WHAT is wrong with Physics and HOW could we show it by EXPERIMENTS

“Nothing sucks in physics and everything is entangled” 

Multiversal Consciousness, a shocking discovery?

see Benjamin Libet's experiment. and my new e-book:

Zero Point Energy Black Holes

and my second blog; Examples of New paradigm BHs

See also Lubos Motl discussion on EVERYTHING IS ENTANGLED.

Five posters on Quantum FFF-Theory.

Something small is missing in Physics with large consequences for QM and Astronomical interpretations.

SIX Q-FFF theory related experiments beyond Einstein:

1: Lightspeed drag and extinction experiment inside a double mirrored fast rotating cylinder.

2: CHAMP-GPS satellite outlier measurement focussed on GPS elevation angle to the earth.
3: Double LeSage gravity experiment with new massive oscillator.
4: Double Stern-Gerlach atomic entanglement experiment .
5: Gravity drag related lightspeed experiment between two Balloons and the earth.
6: Multiverse number count by a renewed Benjamin Libet experiment focussed on RPI and RPII ratio.

With the introduction of these experiments, I try to give only a small push to restore the relation between CAUSE AND EFFECT in Physics.

For 100 years now, both mainstream theories have offered us irrational solutions in Physics, based on statistics of Quantum phenomena and the ideas that the light speed, time and mass, are able to do magical things at all scales without the need for a logical base.

SIX experiments.

FUNCTION FOLLOWS FORM in QM and Cosmology.

 The FORM and MICROSTRUCTURE of elementary particles, is supposed to be the origin of FUNCTIONAL differences between Higgs- Graviton- Photon- and Fermion particles.

Something SMALL is missing in mainstream physics: a NEW 3D String and a splitting and pairing MASSLESS BLACK HOLE, (dark matter black hole) able to explain the cyclic Big Bang, quick Galaxy- and Star formation, down to Sunspots, Comets, Ball Lightning and even Ice Volcanoes on Titan.

At the Quantum Level with a new 3D String I propose, an

alternative symmetric GUT-based extension of the Standard Model.

At the Quantum level.

What is wrong with Physcis at the Quantum level?

Black holes EAT the vacuum lattice with the oscillating Higgs particles.

So, the vacuum lattice structure around a black hole could be represented like this.
As a result, the near vacuum is thinner or diluted, it has holes, which could be the origin of the Universal HUBBLE redshift.
By contrast, my new black hole paradigm says:
the origin of universal redshift is Dark matter (black holes) but the speed of light is NOT slowing down on the journey along these deluted vacuum areas present around black holes. The wave length of each photonic bunch seems to be elongated by this effect. The holes in the vacuum lattice around black holes (see figure below) seem to be able to force the photon wavebunch to spread out and elongate the wavelength.
Dark matter is the proliferation of vast numbers of Galaxy Anchor Black Holes (GABHs) around Galaxies.

news:
Graphene may reveal the grain of space-time
13 May 2011 by Kate McAlpine
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21028125.400-graphene-may-reveal-the-grain-of-spacetime.html

The diluted vacuum structure around a black hole.

Vacuum structure around multiple black holes can be found in islamic tiling!

also called Alhambra Escher Fractal tilings.

According to Quantum FFF theory Galaxies are crowded with black holes!  

The new 3D String result is,

that the eigenenergy of Fermions is originated by energetic but massless oscillating Higgs particles embedded in a tetrahedron vacuum lattice, able to convert into other singular particles like Photons/Gluons, Electrons and Positrons.

That The lightspeed is variable between astronomical separated local reference frames around massive objects like the earth and dragged by the mass of objects combined with an extinction effect over large distances.

 That black holes have Fermion repelling horizons due to a new Fermionic SPIN FLIP effect.

(see below Hyperion).

Accelerated pairing and splitting black holes are present at all scales, from Galaxy Anchor black holes (GABHs) Stellar Anchor Black Holes (SABHs) down to Sunspots, Comets and Ball lightning.

Black holes produce positrons and electrons with a preference for positrons to merge with Gluon/Photons to form compound Quarks and even matter and anti-matter in our CHIRAL osicllating vacuum frame. Recent findings above fireball (Sprite) producing Thunderstorms are a support.

At the astronomical scale.

What is wrong with Physics at the astronomical scale?

The most obvious examples of the new black hole are:

1: The so called Spire gas pillar in the EAGLE nebula.

2: The internal structure and shape of the icy moon HYPERION.

3: Ball lightning Black hole photo from Japan showing washed out gas trail.

Double click for enlargement to the blog maximium of 500KB, sorry.

I will be pleased to send anybody 1.2 MB JPG poster images per Email.

Blog Contents up to februari 2007.

1. Higgs-Vacuum Black Hole Lensing
2. Cygnus-A Black Hole Lensing with Ionisation effects
3. Rigid Elementary Click-On Particles and Propellers
4. Galaxy Form and formation
5. Higgs-Graviton Quantum Gravity etc. etc.
6. Small GR anomalies and Test Proposals
7. Is Less More in the Symmetric Multiverse?
    and FREE WILL  
8. Magnetic Quantum radiation Test
9. New Nuclear Polar-Ring Structure
10. The CPT symmetric Big Bang multiverse

ADDENDUM
1. High Speed Black Holes.
2. Planetary Lightspeed Frame Dragging
3. The Evaporating Big Bang Black Hole
4. Rigid Gluonium Knots and Ball lightning
5. The Black Hole relation with Comets
6. Vacuum Lattice models and Diffraction
7. The Geometry of Decay Processes in Detail

SEE ALSO:
My second blog:
Examples of New Paradigm Splitting and Pairing Black Holes.

CONTENTS of this second Blog

The secret of Ball ligthning.

The Dynamics of accellerating Micro Black holes inside Nebula and on Earth.

The accelerating plasma tail of NEW paradigm black holes, and the splitting of larger black holes by smaller pairing black holes, (Eagle Nebula) seems to be the origin of a smooth proliferation of black holes through Galaxies and Nebula.

In addition, FFF theory assumes, that the Dark matter distribution around Galaxies (clusters) represents the smooth distribution of black holes, with the largest black holes at the outside of Galaxies.

COPY OF MY FORMER WEBSITE OF 2003.

The outlines of a Theory of Everything with Cosmological Non-Local Symmetry at a Distance.   

 A Chiral “Oscillating Quantum Vacuum Lattice” and "Big Bang-entanglement" 

could lead to the explanation of how the  Quantum Mechanical World is able to mimic Relativity.

By: Leo Vuyk, Version 21, (December 9-2003) 

See also: http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/

And http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/

By: Leo Vuyk © all rights reserved.

Contents:	Page :
Introduction date: 9-5-1996	1
Coding of  elementary  “Quatron Particles”.	2
Quark generations	3
Coding summary 3-D represented	4
Alternative standard particle model	5
Quantum gravity.	6
Variable Higgs-virgin oscillations and Lorentz transformations	7
Quantum gravity around black holes	8
The Higgs-virgin repelling zone around black holes	9
Complex Higgs-virgin repelling zones between two (or more) black holes, as the origin of Galaxies and Open Star Clusters.	10
4 Tests and other considerations	11

This Site is under construction, the next articles marked with (X) are NOT enclosed on this site!!

Postscripts:
Agreement with Cosmological observations and dumbbell systems.	14-17
Talk on ball lightning, Canterbury date 7-9-1995.	18-25
Systematic sketches of interacting anchor black holes , the origin of Galaxy-types	26-27, 28-31

Appendices:	Appendice pages:
Sub quantum particle structure and D. J. Bohm.	app. 1-2
Examples of the cosmological consequences date: 9-5-1996	app. 3-4
Improved instrument to measure North- and South magnetic radiation	app. 5
Spin and Dipoles.	app. 6
Atomic Nucleons and magic numbers.	app. 7
The basic identity of the Lorentz force.	app. 8-9
John Bell and Basil Hiley by Paul Davies.	app. 10, app. 11
	app. 12-13,
How the Big Bang started after a Big Crunch	app. 14, app. 15
	app. 16-17, 18-19, 20, 21.
The Decay of Quarks and Leptons. Kaon decay and the chiral creation of matter.	app. 22-23 app. 24-25
Rupert Sheldrake correspondence.	app. 26-27, app. 28, app. 29, app. 30-32   (X)
How and Why God plays dice.	app. 33        (X)
2-stage semi-cold Fractal Big Bang/ ZPE Galaxy Anchor Black Hole (GABH) propulsion.	app. 34-35   (X)
	app. 36-37   (X)
	app. 40-46

---

Page: I

Introduction.
Suggestions for the architecture of elementary particles and some Universal consequences.

Sub quantum-level structure of elementary particles combined with an energetic oscillating Vacuum suggest to be the base for new physics .

As an architect I was always interested in form, models, motion  and later in the geometrical aspects of Physics and Astronomy.
I didn't like the impossibility to compose a causal model of the Universe, therefore I started some 15 years ago with magnetic experiments (page: 19). I found out that there should be two different sorts of magnetic radiation of the Earth (North and South). I started to design possible 3D particle models (page:2-5). The model idea was based on the assumption that there should be a possibility to design a particle system out of one convertible virgin vacuum particle. This particle should have form-changing properties with as few as possible freedom to change and at the same time fitting the particle bill of the accepted "standard model" as tight as possible.
The idea that light (waves or photons) could not escape from a black hole introduced the consequence that graviton-photons should have the same problem as other photons. This introduced to me the concept of a repelling gravitational energetic oscillating Virgin Vacuum lattice which I called Higgs-virgin vacuum.

The common idea that gravitons (with spin-2) should be able to give a negative impulse on mass-carrying particles and create attraction, without help from another system, has always been a big question for me.
At the same time this Higgs-virgin vacuum should lose or gain oscillating impulse energy (or zero point energy ), to explain the origin of vacuum fluctuations (pair production), the four fundamental forces , and the infinite energy of the electromagnetic- and the gravitational field, which gave physicists a major problem.

Consequently photons should have different forms to explain the different qualities such as electric- magnetic- gravity and gluonic photons. By introduction of these quality differences compared to the Higgs-virgin particle it was possible to imagine all four forces of Nature as a result of combined impulse-differences from Higgs-virgin particles in combinations with other photon impulses on mass-carrying particles. This system should be the origin of the planetary motion of electrons, the fuzziness of particles, the chaotic period of the so called quantum break-time , the energy levels of electrons exactly fitting into the Riemann numbers , the Heisenberg uncertainty and the Planck constant .

However, as a consequence, this Vacuum should have resistance for mass in motion. The so called "Lorentz polarization" in combination with Higgs-virgin -repelling and particle dependant memory or EPR consciousness between dual universes, gave the solution (see introduction).That Higgs-virgin repulsion should be detectable in space was evident, and introduced the idea of repelling mass less black holes with a so called clustering potency . (page:10-12 and 26-31). This introduced a whole new approach to galaxy formation and other not unraveled cosmological structures, like Eta Carina (page: 26-29). That Higgs-virgin repelling should lead to new physics and be detectable on Earth surprised me by accident as a result of our ball-lightning research. (page: 18-23, app:1-2).

The idea that elementary particles have a specific form, which determines the main property of the particle is not new. (the sub-quantum level ideas of D. Bohm. or A.Salam (appendix page:1-2). Therefore it was an interesting new step, to give real form to specific particles, and see the universe as a mechanical impulse- and bounce machine, guided by Big Bang- entanglement and based on only one vacuum particle, to have a base for unification.

This convertable vacuum particle is called Higgs-Virgin particle and is supposed to oscillate in a 3D-spaceframe lattice configuration, which is supposed to have an incomplete chiral tetrahedron-octahedron form.

The vacuum particle is oscillating in chainlike (space frame lattice) connection with other Higgs-virgin particles. It induces different impulse-energy, depending of the angle of collision with a 3-D propeller formed mass carrying particles.

Quarks are supposed to be compound click-on combinations of one or more electrons or positrons as a base, with five different kinds of photons to clip on. If a photon is colliding with a mass carrying particle, the impulse difference with the succeeding "opposite repelling" Higgs-virgin particle is the origin of the resulting fundamental force. (page:6, app. p. 13). There are no attractive interactions between two particles. There are only impulse differences between photon impulses and vacuum particle impulses. Thus the standard Feynmann diagrams, have to be extended with these extra vacuum interactions.

Leo Vuyk.

---

Top Home Index

 Page:2.

Coding of  elementary  “Quatron Particles”.

It is possible to describe these elementary particles by codes. If we assume that the Higgs-Virgin Vacuum Torus particle has the ability to change its Torus shape by 90 degree Hinge ROTATIONS. The Torus is supposed to be  equipped with one splitting point and three Rotational hinge points. These 4 points are placed regularly over the ring with a spacing between each other of a quarter part of the ring, which was reason to call these particles “Quatron Particles”. Each hinge can rotate two adjacent (quarter shaped) ring pieces relative to each other into 4 positions. With a 90-degree rotational "click position" for each hinge, thus there are four positions possible for each hinge. As a consequence, 100 combinations are possible originated by different rotational “click” positions. These different rotational positions can be coded.

The coding is based on the 90 degree "click position" of the three hinges of the Torus shaped (Higgs) vacuum particle.

Simplified representation of  the  Vacuum 3D  Space Frame Lattice and real Rigid Knotty Particles:

The coding of these positions are as follows;

U= UP click position : if the hinge changes the original Torus ring by a 180 degree relative axial rotation between two Torus quarter parts.
O= Circle : if the hinge does not change the original Torus form between two Torus quarter parts.
L= Left click position: if the hinge changes the original Torus form by a 90 degree relative axial rotation to the left, if the Torus is observed from the outside
R= Right click position: if the hinge changes the original Torus form by a 90 degree relative axial rotation to the right, if the Torus is observed from the outside.

To be able to “Click on” with other particles to form quarks, the Torus should have a  diameter relation of ca. 1:7 up to 1:9  between the circular section surface, and the Torus diameter itself. This is proved by model experiments.

Summary;
Spin; 0 particles; for each particle there are three hinges, thus the Higgs-virgin (vacuum) particle is coded OOO.

Spin; 1 particles; Photons or Gluons (8 particles are found see below)

1: The Graviton in this model is a spin 1 particle instead of a spin 2 particle!!! LOR= ROL= identical. (not supposed to act also as a gluon)

2: General photon UOU. (light photon, gamma and x-ray photons) (is supposed to act also as a gluon)
3: El.magn.North photon (=also gluon)= ROU. 4: El.magn.South photon (=also gluon)= LOU. 5: Electric plus(+) photon (=also gluon)= ROR. 6: Electric minus(-) photon (=also gluon)= LOL. 7+8: x-ray and gamma ray particle= LOO, ROO.(not in action as a gluon)

Single Spin 1/2 particles: ( 8 particles) 1: Positron= OLO. 2: Electron= ORO. 3: El. Neutrino= RLR. 4: Anti-el. Neutrino= LRL. 5: Muonic Neutrino= LLL. 6: Anti mu. Neutrino= RRR. 7: Tau Neutrino= ULU.8: Anti tau Neutrino= URU.

That is all there is in basic elementary 3-D particles! (a total of 16 elementary particles + the Higgs-virgin vacuum particle)

Quarks are not supposed to be "single" elementary particles, they are click-on combinations of electrons or positrons with one or two photons, so Quarks are not elementary, the same as muons Tau leptons , and Z particles !.The W particle does not exist as a separated entity, it must be interpreted as a combination of processes.

The transition possibilities, from Higgs-virgin OOO up to neutrinos:
Two OOO particles become after collision with each other> OLO and ORO (e+ and e- pair production) Thus: Higgs-virgin > e+ and e-: representing two propeller forms with a left and a right "pitch". The middle hinge of the Higgs-virgin particle O, can rotate over 90 degrees into L or R and backwards into O, it never rotate into U).

One OOO particle can become > ROL or LOR ( thus: Higgs-virgin > graviton: The side hinges can rotate by collision over 90 degrees simultaneously into L and R or R and L ) ROL or LOR: (The graviton can not rotate over the middle hinge O: consequently, can not change form into other particles .

One UOU particle (the general photon) can become > ULU or URU (or: the General photon can become > Tau or anti-Tau particle; the middle hinge of the general photon O, can rotate over 90 degrees into L or R, but never into an U) One ROR particle can become > RLR or RRR (thus: the El.+ photon can become > el. neutrino or anti-mu-neutrino: the middle hinge O, is rotating into L or R, but never into an U)
One LOL particle can become > LLL or LRL (thus: the El.- photon can become a > mu-Neutrino or anti-el. neutrino: the middle hinge O, is rotating into L or R, but never into an U)
An ROU and LOU particle (the magn. Photons North and South) can not rotate over the middle hinge O: they can not change form into other particles than backwards into OOO).
One OLO particle can become > RLR or LLL (thus: the Positron can become a> el. Neutrino or mu-neutrino: the side hinges can simultaneously change into LL or RR.) For weak interactions this system is going backwards: each of these neutrinos can change into a positron.
One ORO particle can become >RRR or LRL (thus: Electron > anti-el. neutrino or anti-mu neutrino: the side hinges can simultaneously change into LL or RR.) For weak interactions this system is going backwards: each of these neutrinos can change into an electron.
A LOL particle or ROR particle can become >UOU. (thus: El- or El+ photon can rotate into a general photon and backwards, for electromagnetic decays )
For Strong interactions the Higgs-virgin vacuum can produce through collision of two Higgs-virgin particles a set of: d and anti-d or u and anti-u quarks.

Neutrino creation:
Neutrinos are created by interaction of two Higgs-virgin particles (which interact from two different directions at the same moment, ) with;

• A; Quark-bounded photons. from which the middle-hinge changes (spin-1) by 90' clicking (0 becomes L or R) at the same time spin-1 becomes spip1/2. (e.g.; UOU becomes ULU or URU).
• B; Quark-bounded electrons or positrons from which the two side hinges change by 90 degree clicking and spin 1/2 stay the same (for inst. OLO becomes RLR or LLL).
• The ROU and LOU ( the magn. South and North) particles are not able to change into neutrinos because they are a- symmetrical and consequently doesn’t have the possibility to interact symmetrical with two Higgs-virgin particles..
  A quark-bounded electron (or positron) can through the same (double Higgs-virgin) mechanism change back into a Higgs-virgin particle; (suggested to be active in Neutron decay). Two Higgs-virgin particles can change (by head on bounces) into a set of a positron and an electron.
  Five photons: General, Em. North, Em. South, E+ photon and E- photon, combined with the electron and positron are the only building-stones for quarks. Neutrinos are the collision remnants of these particles.

Page:3.

Quark generations.

Suggestions for Combinations of electrons, positrons and 5 different types of photons(Gluons) to create compound quark variations, muon and tau and Z particles.

The three different colored up-quarks are coded: ORO+LOL, or ORO+LOU, or ORO+UOU. (2 compound particles)

Anti-up-quarks (three colors) are coded: OLO+ROR, or OLO+ROU, or OLO+UOU. (2 compound particles)

down-quarks (three colors) are coded: ORO+2.LOL, or ORO+2.LOU, or ORO+2.UOU. (3 compound particles)

anti-down-quarks (three colors) are coded: OLO+2.ROR, or OLO+2.ROU, or OLO+2.UOU. (3 compound particles)

The three different colored strange-quarks are coded: 2.ORO+LOL, 2.ORO+LOU, or 2.ORO+UOU. (3 compound particles)

Anti-strange-quarks (three colors) are coded: 2. OLO+ROR, 2.OLO+ROU, or 2.OLO+UOU. (3 compound particles)

charm-quarks (three colors) are coded: 2.ORO+2.LOL, 2.ORO+2.LOU, or 2.ORO+2.UOU. (4 compound particles)

anti-charm-quarks (three colors) are coded: 2.OLO+2.ROR, 2.OLO+2.ROU, or 2.OLO+2.UOU. (4 compound particles)

The three different colored bottom-quarks are coded: 3.ORO+LOL, 3.ORO+LOU, or 3.ORO+UOU. (4 compound particles)

Anti-bottom-quarks (three colors) are coded: 3. OLO+ROR, 3.OLO+ROU, or 3.OLO+UOU. (4 compound particles)

top-quarks (three colors) are coded: 3.ORO+2.LOL, 3.ORO+2.LOU, or 3.ORO+2.UOU. (5 compound particles)

anti-top-quarks (three colors) are coded: 3.OLO+2.ROR, 3.OLO+2.ROU, or 3.OLO+2.UOU. (5 compound particles)

Muon particles are coded: mu+: OLO+2ORO, (=anti-d-quark) mu-: ORO+2.LOL.(=d-quark)

Tau particles are coded: tau+: 2.OLO+2UOU, (= c-quark). tau-: 2ORO+2UOU.(=anti-c-quark)

Together with the Z particle (ORO+OLO) we suggest that there are 37 different compound particles.

Together with the 16+1 single particles, there are 17+37 = 54 different formed functional particles used in the universe as we know it.

Different combinations are still possible, such as for the Ball Lightning interference particle.

Based on model research of these compound forms, and in line with particle accelerator measurements it could be stated, that the more compound particles a quark accommodates, the smaller is its stability, starting to count from 3 compound particles.

QUARK summary of CLICK_ON COMBINATIONS AND DECAY DIRECTIONS

Page:4.

·        Coding summary 3-Dimensional represented (not enclosed)

---

Top Home Index

  Page 5.

Alternative Standard model (not enclosed, see also app.p.22-24)

 

Page6.

Quantum Gravity

QUANTUM GRAVITY, Is the Imbalance between two PUSHING powers (figure A).

Quantum Gravity is the Imbalance between two pushing powers: the pushing vacuum oscillations (= dark energy) and the less powerful Graviton vacuum oscillations radiated by mass.   If the vacuum oscillations are the only universal energy source, pushing around non-energetic quarks and Leptons, then even Gravity can be interpreted as the net result of the repulsive momentum transfer, originated by vacuum particle oscillations. The repulsive momentum transfer can be represented as vectors pointing from all (globular) sides on Quarks and Leptons. It is postulated that Gravitons do decrease the oscillatory momentum energy of the vacuum particles only from the radial direction of the graviton source. Thus the momentum vectors will shorten in length. The different repelling energies of the vacuum particles- and graviton influences introduce a combined net repelling force (or anisotropic radiation pressure) on quarks and Leptons. Thus the repelling Higgs-virgin force from directions outside the Earth on Quarks and Leptons, will over-compensate the opposing (but weaker) repelling mixed Higgs-virgin/graviton force, radiated from inside the Earth, to create the illusion of gravitational "attraction". This is an illusion because the vacuum oscillatory energy is weakened by the negative graviton energy. Thus gravity is supposed to be a repelling force, and not an attractive force.

Mass is the Lorentz covariant Capacity (Cg) of Quarks and Leptons to transform a specific number (N) of colliding vacuum particles into (the same number of) gravitons, multiplied by the local time unit, Cg=N.t. . E=Cg.c^2. Thus mass is based on discrete entities named gravitons, which are supposed to be real particles (only for a short time) and a collision product of oscillating vacuum particles and Quarks and Leptons. Gravitational mass and Inertial mass are equivalent due to this phenomenon. Gravitons are supposed to transform like all photons after 1 cm (see above) back into a real oscillating vacuum particle, with decreased a-symmetric oscillation pressure. (Particle-wave duality see the introduction)

Figure A, represents a vertical section through the surface of the Earth. Explanation of the numbers: 1: A mass carrying particle. 2: The Earth surface 3: Incoming oscillations of the Higgs-virgin particles represented by oscillatory impulse vectors from 360 degrees around the mass carrying particle (The length of the vectors is representing the effective impulses per local time unit on the mass carrying particle). 4:The combined Higgs-virgin/graviton impulse vector curve as a section of the Higgs-virgin/graviton vector globule, representing the average of Higgs-virgin/graviton pressure on the particle. 5: The perfect (globular) Higgs-virgin impulse vector curve existing in empty space, without mass influences. 6: The graviton impulse vector curve represented in addition with the Higgs-virgin impulse vector curve (3) originating the difference zone (8). 7: The tidal zone due to the space curvation originating extra incoming Higgs-virgin-particle oscillations, (see also page: 8, space curvation around a black hole). 8: The difference zone which is originated by the difference between upward and downward impulse effects, is the representation of the Quantum Gravitation. 9: Attention: The graviton impulse vector curve will be much smaller than sketched in the picture represented by the circle (6).

Page7.

Variable Higgs-virgin vacuum impulses due to different impulse directions relative to a fast moving polarized spinning quark or lepton particle, in a preferred vacuum spaceframe lattice.

VARIABLE HIGGS-VIRGIN IMPULSES AND LORENTZTRANSFORMATIONS

(OR POLARISATIONS Figure B).

Resistanceless movement through the oscillating Vacuum spaceframe lattice is only possible, if the effective Higgs-virgin impulses compensate Lorentz covariant, for the resistance of the moving mass carrying particle (S) created by the oscillating vacuum frame itself. See Figure B). The mass carrying particle (S), is suggested to move with the velocity 1/2c. through the oscillating vacuum spaceframe lattice to the right side of the figure. The number of colliding Higgs-virgin particles in each time unit and the impulse magnitude is proportional to the velocity of (S) relative to the vacuum frame.

The mass carrying particle (S), is suffering more frequent but weaker impulses coming from the front than from the back side of the particle. Due to the "absolute motion through the vacuum", the particle is heading its polarized "nose" proportional into the velocity direction. Consequently less but more massive vacuum impulses per time unit on the "backside" of the polarized particle, will compensate the more frequent but weaker impulses coming from the front. This phenomenon we will call: Lorentz polarization.

This Lorentz-polarization has three properties: a polarization grade, a polarization direction and a memory.(as apart of Big Bang entanglement, see also: app.p.29) So every mass carrying particle has self consciousness (or Big Bang entanglement) in the way it has a memory for its polarization grade and velocity direction in Higgs-virgin space.

It sounds odd: The Higgs-virgin particle impulses on the nose side of (S) are more frequent (with a higher impact velocity).

However the effective impulses are less massive than those on the "back side" of the polarized particle (S), due to the specific propeller form of these polarized Quarks and Leptons. The total impulse effect must be zero to fit in Special- and General Relativity. As a result both Higgs-virgin forces (A) are equal.

Page 8.

QUANTUM GRAVITY AROUND A BLACK HOLE.

QUANTUM GRAVITY AROUND THE “NEW” BLACK HOLE, (Figure C).

The black hole is suggested to EAT the vacuum particles in its dense packed non-zero sized nucleus. The Black Hole particle nucleus is supposed to be always under heavy pressure of the incoming vacuum particles. (see page; 21). The black hole nucleus originate a screening- and sucking effect on the oscillating Higgs-virgin vacuum, which should influence the structure of the neighbouring Higgs-virgin space frame. As a result, the vacuum is constantly EATEN by the nucleus. However ALL SPINNING PARTICLES  will feel the very complex propulsion of the so called Higgs-Virgin vector Curve (9), which is supposed the origin of a small “repelling zone” around the Black Hole nucleus. (see Higgs Virgin Repelling zone:   file:///C:/Mijn%20documenten/homepage1/leo_intro.htm#higgs_repulsion)

Explanation of figure (C). The sketch is a cross section of a black hole nucleus (1) with: 2: the central axis of the partly plotted (for clarity) inflow patterns of Higgs-virgin or photon particle lattices or chains (3) coming from only one direction (3).
3: From other directions there are similar inflow patterns (3). 4: A photon or better called a photon oscillation (see lines or chain trajectories) which will be collected by the Black hole.
5: The photons (oscillations) which will pass the black hole, but are influenced in there trajectory by the in-falling vacuum lattice all around the black hole. 6: The photons which are in between, will stay on the so called light horizon,(7). 8: Two distinct mass carrying particles are plotted: one at the horizon and one outside the horizon (7). 9: gives the distribution pattern of the inflow of Higgs-virgin particles around the mass carrying particles in the same way as is represented for Quantum gravity in figure, (A page: 6 ) called the Higgs-virgin vector curve . It is clearly visible, that by the black hole deformation of the vacuum, the Higgs-virgin-vector curve has a total different butterfly form. 9; is the cross section over the outline of the Higgs-virgin vector curve, which has a rotational axis connecting the mass carrying particle (8) and the black hole (1) The butterfly-like form of the cross section is originated by the space curvation at that specific location in the vacuum. As a consequence, space is curved due to really curved trajectories of the Higgs-virgin photons.
10 and ll: As will be explained in figure (D) there should exist a Higgs-virgin-repelling zone around a black hole for mass-carrying particles, with two globular boundary layers, (10 and 11). Contrary to the black hole repulsion, in special cases the black hole absorbs also mass carrying particles like quarks and leptons. It is supposed that Quarks and Leptons have the chance to break through he Black Hole repelling zone only at very high speed (in the form of high speed jets) (page 9).

Page 9

THE HIGGS-VIRGIN REPELLING ZONE AROUND A BLACK HOLE, (Figure D).

Explanation of the numbers:

A: On top of the figure a horizontal axis is plotted (1) with seven Higgs-virgin vector curves (2) supposed to be present around mass carrying particles (3), which are thought to be situated at different distances from the black hole. The black hole is sketched at the right side of the axis, as a point ( representing the nucleus), and a circle (representing the black hole horizon).

B: If a particle in space (3) is attracted by a black hole, only the impulse differences originated by the local Higgs-virgin vector curve (2) are pushing the particle in the direction of the black hole with a non-Newtonian gravity force. This force is non Newtonian because it is only based on the absence of vacuum particle oscillatory energy, which is supposed to be screened by the black hole. There is even no graviton energy present coming out of the black hole, like in figure A (see figure: A)

C: At a certain distance from the black hole (4), the mass-carrying particle which has a complex propeller/cone-form (3) will become polarized by the peculiar "vector curve" of the Higgs-virgin vacuum, and will turn its propeller-nose more or less in the opposite direction, of the black hole. Thus the lack of Higgs-virgin oscillations from the direction of the black hole give a polarization effect on the particle; and as a result it will turn its nose back from the black hole. This is a comparable effect with the Lorentz transformation in figure: B.

D: The result of this polarization is that the total average of Higgs-virgin impulses within each time-unit, from the direction of the black hole are becoming stronger than the opposite coming Higgs-virgin impulses.  We will call this important effect: Higgs-virgin repelling effect of a black hole.
E: At the light horizon (6) of the black hole (on the contrary), the total average Higgs-virgin impulse is clearly coming only from outside the black hole because there is no outflow of vacuum oscillations. (see the local Higgs-virgin vector curve 2). Consequently on this location, there is Higgs-virgin attraction to the Black hole even for mass carrying particles..  The turning point, where gravity is zero, is given in point (7).
F: The space in between point (4) and (7) is called: Higgs-virgin Repelling (Repulsion) zone (8) , which is suggested to be responsible for a lot of unravelled Cosmological questions, like the origin of Sunspots, matter spitting Comet Tails, Open star clusters, Single and Double Lobed Quasars, and the very short time scale of the creation of Galaxies after the Big Bang . The corresponding Higgs-virgin gravitation diagram is plotted on the axis (9). At point (4) there is a discontinuous jump originated by the start of the Lorentz-polarization which can be different for each mass-carrying object. We sketched an intermitted line representing the average of the jump 10: The space around the jump zone is supposed to be a real mass trap. This is supposed to be the zone where the annihilation of anti- and real hydrogen will take place around  Comet Black Holes and  Quasars hot spots, as is clearly visible around the two hot spots of  Cygnus A. 

Page 10.

COMPLEX HIGGS-VIRGIN REPELLING ZONES and a WHITE HOLE, BETWEEN TWO BLACK HOLES,

(Figure E-F).

If two black holes approach each other, then all gas or dust particles will be driven into the center of these two Black Holes called : The White Hole, due to a special repelling effect induced by the vacuum oscillations coming from the directions of the two black holes. At a certain distance from the black hole , the special propeller form of quark- and Lepton particles, is supposed to be the origin of polarization of the particle. The particle will polarize its propeller "nose" into the direction where the most vacuum oscillatory energy is radiated, and by doing so it will be accelerated away from the black hole. (see also Higgs-repelling, fig. D for comparison) They are accelerated away from the nearest black hole, due to the extra energetic Higgs-virgin impulse effect originated by the polarization. Although the vacuum oscillations from the direction of the black hole, are less energetic than the oscillations coming from the opposite direction, the net effect is a repulsion from the Black Hole.

As a consequence, there has to be a very complex Higgs-virgin-repelling zone in between the two black holes, which is creating a new phenomenon, a so called "White Hole" in the middle (8). This "White Hole" is the concentration point of all the repelled mass carrying particles. Thus in this model a White Hole is not the mathematical counterpart of a Black Hole !!! Figure (E) gives a cross section of the two black holes (1) with the spherical Higgs-virgin repelling zones (2) around them . As a result of interference of these double systems we postulate in addition two secondary Higgs-virgin repelling "CONES" (3),which are acting together like a universal vacuum-cleaner. This system of repelling cones, is collecting particles exactly between these cones' at a central disc-formed plane (4), and concentrating them into the center point, the WHITE HOLE.(8). The two interacting black holes we will call "ANCHOR BLACK HOLES", because they are the origin of the white hole. Consequently this system we will cal a "DUMBBELL SYSTEM" which is suggested to be the form-giving base of most universal forms of matter, like our own Galaxy (figure F).
Figure (F):
The very interesting consequence of this system is, that it gives an explanation for the form differences of Galaxies and most other universal dumbbell forms like Quasars, Planetary Nebulae as remnants of  exploded Stars (page 27) but also for Open Star Clusters. The structure of Globular clusters (5) in the halo of Galaxies are suggested to depend also on this Higgs-virgin-repelling system. If there is a gliding scale of magnitude from the most massive dumbbell black holes (1) via the massive star cluster "Anchor Black Holes" downwards to Solar Anchor Black Holes, we may expect, that the smallest black holes are situated in the center of a Galaxy. Such a system will grow and is suggested to be responsible for the inflation of the bulge of a Lenticular or spiral Galaxy (6) into a more globular form (7). For Elliptical Galaxies (see page 26), it is assumed that a more complex Anchor Black Hole system is needed, with more than  more than 6 massive Anchor Black Holes equally distributed around the Elliptical Galaxy system.

Page 11.

Tests and other considerations.

 4 tests,

Test 1: Babcock and Bergman experiment improvement.

The original Babcock and Bergman (B&B) laboratory experiment [3] was designed to check the relation of the light speed with two fast (moving) rotating sources. B&B concluded that there was only a very small correlation grade of 1 % between the lightspeed and the speed of the glass windows , which was reason to abandon a theory which supported the addition of velocities (c+/- v) over the whole length of the light trajectory, so this experiment was interpreted as a support for Einstein’s light speed constancy. As described before, there is reason to assume that the light speed relation with the source (c+/-v) is only active for a trajectory of max. 1 cm, which makes it possible to design alternative experiments to support this idea. In the B&B case two fast rotating glass windows were used in a vacuum chamber.

Better results are expected if the ratio between the 1 cm. postulated photon relation to the source and the succeeding "free light path" in the apparatus is increased. We will call this ratio, the "B&B ratio". The B&B apparatus [3] used in 1964, had a B&B ratio of 1/140cm. (1cm/Free light path).

It is suggested to improve this experiment, by improving the so called B&B ratio.

A, by decreasing the light path. For example: if the "free light path" after the light is leaving the fast rotating glass window (this was in the B&B experiment 140 cm) is decreased with 50% (=70 cm), then the structural "Fringe shift indicated " anomaly should raise 100% from 0,7% up to 1,4. %. . The suggested "1 cm postulate" that the speed of light is always related to the speed of the source (glass window) over a 1 cm trajectory, should originate a double influence on the fringe shift, if the free light path is 50% decreased.

B, by placing more glass windows behind each other. The B&B ratio will also improve by increasing the number of fast rotating glass windows, (placed at 1 cm behind each other ) inside the original B&B experiment.

C, by replacing glass windows by a set of 4 mirrors creating an omega shaped light path. If the baseline of the omega path is 1 cm, the anomaly of the B&B apparatus will also increase from 0,7 up to 1,4%, because the velocity effect on the photons is expected to double. A second advantage of these omega light paths is that there is certainty obtained about the 100% correlation grade of the light beam with the fast rotating mirror. A very thin glass window is not expected to have such a high correlation grade.

D, by a new carrousel alike system with a fixed central drum inside a rotating drum , both equipped with mirrors, should give the best opportunity to support or falsify the 1 cm postulate of this model, because the carrousel is expected to optimize the B&B ratio in a simple way.

E: As an alternative for D, it must be even possible to use a so called conventional "Sagnac interferometers" carrousel equipped with 4 or more fast rotating mirrors, to measure the real "source related lightspeed distance" by the induced fringe shift.

F: In this theory it is assumed that inside glass or water, the so called "1 cm postulated distance" is much smaller than 1 cm. and the subsequent photonic vacuum related oscillation trajectory is also very small. Therefore the so called "Fresnel drag coefficient" must be interpreted as the result of a natural B&B RATIO IMPROVEMENT inside water or glass. Fresnel drag, is the base for so called: "fiber-optic gyros" (FOG). As a consequence, "FOG gyros" must be interpreted as a proof for the "1 cm postulate". As a result, FOG gyros are able to measure the rotation of the internal "fiber loop" inside the vacuum reference frame very accurately. The internal "fringe shift" related to the rotational speed of the FOG, should give a measure for the B&B ratio inside glass or fiber.

Test 2: Electron Synchrotron diurnal variations.

Despite the Earthly LASOF oscillating vacuum frame, the Solar LASOF oscillating vacuum frame, should have a diurnal subtle influence on microwave radiation intensities of synchrotron rings, measured up and down the radiation direction, which is most in line with the orbital propagation direction of the Earth around the sun. The lightspeed around the Earth is made constant by the LASOF, however the LASOF doesn’t influence the vacuum lattice structure itself. Thus fast moving electrons in a synchrotron ring (CERN etc.) have to deal with the "ether wind" of the Earth speed inside the Solar centred reference frame of the vacuum lattice, which will influence the synchrotron microwave radiation in a subtle diurnal way.

However until now all the diurnal effects which are measured in synchrotron rings, are as a matter of fact thought to be the influences of other exterior perturbations, like the Solar gravitational influence or the oblateness of the Earth which deforms the synchrotron ring in a subtle way. Because the runtime- filling time of these rings is relatively short, (ca. 12 hours). However it must be not so hard to show  sidereal time relations of the diurnal effects.

Test 3: Dual GPS or dual mountain summit, one-way Lightspeed tests outside the isotropic LASOF area.

It is postulated that the earth is floating within an oscillating quantum vacuum frame, which by itself  has a specific orbital velocity relative to the solar system. Until now Two isotropic lightspeed bubbles (LASOFs) located at both sides of the earth prevented the measurement of firm lightspeed differences.   

As a consequence, it is postulated that a  quantum vacuum must originate  a measurable ether drift effect, which should be measured at best at mountain summits or in space by the difference in the (one way) light speed between two GPS or GEO satellites (up and down). These speed differences should be measured more or less parallel with the orbital propagation direction of the Earth around the sun and even parallel with other possible ether drift directions of the earth.. Until now, only a small  Earth velocities are measured .

 e.g. by A: 2001: Yu.M.Galaev, "Ethereal Wind in Experience of Millimetric Radiowave Propagation" (between two mountain summits) ,  http://www.spacetime.narod.ru/0010-pdf.zip    and  Dayton Miller in 1926,  see: James DeMeo : http://www.orgonelab.org/miller.htm at mount Wilson. Dayton Miller published his findings in:  Review of modern physics 5, 203-242 (1933) called: “The Ether drift experiments and the determination of absolute motion of the earth.  Miller concluded however that these subtle results where still in line with SR.

However, professor H. A. Munera and M. Allais,  have shown us the way to interpret Millers ether drift measurements in a more conclusive anti-SR way. See: : http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-272/aflb272p463.pdf   http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-272/aflb272p463.htm http://allais.maurice.free.fr/English/media12-1.htm

For this model it is assumed that Millers results where handicapped by the influence of the LASOF and a kind of  “semi-Lorentz contraction” of rods. The Earthly  LASOF   ("Local A-symmetrical Oscillating Vacuum Frame") are supposed to be  two isotropic light speed bubbles, which compensate the ether drift effects in general and especially in Spring and Autumn.   The proposed  GPS  experiment should be able to check more clearly the orbital speed of the Earth around the sun and  other ether drift directions of the earth, if it is done outside these LASOF areas. 

GPS one-way light speed and other experiments have proven that there is  no  “one-way  light speed difference”  measurable in more or less perpendicular  directions relative to surface of the Earth. If this was the case by ether drift effects the whole GPS system would not work with such a precision. At the same time however, the quantum vacuum and the earth should have  a relative motion to each other which should be measurable as a so called “Ether drift”. Interestingly, this is the case by the measurements of D. Miller , which where made only in the horizontal plane, where the GPS has its flaws.

To solve this contradiction, it is assumed that massive objects like the earth  create their own isotropic light speed bubbles at both sides of these massive objects, called LASOFs. These bubbles are supposed to be shaped in  a double cone form with a common axis pointing always parallel to the orbital motion of the earth around the sun and the earth as the centre point. Secondly, if we assume that there is also a second ether drift perpendicular to the equatorial plane of the Sun, (also measured by D. Miller)  then a second LASOF double cone should be introduced. Both LASOF systems are supposed to have a decreasing influence on the vacuum light speed measured parallel to the surface of the earth at increasing Altitudes. (Millers experiment was made at the top of mount Wilson U.S.A.) Consequently  it is proposed that the  GPS altitude, will be sufficient to measure more clearly the real vacuum correlated  light speed differences into the “up or down” direction between two Satellites. In future experiments even "inter satellite tracking"  e.g. between two so called block II GPS satellites and only one Ground Station should give enough information to check the existence of LASOFs.

Test 4: Large Sagnac Laser Ring Interferometer "LASOF crossing" variations.

In spite of the former assumption that the vacuum drift should be measured at GPS altitude or mountain summits, there are some indications that even inside the earth the LASOF  has measurable effects on the local  light speed differences.  It is assumed that a large Sagnac Laser Ring interferometer with enough "internal surface" or "light arm separation" designed to detect only subtle changes in the Rotation of  the Earth, could also be used for detecting subtle LOCAL  lightspeed differences, in the up and down direction  between the individual Sagnac Ring  arm trajectories. This is an experiment which is already in action at the Canterbury Ultra-G Ring Laser Project at Canterbury University New Zealand (Christchurch, within the Cashmere Cavern, managed by professor Geoff Stedman). The Perimeter of 77 meter and the Area of 370 m2 seem to be just enough to measure the within 24 hours rotating "LASOF double cone" influences on the local lightspeed differences around the Earth. In fact this Large Sagnac Laser did already indicate some interesting anomalies, which should be connected to the local lightspeed differences originated by the  LASOF. If Massive bodies like the earth are equipped with LASOF double cones, the lightspeed should be influenced exactly at the borders of that double cone rotating with the rotation of the Earth within 24 hours over the  surface of the Earth. 

The LASOF double cone main axis, is supposed to have a stable orientation parallel with the orbital trajectory of the Earth around the Sun. As a consequence, subtle local lightspeed variations are supposed to be measurable on locations placed between 45 degrees North or South Latitude. The double cone shape of the LASOF is supposed to have two circular sections with the surface of the earth located opposite to each other at both sides of the earth, with the common circular symmetry axis pointing through the centre of the earth, parallel with the orbital motion of the earth around the sun . 

This effect is already measured by the Stedman team: see: the first Ultra-G (UG-1) results 1-14 January 2002 : http://www.phys.canterbury.ac.nz/research/ring_laser/UG0102.pdf The transition of 4 into 2 fold frequency shift variations each day, exactly on the 10th of January 2002, is in line with my so called LASOF (Local A-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame) boundary predictions.

A daily 4-fold lightspeed variation change into a two fold variation on the 10^th of January  is the reason to suggest that the LASOF boundary circle at that time in the Cashmere Cavern  must reach down to about 45 degrees Southern Latitude, because the latitude of the Cashmere Cavern itself is Southern-Latitude: 43 degrees, which is 2 degrees within the maximal LASOF cone. The 4 fold lightspeed variations are supposed to indicate that both of the LASOFs circles  are crossed. After  the 10^th of January it is supposed that only one of the LASOFs are crossed due to the different orientation of the Polar rotational  axis of the earth relative to the LASOF axis, parallel to the orbital direction of the earth.

In summer and winter times, around 21 June and 21 December the 4 fold lightspeed variation change will have a maximum distance during the day. Due to the orbital change in the Polar rotational axis of the Earth. As a consequence we may expect, that during each year, the "transition" data which change the daily 4-fold variation into 2-fold frequency variation, will be on the 10th of January and the 10th of July and the "transition" data which change the daily 2-fold variation into 4-fold frequency variation, will be on the 1st of June and the 1st of December:.

The Moon LASOF.

If the Earth has a LASOF the Moon should have also one.   If the moons position is exactly  in “front or at the backside” of the Earth’s orbital  motion axis around the Sun, the  UG-1 Ring Laser in New Zealand, should give a clear “jump” inside the Sagnac signal for a period of several hours. Consequently this is expected to happen at the First and Last quarter position of the Moon, when the moon is located within the ecliptic plane at the so called nodal position. Information from Cashmere Cavern UG-1 seem to support this phenomenon for  31 august 2002.   However, if as Dayton Miller measured there is reason to assume also an ether drift along the axis of the Solar planetary plane, then the moon influence on the Ultra Large Sagnac Laser measurements is expected to be also present at other quarter positions of the moon. This will become clear only after publication of the UG-1 measurements by the Stedman team in the near future.

The Earthly LASOF or E-LASOF double cone.

In spite of all the "one-way tests of light speed isotropy" made in history, which are all consistent with Special Relativity, it is obvious that these experiments does not account for "non-isotropic light speed bubbles" on both sides of the Earth, or the "photon transition" within 1 cm mentioned before.

According to this model, the Earth is cruising through a Solar centered oscillating vacuum lattice frame. This vacuum lattice is connected to the Sun, by the influence of Two so called "Stellar Anchor Black Holes" (SABHs) located on both sides of the planetary plane at about 1 light year distance of the sun.

It is postulated that in the neighborhood of mass concentrations (e.g. the Earth), the speed of the photonic wavefunction expands a-symmetrically relative to this Solar reference frame in a complex non-isotropic way. ( see before: "Microscopic Amplitude Variation, the origin of the constancy of the speed of light")

As a consequence, the Earth in motion relative to the Solar reference frame, is equipped with its own mimicked (imperfect) reference frame, which is supposed to have a complex form based on a Double Cone or hyperboloid. This Double Cone we will call: the "Earthly- Local A-Symmetric Oscillating vacuum Frame" (E-LASOF).

The summits of the two cones of the double cone, are supposed to coincide with the center of the earth. The Cone summit angles are supposed to be 90 degrees which is based on recent Sagnac Interferometer "Ring Laser Project" measurements in Canterbury university (Christchurch, New Zealand = 43 degrees latitude South) . Inside these cones it is supposed that the speed of light is constant within the limits of the so called "extinction distance" (described before ) in all directions, related to the geometry of the double cones, and not related to the ROTATING Earthly surface. Outside these Double Cones it is supposed that the Solar vacuum reference frame (or S-LASOF) must be accounted for with an exception for an Earthly cylindrical volume with the same diameter as the Earth and connecting the two E-LASOF cones.

The major symmetry axis of the E- LASOF double cone and the cylinder, is always pointing parallel with the direction of the Earthly orbital motion around the sun. One cone of the E-LASOF is located at the front-, and one cone is located at the backside of the Earth relative to the orbital motion. As a consequence, the E-LASOF Double Cone is supposed to intersect the Earthly surface by two giant circular LASOF SURFACES. Due to the top angle (90 degrees) of the LASOF double cones, the circular LASOF SURFACES will have a diameter of ¼ of the planet circumference.

"A-symmetric oscillating" in a E-LASOF, means that the Higgs-virgin vacuum particle oscillations measured in different lattice directions, have a different anti-symmetric spiraling/sinusoidal form related to the time-base.

The Inter shaped cylindrical area around the Earth, connecting the double cone, is supposed to have is supposed to have ONLY lightspeed isotropy with the double cones into the direction parallel with the main double cone axis. This is the reason why it should be possible to measure the speed of the Earth in the reference frame of the Sun by GPS "one-way" signal speed difference measurements (see 4 tests) if these GPS spacecrafts are in positions outside the E-LASOF.

The Solar LASOF or S-LASOF.

The Solar LASOF is supposed to have an REVERSED double cone form. The Solar LASOF should be interpreted as reversed double coned reference frame which is locally fixed to its so-called "Stellar Anchor black hole" system. In this model we may call this: the solar dual anchor black hole system, which has the form of a dumbbell, with reversed double coned LASOFs in between the black holes. As a consequence, The LASOF of the Earth is acting within the Solar LASOF. In YOUNG stars, the Solar anchor black holes (SABHs) are spotted and described as "glowing caps" or "bow shocks" at the end of the dual jets, see: HH 34, http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap991129.html . We noticed, that in DYING stars (in Planetary nebula) these anchor black holes are also often visible as bipolar bow shocks , see M2-9: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap990321.html

It is supposed, that the E-LASOF is the main reason why so called first order (one way) light velocity measurements with the Global Positioning System are only accurate, if the measurement direction from the Satellites is directed more or less perpendicular to the Earth surface. GPS Measurement directions which have a small Earth surface angle become often inefficient, mainly due to the distortion of the light speed represented by the absence of LASOF perpendicular to the orbit direction of the Earth around the Sun. As a result, the orbital velocity of the earth around the sun relative to the solar reference frame, should be measurable by future one way velocity experiments of the GPS. (The so called Sagnac effect which is originated by the Earth rotation itself, is already converted in the GPS system)

Just like the Canterbury Sagnac Ring Laser project results ( http://www.phys.canterbury.ac.nz/research/ring_laser/ring_2000_html ), GPS Satellite High precision time comparison "one-way" light speed experiments show periodic (light speed) variations. These variations are mentioned as a "problem", and "insufficient agreement in results", which "remain to be settled" see:[4].(Saburi, IEEE, IM 25, no 4 dec 1976, pp. 475). Saburi concluded: "Thus two problems , the existence of small and periodic variations and an insufficient agreement in results, remain to be settled".

As a consequence, this model is in MEASURABLE DISCORDANCE with Einstein’s Special relativity which says that light will always travel at a constant rate, regardless of the frame of reference. The Higgs-virgin oscillating LASOF influenced cosmos mimics most –but not all- the predictions of special- and general relativity, which lead to several realistic falsifying or supporting tests for this model.

Stellar aberration.

The well known "Stellar aberration experiment" made by Bradley (1725!) is also supporting the idea that the Earth is floating within a stationary light medium. Thus it is not falsifying the idea of some sort of  isotropic Lightspeed bubbles like  LASOFs around the earth.

Outside the-LASOF areas,  the SOLAR LASOF reference frame is supposed to be unchanged as the stationary or semi-stationary light medium. Consequently, outside the LASOF  areas, so called "one-way signal speed" measurements between two GPS or GEO satellites, made in a direction parallel with propagation of the Earth around the Sun, should be able to prove the difference of the light speed.  [2] (Phys.Rev.Letters. vol 1, no 9, 1958, p.342-343, [3] Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1964,v 54,no,2 p.147-151.

Anti-relativity GPS "one way" light speed test, outside the "LASOF Double cone".

One of the future experiments to check this model is based on the prediction, that it should be possible to measure "some" influence (more influence that D. Miller measured) of the speed of the Earth through the Solar vacuum reference frame by special "one way" GPS signalling speed measurements. This experiment has to be done more or less outside the influence of the so called "LASOF Double Cone" or "Local a-symmetric Oscillating vacuum Frame" (see: LASOF Double Cone below), which is originated by the interaction of the Earth with the oscillating vacuum lattice. The Solar vacuum frame is supposed to be anchored around the sun, and is not rotating around the sun relative to the galaxy center.

This experiment can be done, by measuring the difference in the signalling speed between two GPS or other  satellites, at the moment that these satellites are able to exchange signals, in the up or down (vacuum wind) direction of the motion of the Earth (30 km/sec.) around the sun. Thus it is proposed to measure the signal speed difference between two  satellites, in a direction which is chosen more or less PARALLEL with the axis of the Earthly propagation around the sun, to check the influence on the measurement of the speed of the Earth (30 km/second) relative to the Solar reference frame.

Universal change of Alpha and the light speed.

The recent discovery of the variation of the electromagnetic coupling constant (or fine-structure constant) Alpha, seem to introduce a new light speed perspective in the physical community. (John K. Webb. /P. Davies: "the speed of light has changed" http://www.pr.mq.edu.au/events/index.asp?ItemID=607 )

In this Oscillating Quantum Vacuum (OQV) Lattice model, it is assumed that the Vacuum Lattice measured from the center to the rim of our universe, becomes more and more "structural anti-symmetric" in redshift, due to the absorption of the Vacuum Lattice by Dark Matter (spacetime curvation), located around Galaxies in the form of "Galaxy Anchor Black Holes" (GABH’s), Galaxy Halo Black Holes (GHBHs) and smaller within Galaxies: Stellar Anchor Black Holes (SABHs), Comets, etc. (see: semi cold dual Fractal Big Bang.) . This anti-symmetry in redshift, can be compared with the LASOF areas (Local A-Symmetrical Oscillating Vacuum Frame) connected to massive objects.

As a consequence it is assumed that the "Hubble redshift" is originated not by the expansion of the universes, but by this Dark Matter/ Black Hole absorption effect. As a result, the universal change in the Lightspeed (or alpha change) suggested by P.Davies should be not continuous.

This discontinuity is supposed to be originated by the increased vacuum absorption rate of GABH’s located in the center of the universe, which must be more evolved than the GABH’s at the universal rim, if we include the effect of the so called "look back time". It is assumed that somewhere in between this distance, the lightspeed ( or alpha) change is decreased. This effect can be seen at: "Michael Murphy’s Research" page. At http://bat.phys.unsw.edu.au/%7Emim/res.html figure: 2, between 0,65 and 0,85 "Fractional look-back time" we can see a structural decrease of the alpha change, which is supposed to be the result of the former described effect.

It is proposed that even the recent discovery of the "acceleration of the universal expansion" measured by comparing so called Type 1a Supernova data should be also originated by the same increased vacuum absorption rate of GABH’s in the center of the universe.

Ergodic Hypothesis.

The former proposal for a vacuum lattice has parallels with the "Ergodic Hypothesis" in classical mechanics. It was Boltzmann who proposed the so called "Ergodic Hypothesis", (Greek: erg+hodos= energy path) also called: the "continuity of path" by Maxwell. Ergodicity of a system has been the fundamental assumption of classical mechanics, and it is also used in computer simulation practice. Thus if we want to represent the vacuum lattice qualities, it seems plausible to use Ergodic math. The vacuum seems also to be a computational system with so called "excitable cellular automata". There are two families of excitable cellular automata : the Greenberg-Hastings model (GHM) and the Cyclic Cellular Automaton (GCA). Each family consists of local deterministic oscillating lattice dynamics. See: http://arxiv.org/abs/patt-sol/9303002

TWO HISTORICAL MISINTERPRETATIONS OF EXPERIMENTS made by Babcock and Bergmann (1964) and K. Brecher (2000), a good bye to the "Occam’s razor" criterion..

The LASOF light speed change or the "source to extinction distance"

Inside the LASOF (Local A-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame) areas on both sides of the orbiting object, the light speed around a massive object like the Earth, is supposed to be related to the object, within a specific redial distance, which can be called the "source to extinction distance".

It is to credit Robert S. Fritzius, who gathered parallel ideas on "extinction distances"., He found that Walter Ritz and R.Tolman did already find evidence for extinction distances, which was called "Ritz ballistic hypothesis" resp. "Tolman extinction" (or "source to extinction distance"). In the paper of Fritzius, called "Stellar Gamma-ray lashes" : http://www.ebicom.net/~rsf1/grbs.htm he presented both interpretations: we quote as follows:

Kenneth Brecher gave a paper on testing special relativity using Gamma Ray bursts at the April 2000 APS meeting in Long Beach California. ( http://www.eps.org/aps/meet/APR00/baps/abs/S5800012.html ). He evaluated the expression c' = c + kv where k = 0 for special relativity and k = 1 for the Ritz ballistic hypothesis. He states "If the SR second postulate is invalid, photons emitted simultaneously towards an observer from a source at distance L, characterized by internal velocities v (both towards and away from the observer), will arrive at the observer as a pulse of finite width dt, implying a value of k = (c^2/2v)(dt/L)." He used v > 0.1c, dt = 1.0 msec and a cosmological distance of 10^28 cm for L (GRB to observer). For these values we get k = 10^-20. Brecher says "This represents, by a factor of 10^9, the most precise test of the second postulate of special relativity to date." R. Fritzius comment: According to John Fox(4), Tolman's " source-to-extinction distance" has to be used in calculations, such as in Brecher's special relativity test, rather than the source-to-observer distance. (For cosmological distances the former is generally very much shorter than the latter.) When we plug in the extinction distance, as calculated for the Crab pulsar in another part of this presentation, L=2.6*10^10cm, (which is 2.6*10^5 Km or approximately 0.7 times the Earth-Moon distance) we arrive at a much fuzzier result for this SR test, i.e., k=5.8*10^-3.

According to the expected mass difference between the Crab pulsar and the Earth, it is likely to assume, that the "source to extinction distance" of the Earthly LASOF double cones postulated by this model, could be expected to be much less than 0.7x the Earth Moon distance.

At the same time it is shown that the interpretation mistake, (to calculate with the "source to observer distance") made by Kenneth Brecher, is the same mistake as is made in the "Babcock and Bergman" experiment within the laboratory (see below: "the 1 cm postulate" ).

The 1 cm. LASOF Postulate, based on the new-interpretation of the Babcock and Bergman experimental results.

The well known Babcock and Bergman (B&B) experiment called "Determination of the Constancy of the speed of light" [3] (originally done by Kantor in air) was designed to discover the relation between the light speed and the light source ( by placing two fast rotating glass windows in the light beam trajectories. The B&B experiment was done in a vacuum chamber). The goal was to check the SR postulate, that the speed of light is a constant for all observers, regardless of their motion relative to the source of the light. The B&B experiment supported the light speed invariance up to a subtle 0,7 % structural anomaly, which could not be explained.

This small but structural light speed anomaly was structural related to the fast moving (rotating) glass windows. On page 151, of [3] Babcock writes: "it is only claimed here that the (fringe) shift between rotating conditions was less that 0.02 fringe, a value to be compared with the shift of 2,9 fringes predicted on the assumption of addition of velocities". "It is also concluded that the results are, to within their own precision, in agreement with the prediction of the theory of relativity". Thus B&B measurements where interpreted as supporting the 2^e postulate, because the fringe shift was ALWAYS POSITIVE RELATED TO THE SPEED OF THE SOURCE, although it was very small.

However the B&B experiment supported the 2^e postulate ONLY if it is assumed, that the WHOLE "free" light beam trajectory (between the glass window and the fixed reflecting mirrors = 140 cm) has to be influenced by the speed of the glass window.

If we don’t take the whole trajectory of the light beam into account, and suggest that there is some kind of a "source to extinction distance" active, THEN a simple calculation tells us that the ratio of 0.02/2,9 is 0,7 % , so (0,7/100x140= 1 cm). : 0,7 % over a distance of 140 cm, in which the light was moving unreflected in vacuum, after leaving the fast rotating glass window.

Conclusion: we may calculate that the speed of light has a speed relation with the (fast) moving glass window source only over ca. 1 cm distance, which we could interpret as a structural small LASOF. However, the mass of the glass window is so small that we postulate that this effect is not a real LASOF effect. Contrary we expect this effect to be a universal effect of all radiation, and the base for all wave-particle duality. We will call this effect the 1 cm effect.

We will raise this effect to the "1 cm postulate": that all radiation is always related to the speed of the source over a mass dependent distance of at least 1 cm, measured in the reference frame of the source. Despite all the experimental evidence for Relativity, the search for subtle flaws in these experiments can bring Reality nearby. References: [3] Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1964,v 54,no,2 p.147-151.

5 new Postulates on the lightspeed around massive bodies.

The local speed of light and the "stretching and compactification" of the spiraling light wave in the local vacuum lattice reference frame, is supposed to be influenced by mass according to 5 new light speed postulates. These postulates refute the universality of Special Relativity, and introduces the existence of local light speed (LASOF) boundaries. These postulates are:

1: that all celestial massive bodies moving (orbiting) in the local lattice vacuum reference frame , are equipped with "double cone" formed areas with special an-isotropic light speed properties called LASOFs, (Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame) located on either sides of the moving object. The main axes of this double cone are inline with each other and in line with the propagation direction of the object through the vacuum lattice. These LASOFs mimic Special Relativity rules about the lightspeed, and are the origin of the misinterpretation of the constant lightspeed by the Special Relativity theory. The LASOFs are only effective to compensate for Special Relativity requirements, for velocities under 1/8 of the light speed of the moving object related to the vacuum reference frame.

2: that inside these LASOF areas, the light speed is related both, to the moving object and the vacuum reference frame with a changing ratio from 100% to 0%, dependent of the distance to the object in motion called the "distance of extinction". Inside the LASOF (Local A-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame) areas on both sides of the orbiting object, the light speed around a massive object like the Earth, is supposed to be related to the object, within a specific redial distance, which can be called the "source to extinction distance".

3: that the dimensions of the LASOF areas are related to the total mass in motion and the mass density of the object. (However, the light speed is in the first place always related to the light emitting object over a mass dependent minimum 1 cm around the object itself. see: "the 1 cm postulate" below)

4: that stars like the Sun are also floating in the center of a so called "Secondary Stellar LASOF", which has the form of a double cone, with the circular bases located into one common central plane of different space structure. These cones are originated by two massless so called "Stellar Anchor Black Holes" (SABH’s) of medium size, each located at one of the summits of the double cone. The Solar planetary plane is supposed to be orientated perpendicular to the common central axis of these cones, and centered within the common circular cone bases.

As a first possible evidence in space of such a secondary LASOF, we found a so called "Highly ordered Faraday Rotation Structure in the Interstellar Medium" in the form of a double cone, with a central plane of different polarization, by B. Uyaniker and T.L. Landecker.(Astr.Ph.J. 575:225-233. 2002, 10 aug. See also: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/ps/0204/0204274.f3.jpg .

These Solar Anchor black holes (SABH’s) are supposed to "Eat" or absorb the energetic oscillating vacuum, at both sides (North and South) of the sun, which should be the origin of the "Solar LASOF" which is supposed to have an extra influence on the vacuum structure. The vacuum "eating" of these black holes is reason to postulate that the SOLAR LASOF is not based on a-symmetrical oscillations, but on vacuum lattice "drag" by the two Solar Black Holes, together with all the other Stellar- and Galaxy Anchor Black Holes (SABHs and GABHs) of the Milky way. SABH’s are supposed to be identifiable by their gravitational micro-lensing effect on background stars, showing asymmetry due to the Earth’s orbital location shift during the year. It is supposed that this identification could be extracted from existing terrestrial astronomical photographs.

5: that each Galaxy is supposed to have a complex " Tertiary Galaxy Halo LASOF" structure around, originated by at least two Massive "Anchor Black Holes" comparable with the Stellar Anchor Black Hole/LASOF combination. These so called Galaxy Anchor Black Holes (GABH’s) are supposed to be identical with the well known primordial black holes (PBH’s), left over from the Big Bang and recently recognized by astronomers as "gravitational lensing" satellite CDM substructure in Galaxies and Galaxy clusters.

(The Galaxy Anchor Black Holes, together with the smaller Stellar Anchor Black Hole systems, are supposed to "eat" the vacuum, which is the origin of phenomena like the Gravitational Lensing, the Hubble Redshift, Dark (missing) Matter, Spacetime distortion, the universal evolutionary clock. This universal clock is based on the absorption of the vacuum lattice by dark matter (black holes), the origin of the future Big Crunch. The number and distribution of GABH’s is supposed to be responsible for the differences between Galaxy types. In "quadruple gravitational lenses" like PG1115-080 the measured anomalous "flux ratios" of the 4 different images, are indicating that these quadruple images are not representing the same Background Quasar, but instead 4 different satellite GABH’s, surrounding in tetrahedron configuration the central Elliptical Galaxy). (N.Dalal  )    http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/castles/Individual/PG1115.html

The Particle -Vacuum Lightspeed relation.

The light medium is a linear oscillating particle based 3D space frame in the form of a chiral (left or right handed) incomplete tetrahedron lattice .Two oscillating vacuum particles oscillate in opposite direction along the same linear vacuum lattice and transfer photonic information between the two nodal points at each end of a lattice.

Matter (quarks and leptons) is made of  ether particles which change their shape by collision into tiny -two armed- chiral propellers, which are supposed to have real spin by the continuous traction of colliding oscillating vacuum particles.   Each collision between quarks or leptons with vacuum particles, does change the vacuum particle, dependent of the angle of collision, into a different shaped photon, gluon or graviton (all without a chiral propeller form).

Photon particles are supposed to be able to collide, merge and separate again from one specific Lepton and in succession change back as a “neutral” oscillating vacuum particle inside the vacuum lattice. If photon particles don’t merge within 1 cm they will also change back as an oscillating vacuum particle.

Gluon particles are supposed to collide, merge and separate again from one specific Quark and in succession change back as a “neutral” oscillating vacuum particle inside the vacuum lattice.

Graviton particles are supposed to be only able to collide with Leptons and Quarks and in succession change back after a trajectory of 1 cm, as an “non-neutral” oscillating vacuum particle inside the lattice. Non Neutral means that the graviton potential does never die out and is always transferred with the local speed of light through the vacuum.

This system is called: the disruption and repairing system of the vacuum, which is responsible for diffraction, refraction and dispersion inside and around atoms, and is the origin of the differences in the lightspeed through transparent media like Glass, Water and Air.

The local speed of light is less than the local photonic information speed along each vacuum lattice, because there are no straight connected lattices inside the vacuum lattice. The lightspeed in a clean vacuum lattice is 4/7 of the vacuum lattice transfer speed of light along the lattices. The minimum lightspeed could be temporary zero, if the vacuum is able to transfer the light information in circles inside the tetrahedron vacuum lattice. 

Due to the disruption process of the vacuum lattice inside (transparent) matter, the photonic information trajectories are also disrupted, which forces the photonic information transfer process along the vacuum lattices,  to take a longer route through the lattice, which decreases the lightspeed.

If the vacuum frame lattice is in motion relative to (transparent) matter both will become polarized which has a relative influence on the internal lightspeed (Fizeau experiment) and all other SR effects such as time delay, mass increase and probably no length contraction at all.

Massive objects in relative motion with the vacuum lattice will originate two isotropic lightspeed vacuum cones in front and at the backside of the massive object. The vacuum will become an anti-symmetric oscillation pattern, which is called: “Local Anti-symmetric oscillating vacuum Frame”(LASOF).

The LASOF influence is supposed to decrease and die out after a certain distance of extinction, which is dependant of the total mass of the object. This is the reason why the one-way lightspeed measured more or less perpendicular to the surface of the earth seems to be constant at all places. (GPS) However GPS one-way measurements will become disturbed by the vacuum lattice in motion outside the LASOF areas and if the measurements are made more or less parallel with the surface of the earth. (see:  4 tests below)

Knotty Jets, the Tell Tales for Early Dark Matter and Spiral Galaxy formation.

 It is proposed that the new paradigm for Black Holes with a nuclear particle content, (see before)  lead to  a 2 stage semi-cold Black Hole evaporating Big Bang see  http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix40    which is supposed to be the origin  of  “simple” progenitor Spiral Galaxies equipped with at least one so called Galaxy Anchor Black Hole (GABH) at either side of the disk.
These Early simple what I call “dumbbell” Spirals are supposed to be able to merge, however without the merging of the GABHs itself.

This merging prohibition is part of the new paradigm for Black Holes, which tell us that Black Holes only merge if the vacuum structure/pressure has become insufficient, as is supposed to happen in the so called Big Crunch. Second, that Black Holes Repel single atoms thus gas clouds, but attract massive stars, which is supposed to be the origin of all dwarf globular stellar concentrations. 

If there is still Gas in the neighborhood of these GABHs it is proposed that a Dwarf Irregular  Galaxy in between these GABHs is formed, or even a Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy .

If there are enough stars available from Galaxy merging activities: GABHs can capture these stars and  form Elliptical shaped star clusters around themselves called Dwarf  Elliptical  Galaxies.
Consequently these GABHs will stay isolated and will form two axial orientated "Tree alike" outer Halos of the Spiral System.
Within Early Spiral Galaxies, these GABHs are supposed to form axial located strings which can be identified as Knots inside Jets produced by the Spiral Radio Galaxies. It is well known that these knots don't move inside these Jets, which is in line with the new GABH paradigm that Black Hole nuclei are supposed to be “Locked up “ within the oscillating  vacuum structure. See also: 3C303    http://hea-www.harvard.edu/XJET/source-d.cgi?3C_303
The Spiral galaxy 0313-192 is supposed to be an example of a Spiral with GABH induced extended Halos in "Tree" form see    http://www.astr.ua.edu/keel/research/rg0313.html
It is proposed That these GABHs can collect stars and form Dim Dwarfs Ellipticals Galaxies. In addition it is proposed that in between these strings of GABHs, Irregular and Spheroidal Galaxies can form like the Dwarf  Sculptor  see: http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March01/Mateo/Mateo4.html

It was professor F.D.A.Hartwick (University of Victoria BC Ca.) who described the interesting extended Halo structure of more or less aligned dim Dwarf Galaxies of the Milky Way (10 dwarfs) and Andromeda Galaxy (11 Dwarfs) See: “The Structure of the Outer Halo of the Galaxy and its Relationship to Nearby Large-Scale Structure” (arXiv:Astro-ph/9912083 v1 4 Dec. 1999.)  http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/9912/9912083.pdf

Progenitor Spirals are supposed to merge at last into Giant Spiral Galaxies.

Within Galaxy Clusters these Spiral Galaxies are supposed to change automatically into Giant Ellipticals, because the alignment of the Tree alike GABHs of the different merger Galaxies inside these Giants will become more random orientated.

However even inside Giant Elliptical Galaxies it seems possible that some remnants of the axial GABH structure can be identified, see :     http://hea-www.harvard.edu/XJET/source-d.cgi?M87
If this is true,   Dwarf Elliptical Galaxies must each harbor a primordial massive GABH which is supported by the fact that most elliptical dwarfs and even Globular Galaxies do not show much gaseous content. (The new paradigm Black Holes are supposed to repel gas but attract Stars)

The extended Halo  GABH is supposed to be a balancing aid for the axial stability of the Galaxy and is influencing the forming of Spiral arms and Galaxy structure. A lot of the Universal Dark Matter in the form of GABHs, should consequently be concentrated inside Dwarf Elliptical Galaxies or unresolved without a stellar globular shell,. inside extended lobes.

As a result, the contemporary idea that all Galaxies harbor a super massive Black Hole in their nucleus should be wrong.
If black holes inside Galaxies are not primordial but only Supernova remnants, then one could speculate that only collections of the smallest Supernova Black Holes should be concentrated in these Galaxy nuclei.

Globular Clusters then, should harbor even bigger (the oldest) Supernova black holes.

This would support the idea that  black holes tend to organize from small to big, from inside to outside Galaxies.
This could be a possible explanation for the knotty structure of our Galaxy nucleus, harboring only small black holes..

A special different scenario however, for  giant Elliptical Galaxies equipped with internal GABHs is possible inside the center of Galaxy clusters.
These Giant Ellipticals could be a combined effort of a concentration of  GABHs (Dwarf Galaxies) connected to the ring of outer Galaxies of the Galaxy Cluster, which have different axial orientations, all pointing into the center of the Cluster.

If these GABHs come together in the center of Galaxy clusters, A new Giant Elliptical Galaxy could be born equipped with old stars from other galaxies and the original Dwarf stars around these GABHs.
Then these Ellipticals could be called "super Dwarfs"' see the example mentioned above: of a Knotty jet inside M87. :     http://hea-www.harvard.edu/XJET/source-d.cgi?M87  which seem to have a  much higher Dark Matter content than the surrounding Galaxies.

Galaxy “Anchor Black Holes” (GABHs) the origin of dark Matter and Tidal Dwarf Galaxies.

It is well known that interacting Galaxies have mostly a relative more than average number of Dwarf Galaxy companions called “Tidal Dwarfs”, see J.Hibbard:  Tidal Dwarf Galaxies:. http://www.cv.nrao.edu/~jhibbard/TDG/tdg.html  and also  http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March02/Mirabel/Mirabel5.html . The origin of this phenomenon according to my new Big Bang paradigm, ( http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix40  )  must be found in the assumption that all Spiral Galaxies are equipped with so called Galaxy Anchor Black Holes (GABHs)  in their outer Halos more or less located  along the axis of Galaxy rotation and the origin of unseen Dark Matter.  Some of these  GABHs are present in the form of Elliptical Dwarf Galaxies, and the rest did not have the evolutionary chance  to capture Stars from their neighborhood to form  Dwarfs, but are supposed to be still hidden inside the extended outer Halo of the Spiral Galaxy.

However it is also postulated before  that Most Giant Elliptical Galaxies even Giant Spiral Galaxies are grown up in history,  by the merging of multiple smaller (primordial)  Spiral Galaxies. As a result, the  Dwarf Galaxy  abundance which we see today in  tidal tails of merging Galaxies, should have happened in history  around ALL Giant  Galaxies.   I  would suggest that GABHs which are located near their Hosts, may lose their captured Shell of tidal dwarf stars after the Galaxy has become stable again.

It is remarkable that the number of Dwarf Elliptical  Galaxies inside Galaxy Clusters,  is relatively much higher than in the normal field around Spiral Galaxies.   See Kraan Korteweg and T ammann (Virgo: figure 10)  http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/Sandage3/Sand2_2.html#Figure%2010   .  I assume that  Dwarf Elliptical Galaxies are able to keep their Stellar shell in place by the different structure of  surrounding GABHs (Dark matter) within the Cluster, or by the continuous  exchange of stars with the Cluster environment.   

In field Galaxies, however it is obvious that only in tidal tails of interacting Spirals these “hidden”  GABHs show up as “Tidal Dwarf Elliptical Galaxies” , see:  the Stephans Quintet and NGC 4038.. See:       http://www.cv.nrao.edu/~jhibbard/TDG/AAS198hibbard.pdf      

Dark Matter extended Halo structure of Spiral Galaxies, the origin of Lensed Einstein Crosses.

If we accept that the small Black Holes (recently calculated about 2 million solar masses) are concentrated in the center of  Galaxies and the bigger Black Holes are concentrated inside axial “Trees” of  outer Halos, then the peculiar Lensed Einstein Crosse could be explained in a more logical way, by proposing that Einstein Crosses are originated by the Cross like (Dark) Matter structure showing up if we look at Spiral Galaxies EDGE ON!.

The Massive GABHs located along the extended axis of the Galaxy combined with the (Dark ) Matter distribution in the Disk and inner Halo form a clear structure in Cross Form if we look at it EDGE ON.  Bradac et al. found these effects in MG0414+0534, see:  http://www.astro.uni-bonn.de/~mbradac/Work/aah3340.pdf   See also N. Dalal and C. Kochanec: This Galaxy is not seen EDGE ON, therefore these 4 images have  two by two a different lensing distance by the different amounts of Dark matter in between them and show up as a trapezium. The symmetry axis of this trapezium should point in the same direction as the rotational axis of the Spiral Galaxy.

  http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/castles/Individual/MG0414.html    http://universe.gsfc.nasa.gov/press/2002/020520a.html . 

Multiple times: Local- and Cosmological Time.

1: If we accept that the "EPR correlation" or "Big Bang Entanglement", is described as a so called instantaneous Timeless "Transactional Interpretation" (TI) between anti-mirror particles, with opposite (+ and -) running time, then there is something like a divine guiding system in the universal system. This interpretation is close to the already described TI, by John.G.Cramer see: http://www.npl.washington.edu/npl/int_rep/qm_nl.html and described in his paper as "instantaneous (THUS TIMELESS) action at a distance",
2: If the universal system is always anti-mirror symmetrical, without a "broken (Big Bang) symmetry" and synchronized by EPR effects, then it could be expected that we have to deal with copy anti-universes with "mathematical opposite running LOCAL AND COSMOLOGICAL time".
3: If the vacuum is equipped with a crystalline lattice system of complex oscillating Higgs alike real vacuum particles, "pushing around" quarks and Leptons, then this oscillatory jitter of Fermions should be interpreted as the origin of local time, This would be the first "real time" to deal with.
4: If the vacuum particles are constantly absorbed by a not yet discovered system of Black Holes spread around Galaxies and stars like our sun (already recognized as "Dark Matter"), then we could come to the solution that there is also "Cosmological Time": the time that the cosmos need to pulsate in and out, from Big Crunch via a complex Fractal Big Bang to the second Big Crunch.

5: In between these small scale and large scale time scenarios, it is assumed that what we could call medium scale pulsations or rotations can be taken into account. As an example: The rotation of the earth around its own center and around the sun, the life time of stars, the Sunspot cycle of 11 years, up to Galaxy center explosions which are predicted to recur each 13,000 year, (by dr. P. LaViolette. See http://www.etheric.com/LaViolette/predict.html ).

Shape changing properties of vacuum particles.

The linear lattices with the Planck length, represent linear (longitudinal) energetic oscillations of real non-zero sized "hardrock" vacuum particles, which oscillate only locally and are supposed to have "shape changing properties". The vacuum particles are able to transport and transmit photonic/gluonic and neutrino information with 7/4x the speed of light. Two vacuum particles can change form by mutual collision by "shape changing properties" into an electron/positron pair. Single vacuum particles can also change by collision with quarks and Leptons into 6 different shaped single "elementary" real particle shapes: gluons and photons. Only photons and gluons can "click together" with electrons or positrons to form compound Lepton or Quark particles.

Compound particles are supposed to have a more or less stable connection with each other. Consequently they have to resist the fierce attack of the continuous collision with energetic oscillating vacuum particles, responsible for all spin. This fierce vacuum attack, is supposed to be the base for the creation and decay processes of compound particles: quarks, muon- and tau leptons.

The energy of the Vacuum particle oscillations is assumed to be the ONLY energy source in our universe, which is in balance with our synchronized dual anti-Universe, together adding up to zero energy. The sum of kinetic and potential energies in the dual universes, the Total Hamiltonian =0. The vacuum oscillations are supposed to "push around" all real spinning (spin ½: neutrinos excluded) particles. The force transfer by photons/gluons/neutrinos, is supposed to be the result of a statistical impulse mechanism of different directional polarizing momentum transfer of the different vacuum particles added within a certain time unit. The charged (spinning propeller) particles are supposed after collision with a photon (gravitons are excluded) to polarize their spin axis into a certain direction which is influenced by the momentum transfer of the photon. As a result the pushing power of the oscillating vacuum becomes anti-symmetrical for a moment and a "force" is originated by the vacuum. A curved electron trajectory in a magnetic field must be seen as an example of this polarizing effect. Thus photons don’t transmit forces, they transmit polarization information for Quarks or Leptons. Consequently the Feynman diagrams have to be extended with these vacuum oscillations, coming from 6-12 tetra/octahedron lattice directions in a new type "Feynman diagram".

As a consequence gravitons have no "back action", opposite to the direction of travel. Gravitons are supposed to transfer less repulsive force in the direction of travel, than the opposing vacuum particle momentum does as a kind of secondary "back action".

Wave-particle duality and vacuum disruption and repair.

After creation, force carrying REAL shaped particles (photons, gluons etc.) are supposed to transform back into a vacuum particle shape, after a flight trajectory of less than 1 cm. This mechanism is supposed to be the origin of particle-wave duality. This photonic transformation influences the oscillatory energy of the vacuum particles and the former "hardrock photon particle information " will continue as a spiraling longitudinal oscillation inside the lattice reference frame. However the photonic transformation (vacuum particle into photon) also disrupt the vacuum lattice structure, as a result ONE vacuum lattice will become non functional for each created photon. After a maximum of 1 cm of flight, the photon will change its form back into an oscillating vacuum particle, so it is able to repair the local vacuum lattice within the 1 cm boundary. This system is imaging the vacuum as a constant disrupting and repairing lattice system, which is supposed to be the origin of well known effects like diffraction, refraction and dispersion in and around atoms.

The collapse of the wavefunction by EPR Correlation between dual anti-mirror universes.

Each individual vacuum particle oscillation in our universe should be correlated and compensated, by its copy oscillation in our dual anti-mirror universe, together adding up to zero energy and zero information. Consequently the origin of all these vacuum oscillations, must be found in some sort of bow tension of these vacuum particles. All these vacuum particles have been evaporated smoothly in dual BBE guided symmetry, out of a new Big Bang nucleus. Standard models tell us that the Big Bang should be infinite hot. However if the energy of the BBE dual anti mirror universes is zero, there is reason to postulate a 2-stage semi-cold Fractal Big Bang inflation, without so called "symmetry breaking" into a limited set of dual EPR (Einstein Podolski and Rosen) correlated or Big Bang Entangled (BBE) universes.

The BBE is supposed to be constantly synchronizing all these anti-mirror twin particles, between dual anti mirror universes such as non-zero sized vacuum particles, Photons/Gluons and elementary non-zero sized twin Quark- and Lepton particles.

However these twin particles are living apart in dual -spatial separated- copy anti-mirror universes. The anti-mirror twin- particles are supposed to be their alternate instantaneous EPR correlated "conscious observers" "outside the system" (outside each others universe). These twin particles alternately initiate at random the collapse of each others wavefunctions by a trigger mechanism which is possible by so called "Floatation differences" and subsequently mediated by the so called "instantaneous two-way EPR correlation" . Thus the absolute first real scattering or collision of particles (vacuum particles with quarks or leptons) into its eigenstate is the trigger for the "instantaneous" EPR mediated collapse of the opposite twin particle in the other universe(s). As a result, these twin particles have a fully random alternate object-subject = observer-observed dual system relation, dependant of so called floatation differences within each Planck time.

In Quantum Mechanics, the Self of the observer is connected to human beings. This has led to strange ideas about living and dead Cats and the well known idea that the moon should only shine if it is observed by humans. In this model all so called "collapses of the wavefunction" are the result of at random real collisions and transformation processes of different shaped oscillating and spinning particles, within a dual universal EPR correlated process. Consequently the collapse of the wavefunction is INDEPENDENT of human measurement or observation, with an exception for human volition and action itself. Consequently the universe is described in this paper, as a Quantum Mechanical Dual Conscious Universe.

Uncertainty.

Uncertainty on two different levels, seems to be the ruling principle of choice in Big Bang Entangled, Dual Anti-Symmetric Copy Universes.

In contrast with Einstein’s "God plays no dice", it is postulated that God plays with real Big Bang Entangled rigid dice: the elementary non-zero sized particles, and the energetic oscillating particle based chiral vacuum lattice in dual universes.

Like Gods dice, the real particle (die) shape and structure, spin and continuous collisions are the origin of the choices nature makes. This is the origin of a logic based uncertainty of oscillating, spinning and colliding rigid particles, what we would call uncertainty "of the first kind".

However all these dice and vacuum oscillations are also dual universal correlated by Big Bang entanglement, which introduces an extra uncertainty of the "second kind" to the "dice form" collision uncertainty of the "first kind". Uncertainty of the second kind is supposed to be originated due to the at random choice nature makes which of the twin entangled particles is the "observer"- and which is the "observed" particle (The EPR synchronized collapse into the opposite eigenstate ) .This random choice is only possible if the twin entangled particles are not always exactly synchronized in the same eigenstate, they have to have floatation differences (perturbation differences) within each Planck time.

These fluctuations are supposed to be the origin of the alternate -but fully at random- initiating the choice which particle is the observer and which particle is the observed one. The eigenstate of the observed particle is supposed to be the one which is (mirror) mimicked by the observer particle and the origin of the dual collapse of "wavefunctions". Consequently in contrast with standard Quantum Mechanics, each wave or particle has always a precise position (relative to the Planck scale), also before an "experimental measurement (by humans)" is made. Thus when we measure the position of an electron, the measurement occur at the moment this electron interacts with the closest particle in the detector, ,………OR it will occur slightly after the moment (but within the Planck time) that the EPR correlated anti-mirror electron (positron) in the opposite universe interacts with its closest particle over there.

Particles and waves can still be described by Schroedinger equations, however particles and waves are always "precise" located within the Planck length, they don’t "spread out" as suggested by standard Quantum Mechanics.

This non-local description of reality has no connection to the Hidden Variables (HV) interpretations due to the so called "Value Definiteness" of HV, which means: all observers defined for a QM system have definite values at "all" times. The observer (particles) in this model are not defined before the measurement is made and definite values at ALL times is reduced to all times beyond the Planck time.

Thus God plays dice on multiple dual-non-local EPR correlated universal tables, and probably on more than two tables (universes).

Interference.

We could imagine the dual anti-mirror universes as being each others projection through a converging lens. If we imagine to place so called double slit experiments on both sides of this lens, and mark the corresponding slits A, resp. B, then after we combine these experiments into one experiment, the mystery of double slit experiments is explained. The photon which passed slit A, in our universe, interferes with its dual universal BBE correlated (anti-mirror shadow) particle, which passed in our perspective through slit B, by the anti-mirror symmetry relation.

There is even reason to suggest that these anti-mirror particles are present in or around each real particle. I suggest, that in so called "single photon interference events" (e.g. double slit experiments) the photonic wavefunction does not split in two equal halves. In stead:. These photons seem to be able to split into different anti-mirror wavefunctions representing two different particles: a shadow particle (also called mirage) and a real particle. In the same way, quarks and leptons, can split into two different (anti-mirror) shadow and real non-zero sized particles which can be described by their own anti-mirror wavefunctions. If these shadow and real particles (or shadow and real photons) reunite appropriately after passing a double slit, single-particle interference will occur. Even complete atoms are able to interfere by single particle interference (double slit) A new EPR correlation concept.

The interpretation of "EPR correlation" which is assumed to be most applicable in my model, resembles the "Transactional Interpretation" (TI) described by John.G.Cramer in "Nonlocality and the Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics" see: http://www.npl.washington.edu/npl/int_rep/qm_nl.html .

The TI of J.G. Cramer, is in this model interpreted as a timeless "handshake" between anti-mirror particles or compound particle systems (like humans) equipped with (mathematical) opposite running time, (as is in my model the case between two anti-mirror universes).

These anti-copy-universes are also mathematical each others opposite, thus:

ALSO CLOCKS ARE RUNNING IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION,

and the hart of my anti-Self is located at the right side of his body, which however he calls the left side.

THIS SOUNDS LIKE A JOKE BUT IT IS FULLY CAUSAL.

Dual Universal EPR correlation is here interpreted as "instantaneous action at a distance" even between two or more distant anti-mirror particles or compound particle systems living in anti-mirror copy universes with opposite running time.

It is postulated that Big Bang entangled Quantum Mechanical systems like humans, living in spatial separated anti-mirror copy universes are equipped with this "Retarded Handshake" possibility to create free will by means of a VETO in decision making within a time window of 200 milliseconds. This idea is based on the research of Benjamin Libet (in: "do we have free will?" Journal of Consciousness Studies, vol. 6 no. 8-9, 1999). Other complex systems like animals and vegetation are supposed to be equipped with a "retarded handshake time", which is shorter than 200 ms, so they are expected to have less Free Will..

The Human retarded Handshake time.

If we are experienced car drivers, we think that car driving is mostly a kind of autonomous "internal" habit to react always according to our experience on different traffic situations, based on "Our Private Own" driving intelligence. The longer we drive cars, the less energy it cost to keep attention on the different details of the traffic situation and the driving itself. We could interpret this intelligence as a kind of "hard disk" memory in our brain, which contains a lot of filed traffic experiences, in the years we drive cars. However we often realize, that without seeing a dangerous upcoming situation we often feel those dangerous situations internally, and because of that feeling we often are able to prevent dangerous driving situations. A lot of people are aware of this habit.

How is that possible? The possible CRAZY answer to this simple but deep question is "Anti-copy-universal EPR correlation" coined "Big Bang Entanglement". If there is "dual anti-mirror symmetry between separated universes" managed/mediated by "Big Bang Entanglement", then every person living in one of the anti-mirror universes is instantaneous (non local EPR) connected to his/hers twin anti-mirror person. It is expected, that this inter-universal non local semi-instantaneous connection acts retarded within 200 milliseconds.

This idea is based on experiments made by Benjamin Libet.

Thus if there are 12 correlated universes we look with 24 eyes around us, with slightly different perspectives and attention within a retarded time boundary of 200 ms. Conclusion: we are not alone, we seem to communicate with other anti-twins living in distant universes, who communicate with each other semi-instantaneously (200 ms.), without the notion of it. It is supposed that this "quality" also explains why people are able to play such a high level of top tennis and other sports. This sounds really CRAZY, but it is a serious option which is elaborated in this paper.

systems.    Each quark, lepton, boson and even Atoms  should be somehow escorted by its own anti-mirror companion (shadow) particle. So called mirage (shadow ) cobalt particles were recently found in elliptical quantum corrals, by dr. D. M. Eigler IBM (se quantum mirage effect (QME) http://www.almaden.ibm.com/almaden/media/image_mirage.html ) These mirage cobalt particles seem to have a one-third weaker intensity than the original cobalt particle. Recent so called "muon g-2" anomaly measurements suggest also that the muon could have a "super symmetric" partner escort particle, which influences its magnetic moment. (see: http://phyppro1.phy.bnl.gov/g2muon/index.shtml )

No broken Big Bang symmetry.

According to modern physics, the EPR correlation mechanism predict that each elementary particle that came out of the Big Bang, had a counterpart (anti-mirror spinning and charged ) particle which was EPR correlated. These EPR correlations should now be "washed out" due to a not well understood decoherence- and annihilation mechanism, which created the so called "broken symmetry" of our material Universe. However this model predict that the EPR correlated anti-mirror symmetry between particles is still there, in the form of dual universal symmetry synchronizing mechanism called "Big Bang entanglement" which should exist between dual spatial separated copy universes.

As a result, these ideas introduced a new ontology of physics, and a new particle-wave-vacuum principle. The vacuum is supposed to be filled up with real so called non-zero sized energetic oscillating so called "Higgs-virgin particles" (Dark Energy). These linear oscillations should have the Planck length, and are supposed to be the base of a quantum lattice , with the geometry of an incomplete complex chiral crystal lattice. By comparing different real 3-D octa-/tetrahedron lattice models, it came out, that there are at least two possible chiral vacuum lattice models possible, with a left- and a right hand spiraling geometry. ....

The "3-D  Chiral Space" a NEW chiral space filler.

It is possible to fill space with a network of alternating octahedrons and tetrahedrons (with edges of identical length), which we will call "Standard Tetrahedron-Octahedron Space" (STOS) . This is the result which we get by so called "Close Sphere Packing" models and is also called an "Isotropic Vector Matrix". If we cut away special chosen octahedron edges present in a STOS, then a so called "Truncated Incomplete Tetrahedron Space" filling system (TITS) is created. These Truncated Tetrahedrons have the form of what is generally called by Buckminster Fuller, a (3v- or) "3 Frequency Truncated Tetrahedron", which means that all the edges of the truncated tetrahedron have the same length. The TITS system is incomplete because at four sides of the truncated tetrahedron, an empty "tetrahedron shaped cavity" is left behind in space. Thus the TITS system, leaves a second system behind of smaller (1v) Tetrahedrons which are all connected ONLY by their vertices, thus they don’t have edges in common.

This incomplete space filling system will look at what we will call: a "Singular 3-D STAR SPACE"..  (3D-SS) .These tetrahedrons are only connected by their vertices, which makes it possible to rotate these tetrahedrons in string series of 3 left or right, without "torsion" problems for the system itself. At both ends of a string of 3 rotated tetrahedrons, it is needed that there is one stable (non rotated) tetrahedron at both sides, fixed to the original non-chiral Star  lattice. The rotational "torsion" possibilities of the vertices  are supposed to be the only boundary condition for the Chirality of the vacuum lattice of space. It is assumed that after rotation of these tetrahedrons, the whole lattice will "shrink" a little bit in volume until the vertices boundary condition of torsion is reached.

At the same time there is a second 3D-SS system possible, if we RE-introduce within each truncated tetrahedron the so called "internal tetrahedron". As a result there are two non-connected chiral SODS systems possible in 3-D space.

So the only space possibility I could find for a "chiral oscillating quantum space" with edges of equal length, is the single or double "3-D STAR  SPACE" .

A new causal Particle-Wave duality.

It is well known, that the concept of Special Relativity of time, space and simultaneity as proposed in the Special Theory of Relativity, is proven to be logically untenable. With the arguments described here, a causal explanation and 4 tests for LLI (Local Lorentz Invariance) effects is presented.

It is postulated that real non-zero-sized photon/gluon particles are created by transformation of real vacuum particles due to collision of these vacuum particles with Quarks and Leptons. Photon particles are postulated to travel over a distance of less than 1 cm with the speed of light related to the light source, in the form of a real particle. After less than 1 cm flight, the photon particle will change its form back again into an oscillating vacuum particle, and change its properties into a wave form. This postulation is coined the "1 cm postulate". The photonic wave is interpreted as an additional vacuum oscillation of successive vacuum particles oscillating in the 3-D vacuum crystal lattice. The additional vacuum oscillation will travel with the speed of light dictated by the local oscillating vacuum frame. However, in addition to the 1 cm postulate, the local oscillating vacuum frame can have so called "LASOF" properties (Local A-Symmetric Oscillating Reference Frame). This means that relative to the vacuum frame the speed of light can differ in different directions, dependant of the mass of the radiating object in motion relative to the vacuum frame. (see LASOF )

Fresnel drag.

So called "Fresnel drag" must also be interpreted as the result of the "1cm postulate" acting inside transparent matter like glass or water. The 1 cm boundary however, is supposed to be much shorter, and the vacuum frame related flight trajectory of the photonic information inside water or glass, must occupy microscopic distances. Future experiments with so called Fiber Optic Gyros could give the answer.

How the Quantum vacuum Mimics the isotropic lightspeed above the 1 cm limit.

The most indicative experiments for some kind of lightspeed anisotropy are clearly those made by Dayton Miller at Mount Wilson (LA) in 1926.see: M. Allais and H.A. Munera:   http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-272/aflb272p463.htm http://allais.maurice.free.fr/English/media12-1.htm   The results of these experiments can be fully understood if we assume that these results are influenced by the next phenomena. The next assumptions are in full agreement with the well known Stellar Aberration and secondly with the temperature polarity of the Solar system relative to the so called 2,7 degree Cosmic Background Radiation.

1: The LASOF (Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating Vacuum Frame) effect, is assumed to create isotropic lightspeed bubbles (or double cones) on both sides of the Massive object axial relative to the velocity vector(s) of motion or ether drift . This must be the origin that GPS satellites don’t show (one way)  lightspeed anisotropies under elevation angles with the horizon of more than 5-10 degrees. Consequently I assume that LASOF is the origin that all lightspeed differences above these 5 degrees horizon elevation  are compensated. Thus the LASOF bubbles are supposed to be the origin, that lightspeed differences are only measurable at high elevations such as mountain summits, and only if the  “Ether drift” direction  is parallel with the Earth surface at the place of measurement.

2. According to the result of D. Miller (1926) we are forced to assume that there are two “ether drift effects into two directions” .

A: an ether drift direction parallel with the Velocity Vector of the Earth’s Orbit around the sun, due to the orbital velocity.

B: an ether drift direction parallel with the Axial direction of the Solar Planetary plane, induced by the two  Solar Anchor Black Holes (SABHs) located at either side of the Planetary plane “eating the vacuum” with the result of a secondary ether drift effect. (see under: SABH)

3: A possible reduced but  very subtle Lorentz contraction effect on the length of rods pointing into the direction of motion, such as the contraction of  interferometer  arms of D. Miller could have suffered, which could be partly the origin of the reduction of  the measured lightspeed differences.

If we combine these three effects it is obvious that the orbital motion of the Earth itself around the sun, is only visible in a suppressed way by the Dayton Miller results ONLY on two dates: 1st. august 1925 and 8th February 1926.

As a result it should now be possible to design new experiments at higher altitudes above the earth, on mountain summits or between satellites, to tackle the problem and to prove Einstein wrong.  

Local Potential Spacetime.

Gravity influences the local oscillation pattern and oscillatory energy of vacuum particles and thus the decrease of time rate. The oscillations are responsible for the jittering pattern of mass carrying particles by constant collisions, and thus for the exact ticking rate of atom clocks. It is now reasonable to accept, that a fast moving clock will decrease its time rate according to the general relativity rules, by its absolute speed through the universal vacuum frame. This frame has local properties, which are influenced by massive objects and black holes. This is supposed to be the real base for the solution of the so called Twin paradox. The astronaut who is accelerating away and is coming back to his twin brother, (who does not accelerate in the universal reference frame), will have a decreased time rate relative to his twin brother.. Consequently the local oscillation quality of vacuum particles together with the absolute speed of a mass through the universal vacuum reference frame, is the origin of local time, which is mimicking the relativity rules.

Humans and the Cosmic Law of Free choice between Hatred and Forgivingness .

We humans are quantum mechanical systems, who are only able to follow the quantum mechanical rules of the Universe, which we merely partly know and understand. Consequently we have to search and innovate these rules to find out who we are, and how reality can be described ontologically . Our understanding of the world is restricted by an ontological gap, between scientific language and reality, therefore we have to search for a bridge. This paper is an attempt to describe possible outlines of that bridge.

It is postulated, that the basic features of the Universe must be of a type that allows the evolution of dual mirror symmetric, EPR correlated observers outside the "system", which means that "we and elementary particles" are always correlated by "instantaneous action at-a-distance" acting between dual correlated universes. If we take a Chiral Quantum Mechanical Universe as a "system", then The Universe that we know is only a half-truth, without a "broken symmetry", and we should have a mutual observer- and guiding relation with at least one spatial separated anti-mirror Universe.

Consequently, the so called "superposition- and collapse events" in the universe are only the half truth, all these events are based on "instantaneous information flow" called "actions at a distance" or "Big Bang entanglement " between at least two spatial separated events in different universes. Even if we measure a collapse event in the laboratory between "local" related particles in an EPR experiment, which is also supposed to have an instantaneous non-local collapse relation, this dual universal "BB entanglement" should be also present on top of it.

Then I suggest that each elementary particle is instantaneous observed and/or guided without the time for "reflection", by its distant shadow anti-particle in our dual anti-mirror Universe. The difference with human choices is supposed to be, that humans are equipped with enough time for reflection (retarded EPR correlation or retarded Big Bang entanglement ) to develop what we call Free Will by Vetoing urges and intentions (Benjamin Libet), and become aware of moral differences, and even altruism and forgivingness.

Consequently if this increase in reflection time is related to the evolutionary increase of complexity of cells, the goal of human evolution seems to be the creation of moral awareness, made by animate dual synchronized logic quantum computers with enough time for "reflection", like our dual synchronized brains.

The Cosmic Law seems to be, that we are only free to VETO our deterministic urges and intentions and only Free to VETO those urges based on egoistic or Altruistic awareness. However it is supposed that we never will be able to prove some kind of relation between our life after dead and the way we have managed to become "moral aware" and were able to choose for egoism or altruism, for hatred or forgivingness, as described in the bible. If we could prove such a relation, we would not have this RESTRICTED VETOING FREE WILL any more.

Thus: Descarte’s: "I think therefore I am" should change into: "I am a QM system, which is always non-local instantaneous EPR correlated, and in competition for Free Will by VETOING the choices of my opposite anti-I, living in a dual anti-mirror universe, therefore We are! We are dual co-authors of our common life".

Stephen Hawking.

Stephen Hawking explains in "A Brief History of Time":

"We could still imagine that there is a set of laws that determines events completely for some supernatural being, who could observe the present state of the universe without disturbing it. However, such models of the universe are not of much interest to us mortals. It seems better to employ the principle known as Occam’s razor and cut all the features of the theory which cannot be observed"

I think we could change Hawking’s statement a little. If we change "for some supernatural being" into "by EPR non local instantaneous correlation" between dual anti-mirror universes with a chiral vacuum, then this model is of real interest to us mortals. However probably we need modern mathematical stuff like Operator algebra, Poisson manifolds, K-theory, Lie-groupoids, Lie-algebroids, and von Neumann algebra’s, etc. to prove these ideas.

Successful experiments carried out to test the famous "Bell theorem" (e.g. A. Aspect 1982) demonstrated that Quantum Mechanics is Non-Local. It is demonstrated that there is "instantaneous action at-a-distance" between events that have a common cause, and the Bell theorem only applies to events that have a common cause. If the Big Bang is true, then Bell’s theorem may imply that everything that ever originated in the Big Bang maintains its so called EPR correlation which has to be also "instantaneous action at-a-distance". Consequently on top of the contemporary rules of physics, I suggest that there was no "broken symmetry" after the Big Bang, and EPR correlations left over from the Big Bang are still guiding us and even all elementary particles in our Universe, which is instantaneous non-local EPR correlated with at least one synchronized identical real anti-mirror Universe.

These universes has to be spatially separated and are supposed to be each others "observers". The oscillating quantum vacuum is supposed to play a crucial role, in the origin of matter or anti-matter, energy, mass, gravity and the deterministic role of non-local correlated forms of particles . God really plays dice with real 3-D formed dice: the quarks, leptons and bosons which are supposed to posses real physical 3-D form at the moment they interact. Nature is by these 3-D particle forms (which could be interpreted as a kind of hidden variables) fully deterministic combined with real random collision of particles, for non DNA based matter. Animate matter is semi deterministic, it seems to have more or less the possibility of choice by veto action (or reflection) due to a sort of retarded transactional EPR correlation between dual copy universes.

Vigier-Bohm, and Salam ideas.

This model combines two different quantum mechanical ideas, suggested by David Bohm and Jean Paul Vigier described in: "Infinite potentials, the time and lives of David Bohm" (1996) by D. Peat : Quotations: 1, "D. Bohm argued, that the quantum potential (also dubbed pilot wave) guides the electron in a non-mechanical way. In this paper I will use this idea which may be compared with: "Big Bang entanglement". 2, J.P.Vigier favored explaining the process in terms of some sort of underlying mechanism as an energetic sub-quantum fluid "pushing the electron around" . {In this new Physical model, I will call this sub-quantum fluid the energetic oscillating "Higgs-virgin vacuum"} . 3, Abdus Salam considered together with Jogesh Pati, in 1974 that Quarks and Leptons are made out of 8 compound Preons (4 chromons, and 4 Flavons).

If quarks and leptons (neutrinos excluded) are able to absorb directional energy from the vacuum, they should have knowledge at any time about their speed and direction in space. The solution this new model suggests is: to re-introduce the not so weird idea of universal symmetry by postulating the idea of the existence of synchronized "Dual anti mirror Universes", which are EPR correlated which is coined: "Big Bang entangled down to the Planck scale".

As a consequence, the second law of thermodynamics has to be interpreted as to be valid only at the same time in both Universes. Everything, even YOURSELF, has to be interpreted as non Cartesian DUALLY EXISTENT. The Cartesian "Cogito Ergo Sum" "I think therefore I am" has to be changed into: " I am a QM system, which is always non-local instantaneous EPR correlated, and in alternate time competition for free will with my opposite anti-I: We think by alternate doubt, therefore We are! (alternating non marionettes) see TESTS, Libet)

As a consequence, this model points into the direction of a Universe, that is at the same time MECHANISTIC, by oscillating colliding and spinning real non-zero sized particles , and HOLISTIC, by Big Bang Entanglement (BBE) acting at different levels of existence from particles up to humans.

Many Worlds Interpretations.

There are more Many Worlds Interpretations. David Deutsch wrote: "Experiments have confirmed Quantum Physics, and the Many Worlds Interpretation (MWI) is the only known non-paradoxical interpretation of it. All these many worlds are real, and I am in one of them. The universe is described by a wave equation. Essentially, the equation says that at each moment of time, the world (Universe) can split into many worlds. Each world is one of the possible things that can happen at that point, and these worlds are interacting with each other. This is the "many worlds" interpretation of quantum mechanics."

However, a well known ontological problem of this Many Worlds Interpretation is the bubbling up of billions of universes each split second, caused by the fact that all quantum mechanical possibilities has to be realized and there is no wavefunction collapse. The number of universes in MWI is related to the frequency of quantum events also interpreted as the frequency of branched histories. At the same time MWI says that interference phenomena provide evidence of multiple universes, because particles interfere between two universes: (double slit experiments reveal interference between neighbouring universes, according to D.Deutsch) the real universe in which I live and a shadow universe.

I first suggest that these problems could be solved if we translate shadow and real universes of David Deutsch into shadow and real "LOCAL" particles. The real particles are always accompanied by these shadow particles until they are measured in a specific way. (e.g. for interference in double slit, or in Stern-Gerlach or Mach-Zehnder experiments) There is reason to suggest that these anti-mirror particles are present in or around each real particle. I suggest, that in so called "single photon interference events" (e.g double slit experiments) the photonic wavefunctions do not split in two equal halves.

In contrast, these photons split into different anti-mirror wavefunctions representing also two different shadow and real LOCAL particles. In the same way, quarks and leptons, (neutrinos excluded) can split into two different (anti-mirror) shadow and real non-zero sized particles which can be described by their own anti-mirror wavefunctions. If these shadow and real particles (or shadow and real photons) reunite appropriately , single-particle interference will occur. So called mirage particles were last year found in elliptical quantum corrals, by dr. D. M. Eigler IBM (see: quantum mirage effect http://www.almaden.ibm.com/almaden/media/image_mirage.html )

Secondly I suggest that multiple D. Deutsch universes could also be interpreted as identical synchronized anti-mirror universes spatially separated and non-local EPR correlated. Thus in this paper "many worlds" is interpreted differently from "Deutsch’s MWI", the wavefunction collapse is still incorporated as an "objective phenomenon" between spatial separated universes. There are EPR correlated observers "outside" the system, which are positioned in the opposite dual universes. "Hidden variables" or real particle forms are responsible for the chance element in nature, and together with a local oscillation pattern of real non-zero sized vacuum particles (dubbed Higgs-Virgin particles) they are responsible for the exact ticking rate of atom clocks and they are the origin of time and mass all according relativity rules.

We.

The very bizarre anti-Cartesian but causal result of this model is, that YOU are not what you thought you were: a single individual. You have to deal with a real dual anti-mirror Self, which- in your perspective- lives in opposite time in an other universe. Consequently WE and not I found some support for this phenomenon in the well known volitional act experiments made by Benjamin Libet, and we expect that future adapted "Libet experiments" should give possibilities to falsify or support this result.

If we accept that the increase of duration of so called "retarded EPR correlation" is an evolutionary gift, which gives humans more time than animals to have "reflection" for Vetoing an urge or intention , Then the Tree of Good and Evil in the Paradise was a FALSE EXCUSE to throw Mankind out. It was an evolutionary necessity that humans made complex social conventions (moral) and created differences between good and evil. Thus it seems even to be one of the evolutionary goals of the universe: to develop Love and Hatred, Peace and Aggression, and the evolutionary choice for humans to base social conventions (or moral ideas, leading to stable social systems) on these differences. Consequently, we seem to have more time for "reflection" than animals to compare our intentions and urges with our moral standards and to calculate our choices with our intelligent potential, but we may be called really FREE (freed from calculatory constraint) if we make altruistic choices.

Particles and Waves.

Beyond contemporary physics, we postulate: a causal world of real sub-quantum level structured-or shaped, non-energetic Quarks and Leptons, floating in-, energized - and even propelled by a vacuum sea of Zero-Point Energy (ZPE) driven-, oscillating real Higgs-virgin vacuum particles. All Higgs-virgin oscillations and real particles, are supposed to be instantaneously Big Bang entangled with their anti-particles in the opposite anti mirror universe. Higgs-virgin particles will change form by individual collision with real quarks and lepton particles, into different kinds of real photon/gluon particles. Two mutual colliding Higgs-virgin particles can transform into a real electron-positron pair.

Electrons and positrons can merge with one or two photons to configure compound quarks and compound leptons (only mu and Tau leptons). The electron, positron, neutrinos, and photons are "single particles". Neutrinos can only be produced by collision between Higgs-virgin particles and compound quarks or compound leptons in decay processes. They can be "transformed" by collision processes out of compound electrons, positrons and photons/gluons, ONLY if these particles are a compound part of compound quarks or compound leptons. Reminder: All quarks, leptons, and Higgs-virgin bosons, photons and gluons, are dual universal EPR correlated for the collapse of their wavefunction.

Quarks and Leptons (neutrinos excluded) don’t have force potentials themselves, in contrast with Higgs-virgin particles, Neutrinos and single Photons. Photons/Gluons and Neutrinos are equipped with ONLY REPELLING OR GUIDING force potentials. If Photons/Gluons and Neutrinos are created by changing the shape of a unifying vacuum particle , they automatically re-transform after ca. 1 cm (the 1 cm postulate) , back into single Higgs-virgin particles, what we will call the Photon Transition. (see the explanation of the light speed constancy). Within this trajectory of 1 cm, these particles will have the speed of light, which is ONLY relative to the source. After the photon transition, photons and neutrinos will leave their properties and energy behind in the form of an additional Higgs-virgin vacuum-oscillation which propagate with the speed of light. We will call this the Photonic Wavefunction which expands (in "flat space") with the speed of light relative to the local preferred reference frame. In "curved space" (around massive objects and Black Holes) the speed of light is anisotropic, in agreement with the "LASOF" rules. These additional Higgs-virgin oscillations will re-transform again into real photon or neutrino particles, if a photon "measurement" in the form of a so called collapse is made (photonic collapse). This is the explanation of photonic wave-particle duality. A photon measurement is interpreted as the random, ( Dual Universal correlated) collapse of the photonic wavefunction changing a local Higgs-virgin vacuum particle into a real photon particle with a specific shape.

There are 6 different specific photon shapes: one general photon, 2x magnetic photons (North and South), 2x electric photons (plus and minus) and the graviton. The origin of the collapse is made by the random interaction of the real spinning quarks and leptons with the additional Higgs-virgin oscillation (the photonic wavefunction) of the vacuum particles. In contrast with modern physics we suggest that the wavefunction of MASS: quarks and leptons, (neutrinos excluded) is originated by the continuous real particle collisions with the Higgs-virgin vacuum particles. Therefore these material wavefunctions should be interpreted as vibrations of spinning real particles, different from photonic wavefunctions, and propelled by the oscillating Higgs-virgin vacuum particles.

Collision induced Gravity and Mass.

Mach supposed, that inertia was originated by the gravitational influence of all existing mass in the universe. As is explained below, this model assumes that inertia is originated by the influence of the local oscillatory qualities of the spaceframe lattice and the absolute speed of the object through this spaceframe.

The vacuum oscillations equipped with the additional photon oscillation (wave) packets, are supposed to be the only universal energy source, pushing around non-energetic quarks and Leptons, each with a specific real propeller form and a specific mass. Gravity is the net result of the repelling a-symmetric momentum transfer, averaged over many collisions and originated by the particles of the Oscillating Quantum Vacuum (OQV) , colliding from all spaceframe sides (12x) on Quarks and Leptons. It is postulated that short living photon particles (less than 1 cm flight) like Gravitons radiated from the source will travel as a vacuum oscillation in the radiation direction. Gravitons are supposed to decrease the repelling energies of the vacuum oscillation packets and introduce a combined net repelling force (or non-isotropic vacuum oscillation pressure) on quarks and Leptons, within a certain time window. We may call the OQV energy a "Fifth Force" as it opposes not only gravitons but also the other three forces in the universe. Thus the vacuum repulsive force from directions outside the Earth on Quarks and Leptons, will over-compensate the opposing (but weaker) repulsive mixed vacuum/graviton force, radiated from inside the Earth, to create the illusion of gravitational attraction of the Earth. Thus gravity is supposed to be a repelling force, and not an attractive force.

Mass is the Lorentz covariant Capacity (Cg) related to the local vacuum reference frame of the Quarks or Leptons to transform a specific number (a part) of the colliding vacuum particles into the same number of gravitons per local time unit. Thus: E=Cg.c^2 and mass and even energy, is based on discrete entities named gravitons. Gravitational mass and Inertial mass are equivalent due to this phenomenon, however the graviton radiation direction seems to be related to the scattering process induced by the absolute object velocity through the oscillating spaceframe lattice of the vacuum..

In cases of mass acceleration relative to the local vacuum reference frame (the local oscillating vacuum lattice), the local accelerated mass (and the graviton production capacity Cg) of an object, increases Lorentz covariant with the gamma factor. The clock speed of an object which is accelerated relative to the local vacuum reference frame however, decreases also Lorentz covariant with the gamma factor.

Thus the number of gravitons radiated by the object per local (object) time unit, increases twice with the so called gamma factor. "Lorentz polarization" of the propeller formed Quarks and Leptons relative to the vacuum frame, is supposed to be the origin of the former effect. It is assumed in contrast with Relativity, that the absolute speed of a mass through the vacuum spaceframe lattice is the origin of the Lorentz covariant particle polarization, which determines the object mass and Inertia.

Based on normal scattering distributions, it is proposed that the trajectories of the radiated gravitons, which are produced by collision with vacuum particles, will be concentrated (or polarized) more or less in the form of a cone. The central cone axis will point parallel with the propagation direction of the massive particle, and the top of the cone will be directed into the propagation direction and fixed to the massive particle itself. Thus if we take a fast spinning massive wheel, this "Cone Effect" is the origin that more gravitons are radiated more or less into the direction of the plane of the wheel, within a V-shaped cross section profile, relative to the center of the wheel.

Multiple dual correlated dice and Schroedinger’s Cat.

Einstein used to say "God plays no dice". In contrast with Einstein, we postulate that God plays with real dice: the elementary particles. The real particle form (or configuration), spin and continuous collisions are the origin of choices nature makes, which seems to be the origin of a clockwork causal universe. However all these dice are dual universal correlated by Big Bang entanglement. God plays dice on multiple dual-EPR correlated universal tables. The micro fluctuations and tiny differences in position on the Planck scale, between these correlated particles, is the causal origin of uncertainty!

Not only elementary particles but also spinning billiard balls are instantaneously anti-mirror correlated between Dual Universes. Only humans and perhaps even animals have a "retarded transactional collapse" correlation, which is supposed to be the origin of Free Will. (appendix. p.: 45-46). There are no superpositions of states which lead to paradoxes like Schroedinger’s cat, the wavefunction of photons or quarks and leptons may collapse in one universe, by its own random interaction with the quantum vacuum (Gods playing table). There is a superposition of states between dual universal correlated, or EPR laboratory correlated waves or particles. However, the first collapsing particle instantaneous collapses the other particle, by this instantaneous EPR correlation at a distance.

The Higgs-virgin mechanism and 6 quantum clocks.

The so called Higgs mechanism which was originally invented by modern Physics as a mathematical tool, to compensate for the infinite energies measured on Quarks and Leptons, should be interpreted as the basic and real Universal oscillating energy source, which is Big Bang Entangled and nullified by our Dual anti-mirror Universe (together: negative and positive vacuum energies add up to Zero energy !). Consequently, the extraction of Higgs-virgin vacuum energy is fundamental, but instantaneously compensated (nullified) in our Dual anti-mirror Universe by BB Entanglement and at the same time, although it seems paradoxical, the second Law of thermodynamics extended for both universes is not violated.

If the QM vacuum is formed by oscillating vacuum particles, oscillating along the edges of a chiral complex octahedron/tetrahedron lattice structure, and each vacuum particle is representing a dual universal EPR correlated clock, due to instantaneous EPR correlated symmetry with its anti-universal oscillating vacuum particle. Then we could count on each vacuum octahedron node 6 different dual universal EPR correlated clocks oscillating along the edges of this complex lattice.

If the light speed isotropy on Earth is originated by non-isotropic sinusoidal oscillations of these particles ( the LASOF), which compensate exactly for the speed of the Earth through the Solar framed complex vacuum lattice, then each vacuum lattice should oscillate in a different a-symmetric sinusoidal way, and with the same period of a complete oscillation. This could be counted as 6 different (Earth orbital direction dependant) oscillating clocks for each vacuum lattice, influencing the light speed and all the other Relativity effects.

Top Home Index

.Free Will and Schrödinger’s Cat, BOTH need Entanglement between (anti-) symmetric Copy Universes: the Raspberry shaped Multiverse.

MULTI-UNIVERSAL CPT SYMMETRICAL QUANTUM STATES,

are needed for Human Free Will beyond Libet

Free Will inside the Multiverse.

Benjamin Libet measured the so called electric Readiness Potential (RP)
time to perform a volitional act, in the brains of his subjects (students) and
the time of conscious awareness (TCA) of that act, which appeared to
come 500 msec behind the RP. The “volitional act” was the by free
choice pressing on an electric bell button.
see:http://skeptically.org/spiritualism/id11.html

The results of this experiment gives still an ongoing debate in the
broad layers of the scientific community, because the results are
still (also in recent experiments) in firm contrast with the expected
idea of Free Will and causality.
We would expect that based on causality the Time of Conscious
Awareness (TCA) ALWAYS comes before the electric RP, which is found to
be present in our head because this would be the proof that we humans
are equipped with the free will to press on the button at the moment.
WE are also conscious to do that!!!.

HOWEVER Libet (and later all other researchers) measured the opposite
for most of the students.

Only sometimes times students reported to have “PREPLANNED their ACTION” (RPI )

A causal but weird Multiverse solution beyond Benjamin Libet.

If we assume that we are living inside one of the 12 postulated copy
universes, which are each others observer by “mutual entanglement” to
trigger randomly and alternating the collapse of the copy
wavefunctions, (thus also to trigger a volitional act, like Libet's
subjects) in the other 11 universes.

Then as a consequence, we may expect that only a small part of the
students will report to have had the conscious intention to act
earlier. Thus in the case of 12 entangled universes we may expect that
1/12 part or 8,3 % of all (human) timing of conscious intention to
act, will show a reversed timing sequence between the so called Time
of conscious awareness (TCA) which will come BEFORE the electric
Readiness Potential (RP).

Indications of those percentages, are already found by Judy Trevena
and Jeff Miller (Otago university NZ). See:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12191935&dopt=Abs;..
-------------------------------------

The Benjamin Libet percentage results of pre-planning (RP I and II) are very
poor quantified in his and later experiments.
Reason to do it again with more precision on the readiness potential
percentage differences between RPI and RPII..
If humans are entangled cooperating decision makers inside the
postulated 8 or 12 entangled but separated universes, then for every
decision we need always only one preplanning test-person who pre-plans
his choice. The other 7 or 11 test copy-persons are only able to
follow OR REJECT this decision.
As a result we may be able to measure (in the future) the number of
copy universes involved, by counting the average percentages of
preplanning persons in test situation like the Libet test..

For 12 universes the RPI percentage will be 100/12=8,3%. For 8
universes RP I will be 12,5% For RP II it will be 91,7 respectively
87,5%

SO: The base for free will is the possibility to VETO an act.
That was also the conclusion which Benjamin Libet made about free
will, without the Multiverse foundation.

POSSIBLE SOLUTION.
Most Physical Theories accept that our universe is the most macroscopic
"Closed System", created by a Big Bang process which need to incorporate
a so called "broken symmetry" and is in Quantum Mechanical terms plagued
by observer- and measurement problems, because each phenomenon (or
wavefunction collapse) requires an observer. However if we assume that
there was no "broken symmetry" in the Big Bang process, then our
universe could be not a single-, but a multiple anti-symmetric "closed
system" of spatial separated bubbles of (anti-mirror symmetric) COPY
universes, with only one anti-mirror symmetrical reality, synchronized
by an, observer-observed dual EPR correlated system (subject-object)
what is called "Big Bang entanglement" (BBE).

Schroedingers Cat.
Thus this BBE system is supposed to solve all observer- and measurement
problems as is still an ongoing discussion in physics called the Schroedingers Cat problem.
If we assume that the vacuum has "chirality", left or right handed,
which is supposed to be opposite inside dual Matter-Anti
Matter-universes, then there is no need for a large scale annihilation
of matter/anti-matter in the multiple (Big) Bang process, because then,
the vacuum itself is the origin of matter or anti-matter creation.

This is supposed to be possible if we assume that Quarks are compound
particles made of different "chiral shaped" photons/gluons, combined
with a single "chiral shaped" electron or positron used as building blocks.

If BBE is interpreted as a complex, non-local instantaneous Einstein
Podolski and Rosen (EPR) guided "wavefunction collapse system" and a
continuous particle guiding system acting between dual anti-mirror
universes, then these universes will stay always each others anti-mirror
COPY universes. Thus these anti-copy universes must be interpreted as
spatial separated subsystems entangled by BBE.
It is supposed that only subtle oscillatory floatation differences or
phase shifts are needed between the EPR correlated anti-copy particles
living in these anti-universes, to make an alternate observer and
observed dual system possible, as is required by Quantum Mechanics.
Thus BBE is supposed to create a symmetric two-way mutual influence between
these entangled anti-copy universes on the quantum level.
As the ultimate consequence of this new Anti-Symmetrical reality, it
will be a real shock to accept the idea that, we humans can have no
SINGULAR private Self. We have to accept that the Private Singular Self
is a Cartesian illusion, because all elementary particles and even the
"Self" should have a long range "non-local" instantaneous two-way mutual
"action at a distance" between dual alternate object-subject related
anti-symmetric copy humans. Famous "free will" experiments made by
Benjamin Libet are supposed to be the tell tales of this phenomenon.

In our perspective, Time is running (only mathematically) backwards in our
opposite anti-symmetric universe. Our opposite anti-mirror copy humans
living over there however, will calculate our time as running backwards.
"I think therefore I am" should change into "We think by alternate
doubt, therefore we are".

In anti-mirror terms, my anti-mirror copy human Self, living in the
other distant EPR correlated universe has his hart at the opposite side
of his body. If I raise my right arm, then at the same instant, my
anti-mirror Self will raise his (in my perspective) left arm. As a
consequence the ZEN BUDDHIST expression: "clapping with one hand" has
some physical reality, based on ANTI-MIRROR symmetry between these dual
universes.
We will coin this:
Multi-universal Entanglement Symmetry of the Quantum State: (MES-QS). also  known as Quantum entanglement between universes.
SEE ALSO:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/03/max-tegmark-john-cramer-and-aphorisms.html

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2010/09/grand-design-for-entangled-12-fold.html

The structure of the cyclic multiverse seems to be

a raspberry or blackberry structure!

The origin of CRAB NEBULA’s Ultra High speed electrons and Gamma Ray Flares according to FFF theory.

Why is it, that only the Crab Nebula is a frequent producer of Gamma ray flares, and the Eagle- or Carina Nebula are not!
Based on Function Follows Form (FFF) theory, I postulate that it is because the Crab nebula is the youngest nebula still in its infancy!!
The crab nebula is only about 1000 years old, because it is reported in Chinese and Arab Astronomy files in the year 1054!.
According to FFF theory, the former ejected (sun) starspot black holes of different sizes present in the exploding former star of the Crab nebula, are mixed  up by the explosion, they start to meet each other pushed by plasma tails, just like ball lightning.
If they are of equal size they form stable Herbig haro systems.
If they have not the same size, a splitting process with gamma flares or bursts is the result. (see image below)

Related article in Newscientist: Mystery flares betray hidden force within Crab nebula
 19:00 06 January 2011 by Rachel Courtland
Quote: Forget the Large Hadron Collider: an interstellar dust cloud called the Crab nebula has been identified as the most powerful known particle accelerator in the universe. But exactly how it boosts particles to record-breaking speeds is a mystery…
Two orbiting telescopes have revealed that the nebula, which sits some 6500 light years from Earth, releases brief, bright flares of gamma-rays, a pair of papers released today report. These flares are most likely produced by electrons that have been whipped up to record-breaking speeds……
These are "the highest particle energies ever associated with a single source", says Elisa Bernardini of the DESY research centre in Germany in an accompanying paper.
The discovery of the flares comes as a surprise.”
see also: "Surprising Gamma flares in Crab Nebula"

According to my FUNCTION FOLLOWS FORM (FFF) theory The origin of these forces has to be found in the uncovered SPLITTING AND PAIRING complexity of MICRO and MINI BLACK HOLES inside Nebula.

Theoretical system of black hole SPLITTING and

GAMMA RAY FLARE (or Burst) production

The SPIRE/EAGLE NEBULA (below) is the best example I know,

of a splitting and pairing mini black hole system.

We can observe, that TWO black holes started (see; two gas trailers below at the base)  to pair with each other.

However probably because these black holes had different nuclear content the smaller black hole SPLITTED the larger black hole in two smaller black holes.

(See for the theoretical system the first image)

As a result the Eagle Nebula is also a good axample for former Gamma Ray flare production by splitting larger black holes into smaller ones.

The result is that local differences in black hole sizes seem to cancel out by this splitting process. 

The propeller shape of Quarks and Leptons is THE origine of the repulsion of Fermions by a new spin flip process just outside the black hole event horizon.

(New Black Hole Paradigm.)

These mini black holes inside Nebula are supposed to be ejected from the original exploded star as SUCCESSORS of the original STELLAR SPOTS which are supposed to be the result of COMETS CRASHED INTO THE STAR.

As a result there is a firm reason to search for the origin of the mini black holes inside COMETARY NUCLEI. http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2010/11/comet-hartley-2-hides-two-gas-jets.html
In my opinion, the star itself is responsible for the production of Cometary nuclei or mini black holes, by magnetic stellar outbursts during its life. So not the Kuyper belts or Oort clouds are resposnible.
For more information on Splitting and Pairing black holes inside Nebula, see:.
Three Nebula: Carina, Crab and Eagle Nebula.

http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2008-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-08%3A00&updated-max=2009-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-08%3A00&max-results=8
Other related information:
http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/2009/09/splitting-black-holes-origin-of-gamma.html
http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/2009/09/bh-examples-of-double-armed-objects.html
http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/2009/08/origin-of-universal-complexity-and-gas.html


Is there other evidence for the Sunspot-Black hole-Gas-pillar relation?
Yes I believe so:

The Helix and Ring nebula show both lots of knotty elements which seem to produce gas trails at the opposite side of the exploding or evaporating star.
So we may suggest that the knotty black holes in this (infant) Helix nebula still did not have the chance to pair with other black holes or come to a black hole splitting process!. Perhaps the Helix nebula is too small for a Crab comparable mini black hole pairing and splitting process?

PAIRING BLACK HOLES IN THE CARINA NEBULA.

This blog is under construction.

Leo Vuyk.

For FFF theory see:

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/