and
backwards a Lepton into a Gluon from s into a Quark.
(d<=> s)
At the same time it is proposed that the backward
changing d into s last longer due to the slight
chirality of the vacuum .
The angle of attack of the Tandem oscillating Higgs
Particles to the Quarks, must be slightly different.
This is reason to propose that it is the S, anti-S
(Eta Particle) that is the reason for the strange Kaon
decay time-differences
Explanation: the Kaon 0 Particle coded as: d-Quark:
(ORO,LOL,LOL) anti-s Quark: (OLO,OLO,ROR)
will change into an Eta (s) Particle: s Quark:
(ORO,ORO,LOL) anti-s Quark: (OLO, OLO, ROR) by the
Direct Weak attack mechanism of the tandem vacuum
Particles to change three hinges of one compound
Particle at once (OLO <=> ROR, or ORO <=>LOL).
Then after a while, the intermediate (s anti-s) Eta
Particle will be changed into the
anti-Kano-0, coded: S: (ORO,ORO,LOL) anti-D:
(OLO,ROR,ROR,)
Thus it is assumed that the origin of this strange
Long and Short Kaon decay mechanism is to find in the
difference in transition speed for the LOL Gluon into
the ORO Electron (needed to change the d Quark into an
s Quark) which is supposed to be faster due to the
chirality of the vacuum than the transition speed to
change the OLO Positron into the ROR Gluon (needed to
change the anti-s Quark into an anti d Quark, to
produce the anti Kaon-0 Particle).

Special Weak Interactions:

The “Direct Weak attack mechanism by the tandem oscillating vacuum
Particles” or "two Higgs doublets".
Special Weak interactions are supposed to change all
three Hinges at once without the aid of the
Z-Particle, such as in Kaon 0,- Eta mixing processes
(OLO<=>ROR or ORO<=>LOL described below).

Glueballs.
( for latest Glueball information see also;
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-ph/pdf/0209/0209339.pdf )

The shape of some Gluons makes it possible to suggest
that these Particles are able to “click-on” to each
other WITHOUT THE AID OF ELECTRON or POSITRONS
and form so called Glueballs, found already 20
years ago in collider experiments.
Model experiments are pointing into the direction of
10x “bound state, click-on” possibilities for two
Gluon Glueballs and also 8x Exotic “bound state,
click-on” possibilities of Gluons with single Leptons
(ORO and OLO).

10 different Knots with 2xGluon Bound States:

UOU+ROR, UOU+LOL.
UOU+LOU, UOU+ROU.

LOU+ROU 2x because there is also a second mirror
image possible.

ROR+LOU, ROR+ROU.
LOL+LOU, LOL+ROU.

8x different Exotic Knots with Gluon-Lepton Bound
States.

OLO+LOU, OLO+ROU.
OLO+LOL, OLO+UOU.

ORO+LOU, ORO+ROU,
ORO+ROR, ORO+UOU.
For comparison, see: 17 masses at
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-ph/pdf/0209/0209339.pdf
Page 11 figure 1, comparison between the Glueball
spectrum and Knot energies.
By: R. Buney.

2x different Knots with 3x Gluon bound states:

3x ROU or 3x LOU.

1x Knot with 4x Gluon bound states:

4x UOU.


This new description of elementary Particles, is based
on the idea that Quarks are not single Particles but
compound Particles (bound states) and able to be
created out of the Higgs vacuum at once as Particle
anti-Particle (Quark) pairs, just like an Electron
Positron pair and able to decay into smaller parts.
(see Page 1)

Kitchen Table Models.
Based on real “kitchen table” model binding
experiments, it is proposed that the 36 different
Quarks of the “Standard model” are composed out of
one, two or three Electrons, or Positrons and one or
two Gluons, both kept together inside the Quark, by
the special shape which these Quatron Particles should have.
All these forms are supposed to be derived by real
shape transformation out of only one Particle, called
the Higgs “Quatron” Particle which should have a
special Torus form.
The Torus form is supposed to be equally divided into
FOUR rigid quarter parts, (like “Macaroni” tubes) each
able to rotate axial relative to the neighbouring
Macaroni tubes and change the shape of the original
Quatron Torus into more complex shapes.
It is assumed that the unification of Particles is
based on a simple 90 degree axial “cutting-edge
rotation” of the four quarters of the Quatron Torus
form.
This Toy system seems to be surprisingly a simple aid
to mimic shapes for elementary Particles, exotic
Particles like Glueballs and sub-quantum decay
processes.


Quatron ( macaroni) Particle model description.
If we imagine a rubber Torus shaped Sealing Ring (say
about 4 cm diameter and a thickness to ring diameter
ratio of about 1: 7) which we cut in two halves, then
we are able to make simple propeller forms out of it,
with two different so called “Pitches”.
We are able to make propeller forms with a left handed
Pitch, or with a right handed Pitch.
We can do so, by gluing the two halves together again
after rotation of one half of the Torus over 90
degrees (left or right rotated), at one of the two
cutting edges. (see page 2, 4,5 and 6)
At the same time, for more complex Particles we need
to cut the Torus into 4 equal quarters ( macaroni
parts), connected to each other by so called “Hinges”,
which are proposed to be able to rotate axial in steps
of 90 degrees.
For each Particle , there has to be only three Hinges
which are coded by the mutual rotational displacement
possibilities: O(=unchanged circle) ,U (=180 degree
rotation), L (=90 degree Left hand rotation) and R
(=90 degree Right hand rotation).
As a consequence, the most simple Particle shapes are
the two “Pitched Propeller forms” described before,
coded ORO and OLO., which we will call arbitrarily the
Electron respectively the Positron.
As an other consequence, the Particle with three
unchanged hinges is coded: (OOO), which is chosen to
be the Higgs-Particle.
A Particle with all three hinges with 90 degrees
rotation to the Right relative to the neighbouring
quarter part, is called (RRR) for three hinges with 90
degrees rotation left it is coded: (LLL) .
The Particle with three hinges rotated over 180
degrees is coded: (UUU).
However not all possible shapes are needed to mimic
the standard model, so Particles with a middle hinge
coded U : (XUX) are not used. The only Particles with
U coded hinges are: UOU ULU URU LOU and ROU. (UOR and
UOL are the same Particles as respectively ROU and
LOU.)

Mechanistic particle transformation.

THE RING SHAPED Higgs Particles coded(OOO) are
supposed to oscillate in Tandem
along so called linear Vacuum Lattices, two by two in
opposite directions, as the symmetrical opposite
pistons of a boxer engine, as the origin of all
energy, spin and mass effects.
This enables the Tandem Higgs Particles (doublets) to change the
form of their own Torus into an Electron and Positron
pair at the same time and to originate all other
oscillations and interactions, as d <=>s and c<=> b .
It is proposed that Photon radiation is the result of
mechanical change by collisions between Single Higgs
Particles and Quarks or Leptons.
There are 6 different shapes for Photons and 5 of them
are supposed to act also as Gluons, because they are
able to ”click –on” to a Positron or Electron and form
Quarks, Muons or Tau Particles.
Weak interaction: The two-Higgs doublets in collision with the Quark
connected Gluons, are supposed to be able to change the symmetrical
shape of three sorts of Gluons (UOU,ROR and LOL) into
Neutrinos, respectively URU,ULU,RRR,RLR,LRL,LLL).
Z-Particles are so called Positroniums (compound
Electron and Positron) able to catch neutrinos and
form a compound temporary W Particle, which seem to be needed to
be able to reshape the Neutrino into a Positron or
Electron or even backwards.
As an example, in Neutron decay, the LOL (d-Quark:
ORO+LOL+LOL) Gluon changes via a Muonic Neutrino LLL
into a Positron OLO (u-Quark: OLO+ROR).(see page 3)
With this Higgs system, it is supposed that Higgs
Particles are able to transfer Photonic geometrical
information at a linear average speed of 7/4 the speed
of Light. The expected transfer retardation at the
vortexes of the Chiral Tetrahedron vacuum Lattice is
included. This should enable the vacuum to mimic the
isotropy of the speed of light.
See: http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/ see: “the Local
Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame” (LASOF)

Summary of the single shaped Particles.

The two simple propeller shaped Particles are coded:

ORO: the Electron.
OLO: the Positron.

Gluons.There are in contrast with the standard model only 5
Gluons needed to satisfy the standard model colour
differences of Quarks.
The Gluons are all 5 able to “click on to the Electron
or Positron and form a compound Particles needed for
all Quarks the Muon and Tau Particle .
They are coded:
UOU, ROR, LOL, LOU, ROU.

Photons.There are in contrast with the standard model : 6
different shapes for (Monopole) Photons, 5 of them
have the same shape as the Gluons mentioned before,
they are: .
UOU= Photon for visible and IR light.
ROR= electric + Photon
LOL= electric – Photon
LOU= magnetic South Photon
ROU= magnetic North Photon
………………………………..
The Graviton ROL (or LOR)= is expected to be the
Photon without “click-on” possibilities.
Because of the frequency overlap of gamma and x-ray
radiation it could be possible that this radiation is
not based on the so called General Photon UOU, but
should be coded differently as LOO and ROO.
In that case there are 8 Photons in stead of 6.

Neutrinos.Neutrinos are supposed to be NOT able to “click-on”
with compound fermions as Gluons do.
In contrast Neutrinos are supposed to be originated as
collision products out of the shape of one of the 5
Gluons or Electron or Positron by the standard Weak
Z-Particle operation
Neutrinos with codes and origin Particles:
RRR: the anti-muon-neutrino. Possible origin
Particles: ROR, ORO
LLL: the muon-neutrino. LOL, OLO
RLR: the electro-neutrino. ROR, OLO
LRL: the anti-electro-neutrino. LOL, ORO
URU: the Tau-neutrino. UOU.
ULU: the anti-Tau-neutrino. UOU.
.
The Z-Particle.The Z-Particle is supposed to be a very loose
“click-on” compound combination of an Electron (ORO)
and a Positron (OLO).
The W-Particle is not assumed to exist as a single
Particle, it is assumed to be a Particle changing
process, in combination with the “aiding” Z-Particle.
The Z Particle is supposed to be a help by form
changing processes of Standard Weak interactions
(described above).



Quark generations.
The three different coloured Up-Quarks are coded:

ORO+LOL, or ORO+LOU, or ORO+UOU. (2 compound
Particles)

Anti-Up-Quarks (three colours) are coded:
OLO+ROR, or OLO+ROU, or OLO+UOU. (2 compound
Particles)

Down-Quarks (three colours) are coded:
ORO+2.LOL, or ORO+2.LOU, or ORO+2.UOU. (3 compound
Particles)

anti-Down-Quarks (three colours) are coded:
OLO+2.ROR, or OLO+2.ROU, or OLO+2.UOU. (3 compound
Particles)

The three different coloured Strange-Quarks are coded:

2.ORO+LOL, 2.ORO+LOU, or 2.ORO+UOU. (3 compound
Particles)

Anti-Strange-Quarks (three colours) are coded:
2. OLO+ROR, 2.OLO+ROU, or 2.OLO+UOU. (3 compound
Particles .

Charm-Quarks (three colours) are coded:
2.ORO+2.LOL, 2.ORO+2.LOU, or 2.ORO+2.UOU. (4 compound
Particles)

anti-Charm-Quarks (three colours) are coded:
2.OLO+2.ROR, 2.OLO+2.ROU, or 2.OLO+2.UOU. (4 compound
Particles)

The three different coloured Bottom-Quarks are coded:

3.ORO+LOL, 3.ORO+LOU, or 3.ORO+UOU. (4 compound
Particles)

Anti-Bottom-Quarks (three colours) are coded:
3. OLO+ROR, 3.OLO+ROU, or 3.OLO+UOU. (4 compound
Particles)

Top-Quarks (three colours) are coded:
3.ORO+2.LOL, 3.ORO+2.LOU, or 3.ORO+2.UOU. (5 compound
Particles)

anti-Top-Quarks (three colours) are coded:
3.OLO+2.ROR, 3.OLO+2.ROU, or 3.OLO+2.UOU. (5 compound
Particles)

Compound Leptons:Muon Particles are coded: mu+: OLO+2ORO,
(=anti-d-Quark) mu-: ORO+2.LOL.(=d-Quark)
Tau Particles are coded: tau+: 2.OLO+2UOU, (=c-Quark).
tau-: 2ORO+2UOU.(=anti-c-Quark)

Counting Particles.We count: 6 Photons (Gluons included) , 6 single
neutrinos, 2 single leptons and one single
Higgs-Particle= 17 single Particles. +36 compound
Quarks and one compound Z Particle = 54 different
formed functional Particles if we exclude exotic
Particles like Glueballs etc.(see below)


MATTER CREATION AND THE CHIRAL VACUUM.

A new reason for a dual-symmetrical smooth evaporation
of multiple anti-mirror universes in an alternative
Big Bang process, is based on the new system for
elementary Particles, described before and the
chirality of the Higgs-Particle based vacuum .
The chirality of the vacuum , should be responsible,
for our material universe, because it is assumed that
anti-matter is less stable than matter within the
moment of creation in a chiral oscillating vacuum after the
“semi-cold Higgs particles evaporating Big Bang”.
Thus Matter in our universe, is supposed to be created
without annihilation processes, direct out of the evaporated
vacuum Higgs-Particles.
At a result, the chirality of the vacuum should be
responsible for the origin of strange CP violations
found in the so called Kaon- O Short and Long decay.

More details at : http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/


Leo Vuyk.

Basic Quark decay modes.