How you become a real radical rebel questioning relativity.

IMHO you are a real radical rebel if you go back to the start of relativity and dig deeper than Einstein did.
Then you have to question the constancy of the lightspeed and even the Fitzgerald contraction descibed by John Bell in "How to teach special relativity"
It was Abdus Salam who proposed that quarks and leptons should have a sub-quantum level structure, and that they are compound hardrock particles with a specific non-zero sized form.
Jean Paul Vigier postulated that quarks and leptons are "pushed around" by an energetic sea of vacuum particles.
David Bohm suggested in contrast with The "Copenhagen interpretation", that reality is not created by the eye of the human observer, and second: elementary particles should be "guided
by a pilot wave".
John Bell argued that the motion of mass related to the surrounding vacuum reference frame, should originate real
"Lorentz-transformations", and also real relativistic measurable contraction.
Richard Feynman postulated the idea of an all pervading energetic quantum vacuum.
He rejected it, because it should originate resistance for every mass in motion, relative to the reference frame of the quantum vacuum.
However, I postulate the strange and counter intuitive possibility, that this resistance for mass in motion, can be compensated, if we combine the ideas of Vigier, Bell, Bohm and Salam, and
a new dual universal Bohmian "pilot wave", which is interpreted as the EPR correlation (or Big Bang entanglement) between individual elementary anti-mirror particles, living in dual
universes. see:
The O‘Connell Effect in Eclipsing Binaries Explained by Mass Related Light Speed Extinction Distances (Lasof) of Stars and Even Planets.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1409.0164v2.pdf

If the orbits of close binary stars are circular, and the light speed is NOT influenced by the speed of the stars, we have to expect that the light curves are symmetrical between moments
of eclipse or even conjunction.
However, This is mostly not the case and still an ongoing debate in astronomy and called the “O ‘Connell effect”.
According to Quantum FFF Theory, however I assume that the local light speed around the  stars is gravity related for a mass related distance from the source (star) called LASOF
ellipsoid, (Local Asymmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
As a result the so called O ‘Connell effect can easily be explained as a logic result of  additional redshift or blueshift by the local lightspeed variation.
At the same time also planets should show such lightspeed extinction effects, which is already measured but not understood by I.I.Shapiro (see “radar astronomy” edition by Evans and
Hagfors, 1964).
see Also: Experiments to determine the mass related Lightspeed extinction volume around the Earth and around spinning objects in the Lab.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1102.0056v2.pdf

Different headed Egyptian anthropomorphic figures, and the Anthropic principle.

Different headed Egyptian anthropomorphic figures, as indication that the Anthropic principle is probably not Universal, as support for an Encephalic or cerebral principle.

see also: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/08/the-antropic-principle-should-change.html

The ANTHROPIC principle should change into ENCEPHALIC principle.

The ANTHROPIC principle should be changed into what I would call ENCEPHALIC (brain) principle.
So, not humans but complexity of brains (the frontal cortex) seem to be cruxial for the survival of species.
According to My Quantum FFF model ( Function Follows Form) the Frontal Cortex of all animals, is supposed to be responsible for the length of the VETO time period (Human=400 msec.Benjamin .Libet) related to each initiative to come to a decision/action inside the idential anti-copy (instant entangled mirror symmetrical) multiverse raspberry bubbles.
Secondly: The fundamental laws of physics take the particular form we observe because all particles and forces are dependent on different sub quantum particle shapes.

IMHO, it could be postulated that the Einstein Rosen (ER) “bridging wormholes” between entangled particles are the guiding channels .for Einstein Podolski and Rosen (EPR) non local entanglement even at universal distances.
So; ER=EPR in the Multiverse and in the lab
My Supersymmetric Multiverse interpretation of quantum mechanics is based on the idea that
NOT ALL POSSIBLE ALTERNATE HISTORIES of OUR UNIVERSE need to exist if there is instant mirror symmetrical wavefunction collapse in at least two distant (Charge and Parity) mirror symmetric universes.
So I postulate that ALL POSSIBLE ALTERNATE HISTORIES of OUR MULTIVERSE
exist because there is instant mirror symmetrical wavefunction collapse in at least two distant (Charge and Parity) mirror symmetric universes.
Then all alternate histories exist but have the same anti-copy mirror result (inside different
charged anti-copy universes).
Dual entangled Cats and anti-Cats in both universes, die or live instantly (superpositioned) without looking at them: they (the nuclear decay trigger) look to each other by long distant instant! Quantum entanglement.
see: 
ER=EPR in the Supersymmetric Cyclic Multiverse and in the lab without strange Cats.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1604.0229v1.pdf 
and: 
Democratic Free Will in the Instant Entangled Multiverse.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1401.0071v2.pdf 
and:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/08/inside-supersymmetric-multiversal.html 
and: 
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/08/no-lhc-particle-susy-means-multiverse.html 

Conclusion: Humans could not be the only intelligent species in the multiverse..

No New Physics by the LHC but by DIGGING UP OLD IDEAS..

The LHC new physics failure could be reason to go back to the beginning, some thoughts
It was Abdus Salam who proposed that quarks and leptons should have a sub-quantum level structure, and that they are compound hardrock particles with a specific non-zero sized form.
Jean Paul Vigier postulated that quarks and leptons are "pushed around" by an energetic sea of vacuum particles.
David Bohm suggested in contrast with The "Copenhagen interpretation", that reality is not created by the eye of the human observer, and second: elementary particles should be "guided by a pilot wave".
John Bell argued that the motion of mass related to the surrounding vacuum reference frame, should originate real
"Lorentz-transformations", and also real relativistic measurable contraction.
Richard Feynman postulated the idea of an all pervading energetic quantum vacuum. He rejected it, because it should originate resistance for every mass in motion, relative to the reference frame of the quantum vacuum.
However, I postulate the strange and counter intuitive possibility, that this resistance for mass in motion, can be compensated, if we combine the ideas of Vigier, Bell, Bohm and Salam, and a new dual universal Bohmian "pilot wave", which is interpreted as the EPR correlation (or Big Bang entanglement) between individual elementary anti-mirror particles, living in dual universes.
See my poster collection for the Quantum FFF Model ( Function Follows Form at the Planck scale)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/albums/72157652141594655
and http://vixra.org/pdf/1604.0229v1.pdf

Strange star KIC8462852 with sphere of Sunspot BHs resembles the vast sphere of BHs in Milky Way

According to Quantum FFF Model, sunspots are micro black holes, ( BHs killing stars) which could even resemble the "vast sphere of observed black holes in center of the Milky way, ( and other galaxies) which seem to kill star production.
see:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/07/nasa-our-milky-way-galaxy-is-embedded.html
and:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/08/strange-star-kic8462852-under-extra.html
and:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/albums/72157645714672412
As a consequence I suggest, that only Herbig Haro (based on dual BH) systems are able to repell Fermions and more complex BH systems are not able to form HH systems with star production and even able to eat Fermions, due to the complexity of the Higgs field between the two BHs.

Butterfly curves depicted in ( 2D) cross section of the (3D) oscillating dark energy push Higgs vacuum lattice. 

Strange star KIC8462852 under extra large sunspot black hole destruction?

According to Quantum FFF Model sunspots are the same as new physics " electric dark matter black holes"
see: http://vixra.org/pdf/1402.0044v4.pdf 
The Impossible Electric Dark Matter Black Hole as the Origin of New Physics even for Comets like 67P,C-G.

Below: Photometry of KIC8462852 as measured by Kepler data. The analysis reveals a slow but steady decrease in the star’s luminosity for about 1000 days, followed by a period of more rapid decline. Image: Montet & Simon 2016.
http://gizmodo.com/the-so-called-alien-megastructure-just-got-even-more-my-1784883811?utm_medium=sharefromsite&utm_source=Gizmodo_facebook 
also: https://www.academia.edu/25189003/Electric_Dark_Matter_Black_Holes_Outside_and_Inside_Galaxies_are_respectively_responsible_for_the_creation_and_contraction_of_a_Cyclic_Universe
see also:
How to kill a galaxy.
"Red Geysers " --Previously Unknown Phenomenon Discovered Killing Off Galaxies of the Universe
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/07/a-new-black-hole-paradigm-supported-by.html

How we could interpret such a process of star destruction by over sized sunspots?
According to Quantum FFF model, new paradigm black holes repel Fermions if there are no other black hole nearby.
In case of galaxy centers and older stars crowded with sunspot BHs , those BHs could probably change into Fermion eating black holes by the complex polarization of the Higgs vacuum lattice.
Fermion repelling BHs are supposed to repel Fermions by their polarization potential of propeller shaped Fermions.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1502.0086v3.pdf 

My Vixra paper summary plus Flickr poster series.

See:
http://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk
Posters:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/
and Facebook info:
https://www.facebook.com/leo.vuyk

see also:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/01/salam-vigier-bell-bohm-and-feynman-form.html

How to teach special relativity ( John Bell seems right) with aether related Lorentz contraction and propeller fermions!!

Lorentz contraction effect of each electron shell around a pear shaped nucleus. 
Propeller shaped Fermions are responsible for the act of contraction by plowing into the tetrahedron oscillating Higgs field!
For the origin of pear shaped nuclei (ellipsoid) according to Quantum FFF Theory, see:'
"Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, chapter 9:
"How to teach special relativity" (p. 67-80)
http://ebooks.cambridge.org/chapter.jsf?bid=CBO9780511815676&cid=CBO9780511815676A018
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/07/pear-shaped-atom-nuclei-sem-to-point.html
and:
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-36597142?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link
Dr Scheck says: "We've found these nuclei literally point towards a ( fixed) direction in space. This relates to a direction in time, proving there's a well-defined direction in time and we will always travel from past to present."
He says: "Further, the protons enrich in the bump of the pear and create a specific charge distribution in the nucleus.
Conclusion, according to Quantum FFF Model:  the electron shell around the nucleus will contract along the central axis of the pear shaped nucleus.
The result ;  contraction of the atom sphere and thus contraction into the absolute direction of flight against the energetic oscillating vacuum lattice.


Now we should imagine what happens at the electron shell.
The opposite effect must be working to form an spheroid shaped electron shell.
 Spheroid =Ellipsoid of revolution, see image.

Pear shaped atomic nuclei is reason to assume John Bell was right!
With Lorentz contraction in special relativity.
The atom nucleus is an ellipsoid with elongated central axis.

The electron shell is a spheroid with shortened central axis, according to the Quantum FFF Model.

Propeller shaped Fermions, polarized into the direction of absolute motion through the vacuum reference frame, are pushed from behind as compensation for their resistance!

How does the Fermion know its polarization to keep? by instant entanglement with their copy Fermions of 11 other universes!
Even Bohm and Vigier was in the right direction!
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2016/01/salam-vigier-bell-bohm-and-feynman-form.html 

A double Stern Gerlach experiment and Bertlemann's socks and more

To solve the Q.M. problem described by J.S.Bell about the standard Stern Gerlach experiment.
Experiment proposal to support the existence of a new kind of Entanglement, which should show up inside a double Stern Gerlach experiment with two S-G magnets with different orientation.
The proposal for this experiment, is based on the hypothesis that all heated and vaporized silver atoms inside the silver oven are entangled as a whole and that magnetic measurement of one atom travelling outside the oven influences the magnetic polarity of all the other atoms in the oven.
If the oven sends the silver atoms (by shutters) alternately to the two magnets, then the resulting impact pattern on both screens will show an additional BAR in the middle of the original impact pattern.
This could be the explanation for the fact that only up and down orientated atoms should enter into the S-G magnet to explain the “non smearing” effect on the screen.
John S. Bell described his doubts about the Stern Gerlach experiment interpretation in his book: “Speakable and unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics on chapter 16 ( Bertlemann's socks) page 140-141.
 John Bell argued that there is no logic to be found behind the fact, that there is a so called “absence of smearing” of the particle impact pattern on the screen.

Alternative double Stern Gerlach experiment to measure possible entanglement polarization effects between vaporized silver atoms outside respectivily inside the silver oven.
The result could give answeres about locality and Bell’s surprize that there was no smearing of impacts on the screen observed between between the upper and lower bar.

If the oven sends the silver atoms in small groups in alternation to opposite magnets, then the resulting impact pattern on the screen will show an additional bar in the middle.
This will support the idea that each measurement of an atom will change the polarisation of all the silver atoms at rest in the oven into 50/50 percent groups with aligned up or down polarisation. According to Quantum FFF Model.

Other experiments.

next : axion inflation and Big Bang black hole splitting. 

Magical Saturn temporary spokes explained by dual micro Black Hole lighthouse effect.

NASA: There is no commonly accepted theory for the creation of spokes. Some ideas suggest that spokes result from meteoroid impacts onto the rings; others suggest that they are created by instability in Saturn's magnetic field, which surrounds the planet, near the rings. Whatever the cause, imaging team members will study the new spoke images and maintain their vigil for additional spoke sightings.
http://www.universetoday.com/401/saturns-ring-spokes-are-back/  Temporary spokes at the rings of Saturn are a mystery for NASA. (see text) Quantum FFF Theory offers a suggestion: Lighthouse pencil gravity effect by dual alignment of internal Cometary black holes inside Saturn.
Such pencil gravity effects are also supposed to be active around the sun ( by dual aligned sunspots) and all other planets (Earth) and moons (Enceladus) vulnerable for crashing comets. ( See flyby anomaly )https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/15553800153 

The Great Red Spot of Jupiter is a persistent anticyclonic storm, ploughing against the storm direction. Indicating that these cometary black holes (new paradigm!) are deeper located. For Saturn this is also an indication how the lighthouse pencil shaped gravity based on dual aligned black holes could work out.see:  see: 
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a3/790106-0203_Voyager_58M_to_31M_reduced.gif 
see also:
http://vixra.org/pdf/1603.0240v1.pdf 

Perhaps also involved : The missing ceres crater problem:

see: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/07/160726122956.htm 

see for gravity lensing also; https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/albums/72157658993403568 

Supernova velocity differences by pencil / lighthouse gravity effects of starspot alignment.

Earth Weather Jet Stream influenced (Rossby) by Solar Lighthouse Pencil gravity waves with gravitating Sunspot alignment origin.

See also vertical spokes on earth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPi5JlS_XFk

The Hubble redshift is cheeting us at long distances with an accelerating universe as result.

Neil Turok recently posted a paper as support for the bouncing universe! see:
Perfect Quantum Cosmological Bounce ( by Niel Turok)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1510.00699v4.pdf
Quatation:
"Our investigations suggest the existence of a consistent and complete semiclassical description of a cosmological bounce, paving the way for detailed investigations of new, simpler and more predictive bouncing models"
see also:
Electric Dark Matter Black Holes Outside and Inside Galaxies Possibly Related to the Creation and Contraction of a Cyclic Universe.
http://vixra.org/abs/1503.0186
and: Hubble Redshift Combined with Universal Contraction is Possible.
http://vixra.org/abs/1303.0211

The Dark Matter Black Hole splitting symmetric Big Bang: Redshift is cheeting us at long distances.

Sabine Hossenfelder presented: Can we please agree what we mean by “Big Bang”?
Quotation of Sabine:
This is a very common misunderstanding, which comes about because we are used to think of gravity as matter affecting other matter, not as matter affecting space. Matter attracts other matter, but matter (of any type) causes the universe to expand
http://backreaction.blogspot.nl/2016/07/can-we-please-agree-what-we-mean-by-big.html?spref=fb 

Sorry Sabine Hossenfelder, 
IMHO, the universe is contracting simply by a different new view on the Hubble redshift, originated by the frequency reduction ( redshift related) around much more proliferated dark matter black holes than cosmologists calculate with. .So the tired light hypothesis is now based on ark matter black holes!
This means that redshift is good for distance observation, but not for receding galaxy speed, at long distances!!! 
see:
The Splitting Dark Matter- Black Hole- Big Bang and the Cyclic Multiverse.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1306.0065v2.pdf
and: http://vixra.org/pdf/1503.0186v5.pdf

Example of stellar density with dark matter BH redshift potential for each star.

Not only galaxy black holes but also Sellar Anchor Black Holes ( SABHs) halos around the galaxy.

Shocking: I am not myself, but only 1/12 part of myself in the 12 fold symmetric multiverse.

See:

Democratic Free Will in the Instant Entangled Multiverse.

http://vixra.org/pdf/1401.0071v2.pdf
The entangled multiverse solution: If we assume that we are living inside one of the 12 copy universes, (as is proposed in ref 2) which are each others observer by “mutual instant entanglement” to trigger randomly and alternating the collapse of the copy wavefunctions inside all universes, (thus also to trigger a volitional act, like Libet's subjects) in the other 11 universes. Then as a consequence, we may expect that only a small part of the students will report to have had the conscious intention to act earlier. Thus in the case of 12 entangled universes we may expect that 1/12 part or 8,3 % of all (human) timing of conscious intention to act, will show a reversed timing sequence between the so called Time of conscious awareness (TCA) which will come before the electric Readiness Potential (RP). Indications of those percentages, are already found by Judy Trevena and Jeff Miller (Otago university NZ). See: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12191935&dopt=Abs

The Benjamin Libet percentage results of pre-planning (RPI) are very poor quantified in his and later experiments. Libet wrote to me in private, that these numbers where "buried" inside his files and therefore, he was not able to produce them. I my view this is a good reason to do it again with more precision on the readiness potential percentage differences between RPI and RPII. If humans are entangled cooperating decision makers inside the postulated 8 or 12 entangled but separated universes, then for every decision we need always only one preplanning test-person who pre-plans his choice. The other 7 or 11 test copy-persons are only able to follow OR VETO this decision.
The consequence: There are 12 myselfs:  I think, so we are!

New Scientist : "PHYSICS FEATURES 15 December 2015
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22830520-800-god-vs-the-multiverse-the-2500-year-war/ 
"God vs the multiverse: The 2500-year war.
"An infinite universe and many worlds leave no room for a creator. Time to rethink what’s sacred, says philosopher of religion Mary-Jane Rubenstein"However, Quantum FFF suggests; 
the Higgs vacuum dark matter black hole particles takes over for the bouncing multiverse, in contrast to the creation of humanity and ethical laws.. Let alone the creation of all the Higgs particles itself.

It is indeed hard to grasp the new physics suggested around electric dark matter black holes as a base for universal expansion and contraction. 

However if black holes only can merge in in over crowded BH areas like the center of galaxies -where the Higgs field is chaotic polarized- and in contrast outside those areas are able to produce Herbig Haro star systems, then there is logic behind the magic.

Other vacuum reference frame effects beyond Shnoll and Sheck.

See: https://www.academia.edu/8467271/The_O_Connell_effect_in_eclipsing_binaries_explained_by_mass_related_light_speed_extinction_distances_LASOF_of_stars_and_even_planets

It was Abdus Salam who proposed that quarks and leptons should have a sub-quantum level structure, and that they are compound hardrock particles with a specific non-zero sized form.
Jean Paul Vigier postulated that quarks and leptons are "pushed around" by an energetic sea of vacuum particles.
David Bohm suggested in contrast with The "Copenhagen interpretation", that reality is not created by the eye of the human observer, and second: elementary particles should be "guided by a pilot wave".
John Bell argued that the motion of mass related to the surrounding vacuum reference frame, should originate real
"Lorentz-transformations", and also real relativistic measurable contraction.
Richard Feynman postulated the idea of an all pervading energetic quantum vacuum.
He rejected it, because it should originate resistance for every mass in motion, relative to the reference frame of the quantum vacuum.
However, I postulate the strange and counter intuitive possibility, that this resistance for mass in motion, can be compensated, if we combine the ideas of Vigier, Bell, Bohm and Salam, and a new dual universal Bohmian "pilot wave", which is interpreted as the EPR correlation (or Big Bang entanglement) between individual elementary anti-mirror particles, living in dual universes.

Pear shaped atom nuclei seem to point into only one fixed direction in space

Dr Scheck says: "We've found these nuclei literally point towards a direction in space. 

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-36597142?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link 
and: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.01485v1.pdf

For the 3D atomic ( with a central axis) model of Quantum FFF Theory: see below.

According to Quantum FFF Theory all nuclei should have a small pear shape pointing into the same direction as a compensation for its absolute velocity in the Higgs field !! That velocity direction is also showed up by the redshift/ blueshift axis of the CMB ( Cosmic Microwave Background)
see: figure 15 at: http://vixra.org/pdf/1305.0041v3.pdf
"The Shnoll Effect explained by Quantum FFF theory."
The pear shape of the radium 224 and barium 144, showed that nuclei could have more mass at one end than the other.
IMHO the pear shape should be related to earlier experiments made by Simon Shnoll .
He found the radioactive decay products have a directional preference related to massive objects around us like the sun and moon.

Quote: "The 27 day sidereal moon related period of similar histograms found by S.Shnoll, seem to
show a split in 2 or 3 subgroups of similar histograms. (fig. 13)
These subgroups are supposed to be a support for a DOUBLE truncated tetrahedron 3D polarization of the vacuum lattice as reference frame with CUBIC and HEXAGONAL lattice
directions.
Michelson-Morley didn’t find the ether, BUT Simon Shnoll did!"

I would suggest that related to Shnoll effects, and the conclusion that each ( heavy) atom could show its relation to a complex ( galaxy solar moon related) reference frame.

If it is possible to measure in real time the variability of the central pear axes of the atom during the experiment, then we may know the truth about the a Michelson Morley idea. and the vacuum reference frame around the earth.

For other vacuum reference frame effts, See also: https://www.academia.edu/8467271/The_O_Connell_effect_in_eclipsing_binaries_explained_by_mass_related_light_speed_extinction_distances_LASOF_of_stars_and_even_planets