Secondary inflation? YES, but a little bit different according to Quantum FFF theory

Secondary inflation? YES, but a little bit different according to Quantum FFF theory..
Dark matter ( black hole) inflation comes first and then plasma creation out of the Higgsfield vacuum.

Q-FFF theory is saying: the BIG bang is a splitting (external charged) Dark Matter Black Hole.
Dual dark matter BHs create plasma concentration  in between ( out of the vacuum,not out of the BBang!!) creating a giant star and after a continuous hyper nova process, later a spiral galaxy and by merging into an elliptical galaxy. see:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/albums/72157655834682834

and: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/01/160114213454.htm
and Inflatable dark matter:  http://arxiv.org/pdf/1507.08660v1.pdf

Salam, Vigier, Bell, Bohm and Feynman ideas, form the foundation of Q-FFF Theory.

The Qunatum-FFF model combines some old dissident ideas of 5 well known physicists, with a new Dual-Universal Big Bang without broken symmetry, and a new Dual Universal EPR (Einstein Podolski and Rosen) correlation model, coined "Big Bang Entanglement".
It was Abdus Salam who proposed that quarks and leptons should have a sub-quantum level structure, and that they are compound hardrock particles with a specific non-zero sized form. Jean Paul Vigier postulated that quarks and leptons are "pushed around" by an energetic sea of vacuum particles.
David Bohm suggested in contrast with The "Copenhagen interpretation", that reality is not created by the eye of the human observer, and second: elementary particles should be "guided by a pilot wave". John Bell argued that the motion of mass related to the surrounding vacuum reference frame, should originate real
"Lorentz-transformations", and also real relativistic measurable contraction.
Richard Feynman postulated the idea of an all pervading energetic quantum vacuum. He rejected it, because it should originate resistance for every mass in motion, relative to the reference frame of the quantum vacuum.
However, I postulate the strange and counter intuitive possibility, that this resistance for mass in motion, can be compensated, if we combine the ideas of Vigier, Bell, Bohm and Salam, and a new dual universal Bohmian "pilot wave", which is interpreted as the EPR correlation (or Big Bang entanglement) between individual elementary anti-mirror ( CPT symmetric) particles, living in dual universes.
see: http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.nl/2012/12/abstract.html

Comparable opposing time arrow ideas are recently also postulated Y Ahoronov ( a former student of Bohm) and  E. Cohen and T Shushi.
see: An Interaction between Two Systems with Opposing Time-Arrows
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1512.06689v1.pdf

Q-FFF model is Non-Local Realism.

Feynman proposed vacuum resistance for real spinning fermions.

FUNCTION FOLLOWS FORM in the Quantum world, with a NEW pairing massless Black Hole .: Is Less More in the Symmetric Multiverse? and a new paradigm for Free Will

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2006/03/max-tegmark-john-cramer-and-aphorisms.html?spref=fb

Thus: Descarte's: "I think therefore I am" should change into: "I am
a QM system, which is always non-local instantaneous EPR correlated,
and in competition for Free Will by VETOING the choices of my
opposite anti-I, living in a dual anti-mirror universe, therefore We
are! We are dual co-authors of our common life".

http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthread.php?3461-Clapping-with-one-hand-of-Zen-Buddhism-and-Big-Bang-Entan

FREE WILL to veto an act in the symmetric multiverse without a cat paradox.

we need no real free will for the creation of spontaneous- ideas or initiatives but we need VETO influence on our ideas and actions to become responsible for our actions and therefore wee could use universal symmetry.
Sabine Hossenfelder wrote:

“There is no free will in such a fundamental law because there is no “will” – there is just some randomness sprinkled over the determinism. In neither case do you have free will in any meaningful way.”

For the creation of ideas and initiatives, this should be correct, however it could be influenced by a VETO action.
And:

“This randomness cannot be influenced by anything, and in particular it cannot be influenced by you, whatever you think “you” are.”
Seems also correct but she forget the veto possibility.

Benjamin Libet measured the so called electric Readiness Potential (RP) time to perform a volitional act, in the brains of his students and the time of conscious awareness (TCA) of that act, which appeared to come 500 m.sec behind the RP.

The “volitional act” was in principle based on the free choice to press an electric bell button.

The results of this experiment gives still an ongoing debate in the broad layers of the scientific community, because the results are still (also in recent experiments) in firm contrast with the expected idea of Free Will and causality.

However I would propose the absurd but constructive possibility that we are not alone for decision making in a multiverse as an individual person.

Even Max Tegmark suggested already about the multiverse: “Is there a copy of you reading this article?”

We could be instant entangled with at least one instant entangled anti-copy person living inside a Charge and Parity symmetric copy Universe.

In that case we could construct a causal explanation for Libet’s strange results.

New statistical difference research on RPI and RPII of repeated Libet experiments described here could support these ideas.

See: Democratic Free Will in the instant Entangled Multiverse.
https://www.academia.edu/20185302/Democratic_Free_Will_in_the_instant_Entangled_Multiverse

and: FREE WILL to VETO, and the Wavefunction Collapse between universes.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/albums/72157651824791041

and:

The Raspberry shaped Super Symmetric Multiverse without a CAT paradox.

http://vixra.org/pdf/1308.0083v3.pdf

Thus: Descarte's: "I think therefore I am" should change into: "I am
a QM system, which is always non-local instantaneous correlated and in competition by VETOING the ideas of my opposite anti-I, living in a dual anti-mirror universe, therefore we are! 
We are dual co-authors of our common life".

Monopole Fermion radiation according to the Quantum FFF Model

Comparison of Fermion spin/radiation diagram of Quantum FFF Theory (stiff propeller string with monopole radiation 1,2,3) and the Penrose diagram (flexible string with closed radiation loops: 4)

Hypothesis: The Higgsfield collisions with propeller fermions convert the massless Higgs into different shaped monopole photons and leaving into different axial directions.

Fig.1and 2: axial propeller rotation with 4x monopole sectors (magnetic, electric and graviton sectors)

Fig.3: Double coned magnetic monopole radiation (N+S) and merging electric (- for electrons) and graviton radiation emerges due to so called spin rotation. Magnetic monopole radiation trajectories are intrinsically curved to form closed fields.

See: http://vixra.org/pdf/1103.0002v4.pdf